Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

If Your Heart is in Israel, Your Butt Should be in Israel

Posted by Bob on October 30th, 2015 under Coaching Session, History, How Things Work


Abraham Lincoln must have been God, because he is supposed to have performed transubstantiation.

In a speech far shorter than a Mass, the God Lincoln transformed our Declaration of Independence into a statement that we ruled the world.

Let us see if anybody remembers what the word “independence” means.

Independence means we are dedicated to one thing, and the one thing is that you don’t run our affairs and we don’t run yours.

Lincoln declared that the Declaration gave us the power to force our version of equality anywhere on earth.  General Wesley Clark declared that American troops should be used whenever we feel like it to enforce racial quotas in Europe.  photo constitution1.jpg

People said Lincoln was God and Clark his Prophet.

I think they should have been committed.

The Founding Fathers knew exactly what “independence” meant and they stated it: to “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.”

No congress today would allow such a statement even to be proposed for the Constitution.

It is Nativist and Evil and God will get you for it.

The actual Constitution says not one word about jamming equality down throats around the world.

The clear import of the Preamble to the real Constitution is that we should have no immigrants unless their presence is good for the people already here.

No one who thinks Lincoln is God will know any real history.   So they think there were a lot of immigrants who helped adopt the Constitution.

Actually the generation that adopted the Constitution had the highest percentage of native born white Americans it has ever had before or since.   It is not incidental that the President had to be born here.

I would be a good president if only because I am the only candidate who has ever READ the Constitution.

There is no evidence that anyone else running for office has.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by -backbaygrouch- on 10/30/2015 - 2:30 pm

    The use of upper case letters to deliver a message was more common in the late eighteenth century than present day practice. It is a subtlety alien to many nowadays. It should not be taken as quirky or obsolete.

    With that in mind take note that the authors of America’s Founding Document in the Preamble capitalized “Posterity” but not “ourselves”. The latter says that we are humble before the Almighty; the former, that they are greater than ourselves.

    The Constitution was intended for the ages. It was not a stop gap for the problems of the day. Those wise men understood what a “demographic time bomb” was long before Israeli Racist demagogues like Bibi employed the phrase to herd dimwitted sheeple to the polls.

    The importance of future generations was given primacy and it was limited to “our”. It was not a universal mandate to advocate through violence or other means a form of governance for any other folk, notwithstanding whatever Wesley Clark, sired through a line of rabbis, or any huckster of the “propositional nation” theory expounds.

    In 1787 James Madison and his cohorts did not declare eternal wars on the rest of this Earth for transgressing our ideas of how to administer society. The limiting phrase “ourselves and our Posterity”, shortly after, elaborated in legislation restricting immigration and further outlined in George Washington’s Farewell Address, makes this clear to all but the willful blind, that is, the candidates for the nominations of both the Elephant and the Donkey parties.

    Vote the Founding Fathers. Vote the Constitution. Vote AFP. Vote Whitaker.

  2. #2 by Jason on 10/31/2015 - 11:09 am

    Our borders are left unprotected while pundits demand our young White men be sent to the Middle East to die for the right of gays to kiss in public (the latest fashion they’ve found in the Constitution).

    Lunacy.

    Bob Whitaker is the ONLY candidate who is pro-White and exposes White Genocide.

    Period.

  3. #3 by Richard on 10/31/2015 - 12:06 pm

    I do not want to tailgate, but I am also looking for a candidate that mentions that the three skyscrapers that fell were obvious controlled demolitions. But even without that I surely will vote for Whitaker. None of the other candidates come close to trumping the ONLY candidate who is pro-White and exposes White Genocide.

You must be logged in to post a comment.