In my political days, I would have gotten Jared Taylor or some other Class Act in the AFP to call Ann Coulter, the way I did Rusher in earlier days, and feed to Trump, through her, as I did to Reagan through Rusher, Ashbrook and others. 
But Jared doesn’t speak to me, and Trump is now trying to explain away his AFP and Duke support.
If I were not dealing with inept snobs, one of them would tell Coulter that I came up with her White Genocide line and my pro background. I would put Trump where he operates best: on the offensive.
He would campaign on the right of any Americans to express their opinions.
What I have to say about tax-$-DEDUCTIBLE (NOT just tax-exempt) organizations, coming from Trump, would soil Mommy Professor’s and PBS’ britches.
In fact my whole campaign as set down on my campaign page is main line attack stuff Trump could use.
But it’s the same old problem: to get something to Reagan I had to go through the wall of snobs and old Republicans.
The wall of snobs and old pro-whites may be even worse.
#1 by Secret Squirrel on 02/29/2016 - 10:34 am
The only time I’ve seen Trump on the defensive, is after inept Pro Whites loved up to him. He doesn’t have offensive talking points to deal with the media’s questions.
“I disavow. I don’t know these people. I will have to read about them.” This is a man taking hits, not giving them.
#2 by Henry Davenport on 02/29/2016 - 3:49 pm
Right.
We do get this
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/what-does-it-say-about-the-gop-that-trump-is-the-white-supremacists-candidate/2016/02/28/0d5d0b12-dcbe-11e5-891a-4ed04f4213e8_story.html
The racist American Freedom Party is technically running its own candidate for president on a “Stop White Genocide” ticket, but its heart is clearly with Trump.
But reading the whole article strengthens my opinion that while Trump helps pro-Whites, pro-White support of the inevitable sort hurts Trump (probably a lot) more than helps him.
So effective it would be if all pro-Whites delivered only Mantra about Trump.
But pro-Whites have never been able to see that, neither the “leaders” (that word was hard to write) nor the “soldiers” (that word doesn’t fit either).
Like the respectable conservatives, the pro-White “movement” plays its assigned role in the grand anti-White pageant.
#3 by Jason on 03/01/2016 - 5:18 am
But reading the whole article strengthens my opinion that while Trump helps pro-Whites, pro-White support of the inevitable sort hurts Trump (probably a lot) more than helps him.
Exactly right. Trump’s rise is a useful to us (or at least it’s a sign of life among White people). But we are still HERETICS and wrapping our arms around him puts him in an awkward position (at best).
It’s annoying when some pro-White group, in order to get a headline for it’s “leader”, endorses a mainstream candidate. The “leader” gets his name in the paper but does real damage to our cause.
#4 by Jason on 03/01/2016 - 5:14 am
Yes, this is the area Trump gets defensive. He has no talking points, no way to take the offense (like Bob would give him).
And now there is no back channel.
#5 by Henry Davenport on 02/29/2016 - 5:22 pm
We have twitter to do the best we can to deliver stuff to Trump through Ann Coulter, Trump’s children, and his known staff.
Let’s collect in this thread the twitter addresses of all those folk. Below are the few I have handy right now, and I’d think that at the moment Trump is most in need of thinking about this:
He would campaign on the right of any Americans to express their opinions.
@AnnCoulter @DanScavino @TeamCavuto
I follow a couple of his children and can edit those in later if no one else posts them.
#6 by Simmons on 02/29/2016 - 6:34 pm
FYI the new media is running circles around the old media. I don’t think even here or Horus knows where its going or its total effect on culture and politics.
For instance while some dinosaur pro-whites are wasting oxygen the website Chateau Heartise is today running a bit about white genocide with the Article II of the Convention ( I think the article about group defense more germane). It wont get the usual 150 comments but it will gather lots of eyeballs and you can’ take it away.
If you notice the old media never brings up white genocide to those dinosaur pro-whites. Now if the old media could be baited to ask the old dinosaurs about white genocide it would be interesting to see how useless they really are.
#7 by Tom Bowie on 02/29/2016 - 8:53 pm
I see you’re ahead of me at least by putting it into written words HD. (You’ve also provided extra targets than my initial single target.) We don’t currently don’t have a person able to contact Ann Coulter after they decided to be Respectable Heretics. We do have an objective, a topic, a message and, A Swarm.
Somebody like Ann Coulter literally gets 1,000s of notifications on her Twitter account per day and, it’s not possible for her to see them all much less read them. Any single tweet is likely to get lost in the flood and even a fair amount of tweets may go unnoticed unless they have something eye catching.
A Tweet with more Re-Tweets and Likes gets more attention. I know how to sort of Like a Tweet more than once; kind of. Like a Tweet and it goes into the notifications of any person related/named in it. If you do this in the evening when it’s more likely to be seen by somebody who gets many Tweets (Ann Coulter) they have a higher chance of seeing it.
Come back in the morning and Unlike them, then in the evening Like them again; yeah you get the idea; repeat.
Math: If just 11 people working together do this that’s 11 Tweets with 10 likes per day; plus any others they pick up along the way. It’s harder to miss these Tweets on any given day and impossible after a period of time.
(The same can be done with Re-Tweets but, it’s more noticeable.)
Anybody that wants can make a pinned Tweet to attempt to reach our target audience and, I or anybody can make a public list of everybody that wants to participate and people can just subscribe to it for their daily Power Swarm.
Naturally this list can also be used to search for other random Tweets aimed at our recipient.
Objective gain the attention of somebody able to get us to a point whereby an aggressive message gets in Trump’s hands; win = win.
Now the big question is what link (Perhaps this article?) do we use?
#8 by Bob on 03/01/2016 - 9:38 am
Wouldn’t it be a dream come true if HD were right: Now that I have a Swarm, I don’t need snobs!
But that would mean you would have to really SWARM!
#9 by Tom Bowie on 03/02/2016 - 6:23 pm
Sorry we’ve not kept you up to date but, there’s a few Tweets headed in the right direction so-to-say.
#10 by Jason on 03/03/2016 - 1:44 am
Pro-Whites are too busy riding the Trump Train to Swarm!
I mean, it’s as good a way to waste time as any.