Bob RAW #012

There’s a beautiful young lady whose entire career is being destroyed by the man who was elected in West Virginia to protect the rights of West Virginians.

This young lady as we know was in the ad for white genocide. It think what she said was, anyone else can date who they want to, blacks can say they only want to date blacks, Asians can say they only want to date Asians and so forth. Her career is now destroyed by the attorney general of the state of West Virginia who is a democrat.

Now this is a weapon that any half way decent politician could use to DESTROY the opposition. It will not be used, they wont touch it. In fact with a respectable conservative adviser, Trump, if he’s pressed on it will apologize and support the people who are burning this young lady at the stake.

He should put it front and center and he could win the presidency of the United States by doing so.

The only thing between Trump and the presidency is another piece of pure respectable stupidity.

Bob pleads that you get started NOW forcing people to SEE the words “CHASING DOWN WHITE PEOPLE.”

PLEASE don’t just kick in those words after you have made a point to show how clever and perceptive YOU are.

Stick it out there naked and unavoidable: How can you do studies to find concentrations of white people so you can chase them down with a non-white population and then say that is not genocide?”

You can never get the truth until you demand “The truth, the whole truth, and nothing BUT the truth.”

One very popular story has a wealthy woman who has just been taken by a Prime minister to see Parliament in session.

The punch lines are:

Woman: “It’s just a bunch of men expressing their opinions”.

And the PM’s classic response:

“Madam, Opinion rules the world.”

As a professional politico I am fascinated by religion. Religion is opinion. Religion is thousands of years of trying to formulate opinions and “selling” those opinions.

One Catholic in my class in Public Choice — a brand of economics — said that he would gladly trade a year of graduate study for half an hour if he could understand the cardinals when they are selecting a new pope.

This devout Catholic opined that cardinals at the highest level of decision making in the Church to which they have devoted their lives would make what we call “a political expert” look like a newborn drinking his first bit of milk.

So I am often surprised at how religious leaders — who only an idiot or a Mommy Professor would consider an amateur in politics — so often make the most obvious mistake of all in debate.

It is the same mistake pro-whites always seem to fall for:

Letting their enemies frame the question.

The main thing I have to teach you to practice is to avoid letting the other side frame the question so you are lost before you even start.

I will not let someone begin a discussion of the merits of Marxism until they have told me why every Marxist country has to build a wall and station thousands of armed men to keep people INSIDE.

Sane people do not DEBATE whether a prison is good or bad.

Except when the prison calls itself a “Workers’ Paradise”.

Cardinals and other high churchmen may or may not be what you call “correctly educated,” but there is no doubt anywhere that they are past experts in really practical politics.

So I am astonished at how these otherwise expert people get frame.

They let the fate of God’s existence rest on whether evolution is true or not.

Let’s reframe this into plain English, “Does God, who created the universe, also FIT INTO that universe?”

The same is true when the existence of God is said to be based on how well God FITS INTO history.

I have the usual awful time with faith, so I have no answers. But I can tell from a mile away that the theist has already lost by letting the question be framed the way he does.

We BUGSERS do not allow ourselves to be framed.

If you say that you lived in America because America is stolen property, I ask you to do what anybody with stolen property has to do: LEAVE THAT PROPERTY WITH THE POLICE.

If you let the others guy frame the question, you have lost before the argument begins.

A beautiful young lady has just had her career destroyed because she appeared in one of our most effective youtube videos, independently produced by JohnnyMantraseed – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zMzeKBEvaQ

http://atlantablackstar.com/2016/08/26/west-virginia-ag-spokeswoman-fired-appearing-stop-white-genocide-video/
“In the 6-minutes-long video, the former spokeswoman is heard repeating the phrase, “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.” The well-known slogan was coined by a notorious South Carolina white supremacist named Bob Whitaker.”

The Great Constitutionalist who fired her was the Attorney General of West Virginia!

And who is going to defend her?

The fund raisers said “White Genocide” was a “hard sell,” though it has gone viral and they use it now. They did two ads for Trump and  he disclaimed both of them. He retweeted “White Genocide” twice.

But the professional pro-whites know their business.  They knew that anti-whites wouldn’t allow it.

It works, so they fought it. That is the entire history of professional critics of the establishment.

So when will any of us come to the young lady’s defense? It would make a major splash if Trump did it.

But Trump has political advisers now, and they would LOSE.

Perot was winning in a 3-way presidential race before he went Mainstream.

No, Hillary, there is no vast right wing conspiracy. It is just that no one makes it to the pro-White or conservative professional level if he doesn’t obey the establishment’s rules.