Archive for October, 2016

Jon Stewart’s Perpetual Sophomores think they’re VIP’s!!! – Part 1

Much of what I wrote in A Plague On Both Your Houses in the mid-1970s is what I am still trying to get across to cuckservatives (Boy, how I wish I’d thought of that label back then!)

On Election night, 1980, the term “Wallace Democrat” changed coast to coast that night. The cucks and the media abruptly forgot they had ever used the term “Wallace Democrat.”

By appealing to the ACTUAL swing vote, which every politician is supposed to do, Republicans won control of the Senate for the first time in a century and Reagan walked over the sitting President without hearing  bump.

Cuckservatives and the media, they all instantly used the term “Reagan Democrat” election night 1980.  photo wallaceDs.jpg

They used the term, but they STILL haven’t got the point.

This was shockingly demonstrated when Hillary just declared that Democrats should totally ignore a quarter of the entire American electorate (The next day she said it was only a fifth of Americans she has said were beneath her notice.)

Still, No American presidential candidate has ever before declared even one in five voters of the country’s voters as too lowly even to notice.

Her snobbery this time was so blatant that even NATIONAL REVIEW NOTICED IT!

In a front page article, no less.

So to say they didn’t get my point in 1976 is a masterpiece of understatement.

The man who won the Republican nomination right in the teeth of NR and those who rule the GOP and the media represents the same group of people I pointed to in 1976.

This article is getting long, so let’s call this Part 1.  It took me a whole book to make this point forty years ago, so it’s worth one article just to clearly state an almost unbelievable fact: Forty years since they admitted I was right and they still haven’t learned a damned thing!




Taking the high ground

The most valuable aspect of the Paltalk sessions with Bob (available on youtube), was not the value of the activism itself. It was the educational value FOR BUGSERS.

For it allowed us to more fully model Bob’s way of thinking and techniques.

A memorable case in point:

In the Paltalk room, an anti-white appeared who had repeatedly flagged Bugser comments while we were SWARMING.

But instead of reacting indignantly to this anti-white, Bob took the high ground:

Bob said condescendingly to the anti-white, that the anti-white was at least trying his hardest.

So placing himself ABOVE the enemy:

A few other examples of taking the high ground:

Anti-white writes:

“You are such a sad, fearful person”  photo hilly.jpg

BUGSER replies:

“In place of childish name-calling, answer this: Are you for or against White genocide?”

Other examples:

“I am anti-retard”:

Who told you it was ‘intelligent’ to support White GENOCIDE?

Diversity is a codeword for White GENOCIDE

“lol”/“No one cares”:

People of conscience care about genocide. Get a moral compass

“Why should I care about my race?”:

That is the SOCIOPATH’S QUESTION. Only a sociopath doesn’t care about the future of his people.

All these responses take the high ground – especially the MORAL HIGH GROUND. Very important!



Huffington Post asks what’s next for Bob Whitaker and the #WhiteGenocide movement?

Dana Liebelson, a journalist from the Huffington Post reached out to me yesterday;

“It’s clear to me that Trump has given the white genocide movement a somewhat unprecedented platform. In the event Trump does not win the presidency, what’s next for the movement? Do you think it will suffer a setback, and why or why not?

How do you plan to levy the new wave under Trump to further support your cause, if he is not elected?

And how specifically would you plan to rally politically post-Trump? By supporting/running local candidates? By running yourself? What else? “

 Below is Bob’s reply;

Bob Whitaker for President has little to do with this election. Please see “A Candidate Can Still Be An American Citizen” 10/07/2016, for quotable lines on this.

 photo whitaker.jpg

Mrs Clinton stated our situation perfectly, Trump’s candidacy represents an American public opinion which is regarded by those who consider themselves the “W=we’s” in a “we” versus “them” situation.

To call you the establishment is a gross understatement. You regard us as a group which is to be crushed by firing us and using thugs to crush any expression of our position.

Trump’s nomination is something you simply cannot understand. It has shown us that we do not have to just lie down and whimper and be crushed and ignored.

I was part of this same phenomenon in the Goldwater campaign and defeat, where the movement really got going that overwhelmingly elected Reagan and the Soviet Empire, once considered the Voice of the Future, disappeared forever.

Trump’s voter base is exactly the same as the working people’s votes in 1968 which were branded “Wallace Democrats.” I was their leading public spokesman. They were the ”Wallace voters” until Election Day 1980, when absolutely everybody suddenly called them “Reagan Democrats and pronounced them to be THE swing vote.

So for me this is history repeating itself. Before 1980 both sides on any network meant a moderate or liberal Republican versus a Democrat. For the media, the vast Wallace constituency simply did not exist, just the same as the Trump constituency today.

My campaign is a means of getting some freedom of speech for those who are rushed by shouts of Racist and Fascist and all the rest. It is something those who see themselves as the “ins” still think of as just bad dream.

I’ve been here before. I predicted the Reagan revolution and its largely ignored voter base in A Plague on Both Your Houses, 1976. William Rusher, publisher of National Review, did the enthusiastic Foreword (his spelling) and gave me a lifetime subscription that I still have.

This is much the same situation, a quarter of the electorate routinely ignored as non-existent.

The “ins” will continue to act as if we did not exist.

I will use whatever means I can to make it clear we do.

Two more articles in whitakeronline that might be useful sources of quotes for you are “We Cannot Live in Fear” 09/20/2016 and “Open Letter to Mr. Patrick Morrisey, Attorney General of West Virginia” 09/20/2016.



Black Americans Don’t Really Vote

For decades, there was a perfectly predictable time table on every Republican campaign, one you could trust like sunrise.

In the spring, for example, at a Republican cocktail party, one by one, several people would call  you over and tell you, as if it were Secret Knowledge, the magic formula, “Republicans are going to get the NEGRO VOTE this year!”

Like I say, every spring this was as predictable as sunrise.

As they whispered the Secret Formula for the Black Vote that was being pushed this election year, they would always, decade after decade, recite exactly the same statistics.

They would, even in the 90s, repeat the results of the 1952 and 1956 elections. In those elections, Eisenhower got well over forty percent of the black vote. They would cite, as if it were the first time anyone had ever been let in on The Secret, that Nelson Rockefeller got over forty percent of the black vote consistently.

In fact, I knew of other cases, like a truly right wing congressman, Livingston in Louisiana, who also broke that golden barrier of 40% of the Black vote every two years.

Then I tried to explain, TO A DUMBASS REPUBLICAN who didn’t know politics from cow manure, why this was true but the Blacks weren’t really VOTING.

If you have the choice of explaining real politics to a Republicans or calculus to a hog, pick the hog every time.

The critical fact is that this Black “vote” means nothing because Blacks would consistently go along when there was a landslide. Eisenhower and Rockefeller won their elections by so many votes that the Blacks who went along meant absolutely nothing. Livingston was the same.

Livingston was the same. He won very election big time.

The List would only be pulled out when the Black vote could MATTER.

Eisenhower and Rockefeller would have won their elections regardless. In the cases where the margin was close, only when it COUNTED, the real elections in real politics, which is an alien world to cocktail party Republicans, did the Black List come out.

This was the list handed out at Blacks churches and so forth which listed exactly who to vote for. Makes the Nazi SS look sloppy.  photo backvoting.jpg

Please note that I am using the present tense here. Blacks have NEVER varied from rigid adherence to their Black List and they never will.

As I have pointed out, the Black List got screwed up and gave the United States senatorial nomination, not exactly a small and obscure position, to a complete political unknown and he won in a landslide.

It didn’t matter that Black voters had never heard of this guy. He was on the Black List so he got the Black so-called “Vote.”

Election night some reporters showed their surprise that this total unknown had won the Democratic nomination out of nowhere.

And it was not mentioned another time during the whole campaign.  Everybody who knows anything about politics which category excludes Republicans, knew exactly what had happened.

As I keep trying to explain, NOTHING would have gotten this mentioned in the media.   I keep being told by one or two otherwise intelligent BUGSERS saying that if I produced that list at a press conference…..

Even some of our own simply cannot grasp reality.

Yea, right, gang, the media are going to make a major story out of something that has been known by everybody here since World War II.

REPORT the Black List?

The Black List is there for any reporter to get hold of it just by giving some Black guy what in the case of a White man would be called a bribe and is proudly referred to here as “walkin’ ‘rounds Money”.

His story would be shredded and he would get another job anywhere near the media for the rest of his life.

Like White Genocide, the Black List is one more demonstration of something everybody knows: The results of the “Civil Rights Movement”  were exactly what us   “old Southern Bigots” SAID they would be.

The big Blacs magazine in the 1950s was called Jet Magazine.   Almost every single Jet cover looked like MSM looks today: It showed Black man married to White woman.

Black men want White women.


“Giving Blacks the vote” was ridiculous because they don’t really VOTE.

And if you say this in public and show a Blacks List to the media, you will be a big trouble.

I would be deeply ashamed if our present rulers did not call me a “racist.’”

If the truth is racist, it’s the truth that has got to go.

To be anything but a “racist” in today’s America is treason against the truth.



If It Is Broke, Fix It

Anti-Whites are in control of the media. Therefore the Commission that by law operates the joint press conferences or joint interviews, aka debates, only appoints anti-Whites as moderators, aka, third debaters. This means that the microphones are controlled by partisans of chasing down Whites. Even who can be in attendance is decided with a bias.

Another way of putting it is that the dice are loaded against White interests. The dice cast a lot of sevens for Clinton last night. The snake eyes were only for Trump.

The moderators in the past and this year have displayed bias so blatant that even the media has acknowledged it. Yet no one asks the simple question: If it is broke, why not fix it?

Television news readers are not the only pool that can be drawn from to provide intelligent questions of national interest. There are multiple other resources out there. It is foolish to limit the search to the only professionals less trusted by the public than Congress Critters.

Try as one may there is no way to take partisanship out of organizing the “debates”. The towel of mythical fairness ought to be thrown in. Each candidate should be allowed to appoint a co-moderator. A coin flip could decide who gets which half to question and the other can control the timing during that half. Another alternative could be real debates in which only the candidates talk with a silent timekeeper enforcing a set schedule.  photo radatz.jpg

The second debate this year followed the usual path of not addressing White interests. Anderson Cooper appeared to make some effort at even handedness while Martha Raddatz desperately interrupted and hectored Donald Trump. She was frantic to have her Candy Crowley moment when she could slay a GOP nominee. The hate in Martha Raddatz’s heart seeped through what seem to be a half dozen face lifts the way an overflowing cesspool oozes out across a lawn. The effect was much the same.

There is no need to catalog further the record of bias on display in past TV extravaganzas posing as “debates”.

Bob has spoken about the freedom that being a candidate has given him. A freedom that in is the Bill of Rights.

The “debates” are regulated by law. The Commission is established by law. Laws can be changed. It behooves Congress to take away the power of censorship that the present system has inflicted upon Whites.

The anti-White media must be stripped of its monopoly of public discourse. A candidate such as Donald Trump ought to have his issues addressed. Those are our issues.

Every American is entitled to free speech in theory. A glitch in the law gave Bob a platform. White issues deserve the same. But so long as the anti-White media has a lock on what Americans can hear discussed in public progress is going to be grimly hard.