I think I should announce my candidacy for president in 2020 now or let it be known I will, and I will announce the reason:
First, I would defy our rulers and be the best president in American history. I am perfectly sincere in seeking the office. But there is a second reason I ran for president this time and I will want to become a candidate as soon as possible.
During my official candidacy in 2016, I enjoyed many of the rights an American citizen took for granted before September 11, 2001.
For this brief period I have enjoyed the protection of the first amendment which no longer applies to Americans. I could state what everybody knows, that so-called “diversity” has become a program of locating concentrations of White people and — I mean this literally, chasing them down.
We all know that chasing down White people involves international immigration, by bringing in more non-Whites from non-White countries and placing them in any area in America containing with what our establishment chooses to call “too many White people.”
Areas with what they call too many White people are to be subjected to the program to bring the population mix into line with government-imposed standards.
Everybody knows that that is what diversity is, but we found that there is a ban from coast to coast against anyone, except a presidential candidate, to call this program of “diversity” what it is: chasing down White people.
Like all bans on free speech, this ban on calling chasing down White people by its real name is not called censorship any more.
Violations of free speech are never called violations of free speech. Suppression of free speech always has a different label. Words are banned because they violate “decency” under new definition of decency.
Free speech banned heresy as insulting people because of their religion. So calling “chasing down White people” as what it is, which is chasing down White people, which it clearly is, is banned by declaring that saying “chasing down White people” is a violation of “community standards.”
No one is allowed to question this. No one even imagines finding any precedent for our previous use of these new “community standards.”
Anti-Whites simply say ban it and it is banned.
No mere citizen has the right or the financial resources to question this banning of anything they disapprove of as a “violation of community standards”.
Decades ago when the big news was that some Black Panthers committing violent acts were shot by policemen, the press accepted the Black Panther statement that this police action was “Black genocide.”
No one seriously challenged it. But now any person saying that a national policy of finding and chasing down White people is WHITE genocide is banned. Anyone who uses that term has been fired, their careers ruined.
I do not enjoy living in a society where freedom of speech and freedom of the press is denied to anyone who is not politically correct. As so many tyrannies have discovered, freedom can be addictive. This is why every single Communist country, every country that declares itself a “Workers’ Paradise,” must be surrounded by a wall and by men ordered to shoot to kill any who attempts to escape.
Freedom has certainly become addictive to me. I want to return to being a person with rights under the first amendment as soon as possible.
I want to be a candidate again in any way I can and as soon as I can the moment my rights from the election of 2016 expire.
I hope that some Americans find freedom as addictive as I do.
#1 by time for freedom on 10/07/2016 - 9:34 pm
Cher and I might be having a very interesting conversation about White Genocide. She just tweeted back to me about one of my White Genocide tweets:
@Cher on Twitter
#2 by Jason on 10/08/2016 - 9:31 am
Great. Some celebrities just can’t resist responding!
#3 by Jason on 10/08/2016 - 11:54 am
Oh by the way, a BOT warning! Some Leftist was bragging about how he’s programmed a bot to tweet/argue with people and got someone to do it for 10 hours! I don’t know how that is done, but apparently TweetBots exist.
So, if any of us find ourselves going back and forth too much with one account, it might be a time wasting bot!
#4 by Secret Squirrel on 10/08/2016 - 12:17 pm
I talked to one for a couple of minutes before I worked it out. You just have to ask questions. It can’t answer because it has nothing between its ears. Little different to a garden variety passive aggressive anti-White moron. Its stupidity is what makes it convincing.
#5 by Jason on 10/08/2016 - 1:12 pm
So you’ve learned to distinguish various types of retard. You got your drooling anti-White … you got your low T cuck … you got your bots …
#6 by -Gar5- on 10/08/2016 - 2:28 pm
I just Google it. Twitter bots seem extremely easy to set up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TMNURI1klM
#7 by WmWhite on 10/08/2016 - 9:25 am
It is interesting how an aware and older American like Bob can show us how much the concept of “freedom” and “free speech” has changed in just 50 or 60 years.
The youth of today have no concept of this past American zietgeist, nor do they understand what it was like to walk into a Mall or down a city street and NOT feel like a minority in the country their forefathers built and died for.
#8 by Jason on 10/08/2016 - 9:33 am
There used to be a saying “every man has a right to his opinion”. Boy has that changed.
#9 by Undercover Lover on 10/08/2016 - 2:47 pm
I always find it funny when our enemy says they believe in free speech. The school I go to has a “Free Speech” board in front of the security desk. I’ve pointed this out to several people and you wouldn’t be surprised how often they agree with something along the lines of “well they have to make sure no hate speech is written there”
Then again, I’m not in the U.S.
#10 by Henry Davenport on 10/08/2016 - 3:55 pm
GREAT idea, Bob!
Associating our memes with the presidency for the next 4 years!
A tweet or petition title:
“Support 2020 presidential candidate Bob Whitaker’s call to stop White Genocide NOW”
It should also give bloggers, etc. a more accustomed reason for writing about our memes.
And as “political speech,” it may give all of us entree to some online venues that possibly would otherwise erect legal barriers against us.
Interesting how the situation we’re working in has changed, since for a long time it was better to not have the memes attached to a person.
#11 by Henry Davenport on 10/08/2016 - 4:01 pm
Anti-White: He’s too old (racist, etc. whatever) to be president
BUGSer: But he understands that “diversity” means chasing down the last White person.
Too much fun! 🙂
#12 by Denounce Genocidists on 10/10/2016 - 12:18 am
Is it just me or did Hillary Clinton not look altogether confident about being able to sell “celebrating diversity” to the debate audience?
#13 by Bob on 10/10/2016 - 8:45 am
HD, you will be happy to know that German Chancellor Adenauer led Germany from destruction in WWII to prosperity left office at 85.
Singhman Rhee was 85 when he stepped down.
#14 by Jason on 10/10/2016 - 9:08 am
Hell I still have time to make something of myself!!
#15 by Henry Davenport on 10/21/2016 - 2:25 pm
Bob’s running for 2020 during the next 4 years is excellent. It will focus strength behind Mantra as being distinct from the collection of ideas and vulnerabilities of the growing Alt-Right. Mantra could easily sink out of sight into the Alt-Right, empowering it (as with the term “White Genocide”), but losing the much greater power that it packs on its own.
#16 by Henry Davenport on 10/22/2016 - 1:49 pm
We aren’t Alt-Right. We’re pro-White.
Pro-Whites oppose White Genocide.
Anti-Whites support White Genocide.
Anti-Whites’ “racist/anti-racist” definition of morality for Whites must be replaced by “anti-White/pro-White” as morality for Whites.
We urge readers to use the terms “anti-White” and “pro-White.”
#17 by Jason on 10/26/2016 - 2:02 am
HD, I hate to impose, but for the upcoming petitions, what about one that suggests writing in Bob Whitaker for President in order to stop White Genocide?