Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Huffington Post asks what’s next for Bob Whitaker and the #WhiteGenocide movement?

Posted by Laura on October 18th, 2016 under General

Dana Liebelson, a journalist from the Huffington Post reached out to me yesterday;

“It’s clear to me that Trump has given the white genocide movement a somewhat unprecedented platform. In the event Trump does not win the presidency, what’s next for the movement? Do you think it will suffer a setback, and why or why not?

How do you plan to levy the new wave under Trump to further support your cause, if he is not elected?

And how specifically would you plan to rally politically post-Trump? By supporting/running local candidates? By running yourself? What else? “

 Below is Bob’s reply;

Bob Whitaker for President has little to do with this election. Please see “A Candidate Can Still Be An American Citizen” 10/07/2016, for quotable lines on this.

 photo whitaker.jpg

Mrs Clinton stated our situation perfectly, Trump’s candidacy represents an American public opinion which is regarded by those who consider themselves the “W=we’s” in a “we” versus “them” situation.

To call you the establishment is a gross understatement. You regard us as a group which is to be crushed by firing us and using thugs to crush any expression of our position.

Trump’s nomination is something you simply cannot understand. It has shown us that we do not have to just lie down and whimper and be crushed and ignored.

I was part of this same phenomenon in the Goldwater campaign and defeat, where the movement really got going that overwhelmingly elected Reagan and the Soviet Empire, once considered the Voice of the Future, disappeared forever.

Trump’s voter base is exactly the same as the working people’s votes in 1968 which were branded “Wallace Democrats.” I was their leading public spokesman. They were the ”Wallace voters” until Election Day 1980, when absolutely everybody suddenly called them “Reagan Democrats and pronounced them to be THE swing vote.

So for me this is history repeating itself. Before 1980 both sides on any network meant a moderate or liberal Republican versus a Democrat. For the media, the vast Wallace constituency simply did not exist, just the same as the Trump constituency today.

My campaign is a means of getting some freedom of speech for those who are rushed by shouts of Racist and Fascist and all the rest. It is something those who see themselves as the “ins” still think of as just bad dream.

I’ve been here before. I predicted the Reagan revolution and its largely ignored voter base in A Plague on Both Your Houses, 1976. William Rusher, publisher of National Review, did the enthusiastic Foreword (his spelling) and gave me a lifetime subscription that I still have.

This is much the same situation, a quarter of the electorate routinely ignored as non-existent.

The “ins” will continue to act as if we did not exist.

I will use whatever means I can to make it clear we do.

Two more articles in whitakeronline that might be useful sources of quotes for you are “We Cannot Live in Fear” 09/20/2016 and “Open Letter to Mr. Patrick Morrisey, Attorney General of West Virginia” 09/20/2016.

  1. #1 by Yankee Rebel on 10/19/2016 - 9:54 am

    The media considers White people who dare speak out against their genocide as a small radical movement or a fad that they hope will go away.We are the tip of an iceberg just waiting below the surface for a voice. I am amazed at how easily other Whites respond positively to my message of White Genocide these days. These are so called “normal” everyday working class White people I am speaking about. Like the fall of the Berlin wall, anti-Whitism will fail and will catch the media by surprise when it does.

    • #2 by time for freedom on 10/19/2016 - 6:55 pm

      Yankee i’m just curious about something. You say that White people receive the message of White Genocide very positively these days. I’m curious about the gender specific responses you get from White people. Do White women respond more or less favorably that White Men?

      • #3 by Yankee Rebel on 10/20/2016 - 9:13 am

        Thats an interesting question, TFF. I think I am slower to bring up political subjects with women, in general. Politics is a heavy subject and I usually keep topics light around women. It depends on the setting and the audience.

  2. #4 by Denounce Genocidists on 10/19/2016 - 4:55 pm

    In the event that awful woman becomes Commander in Chief and does not set off a nuclear conflagaration with Russia and China or otherwise make the continuance of life impossible, we will continue to work for an end to the genocidal paradigm of “diversity” forced uniquely on White people by whatever means necessary.

  3. #5 by Jason on 10/19/2016 - 10:35 pm

    I think it is win/win for the pro-White side no matter what happens to Trump.

    If he wins, we might see Political Correctness start to crumble.

    But if he loses, tens of millions of White people will finally realize the Old White America was taken from them.

    Either way, the Ruling Class is going to be playing even rougher soon.

    • #6 by Secret Squirrel on 10/20/2016 - 12:16 am

      “To call you the establishment is a gross understatement. You regard us as a group which is to be crushed by firing us and using thugs to crush any expression of our position.”

      They are colonial thugs.

      • #7 by Jason on 10/20/2016 - 4:55 am

        One thing Trump’s victory as GOP candidate shows is that the Ruling Class Thugs can’t control everything.

  4. #8 by Jason on 10/21/2016 - 4:58 am

    I really like this article by Bob on classism (link below).

    Besides Wordism, another favorite of race-traitors is being loyal to their own “upper class” snobs at the expense of their people.

    Most journalists (who are actually stenographers for the Ruling Class) desperately want to be thought of as members of a Royal Court.

    It also shows the problem with conservatism. Please keep this in mind for all the TradCon types.

  5. #9 by Simmons on 10/21/2016 - 11:11 am

    I’m sure everyone here has now seen Buchanan’s latest opinion piece that deals with Trump accepting the election.

    Outside of the usual beltway speak he used to make sure at least most of the readers understood at least part of it Pat also used the phrases “political legitimacy” and “moral authority”, as Horace has said, “you can’t unhear it.”

    Why do you think the establishment pays Cucks? So you never hear those words or if you do they are associated with punishment and pain. The establishment might be losing that battle, maybe.

You must be logged in to post a comment.