My whole concept of warfare, including the political fronts, says: “Do what the enemy does NOT want you to do.”
So National Review lets their so-called opponents select every single syllable they utter. They call the leftists “progressives,” which means they are always right, and that the “conservatives”, by definition, are people who will eventually admit they were right. 
That’s what the position of “conservative” MEANS.
If you use those words, you CANNOT mean anything else.
Which is why NR is declared responsible, upper class, and anything else it needs.
Hillary is calling this a CONSPIRACY.
All those our ruling chahss loves and advertises to use that magic word “Conspiracy.”
Because the big publications love to quote it.
What I said should be in the past tense because even the truly mindless have caught onto it.
Words the establishment does NOT want to see provoke a “DUHH” from our side.
Because we never see them.
All we see quoted in the mainline press is declared to be from “Largest, representative racist organizations.”
Which is how you BECOME the largest and most intelligent publication on the other side of the media monopoly.
I am not sure that today, after BUGS’ efforts, that even the money base of “Leading racist organizations” could call that a “Conspiracy” without being laughed out of town.
#1 by Gavin on 12/16/2016 - 12:13 am
The media kept asking Trump is “disavow” the kkk. They wanted us to say that we are totally against the kkk and any expression of White racial identity and that “democrats are the real racists!” and talk about Robert Byrd and all that bullshit.
My contribution was very simple. I pointed out the truth.
The kkk doesn’t exist. It hasn’t existed in any real way for decades. No one under the age of 40 has every seen a kkk member in real life because there are none anymore. I used the term “boogeyman” because that is exactly what they are now.
Thankfully some people actually caught onto this. Tucker Carlson said it on his show. I’ve seen comments posted that take my idea almost verbatim.
#2 by Henry Davenport on 12/18/2016 - 2:16 pm
Hi Gavin, it feels real good to see your name here again, and of course to know you’re still active. I’ve always thought of you as the BUGSer who helped me the most to learn how to do this stuff (by showing me perfect responses when I’d proudly posted my tailgating responses on the working thread)!
It took me many weeks to get it, as I recall. And then when I finally suddenly got it one day, it was easy from then on.
HD
#3 by Jason on 12/21/2016 - 1:40 am
One thing is clear:
White people, as a group, can handle ONE issue at a time. That’s it.
Either we get them focused on White Genocide and anti-Whitism or we don’t.
Anything that gets White people off that issue is fatal. Low taxes, gun rights, abortion, environmentalism, anti-environmentalism, etc etc.
One issue at a time. That’s the maximum bandwidth. One.
#4 by Bob on 12/23/2016 - 9:36 am
Jason, your comment is a fine example of your point.