In contrast to an institution of teachers, who tend to promote environment over genes (see the article “Hey Teachers!”)…
A system that would promote GENES over environment would be based on BIRTH.
But left unchecked, one would expect hereditary rulers’ to only be loyal to CLAAAHSS.
And that is what we do find:
The “Royal” family in Britain, the family occupying Windsor Castle, does not care what nationality or race their subjects are. So long as they have SUBJECTS.
That is why if you take a look at a historical atlas of Europe in the Early Modern Period… it might seem that at some point the almost landlocked Austrians suddenly took over Spain and the Netherlands in the most remarkable amphibious assaults of all time!
But what really happened was lands being transferred between different branches of the same INTERNATIONAL family.
For them, nations are merely things to trade among themselves.
That is why Prince Philip, husband of Queen Elizabeth the Second-Rate, was called “King of Greece”, even though he was born in Germany and later lived in England. But Phil is neither Greek nor German nor English.
And a final example to illustrate this. It is how we get Queen Victoria being delighted to be named “Empress”, but to her annoyance only over India. The whites in the empire didn’t accept this title…
So don’t be surprised that the “royal” families stab us in the back!
If left unchecked, ANY institution will work for the opposite of what it claims.
#1 by Jason on 05/17/2017 - 4:53 am
I wonder if the “royal” family doesn’t PREFER little Brown subjects. Their own White countrymen might honor them, even die for them, but they could never offer the kind of abject submissive groveling we see in Brown countries.
#2 by Krishna Dharma on 05/17/2017 - 6:26 pm
When antiwhites have given away enough of our countries to racial aliens for there to be a sizeable non-white population in our formerly all-white countries, the non-whites demand racial representation from within.
They want an Obama. They want a mayor of London. They don’t want and no longer NEED a self-hating white antiwhite speaking for them.
A sizeable non-white population no longer needs white traitors and our race as a minority in its own homelands can not AFFORD traitors.
Self-hating white antiwhites have no future. It’s really no use taking any of the silly crap traitors say seriously. They have NO future.
#3 by Jason on 05/17/2017 - 11:46 pm
Absolutely right. White race-traitors were always a minority among Whites and now they are a minority with a minority.
The tragic question is why the larger White society allowed such traitors to set the agenda for the whole country when we had the whole thing to ourselves.
#4 by Yankee Rebel on 05/18/2017 - 7:47 am
The larger White society probably didn’t realize their loyalty was with the wrong group. Instead of being loyal to their racial relations, they were loyal to wordism and ideas.Just follow the cult leader until he tells you to drink the poison wine.
#5 by Jason on 05/24/2017 - 12:12 am
I’m reminded that Jim Jones, the leader of that Kool-Aid drinking cult, loved what he called “rainbow families”, meaning interracial marriages. Because they would not have anything that got in the way of total loyalty to his words.
#6 by Denounce Genocidists on 05/23/2017 - 8:28 am
Before the Brexit vote Ian Duncan Smith brought up the subject of oaths to Her Majesty not being worth a damn.
When entire cities and regions are being browned in a temporal blink of an eye in total contravention of our rights as human beings under international law.
#7 by Yankee Rebel on 05/26/2017 - 7:58 am
I want to vomit everytime I see the “royal” family in the media consoling the victims of the latest terror attack in the U.K. and pretending to give a damn. The Royal family supports immigration policies that lead directly to terrorists invading Britain and with it the violence against their fellow White countrymen.
#8 by Jason on 05/27/2017 - 3:55 am
The actual British people have given a great life to the “royal family”. You’d think they could show a little loyalty in return.