Archive for July, 2017

Collection of Tweets from Bob’s Twitter Account

-Scythian- posted this in the working thread. It is a fantastic collection of some of the tweets from Bob’s twitter account. Copy and paste these and get them out there for Bob. 🙂

“Here’s a bunch of Bob’s Twitter memes that work as Mantra Responses or can be modified to be”:

  • Anti-Whites never discuss whether anything we say is true. All they have is labels. A label is the weapon of one who has lost the argument.
  • Those who attack us are NEVER doing it to DISCUSS #Whitegenocide, they are ALWAYS demanding that all discussion of it be SUPPRESSED.
  • We all know that the only answer anti-Whites have is to silence us or change the subject. Those tactics ARE answers if you allow them to be.
  • Anti-Whites act like any felon faced with charges he cannot deny. They shout insults, say their accusers are stupid, mean and ugly.
  • The REAL war is a series of words like “racism” “diversity” and series of phrases anti-Whites scream because genocide has no justification.
  • The only weapon anti-Whites have is their screams. It is past time that we disarmed them. #Whitegenocide
  • Calling disagreement “hate” is childish. #Whitegenocide
  • Hate is a Hate Word: It just says “Shoot the messenger.” #Whitegenocide
  • Anti-Whites scream racist and White supremacist. The oldest cliche in the legal profession is, “If you have no defense, attack like hell!”
  • An anti-White thug uses the “Nazi!” label and he uses it only to incite violence. #Whitegenocide
  • When you anti-Whites scream Hate or racism, a.k.a. HERESY!, it says nothing about the point we heretics make. But it tells us ALL about YOU
  • Murder suspects and anti-Whites being interrogated say “You already asked that” and “I already answered that”. #Whitegenocide
  • Anti-Whites avoid answering the Mantra by waiting awhile and then declaring, “But we ALREADY answered it!” #Whitegenocide
  • These anti-Whites say “me no understand” and that’s supposed to be some argument. We have to make our answers as simple as these people are.
  • Silence is the anti-Whites’ most effective technique precisely because it WORKS. It works because no one on our side listens to the silence.
  • We are always being asked why we worry about our race. The QUESTION, for any other people, would bring a person under suspicion of genocide.
  • Anyone who asks “Why should I care about my race‘s survival?” is proving they are a sociopath with no loyalties. You can’t explain loyalty.
  • A sociopath has no loyalties, as a psychopath is incapable of guilt. You can’t explain to a sociopath WHY he should care about his own kind.
  • Anti-Whites say they are offended by being accused of advocating White genocide, but they then go on to describe White people as a pure evil
  • Every word anti-Whites say in response to the charge of #Whitegenocide is a justification for that exact policy.
  • Pro Whites accuse anti Whites of #Whitegenocide They say 1)Whites r evil & deserve it 2)They dont want to end the White race 3)No White race
  • Anti-Whites who say there is no such thing as White pick the countries that must allow immigration and assimilation by that exact criterion.
  • Anti-Whites say there is no White race or White country, but Whites stole America and Australia from the natives. #Whitegenocide
  • A pro-White is told there is no such thing as the White race, and then he is told that the White race owes the rest of the world reparations
  • If there is no such thing as race, how can we have “diversity?” #Whitegenocide
  • When someone asks what a White country is, you tell them it’s a country they insist has an obligation to import huge numbers of 3rd worlders
  • At the time of the Constitution, “we the people” had a higher percentage of native-born Whites than we have ever had before or since.
  • We had slavery. WOW!! The only people who didn’t have slavery were stone age people. Slavery was abolished in Saudi Arabia in 1964.
  • The White race has never committed a unique sin. Anti-Whites say “White people did this or that and therefore must disappear from the Earth”
  • One who argues that race does not exist, or the only race is the human race is stating that genocide has never occurred and cannot occur.
  • The name of the Genocide Treaty shows that saying “race does not exist” is no defense against a charge of genocide. #Whitegenocide
  • Emma Lazarus was a Zionist. What if Bob Whitaker wrote something inviting the whole world to her Zion? These anti-Whites have no shame.
  • If you believe your land is stolen, don’t point fingers, get the hell OFF of it! #Whitegenocide
  • The 1st obligation of any American who believes the US was stolen from the Indians is not to point fingers but TO GET THE HELL OUT!
  • How can you be a White supremacist and White separatist at the same time? #Whitegenocide
  • Remind anti-Whites that they you don’t have to justify genocide unless you are committing it. #Whitegenocide
  • The REAL war is a series of words like “racism” “diversity” and series of phrases anti-Whites scream because genocide has no justification.
  • It is critical to remember that the Mantra is not a debating tactic. The Mantra is repeating back to anti-Whites what they say all the time.
  • Anti-Whites never get tired of repeating racist Nazi. The reason we got in this mess is we didn’t deal with these people on their own level.
  • You have to deal with anti-Whites on their level. They’re a bunch of monkeys screaming. Don’t answer as if they’d said something.
  • Anti-Whites’ world view is threatened, not by exposures of Conspiracy Theories, but by someone saying their basic ideas in plain English.
  • It is critical to remember that the Mantra is not a debating tactic. The Mantra is repeating back to anti-Whites what they say all the time.
  • People can take being out argued but being exposed as a mindless repeater is unbearable to people who’ve been trained to think they‘re smart
  • We keep repeating. That’s what revolutions are made of. Let’s see if we can find a non-White country that needs immigration. Repeat.
  • Crying for tolerance locally while ignoring #Whitegenocide globally is a provincial point of view.
  • Anti-Whites who talk about “true love” aren’t sophisticated enough to see we’re talking about something bigger than 1 country or 1 marriage.
  • Anti-Whites talk about All Mankind and A Global Point of View. Then suddenly they are only talking about one country, so it isn’t genocide.
  • When they say, “We should love all mankind,” tell them they are using decency as a weapon of #Whitegenocide. It is exactly like blasphemy.
  • Someone asked me to “abandon my racism” in the Name of Christ. I replied: “I don’t believe in human sacrifice.” And I don’t commit blasphemy
  • The Church’s only genetic morality is against incest, a level of evolution already reached by meerkats. #Whitegenocide
  • No longer do monks whip themselves and all that. It is time we outgrew the idea that God is a great excuse for self-hatred and for treason.
  • To be anything but a “racist” in today’s America is treason against the truth
  • Those who seek #Whitegenocide prefer mixing to displacement. Their object is not to SUBSTITUTE, their object is to DESTROY.
  • Almost every anti-White would like to see us in prison or worse. #Whitegenocide
  • The Mantra puts the genocide charge on anti-Whites where it belongs. It uses their suppression against them. #Whitegenocide
  • If anti-Whites drive people into the totalitarian camp to save our race, that is their doing.
  • Everything we say is true. Anti-racism is entirely anti-White. #Whitegenocide
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

Intro to Twitter

Peter cottontail created a working thread about twitter and a list of white genocide accounts, so I thought this post of Mantraseeds was a good repost and work discussion starter.

As Peter has suggested, following all Bugsers white genocide accounts and re-tweeting as many white genocide tweets as possible.

We have seen the term white genocide go viral on different occasions by the Swarmers using twitter. (click image)

Bob always said his greatest achievement was the Swarm and its ability to get out there and stay on point.

Mantraseed’s working thread post was from


BY Johnny Mantraseed:
Original thread HERE

Well, I can’t sleep, and as I’ve toyed with writing a thread like this for some time, I’ll give it a whirl. A caveat: I am not Genseric, and never will be Genseric. That is, I am utterly incapable of being pithy and getting to the point, LOL. So, wade through if you think it will be of benefit. I do think I will have a handful of pointers that not many know. They aren’t game-changing, but they are handy. I’ll try to bold them and label them as Tips.

I won’t spend much time on the VERY basic stuff, like what a hashtag (#) is. Briefly, a hashtag is a way to “log” your Tweet into a larger discussion. #s were designed to allow people to easily find other people talking about the same thing, whether it’s the Lord of the Rings, porn (gods forbid), Christianity, rap … whatever. There’s a # for ANYTHING and EVERYTHING. So if you lambast “diversity”, slapping a # on it—e.g., #diversity—will allow it to “feed” into #diversity … which other people will be searching for (and, thus, see your Tweet).

Tip # 1: Sometimes I wonder about the purpose of a #, simply because Twitter’s algorithm is so strong that it will find all relevant results for the word in question. Point being, tip-wise, YOU WILL ALWAYS GET MORE AND BETTER RESULTS IF YOU SEARCH FOR THINGS WITHOUT THE HASHTAG, ESPECIALLY IF IT IS SOMETHING YOU CARE ABOUT. Every day, multiple times a day on my phone, I search

White Genocide
anti-White

It will bring up FAR MORE results than searching for #WhiteGenocide and #antiWhite. You can find LOTS of handy things. For instance, I’ve seen hundreds of billboard Tweets since the one in Arkansas went up, and a new surge since the one in Alabama. When a random person drives by that sign and wants to make fun of it, they aren’t going to slap a # on anti-White and write “#antiwhite”. They don’t know it’s enough of a “thing” to warrant a #. If you search “#antiwhite” you’re going to miss out on all of those goodies. You can find lots of relevant things. Near the White Man March, I found a self-described antifa group that had posted the name and phone number of a BUGSter, and was able to convey a warning to them immediately through a mutual contact … and I was at work, on my phone. Twitter is powerful.

Regarding @s. This is how you contact someone. If you include their “@” (for instance, I am @JMantraseed) anywhere in your Tweet, it will go to them. It doesn’t have to be in the front. They will then see it in their notification timeline. Twitter has reformatted itself. You’ll notice that every page (at least on a computer … the Twitter app on a smartphone doesn’t have this yet) now has “Tweets” and “Tweets and replies.”

Anything starting with “@” gets filed under “Tweets and replies”. If people are using their laptop, they they are less likely to see it on your page. However, this is handy, because sometimes when you want to interact with people, you don’t necessarily want that on your “billboard” of main Tweets. It’s a good way to keep your Tweets “powerful,” and still interact with people without cluttering up your main timeline.

Tip # 2: I have read the following in multiple places, but it is technically hearsay. If you are Tweeting a hostile, or someone more likely to block you, put something before their @. Basically, you just don’t want the @ being the first character in a Tweet. Often, I—and most—will use

.@

in lieu of

@

The “word on the street” is that, if they block you—blocking can lead to ultimate suspension, and the total rebuilding of a Twitter account in which you have invested—it “counts less” if you didn’t start out with “@”. Supposedly, Twitter counts one as an “interaction” and one as a “mention.”

Tip # 3: This is also “word on the street,” but, once again, I’ve seen it multiple places. If someone DOES block you … block them back. Supposedly, that also protects your account more.

Tip # 4: To find out if someone blocked you, you can try following them … if it doesn’t let you, they have blocked you. HOWEVER, that’s not the best way … you don’t want to be randomly following and unfollowing hostiles and strangers. SO … create a List. Set it to Private. Try adding the user in question to a List. If it LETS you … then they haven’t blocked you. If it DOESN’T let you … then they have. BTW, IF IT’S SET TO PRIVATE, nobody will know whether you’ve added them or not. If it’s PUBLIC, people WILL know when you have added them to a List. You do NOT have to be following someone to add them to a List.

Tip # 5: While we are talking about Lists … USE THEM. My single biggest regret is not filtering people into Lists when I first started using Twitter. If you follow a large number of people—which is normally necessary to be followed BY a large number of people—your Home feed will swiftly become unusable. I have 2,227 followers, and I follow 2,187. When I click on my Home feed … it’s simply unusable. Pages of new Tweets every few seconds. And I have too many to take the time to go back and sift through from the beginning. If I could do it over again, I might put people into Conservative, Liberal, Christian, NRx, AMPW, Pagan, etc. Those obviously overlap, but people tend to Tweet about the same things. Now, this presumes you WANT to read their Tweets … which you normally won’t. It’s not a matter of disrespect; you just won’t have the time. HOWEVER, you’ll find that Twitter is very much driven by petty egotism, and it’s good to spread your RTs around, hit different groups, etc. As crass and Jew-y as this sound, try to schmooze your followers when you can, make them feel important, etc. BUGS is about practical politics, not Aryan virtue. 🙂

But even that is unfeasible, with a very large amount. Basically, I don’t even read Tweets anymore … well, I do, but I read #s. I don’t read lists of followers. I just throw stuff out there. But I make certain to try to “interact” with anyone and everyone who “@’s” me, to build involvement and be available.

Twitter Meta-Philosophy:

As a BUGSter, as I see it, you basically have three broad options. These are obviously simplified, and I have seen BUGSters use each.

1) Don’t worry about followers AT ALL, or even worry about saying the same thing repeatedly. This type of account basically Tweets the same thing over and over and over and over to DIFFERENT PEOPLE. Jason normally uses this approach. HOWEVER, it can be very effective. He was RT’d by a comedian once that had over 400,000 followers.

That being said, IF YOU DO THAT, most people won’t follow you (or, rather, you will lose them), because you are going to spam their Home feed, and they’ll get tired of seeing the Tweets. Also, if you DO want 100 people to see the Mantra … you’ll have to Tweet 100 times (or use #’s, but I’m simplifying), since nobody is following you.

But if you do that, people … for Odin’s sake, use a fricking Avatar. MOST PEOPLE IGNORE anything that a generic “egg” account, with the default avatar and no followers, says.

Come to think of it, if you ARE going to create one of these hack/mass-Tweeting accounts, you should let BUGSters know, so that we can give you easy follows. That way, you can “mass Tweet” with a picture and 20 followers, and people will think you are more of a “real person”. Once you get banned, post the link to your new account, and wash, rinse, repeat.

2) The medium approach. Don’t worry about having too many followers, and Tweet a lot … but not to the level of 1) above. I would say the vast majority of BUGSters do this. Acquire 300 followers or so, and Tweet all you want. A fine approach, and perhaps the best.

3) Try to get A LOT of followers and constantly acquire them. This is what I do and, judging by observation, what LL does.

A digression:
Many/most people with lots of followers, even if they follow you, will never see your Tweets. That fact almost puts the whole matrix of “acquiring followers” into the “what’s the fricking point?” category. However, many do. I’ve had people with 10,000 and 20,000 followers RT me, when I thought they weren’t even reading my Tweets. So some do still see them.

ALSO, as a corollary … it’s almost BETTER to be followed by someone with 200 followers than someone with 129,000 followers, that is ALSO FOLLOWING 129,000 people. Why? Because the person with 200 followers is MUCH MORE LIKELY to see and RT your stuff. And, you know, factor that into your advertising. That is, when I have a “conservative” or someone I’m trying to “infect” (albeit with a healthy virus … the Mantra) that RT’s my stuff, I’ll be sure to RT theirs every now and then.

The advantage this approach has is that, if you don’t have a lot of TIME to pull off 1), after months of investment, you can whip out your phone, shoot something out there, and ~2,000 people will see it. See what I’m saying? You don’t HAVE to Tweet 100 times to make 100 impressions under option 3).

Which leads me to:

4) This is nothing you “can” do. It just “is”. LOL. This is reserved for “movement celebrities,” like Horus. That kind of account acquires a LOT of followers, but DOESN’T FOLLOW MANY BACK.

Key word? R-A-T-I-O. Every savvy Twitter user knows that the RATIO of following-to-followers is the most impressive thing. For example.

Johnny Mantraseed:

Following: 2,187
Followers: 2,227

Horus the Avenger:

Following: 95
Followers: 1,015

I have TWICE as many followers as Horus … and I would trade accounts with him in a New York-minute. That kind of RATIO is golden, and virtually unachievable except for celebrities, musicians, girls tweeting naked pics (gods forbid), or “movement” celebrities within a given niche.

Tip # 6: If you DO want to try 3)—and it’s easy to do—simply go through lists of “friendlies” and follow them. In a week or two, UNFOLLOW anyone who hasn’t followed you back. Jew-y? Yes. The way it’s done? Yes.

We in BUGS are about RESULTS and ADVERTISING and INFLUENCE. We don’t play games that aren’t available. We play the game in front of us.

There are websites out there that, in a matter of seconds, will tell you who you are following that isn’t following you back, and vice versa. In 30 seconds you can unfollow 100 people. Easy, easy, easy.

Wash, rinse, repeat.

Quick caveat: Don’t follow or unfollow too many people at once. Twitter changes their suspension-algorithm, so I don’t know what the current limits are. However, don’t go following 800 people at at time—or, for that matter, unfollowing 800 people at a time—because you’ll get suspended. I usually shoot for ~50 a week.

Search around, read articles and reviews, and find one you trust. MANY do “auto-updates” to your account that post how many followers/unfollowers they’ve gained/lost on a given day, along with “pitches” every now and then for the service.

Don’t use those. They come across as narcissistic and annoying. Not all services do that, though. I’ve used the same one for a year—and you have to provide your password—and have had Z-E-R-O problems. I won’t post what it is here, but you can DM me on Twitter or PM me on SF if you want to know.

Random Tips/Ideas for the future:

Tip (Idea) # 7:
#s have “top results,” “top pictures,” “top videos,” etc. Whenever you do a search, you have the option to look through “Top” or “All.” This essentially functions in the same way that YouTube’s “Top Comments” used to function. The more RTs, Favorites, and Responses a Tweet has, the higher it gets. EVENTUALLY, when we have the numbers, we need to start targeting #s.

Once we progress to that point, we need to target things within our reach. For instance, on a quickly moving hashtag like #tcot (true conservatives on Twitter), especially when it is trending, you’ll get 40 Tweets every 10 seconds (or way, way more in many cases), and the Top Tweets will have 60-400 RTs.

We don’t have the numbers to pull that off right now. However, we DO have the numbers to get to the top of #Diversity, #WhitePrivilege, et al. When we do this, it won’t just be a random RTing of every BUGSter. A Tweet will need to be CAREFULLY CRAFTED for optimal impact, posted in the working thread, and we’ll all RT it, Fav. it, and talk to each other under it.

(Mini-)Tip # 8:
Speaking of favorites: Many use them as “social capital,” i.e., “This isn’t good enough to RT, but I’ll favorite it.” Even more cynically, many people will fav. random stuff that seems agreeable—since that shows up in someone’s timeline—and hope that the person follows them.

Sometimes it works. I don’t do it. The favorite function was ACTUALLY designed to let you “mark” Tweets you really like and go back to them. I saw the following suggestion in a Twitter marketing thing, and I use it. Remember, BUGS is about advertising, propaganda, etc. … so this truly isn’t said out of ego. It’s all propaganda, baby!

I use “favorites” as, basically, my billboard. If a “big name” RTs my video, or if it get a really good compliment from someone, or when a good account lists me as a #FF (favorite follower), I’ll favorite that and leave it. That way, instead of 40,000,000 favorites you’ll never look through (and neither will anyone else …), since you’ve been using them as social capital, you’ll now have 20-100, and someone will be more tempted to look … and they’ll see what an outstanding, well-complimented lad you are. LOL.

And, sometimes, I’ll “favorite” simply b/c I don’t know how to reply (essentially using it as social capital to end a conversation) and then, days later, after that Tweet is buried in the recipient’s timeline, go back and unfavorite it (so that my favorites aren’t cluttered).

(Mini-)Tip # 9: As an aside, I also have 8-12 Tweets of my own favorited, all with mini-Mantras in different languages. That way, instead of going to the thread at BUGS, I can just hit my favorites and copy/paste. You can also go to @JMantraseed and access my favorites, and copy/paste from there … BUGS is shareware, copy/paste away!

(Mini-)Tip # 10: There are two ways of using pictures. Both have their merits.

1) Tweeting pics as responses. The upside of this is that they end up on a lot of #’s, and a lot of people see them. The downside is, if people look at your pics, they’ll see lots of repetition and quickly lose interest.

2) Almost never using the same pic twice … and mixing in pro-White, pro-European pics. This is the tactic I’ve taken. I’ve noticed it to be V-E-R-Y E-F-F-E-C-T-I-V-E. I can’t TELL you the number of times I have followed some RANDOM conservative lady … and 20 minutes later I’ll see …

Random Conservative Lady has favorited Pic # 1
Random Conservative Lady has favorited Pic # 2
Random Conservative Lady has favorited Pic # 3
Random Conservative Lady has RT’d Pic # 4
Random Conservative Lady has favorited Pic # 5

Without exaggeration, just last week I followed some random lady, and for the next 30 minutes my phone was blowing up. I must have had THIRTY RTs/favs. What does that mean? That means that she was just SLAPPED with the Mantra AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN …

… and I did ZERO work (think cost/benefit, time-invested/pay-off) other than FOLLOW her.

If BUGS is about experience-based results, hear this: This has happened

More
Times
Than
I
Could
Count

If you take this approach, I recommend (as I did above) mixing in pro-European pics. Stonehenge. Urquhart Castle. And lots and lots and lots of art. As an aside, I’ve basically taught myself Art History in the past six months using this strategy, LOL. I usually go 3 paintings for every 1 WGP/ARIACWFAW (on FB)/WGM3 (on FB) pic. Why? Because as Iceland Creator said on BUGS radio … nobody likes a fanatic. Exposing them to IMPLICITLY PRO-WHITE art and the beautiful things our race can achieve will keep them looking … then you SLAP them with Mantra. If it’s JUST Mantra pics, they won’t look as long, because they will think you are a “fanatic.”

(Mini-)Tip # 11: This is actually VERY “mini.” However, for the MOST bang for your buck (I actually don’t spend nearly as much time on Twitter as it seems), RT someone ELSE’S RT.

RTs and (and Fav’s, should you choose to use them like this) are social capital. Let’s say:

Conservative Man RTs Teaparty Woman
If you RT HIS RT, you’ll spread that “social capital” twice.

Conservative Man will see “BUGSter RT’d your RT” in his timeline, and Teaparty Woman will see “BUGSter RT’d your Tweet” in hers. Even though Conservative Man, like the ego-driven creature he is, will make a Frown Face inside that you didn’t RT one of HIS magnificent, world-changing Tweets, he’ll still know that you were looking through his timeline, and have his ego stroked a bit.

Tip (Idea) # 12:
Many shows nowadays live Tweet—whether its the actual “actors/comedians” (and it often is) or their producers—during shows. Eventually, it would be nice to have a concerted Swarm. I think it would be funny if Tosh, or the Impractical Jokers, or Talking Dead, were trying to sift through Tweets to put on TV, only to get bombarded with Mantra. That would 100% be talked about amongst the production crew. The downside of this is that the fantards might try mass-blocking you, leaving our accounts suspended. I suppose a Trial Run will answer that question at some point. New accounts could be created by people who didn’t want to lose theirs, or who didn’t have a lot invested … which leads me to …

(Mini-)Tip # 13: It’s been awhile since I read up on this, and Twitter’s rules change a lot, but as I recall, Twitter allows you to have multiple accounts, provided the accounts are for different purposes … but if you have an account in which you are invested, be very wary of creating a 2nd account and RTing your own stuff … it could cause you to lose both. Wanting to avoid that, @JMantraseed is my only account.

(Mini-)Tip # 14: Speaking of “fav’s” … it’s also a great time-saver if you are going to run errands, be at work, etc. As I use “fav’s” as place-holders and markings, I would usually “favorite” ten things before I went to work, and then on breaks, I would un-favorite and RT them. That way, you don’t have to go searching for stuff to RT … and you can literally just shoot crap out without so much as 5 seconds effort on your part.

Well, I’m sure I’ll think of more, but I’m a bit typed out. I hope someone out there find this useful.

🙂

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Comments

REPOST: July 4 and REAL Traditional Values

By Bob Whitaker (originally posted July 4th 2007 – http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2007/07/04/july-4-and-real-traditional-values/):

Here is some history you do not hear about. You have heard that Jefferson and Adams both died on July 4, 1826. In fact, the only ex-president who had died before that date was George Washington over a quarter of a century earlier. July 4, 1926 was the fiftieth anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.

The critical point is that it was NOT a coincidence that both men died on that day.

In fact, if you THINK about it, a forgotten art to historians, the date of the death of Jefferson and Adams provides an important insight into human nature. Before modern medicine, it was normal for very old people to decide WHEN they would die. My grandfather reached ninety during a recurrence of a scalp tumor, so he lived until his birthday in August of 1966 and promptly died.

My 86-year-old uncle by marriage lived alone in Florida, drove his own car, and had outlived two wives. Then a widow of 75 years he was courting told him she could not marry him because, in those days, her Social Security from her dead husband would be reduced if she remarried.

He promptly died.

He HATED being alone, so no one was surprised at his death. Back then, it was taken for granted when a man that age gave up the will the live, he died. Today the idea that a very old person can decide on the exact date they will die seems like a superstition.

AND, back then, no one would have felt OBLIGATED to talk him OUT of it. It was his right.

“We’ll MISS you,” would have been an argument. “God demands that you live every last second you can, no matter how miserable you are,” would have been considered blasphemy, and no one even THOUGHT of it.

He died, excuse the expression, with dignity. He did NOT die being wheeled into an emergency room with an intern sitting on his chest pounding away.

AND the possibility that he and a 75-year-old woman might live in sin together never even came up. Modern Thought, both EXTREME Pro-Life and modern liberal, would have condemned the two choices we took for granted. His right to die was assumed and no one even suggested they “live together.”

Again, EXTREME pro-life and liberalism are on the same side in opposing REAL traditional values.

So most modern historians consider it to be a myth that Adams’s last words were, “Jefferson still lives.” If you understand the way people REALLY thought then, it would be exactly what he would have said. He and Jefferson both PURPOSELY stayed alive until that date, and both knew the other was doing just that. Jefferson had actually died a few hours earlier.

James Monroe was the next ex-president to die, in 1834. He ALSO died on July 4th! Now THAT you DON’T hear about. It says too much about REAL traditional values.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

6 Comments

The Real Presidents Told the Federal Courts to SHOVE IT!

By Bob Whitaker:

In case you consider arguing this, the presidents referred to were Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln.

An old Confederate like me is no fan of Old Abe, but the point here is that nobody can say he didn’t fill the Presidential Chair to the point of bursting.

As for Andy Jackson, he remains the only American Chief Executive for whom historians named an age of history, the Jacksonian Era, and I have never seen any historian who disputed it.

The 1860 Republican platform was very short, and of that briefness the election held the issue that took up the least space.

For two generations, the introduction of new states had made the headlines. There had to be an equal number of free and slave states and it had to be kept that way.

The decision was book-length and I agree with Back Bay Grouch that it contained a more thorough analysis and loyalty to the actual thinking of the Founding Fathers than any other decision rendered by the Court.

Generally speaking it was decided that a citizen bringing his property into the territory from a state has a right to expect the territory to protect that property.

A state’s definition of property or other legal terms was legally superior to that of a territory.

That was one of the reasons territories wanted to become states.

In the Dred Scott Decision the Court decided that a territory could not change a piece of property.

Over ninty percent of the reason for the creation of the Republican Party’s existence was to prevent the admission of more slave territories and therefore more slave states into the Union.

So the 1860 Republician plan consisted of telling the United States Supreme Court to take its decision and stick it where the sun don’t shine.

A generation before the same Court had Andrew Jackson return most of the State of Georgia to the Indians because of treaties made earlier between the United States Government and tribes.

Andrew Jackson informed the Court that it could put its ruling in the same convenient place.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments