Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

The success of the phrase “Anti-White”

Posted by Wuntz Moore on January 10th, 2018 under Politics

The following excerpt was written in March, 2013:

“Anti-white” creates a new category

When the word “anti-white” has been put into the minds and onto the tongues of every White person in this world by constant, determined, unceasing repetition, A NEW CATEGORY WILL EXIST:


That category does not exist today. Think how absolutely necessary that category is.

When that excerpt was written, there was no category of ACTIONS AND PERSONS THAT ARE INJURIOUS TO WHITES. Whites and everyone else had been trained to think only of other races as being targets of racial attack.

The absence of any concept of whites being racially targeted was supported by the absence of any name for such targeting. Giving something a name makes it visible and ushers it into the realm of existence.

During the last few years, BUGS has hammered the name “anti-white” into the mainstream. “Anti-white” focuses whites’ understanding of attacks that are made against them because they are white.

Both anti-whitism and White Genocide have been taking place right in front of our faces. But both had no names in the public arena, and so both were going virtually unnoticed, until BUGS yanked the veil off them by hammering their names. 

Those names have now begun to have their effect on the national mind and on the national discourse.

From the late Bob Whitaker and from BUGS, to whites everywhere:

You are welcome!



They say they’re anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white!

Diversity is a code word for White Genocide


[Visitors to BUGS may comment to this article here or here]


, , , , , , ,

  1. #1 by Electric on 01/11/2018 - 5:05 pm

    “Anti-White’ has definitely been hammered into the mainstream successfully without a doubt. We should put more focus & detail into our battles being pro-White vs anti-White. Anti-Whites LOVE to boast about being “pro-humanity” . . . Yet they support the biggest genocide in history against our race. They demand we shut down anything that’s vaguely pro-White. You can’t be “pro-humanity” without being pro-White. In the age of White genocide, you’re either pro-White or anti-White.

  2. #2 by White&Normal on 01/14/2018 - 10:00 pm

    Very true.

    While I still don’t think the term anti-white is used nearly enough yet, I am noticing that its used sparingly at the moment by various people. The more people use it, the more people will use it.

  3. #3 by Wuntz Moore on 01/17/2018 - 12:10 am

    Someone once made the excellent comment below to an article on one of our sites.


    This is tweetable:

    The knockout game is also called POLAR BEAR HUNTING. It’s not random violence. It’s ANTI-WHITE violence.

    The main thing to remember is that you have to say ANTI-WHITE. If you explain that “the knockout game” is the media’s falsely neutral way to describe something that is also called POLAR BEAR HUNTING, white people don’t have any trouble figuring out who the polar bears are. But they forget and lose focus, because they don’t have a memory hook to define the specific kind of violence POLAR BEAR HUNTING would be. You have to tell them it’s ANTI-WHITE violence; then they remember. Without saying ANTI-WHITE you’ve got nothing.

    This message has two or three purposes:

    1. To let white people know they are under attack.

    2. To establish ANTI-WHITE as a useful word that describes something real and visceral.

    3. It can let people know the media is hiding ANTI-WHITE violence with falsely neutral language.

You must be logged in to post a comment.