Archive for February, 2018

Whites Have Rights?! We Need to Study This Odd Notion!

Originally posted on

Dr. Christina Cliff, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Security Studies at Franklin Pierce University recently reached out to us to ask us some questions. The wordist class is perplexed that some white people would actually oppose their own genocide and is starting to become interested in examining this baffling phenomenon.

“I am an academic researcher and I am writing to request an interview with you (either by phone or via email) for my project on the rise of what the mainstream media calls the “alt-right.” My goal is to talk to leaders of groups affiliated with the movement and other notable identity advocacy figures to discuss their views regarding the current political climate.” ~Dr. Cliff

Dr. Cliff has written for the Boston Herald and Newsweek.

In their 2017 meeting, the American Political Science Association (APSA) had a session titled “White Genocide is Gonna Get Your Momma!”

There is debate in pro-white circles about whether we should respond at all to media inquiries. They won’t be fair so why bother? They will twist everything you say to reinforce their anti-white narrative, so why give them ammunition? Our attitude is that in deciding whether to engage with the anti-white media, you should use your own discretion. Keep in mind that if you just run away that makes YOU look like you have something to hide. If you get waylaid you could say something like, “Pro-whites know from long experience that the anti-white media is not going to treat us fairly or report what we say accurately. When I have the equipment to make my own independent recording of our exchange, I will be more than happy to answer your questions.” Or, go ahead and engage. But whatever you do STAY ON MESSAGE. If you make your own recording of the exchange and stay on message, you can make a win-win situation out of an engagement with the media. They can report accurately what you have to say thereby spreading your message. Alternatively, if they lie and distort what you said, you can hold it next to what actually happened and use that to discredit them.

Dr. Cliff may be a genuine truth-seeker, but, generally speaking, these are dishonest people with an agenda. Their goal is to twist everything you say into an American History X narrative. If you choose to respond, a good rule of thumb is to never accept the premises of their questions.

Dr. Cliff was kind enough to give her questions in writing so we would have a complete record of the exchange. Here are Dr. Cliff’s questions and our responses to them:

  • How would you describe your beliefs/ideology?
    1. We’re pro-white. We’re against the genocide of our own race. We’re against all things anti-white. We are loyal to our own kind. We are not wordists. We do not worship any particular set of words.
    2. We’re human rights activists calling attention to the crime of genocide being committed against the white race. The crime of genocide was codified under international law by General Assembly Resolution 260 (adopted Dec 9, 1948 in effect Jan 12, 1951), The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This genocide is being carried out by means of mass non-white immigration and forced assimilation in ALL and ONLY white countries the goal of which is to force blend ONLY white people out of existence. Anyone who objects to this crime is subject to harassment, intimidation, violent acts and threats of violence, psychological terrorism, job loss, and prison terms. We DEMAND an open and free discussion of white genocide without threats of attack from screamers, thugs, or thought police. We DEMAND a worldwide repeal of all laws that make it illegal for white people to speak out for their racial interests. Genocide is any attempt to eliminate a group, in whole or in part, by any means. It need not be violent.
    3. We’re also pro-black. We have no problem with 50+ black countries in Africa. We’re also pro-Japanese. We have no problem with Japanese in Japan. We’re also pro-Vietnamese, pro-mestizo, pro-muslim, etc. We don’t demand that the entire world be turned white, but anti-whites demand that the entire world be turned non-white over time.
    4. Nationalists (people loyal to their own kind) say each group should have its own space. Nationalists can accept other nationalists. Wordists (those who are loyal to a set of words) cannot accept nationalists nor can they accept any other wordist who is loyal to a different set of words than the set of words they are loyal to. Wordists like Communists, Muslims and Christians have historically been far more vicious and intolerant than nationalists. Communism killed 100 million people in the name of peace and brotherly love. In the 30 Years War, religious wordists ended up killing a third of the population of the German states of Europe. The moment a significant number of non-whites had been brought into Europe after WW2, censorship laws were imposed there. That’s why we say multiracialism and free speech are incompatible. Nationalists occasionally go to war but are at peace most of the time. Wordists are ALWAYS at war, whether it is violent war or psychological war, against anyone who doesn’t believe their particular Universal Truth out of the thousands or millions of Universal Truths which have been concocted over time.
    5. The entire non-white world rejects diversity but no one screams “Nazi Racist Supremacist!!” at them. ONLY white countries are expected to drown themselves in a sea of diversity. That’s why we say “Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, white countries for EVERYBODY?!”
    6. ALL races have engaged in conquest and slavery but ONLY whites are demonized for history.
  • Do you consider yourself and/or the Fight White Genocide project part of what the mainstream media calls the “alt-right”?
    1. We’re pro-white. To the extent the alt-right is pro-white, we are pro-alt-right. If they want to do something effective in the global struggle against white genocide, wonderful.
  • What events, patterns in the US would you use to explain why you believe in your ideology?
    1. We don’t concede that loyalty to your own kind is an ideology. Policies of white genocide are being imposed on the United States and all white countries, specifically mass non-white immigration combined with forced assimilation. This is not a matter of belief. These are facts which anti-whites openly brag about. Anti-whites openly brag about the inevitable brown future. The only difference between white countries is WHEN they are projected to become minority white. Whites are the only group being actively denied the human rights to homelands and self-determination. No one’s turning Japanese into a minority in Japan. No one’s turning Chinese into a minority in China. No one’s turning blacks into minorities in 50+ black countries. White genocide is a global phenomenon and it is disingenuous and misleading to focus on only one country when talking about white genocide. To name just a few of the events which taken together add up to white genocide:
      1. 1925 Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi clearly and unequivocally states the intent for white genocide in Europe. Kalergi is subsequently awarded the Charlemagne Prize and is considered the “Godfather of the European Union.”
      2. 1957 Little Rock High School is forcibly integrated by paratroopers with bayonets fixed on their M-14 assault rifles.
      3. 1965 Immigration Act is enacted under the false pretext that it would not upset the ethnic make-up of America.
      4. 1999 General Wesley Clark says “There is no place in modern Europe [ed. not Asia or Africa] for ethnically pure states” while bombing the hell out of Serbia to enforce the Clark Doctrine.
      5. 2008 President of France Nicolas Sarkozy says: “The challenge to race-mixing in the 21st century is not a choice, it is an obligation, an imperative. We cannot do otherwise. If republican voluntarism doesn’t work, it will be necessary to move on to more coercive measures.”
      6. 2012 Peter Sutherland says the homogeneity of European Union states should be undermined.
      7. 2015 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (The Fugitive Whites Act) is promulgated.
      8. 2017 Charlottesville pro-whites are denied their constitutional rights to speech and peaceable assembly by anti-white thugs and police.
      9. 2018 European Council President Donald Tusk says mass migration to Europe must continue and a “solution” is needed to “put an end to” Europeans objecting to this genocide.
  • What (or who) do you think are the greatest threats to the US?
    1. America was founded by a group of white nationalists as a white homeland for “ourselves and our posterity.” The first Immigration Act of 1790 limited naturalization to “free white persons.” The greatest threat to ourselves and our posterity is deliberate policies of white genocide and the people who push such policies. It is hilarious to believe you can have white civilization without white people. Any nation based on a set of words cannot allow any serious questioning of those words. Therefore, it cannot allow free speech. Since diversity and freedom are incompatible, the greatest threat to freedom is multiracialism.
  • The Fight White Genocide Project has become a topic of discussion across various platforms, including being a topic of discussion at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. To what do you attribute your success in making this a topic of discussion?
    1. Ask the APSA why they chose to talk about us.
    2. Relentless repetition of the simple truth of the ongoing global program of white genocide.
  • Do you believe that the election of President Trump is beneficial to your overall goals? If so, why? If not, why not?
    1. Hillary Clinton likely would have put the throttle to the floor on white genocide. Trump may occasionally tap the brakes.
    2. The election of Donald Trump is an indication that white people are starting to come out of their brainwashed, demoralized, self-hating state.
    3. In office is not in power. Conventional politics is largely a sideshow. We mostly use Trump to draw attention to what we have to say. Trump didn’t embolden us if that’s what you’re trying to get at.
  • A recent article on your website seems to be somewhat critical of President Trump’s recent statements, but others seem supportive of President Trump’s policies – do you think President Trump believes that white genocide is occurring?
    1. We don’t know, but Trump did retweet a tweet from someone whose Twitter handle included “white genocide” as Hillary Clinton felt compelled to point out in her “deplorables” speech.
  • What have been your most effective tools for promoting you project/goals?
    1. The terms, talking points and narratives which expose the anti-whites’ lies, contradictions and their anti-whitism.
  • Do you believe that the current political environment will assist you in achieving these goals? If so, why? If not, why not?
    1. Everything the anti-whites are saying, doing, and trying to do today proves our points.
  • Do you support the creation of PLE’s (Pioneer Little Europe) or some other form of white sanctuary such as New Albion, Maine as a way to slow white genocide?
    1. When whites flee to escape “diversity”, they are chased down and the anti-whites in power force them to accept non-whites.
    2. We demand a completely free and open discussion of white genocide without threats of violence, imprisonment, or job loss.
    3. We demand the right to speak out on behalf of white interests without being shouted down or subjected to university censorship, social media censorship, deplatforming, heckler’s veto, attacks by anti-white terror squads (“antifa”) or police stand downs. Our Paypal account was shut down. Our Facebook and Twitter accounts are routinely suspended. We can’t even lease a billboard!
    4. It’s disingenuous to ask people for solutions to a problem you can be fired or (in Europe) imprisoned for talking about. That’s like asking someone in the Soviet Union in 1936 “What’s your solution to Stalin?”
    5. Pro-whites didn’t cause white genocide, anti-whites did. It’s only fair to ask THEM how they are going to clean up THEIR mess.
    6. AFTER pro-whites have free speech, we’ll be glad to talk about solutions to white genocide.
  • What are your favorite sources for news, or what news sources do you consider credible?
    1. When CNN characterizes a call to burn down the suburbs as “calling for peace”, they have certainly destroyed their own credibility.
    2. Any reporter who uses the term “supremacist” without a shred of evidence that the people they are making that libelous accusation against want to supremacize anybody has certainly destroyed their own credibility.
    3. Any reporter who engages in schoolyard name-calling by saying that anyone who disagrees with the Religion of Political Correctness is a racist, nazi, bigot has certainly destroyed their own credibility.
  • You are one of the most prominent female voices in the pro-white movement – have you experienced any difficulties as a woman in a sea of male voices? Do you think more women will become active leaders in the movement?
    1. Being a pro-white woman has afforded me more of a platform. I have not experienced any difficulties working with the men. The male dissidents in our group understand the power of women and we have sought to use that power on many occasions with our various videos.
    2. We are seeking to empower both men and women but as the mass consensus changes it is certain that more women will take the lead.
  • After the death of Professor Whitaker, what was your biggest challenge in continuing with his efforts? Do you think that the BUGS Swarm can continue/thrive?
    1. Bob’s legacy continues. In hundreds of articles and audios he laid out a worldview far more in line with reality than the official worldview and he laid out a strategy for saving white people. He doesn’t need to be alive to have an enormous impact on political discourse. His work is more well known than ever and his tactics are repeated more and more every day.
    2. With or without Bob, it’s crazy to think a whole race of people will just allow themselves to be destroyed without a struggle.
  • You mention that he was your mentor in “practical politics” – what does practical politics mean to you and how do you approach it?
    1. Practical politics means changing public opinion. It means discrediting the anti-white system by repeatedly pointing out its lies, its contradictions, and its anti-whitism.
  • Are there any particular speakers or authors beyond Professor Whitaker (classic or contemporary) that you admire or believe have done good work in identity theory?
    1. Talking about “identity theory” is a way to imply that whites don’t exist so its OK to get rid of them.
    2. When anti-whites talks about white privilege or white supremacy or “whites stole America” they certainly don’t regard race as a theory. We accept the anti-whites’ definition of race, of white, and we agree with them that races can own land. We’re not going to spend any time defining these terms that the anti-whites have already defined.
    3. Whites have a right to exist. Whites have as much right to homelands and self-determination as every other race. We’re not going to spend any time justifying our basic human rights.
  • What else would you like people to know about your ideology, your group, your goals?
    1. We would like to inform them that White Self-hatred is Sick!!!
    2. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
    3. Please visit our site and consider making a donation.


Craft for Breaking the Anti-White Siege

By Bob Whitaker – Originally posted on his first website National

Annihilation by Assimilation

Nobody is saying that Africa needs diversity.

Nobody is saying that Asia needs diversity.

They are already 100% diverse.

People are only telling white children in white countries that they need diversity.

White countries will be 100% diverse when there are no white people left.

Diversity is a code-word for the genocide of white people.

Every white country on earth is supposed to become multicultural and multiracial.

Every white country is expected to end its own race and end its own culture. No one asks that of ANY non-white country.

The Netherlands is as crowded as Japan, Belgium is as crowded as Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve the RACE problem by bringing in millions of third-worlders and assimilating and intermarrying with them.

Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and assimilate with them.

Immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used against the white race.

All this immigration and intermarriage is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries.

Anti-white is called anti-racist, but it leads to the disappearance of one race and only one race, the white race. The real aim of anti-racism is to wipe out the white race or make it a minority anywhere it exists.

It is genocide.

Would a Black Line Go Unnoticed?

What if the same “anti-racist” policy that is at the heart of World Opinion today were applied to black countries?

Anti-whites insist on non-white immigration into white countries that have not adequately mixed to be called brown.

An example of the policy reversed would be if World Opinion split the island of Santo Domingo into two categories, the Dominican Republic, which is mixed race, and Haiti, which is black.

If the same policy currently applied to white countries were applied to Haiti, Haiti would be forced to be “ready for immigration,” as they are saying of Eastern Europe. The anti-white policy reversed would divide every island in the Caribbean into “black” and “mixed enough.”

The American Virgin Islands are definitely black enough to fall inside the Black Line and World Opinion would demand they bring in non-black immigrants AND assimilate with them. In contrast, Puerto Rico, if it were independent, would be considered “brown enough” to lie outside the Black Line and immigration would not be forced on the theory that it was mixed with enough light-skinned people to pass.

The Black Line would run between the coast of Africa and Madagascar and also be somewhere in the Sahara and about the top of Ethiopia. World Opinion would demand that all of the countries within the Black Line have non-black immigration forced upon them so that they were mixed with enough light-skinned people to be considered the “proper” shade of brown.

What are the chances that the Black Line would go unnoticed if every single strip of land inside it, as in the case of the divided island of Santo Domingo, were the focus of a world-wide “anti-racist” campaign?

What if the attitude of World Opinion would be instantly hostile toward any country considered “too black”?

What sane black man would not object to this on the grounds of the genocide of black people?

Genocide is Worse than Discrimination

Doing away with whites is not idealistic; it is the sort of thing a lot of people got hanged for.

Certainly we cannot discuss future racial policy until a free discussion, and I mean totally free discussion, has been allowed on the present policy of demanding that All white countries and ONLY white countries be open to massive third-world immigration and forced into assimilation, with assimilation meaning intermarriage and an end of what THEY call the white race.

Until we get the basic message of white genocide across, we cannot go on to say that genocide is considered a far, far more serious crime than discrimination. The idea that a plan to completely get rid of a non-black race is worse than putting black people at the back of a bus would meet screams of resentment and bring out the Thought Police.

But we are faced with the utter destruction of what THEY call white people when there is immigration or punishment to be inflicted. THEY have set the precedents when it comes to discrimination.

If mere discrimination is cause for affirmative action, genocide is far more so. Which means that the program of doing away with all white people to the point where Europe and America are to be majority non-white this century requires a lot more than merely changing this policy. It calls for affirmative action at a far higher level to make up for this criminal behavior.

It will call for affirmative action so extreme that it is as alien to this genocidal age as the mention of hiring blacks over whites would have been when slavery was the issue.

And slavery is a lesser crime than genocide.

Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White Countries for Everyone

There will still be Africans in Africa. There will still be Asians in Asia. But my race is set to be blended out of existence through mass immigration and forced assimilation.

That’s genocide.

This is happening in ALL white countries and ONLY white countries.

This is genocide through racial replacement.

Wake up and fight the system!

Robert Whitaker

There are two kinds of people, those with hearts and minds in alignment, and those who trade deference for pay, done solely for personal advantage.

However, do not be quick to praise those whose commitments and loyalties are genuine, for they may nevertheless serve resentments and objects that are unworthy, dangerous in their power to lead others astray.

But a small minority are different. Not only are their hearts and minds aligned, their loyalty is to the simple and obvious truth tragically unsaid: the greatest evils of any age are denied and unrecognized.

These are our real leaders. This is Robert Whitaker.



“White privilege” is a code word for White Genocide


We must also cleanse our American soul of its white male privilege,” says Michael Moore.

What Michael Moore really means is that America must cleanse itself of its white males, and of its other whites too.

Michael Moore is an anti-white who supports White Genocide that’s being carried out in white countries world wide by massive third world immigration and forced assimilation.

Japan doesn’t have to be cleansed of its “Japanese privilege,” nor China of its “Chinese privilege.” Anti-whites aren’t interested in cleansing Japan of Japanese or China of Chinese.

What anti-whites are interested in is making whites feel guilty and demoralized so whites won’t resist the cleansing of whites from white countries. That’s why anti-whites attack whites for their supposed “privilege” and for anything else they can dream up.

A quick look at supposed “white privilege” in majority white countries today:

If a non-white is hired over a better qualified white to enlarge the size of a firm’s non-white work force, where is the white privilege in that? I see non-white privilege.

Free speech is supposed to be a right in this country, but actually it’s a privilege given with expansive liberality to blacks and other non-whites, and denied with strict enforcement to whites. In public meetings, blacks can make just about any racial statement with any amount of anger or arrogance they care to display, whereas whites must confine themselves to a strict and decorous liturgy of racial self-abasement that furthers White Genocide.

White self-hatred is sick, but if you’re white and don’t display white self-hatred when required, you’ll be in serious trouble.

There’s “white privilege” for you. The right to, at best, remain silent in the face of non-white privilege, and to remain silent in the face of White Genocide.

There’s black privilege, Chinese privilege, white privilege, Hispanic privilege, etc. — in multiracial America the races vie for privilege and each can succeed in establishing some circumstances in which it is either legally or de facto privileged.

But which “privilege” is attacked as the one that’s real, and why?

Only “white privilege,” because whites must be kept subdued for White Genocide to be carried out.

“White privilege” is a code word for White Genocide.


, , , , , , ,


StormFront Radio January 31st with Jeff and Laura

Hey Guys,

Jeff and I joined Father Francis aka Frank from TN on StormFront radio on Wednesday morning.

We had a great chat. It was good practice for Jeff and I. We spoke about the current Proposition Nation and call for “unity”. How there can be no free speech with such a proposition and any decent will be silenced/censored. We spoke about activism, pointing out the contradictions and how a consistent message works!

Let us know your feedback. We look forward to getting our message out there on SF Radio as often as we can.