For almost twenty years I have been repeating our earliest Mantra:

“If Communism is so great, why did every Communist country have to build a WALL to keep its people in?”

I had used that simple truth to cut down every pseudo intellectual who showed any empathy with Communism.

I had no mercy. Many a time I said, “For the seventeenth time, if Communism is good, why has every single communists state had to build a prison wall to keep its people in?

This worked very well behind the Iron Curtain when it was there, and it is the kind of work I did there which helped take it down.

It worked here, it worked there. But not one conservative publication ever used it ONCE!

Now they have just worked out what they consider an answer.

They have been working over three decades to come up with SOMETHING. Only respectable conservatives have prevented my straight common sense answer from being used.

AT ALL!!!!!

This may sound familiar. David Duke was moving up on the Louisiana State Senate seat. But even the media featured the words that explained the situation. the words I had worked out that put the situation in the exact terms that voguers saw it:

White Genocide.

But no one among respectable conservatives has ever given me ANY credit or, the real point, stopped trying to impress people long enough to SAY what everyone SAW.

Ann Coulter explained this repeatedly as “why people hate the Republicans so much.”

Coulter puts it in plain English: Whites are sick of being knocked round and watching those who claim to speak for them APOLOGIZING to the bullies, declaring how much they RESPECT those bullies. “Talking,” As the Texan put it, “Like a bunch of queers.”

And this Trump-Coulter message, “borrowed” as usual from Bob — and don’t hold your breath waiting for me to get any credit is finally being discovered by its targets.

That is why, after over a generation, one of my earliest arguments is finally being addressed by them.

Why do Communists always have to build walls to keep people in?

I saw the first BBC version of their answer on a BBC show about Hadrian’s Wall.

“Why did they build Hadrian’s Wall?” asked the narrator. And he gave the new standard reply:

“Walls are built to keep people in and to keep people out” So he smiled and said, “Walls are built to keep some people in and some people out.”

“Communist walls were built like all walls to keep some people in and some people out.” This became the Party Line.

So just the other day a woman, desperate to be sophisticated, repeated that line about the Berlin Wall: “It was built to keep some people out and some people in.”

I can cite people were shot down in cold blood trying to get across that wall. I have never heard of anyone who needed the guards there stopping people to get in.

But any answer to the Party Line is always cut off.

This is hard to argue because it says that the entire world leftist machine developed an answer to one man.

That is an answer no one on National Review or Stormfront wants to have HEAR, much the less accepted. When it comes to their rejecting the way putting things that has turned regular people against our rulers, any discussion of it is humiliating. You stand a better chance of hearing about it on anti-white and openly pro-Communist media than you do on those who call themselves pro-white or anti-Communist.

In fact, the only outlet that gives me what I consider credit is the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).

A lot of people wonder why ONLY the SPLC never fails to recite THE ENTIRE MANTRA in full.

I will explain this, and a few other things, in the next editions of WhitakerOnline.com, aka BUGS.

Yes, Dammit, US!!!!!!!!!!!

For at least a decade one of our mantras has been “Political Correctness” is not LIKE a religion, it IS a religion, and we developed that into several approaches we made successful.

I was just reading a book that included a description of cargo cults, and made THIS general observation from that.

Cargo cults resulted from a very close and shrewd observations by natives of the islands that became air bases in the Pacific during World War II.

And even I, an Evil Racist if ever there was one, do not laugh at them the way more “sophisticated” observers do.  They saw what they saw, and they acted on it.

The islanders had almost no knowledge of these strangers who came FLYING into their land.

So the natives did what the most advanced scientist would do:

They observed the strangers’ activities very carefully and tried to learn from it.

The whites called all those riches “cargo,” and their aim was to get cargo of their own.

Their first observation, AND IT WAS PERFECTLY ACCURATE — was that the outsiders did not PRODUCE a single bit of all that “cargo” that kept flooding in.

And they were dead accurate.

So how DID the strangers get all that precious “cargo?”

First of all, as the natives ACCURATELY noted, the strangers did not PRODUCE any of it.

So the natives who wanted “cargo” did what the people who actually GOT the cargo did.

They put things that looked like earphones in their ears.

They cleared landing areas for the mysterious flying machine to land in.

They put up strings leading to the earphones.

And they waited.

In real history, when Lenin’s Bolsheviks took over Russia, they did exactly the same basic thing: They set up offices and sent people out to redistribute the cargo, which we call production. And they were astonished to find that there wasn’t any production.

This is where Marxism starts out. A far as they can tell things are produced and they just need to distribute it.

This is insane. It is insane but it is also Marxism.

The Marxism system collapsed because it never learnt to produce anything.

I am now reading, for the secondtime, a history of the Romanov Dynasty which was reviewed and recommended by National Review.

Bill Rusher was the original publisher of National Review for over half a century.

NR is the best example of political targeting I have ever seen.

Its job is to take an incredibly wobbly target and stay with it. NR must never promote anyone who really offends the left, in a period when the correct words for a group has gone from Negro to Blacks to African-Americans in such a bewildering amount of changes, never actually defined, that leaves those who qualify as “political commentators” in a permanent condition fo uncertain fear.

But NR consistently takes exactly the position allowed by the establishment some people still think is a secret.

Oh, you gotta believe that, too.

NR is so good at this that it can get just the right position out of writers on sport, history, something they refer to as “science,” you name it, they have already scouted out the personnel.

So I am now reading a NR-recommended history of the Romanovs.

To sum up my point, when they come to the freeing of the Russians Serfs in the 1860s, there is a footnote. I rushed to that footnote with great expectations and was not disappointed.

It was single paragraph with a set of statements about Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation that was a quick summation.

Every single statement it made was wrong. It got the wrong number of slaves, wrong YEAR, and so forth.

I am the only professional writer who will mention it.

Ever.

Book – History of the Romanovs: 1613-1918 by Montefiore