Posts Tagged Charlottesville

“We are Morons” doesn’t fight White Genocide

“We are Morons” finally achieved its dream in Charlottesville: a torchlight parade, with a Nazi flag and a chant about Joos!

We are Morons won White hearts and minds everywhere with its always seductive message, “we are naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews.”

Our brave brothers’ guiding slogan, ineptly adapted from Bedford Forrest, is “Get there lastest with the leastest.” A true Moron always accepts his enemy’s chosen battleground, especially if his enemy has arrived there “fustest with the mostest” 60 years ago and has been fortifying that battleground ever since.

What did the display of idiocy at C’ville do for the fight against White Genocide?

“Allow us to distract you!” screamed our Moron brothers as they immolated themselves on the upturned stakes of the enemy.

Or if our intrepid brothers prefer:

“Let us demonstrate our utter inability to understand!” screamed our Morons as they bravely impaled themselves on their own raised standards.

Of course they can’t see themselves hanging skewered. They think they stormed the fortress.

I greatly admire and cherish their enviable bravery, and I despair of their stupidity.

Next time, our brave Morons, don’t carry ANYTHING except signs, banners, and fliers with the memes below and the Mantra beneath:

 

A flier with Mantra memes:

Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries for EVERYBODY!

Massive immigration and forced assimilation is called genocide when it’s done in Tibet.
When it’s done in White countries it’s called “diversity.”
Diversity is a code word for White Genocide.

.
Our schools teach White students that they are immoral and contemptible if they don’t support White Genocide.
Their teachers never tell them, “White self-hatred is SICK!!!
.
Their teachers claim to be anti-racist. What they are is anti-White.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
.
No school, no town, no country is allowed to be White.
“We have found some White people, chase ’em down, bring in minorities…”
“Diversity” means chasing down the last White person.

 

The Mantra:

ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

 

~~~~~~

 

To our Morons and their enablers:

White Genocide is the greatest crime that anti-Whites commit against Whites.

White Genocide is the crime that anti-Whites are least able to defend against.

If you tack other stuff onto White Genocide, anti-Whites can make the other stuff the issue.

Your other stuff has already been armed by anti-whites to blow you away when you touch it.

For the benefit of the observing White masses, hammer anti-Whites over and over and over with their crime of White Genocide, exclusively.

 

This article is also posted at White GeNOcide Project where BUGSers and visitors to BUGS can post comments to it.

Horus and his two guests on This Week in White Genocide 18 were at the C’ville event and have an excellent discussion of it.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

36 Comments

REPOST: First Amendment to the United States Constituition

Original post with comments here – http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/09/17/first-amendment-to-the-united-states-constitution/

By Bob Whitaker:
“… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO PEACEABLY ASSEMBLE, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

There is not just a right to free speech. There is a right to hold meetings, ESPECIALLY meetings of people who are called “extremists.”

Approved people have no reason to NEED such a right to be specified.

I hear a lot about free speech for the big media, but nobody mentions the right to peacefully assemble.

This is in the Constitution because the people who wrote it were themselves threatened by death for meeting for “extremist” purposes.

It does NOT say “the right to assemble for a politically correct purpose.”

The usual way of forbidding our meetings, especially on campus, is by saying that, while police will protect anyone ELSE from being harassed, “they cannot protect people from violence” if the meetings are about heretical or extreme purposes. So our meetings are routinely forbidden because THOSE WHO ARE NOT MEETING PEACEABLY will cause trouble. So the right to peaceably assemble is thrown out because thugs won’t like the meetings.

Considering they, the Founding Fathers, put in the first amendment because they themselves had been extremists and were threatened with thug violence, the idea that a group loses its right to free speech and assembly because THE OTHER SIDE might get violent with them would have been just what British authorities USED up to 1775.

When the Founding Fathers were talking “Treason” in 1775, someone who said it was OK to ban their meetings because they might cause riots — which they did — would not be looked upon as sane by the people who wrote the first amendment.

Allowing heretical views and extremist views AND THE RIGHT TO ASSEMBLE despite thugs was PRECISELY the reason for the first amendment.

Fortunately, no one brings it up.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

, , ,

28 Comments