B. U. G. S.

“how is promoting racial segregation NOT racist?”

How is a world without White people NOT genocide?

“White Girls Club (in NJ) is RACIST!”

Is it “racist” when Africans start a social group?
Is it “racist” when Mexicans start a social group?
Is it “racist” when Asians start a social group?

Of course not, and why should it be? But, it immediately becomes problematic when a member of my race, the white race, wants to stand up and be counted as proud of their ancestry and heritage. Those who oppose any semblance of European (read: white) community say they are “anti-racist” Intelligentsia brought to save the Earth with Diversity and Tolerance. What they promote is white genocide. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white

Asgardian, I think I’d do this:

You don’t want to talk about the fact that ALL White countries and ONLY White countries are being flooded with non-whites, and whites are forced to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white!

Demanding ‘Diversity’ is just the anti-white’s way of advocating white genocide.

I have a question, how do you know when to stop interrogating the anti-White on Youtube? When they keep replying over and over again, sometimes multiple replies at once.

How do I know when to back off?

@Peter Conttontail I know it’s not about “winning” a debate but I just don’t know when to stop replying. Surely there is some sort of boundary so it doesn’t ruin your mantras.

Do I just keep going until the anti-White stops replying?

This is just a little thought experiment I had but I was thinking of using the phrase “white areas” instead of “white countries.” The basic idea is to prevent the whole “this or that is not a white country” from popping up. After all, anti-whites deny every country is a white country but they can hardly deny white people living there. And it is white people living ANYWHERE they have a problem with. I think it had the added benefit of protecting whites who are not in white countries. I’ll give this little idea a try and see how it works. Here is an example of how I intend to use it:

In the 60’s, anti-whites forced ALL and ONLY white areas to bring in millions of non-whites. Then anti-whites forced ALL and ONLY white people to “integrate” or face consequences for being “naziswhowantokill6millionjews.” Now anti-whites are praising and counting down the days till ALL and ONLY white children are minorities and extinct EVERYWHERE. That makes it genocide. “Anti-racist” is a codeword for anti-white.

I always say, “majority White countries”, just to avoid the whole White nation argument. Majority White does not imply possession.

@ Skippy01,

When an anti-white calls me a “supremacist”, I’ll usually respond with this mini-mantra:

A white person who loves their race and wants to see it survive into the future is deemed a “HATER” “RACIST” “WHITE SUPREMACIST” “NAZI” by the anti-white Establishment.
–
Meanwhile, the anti-white Establishment and its supporters are doing their best to eliminate white children via MASS non-White immigration and “assimilation” in EVERY & ONLY White countries.
–
This IS White geNOcide!
Anti-racist is a code word for Anti-White.

I might also say something like this:

You don’t call a African person who believes in having African homelands a “supremacist”.

You don’t call an Asian person who believes in having Asian homelands a “supremacist”.

You say that to White people and ONLY White people.

You say you’re anti-racist. You’re really anti-white.

Your double standard further exemplifies the fact that anti-racist IS a code word for anti-white.

How can one be a white supremacist if his crime is that he wants nothing to do with non-whites? How can you be a white supremacist when there is nobody around but white people?

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2013/11/03/racism-out-white-supremacy-in-i-wonder-why/#comments