Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with
Post on the internet Working Thread

Debate advice and style first 909 posts

Home Forums BUGS SWARM Debate advice and style first 909 posts


Viewing 20 posts - 881 through 900 (of 911 total)
  • Author
  • #41123
    John White

    “how is promoting racial segregation NOT racist?”

    First of all, the anti-Whies always lie. They are not against racism. They are only against White people having a place to live.

    They say they oppose “racial segregation” but they spend all the time demonizing White people of the past that went to live in other races’ land.

    Were the Amerindians “racist” when they fought the European conquerors? The anti-Whites always say that the Americas “belong” to the so-called “native” Americans (that is, the Amerindians who migrated there from Asia, but anyway) and that Whites should “go back to Europe”. According to anti-Whites, that’s not racist at all…

    So, again, anti-Whites do NOT oppose racial segregation. They ONLY oppose a world with White children in it.

    Peter Cottontail

    “how is promoting racial segregation NOT racist?”

    How is a world without White people NOT genocide?

    Daniel Genseric

    “It’s hard to see racism when you’re white.”

    It’s hard to see white genocide when you’re anti-white

    Daniel Genseric

    “White Girls Club (in NJ) is RACIST!”

    Is it “racist” when Africans start a social group?
    Is it “racist” when Mexicans start a social group?
    Is it “racist” when Asians start a social group?

    Of course not, and why should it be? But, it immediately becomes problematic when a member of my race, the white race, wants to stand up and be counted as proud of their ancestry and heritage. Those who oppose any semblance of European (read: white) community say they are “anti-racist” Intelligentsia brought to save the Earth with Diversity and Tolerance. What they promote is white genocide. What they are is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white


    Jack Brutal 12 minutes ago
    Did Hitler create gas chambers from day one of his attempts to kill off any non-Aryans who opposed his regime? NO.
    Did Hitler ever say he was going to kill anyone from the beginning? NO.
    He established himself as a respectable politician who was trying to bring Germany back to its former glory – which is EXACTLY what you’re trying to pretend at doing for white people. In reality, you just care about people who are like yourself.
    White anti-whites oppose your regime, so you’ll kill them.
    Reply · in reply to Thor Odinson (Show the comment)

    Thor Odinson 1 second ago
    We care about the WHITE RACE in its entirety. We want to STOP WHITE GENOCIDE nothing more nothing less. The education is there its FREE. The only reason you mention nazis is because im white.
    Reply · in reply to Jack Brutal (Show the comment)

    Thor Odinson 16 minutes ago
    I dont see any gas chambers on the horizon lol, and no us pro whites dont and will not deal steel, we weave velvet and you spread grey goo, thank you for your contributions in helping to fight white genocide.

    Let me have it dont mince words i appreciate brutal honesty

    Henry Davenport

    Asgardian, I think I’d do this:

    You don’t want to talk about the fact that ALL White countries and ONLY White countries are being flooded with non-whites, and whites are forced to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

    You don’t want to talk about the fact that that’s genocide by U.N. Convention:

    “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”

    You say you’re anti-racist. What you ore is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white!


    Yea…ill think ill take your approach. Thank you 🙂

    Daniel Genseric

    Demanding ‘Diversity’ is just the anti-white’s way of advocating white genocide.


    Good to build one’s position by showing the audience that the anti-whites are stuck in the past. Like so:

    The “conservative movement” (like the other mainstream political charlatans) is still stuck in the 1960s, telling itself that the ’65 Immigration Act won’t change anything.

    “The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs.” – Senator Ted Kennedy, speaking to the Senate regarding the introduction of the Immigration Act of 1965


    I have a question, how do you know when to stop interrogating the anti-White on Youtube? When they keep replying over and over again, sometimes multiple replies at once.

    How do I know when to back off?

    Peter Cottontail

    EWR, make points to the audience. Don’t worry about winning a debate. There is no formula, just keep hammering somewhere.


    @Peter Conttontail I know it’s not about “winning” a debate but I just don’t know when to stop replying. Surely there is some sort of boundary so it doesn’t ruin your mantras.

    Do I just keep going until the anti-White stops replying?


    EWR, I try to limit myself to 1 or 2 replies now. Arguing with one Anti-White for hours doesn’t get the exposure you could get posting on 20 other spots in the same time frame.

    They will never admit you were right. If they say something really hateful about Whites or say we deserve genocide, that is always the perfect time to stop. Let everyone see what they really are.

    It can be really hard to walk away, but look at it this way – they look like fools trying too hard to deny they are anti-White


    This is just a little thought experiment I had but I was thinking of using the phrase “white areas” instead of “white countries.” The basic idea is to prevent the whole “this or that is not a white country” from popping up. After all, anti-whites deny every country is a white country but they can hardly deny white people living there. And it is white people living ANYWHERE they have a problem with. I think it had the added benefit of protecting whites who are not in white countries. I’ll give this little idea a try and see how it works. Here is an example of how I intend to use it:

    In the 60’s, anti-whites forced ALL and ONLY white areas to bring in millions of non-whites. Then anti-whites forced ALL and ONLY white people to “integrate” or face consequences for being “naziswhowantokill6millionjews.” Now anti-whites are praising and counting down the days till ALL and ONLY white children are minorities and extinct EVERYWHERE. That makes it genocide. “Anti-racist” is a codeword for anti-white.

      Apartheit Response

    Anti-White: White people invented Apartheit.

    Reply: American Indian reservations are also “Apartheit regimes”, but anti-Whites only ever use the word “Apartheit” on White people.

    Thanks Bob (if there is silence, start asking yourself why).


    I always say, “majority White countries”, just to avoid the whole White nation argument. Majority White does not imply possession.


    Has anyone got a solid, tested answer to the “white supremacist” name-calling yet?

    “Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white” flows perfectly against “racist” but not against “white supremacist”.


    @ Skippy01,

    When an anti-white calls me a “supremacist”, I’ll usually respond with this mini-mantra:

    A white person who loves their race and wants to see it survive into the future is deemed a “HATER” “RACIST” “WHITE SUPREMACIST” “NAZI” by the anti-white Establishment.

    Meanwhile, the anti-white Establishment and its supporters are doing their best to eliminate white children via MASS non-White immigration and “assimilation” in EVERY & ONLY White countries.

    This IS White geNOcide!
    Anti-racist is a code word for Anti-White.

    I might also say something like this:

    You don’t call a African person who believes in having African homelands a “supremacist”.

    You don’t call an Asian person who believes in having Asian homelands a “supremacist”.

    You say that to White people and ONLY White people.

    You say you’re anti-racist. You’re really anti-white.

    Your double standard further exemplifies the fact that anti-racist IS a code word for anti-white.


    OK that gives me something to try instead of nothing. Much appreciated.


    How can one be a white supremacist if his crime is that he wants nothing to do with non-whites? How can you be a white supremacist when there is nobody around but white people?

Viewing 20 posts - 881 through 900 (of 911 total)
  • The topic ‘Debate advice and style first 909 posts’ is closed to new replies.

Comments are closed.