B. U. G. S.

I like it. But, does it work?

“their genocide of jews”

The last thing we need is a discussion about this on this forum, so I hope dearly to not start one. But I need to say that even if I regarded that phrase as an accurate expression, I’ve been beaten half to death in my life by the big club of the Holocaust®, and so I could never bring myself to use anything about it in service of my efforts here. It pains me every time I see others doing it, but I’m not going to try to talk anyone else out of it. But I will need to write a post like this just occasionally to relieve myself.

I’m with HD on this one. It only took a few hours until someone wanted to argue about joos on this thread.

Edit: That is *Historians* with an capital ‘H.’

HD-I am with you. I try to avoid using the J words when i swarm. However sometimes its a good tactic IF you suspect the anti-White is a J word. They always take the bait and reveal their true colours. Then you just hammer them over the head with it.

Deleted

@Roderick

Terminology is territory.

‘Diversity’ is a codeword for less White People.

‘Community’ is a code word for non-white exclusive.

‘Tolerance’ is a code word for Anti-White prejudice.

‘Dialogue’ is a code word for suppress Pro-Whites.

‘Coexist’ is a code word for White People “Resentful”.

‘Non-Minority’ is a code word for Evil White majority.

Own the territory.

-Note- I’d make a few more about ‘privilege’ and stuff too. This sort of thing might make a good viral marketing campaign for bugs.

Nevermind, I see you have Dialogue listed. Great work.

@clovis

Exactly,

The more I read Bob, Orwell, and Solzhenitsyn, I see the ‘hidden think’ in the enemy’s cryptography. This is a little example of what you can do with some Mantra Think.

“White Entitlement”

In short, if one is able to use mantra thinking you can break it down fairly easily.

“White” here is refereed in the 2nd person to a man or woman of European decent. It’s speaking from a non-white ‘outsiders’ point of view to a White man or woman.

“Entitlement”, is extremely cynical here, again coming from a non-white ‘outsiders’ view. It’s used as a way to defame and demoralize a White man or woman about their heritage, nation, history, or current political/economic standing in their own nation.

Teaching them that if they enjoy the current status they have it is far over their capacity and economic standing to attain it and they have only attained it through a ‘Evil White System of Exploitation’ against the ‘downtrodden non-white outsiders’.

It is very cynical because it essentially tells a White man or Woman that “Hey Whitey, you don’t deserve what you have, stop your clinging to the past which your proud ancestors left for you, your people enslaved others in evil imperialism/capitalism/slavery/oppression/segregation, and don’t deserve any of what you have!”

You can synthesize a ‘code word’ of what it means rather easily when you break it down.