B. U. G. S.

@Wretched White Rabbit: I wouldn’t say “you aren’t really antiracist” because that makes it sound as if we are the true anti-racists.

@Anotherone: As recently as the 1950’s, Blacks (Negroes) had to ride in the back of the bus in some places, could not sit down at White lunch counters, etc. Of course, Whites could not safely enter Negro areas either, so so they had Black Privilege in there areas, and we had White privilege in ours. You seem to be trying to rewrite the past to make it seem as if White countries have always been egalitarian, something like a Rainbow Confederate. I know that that’s not your intention, but that’s how it comes off.

@ Carloman

I’m not seeing how the line is “egalitarian”. You can also say “Anti-racist” is a code word for Anti-White is “egalitarian”. The line has nothing to do with history. The line’s only use and purpose is to have a response for when the Anti-Whites use the “white privilege” meme. It’s not intended to be used as often as “anti-racist is a code word for anti-white” or “diversity is a code word for white genocide”. It’s just a quick response like any of the other responses you’ll find at the Bugs Buddy site.

AnotherOne, you just confirmed to me that you think the effectiveness of a meme is whether news and jewsers over at sf and daily stormer begin using it.

Are you ok man? I’m starting to doubt whether continuing any discussion with you is even worth my time.

You claim that I only listen to Bob? If you actually read through my comments properly both here and on the recent blog article you would know that Bob’s suggested line is very similar (nearly identical) to lines that I have been using for many months now. Lines that work. You are misrepresenting me when you accuse me of listening to Bob religiously.

EDIT: I’m not saying the anti-white conspiracy theory line is bad – I’m saying it is not the best line we can use. As for the line spreading on sf and those other places, that’s a good thing, but certainly not a good measure of a line’s effectiveness.

I think that White Privilege is an anti-white meme and that it should be left alone, responding to it is basically rolling in their grey goo. You all are aware that in the Mantra, non-whites are called third-worlders, correct? So, with a little bit of mental elbow-grease we can work our way up to understanding that it is the white countries that are the first-world. Yes, non-whites want to get in, and they also want white women too, but does that mean I am going to let them have it? (Of course not)

Think about the white privilege meme for just a moment, it is about white vs. non-white. Privileged vs. the un-privileged. But B.U.G.S. doesn’t want to have that conversation. It only helps to put pro-white vs. anti-white, and especially if that anti-white is a white anti-white traitor.

If you’re talking to them, and they force White Privilege (which probably shouldn’t happen since anti-whites are weak and yellow), but if they do, then perhaps you should agree with it. Then ask the anti-white “Are you going to use that as a reason to bring in hundreds of millions of non-white third-worlders into ONLY the white countries, then FORCE us to blend and assimilate with them, wiping us out? That’s White Genocide. Are you sure? You don’t want to be an anti-white do you?” Returning a question with a question is good on the battlefield.

Best regards,

J.P.O.

@Benjamin: I’ve been going over in my mind whether we should say that White countries ought to have White Privilege, or reject the whole concept, just as we reject the concept “racism.” On the one hand, the word “privilege” is a perfectly valid concept, unlike “racism,” which was specifically invented to demonize White people. Under the law, citizens have certain privileges and immunities. In Japan, only the Japanese have those privileges and immunities. In a White country, only White people should have them. So I see nothing wrong with the concept as such. But if you think that is too much to explain to people, that it is too much of a distraction, then perhaps we shouldn’t use the term, even though, from a legal perspective, it is correct.

So do you think I should stop saying, “No one complains about Japanese privilege in Japan,” etc.? That has always been one of my favorite comebacks. You are better at getting a feel for what works than I am.

What do you think about, “It’s not a privilege; it’s our birthright”? I’ve used it a few times, but I can’t see what effect it has had.

I like “Fighting White Privilege is a code word for White Genocide,” and also “Even if there is White privilege . . .”

If you get a college type intellectual talking about white privilege, just for fun ask him,”what the hell is a White person?” I did it once, but he did not reply. It was fun, but probably not effective.

I think that weather white privilege exists or not is beside the point. I personally believe it does exist. I also think that any decent society assures privilege for their posterity. That’s exactly why I completely avoid the question of “does it exist?”.

The 2 things I have been trying have been a copy of “In your opinion im racist, you’re only saying that because I’m white…You only say there is white privilege to belittle White people. It feels a little weak, but I think the audience may relate. It doesn’t seem to meet bugster quality to me. Leads to a repetitive cycle of the other poster saying that it is real, and I say that you’re only saying that to belittle…you get the idea.

#2 is something much more aggressive. I speak directly to the audience and write, “It does not matter how much effort or money is put toward equality, it will never be enough for non-Whites. They will not stop until White people are completely wiped out. White privilege is just one more way to justify Genocide of White people.

I have limited experience with #2, but so far people completely give up the White privilege and start to deny the genocide, or start name calling. Does it work? I have no idea. I don’t really know how I’m supposed to gauge the effectiveness of it if it is geared toward the audience. I get a lot of thumbs ups on some posts and lots of thumbs down on the next. Most of the comment sections are removing down clicks.

I feel like denying it exists leads to a big tailgaiting party of weather or not it is real; meanwhile genocide is happening right under our noses.

“Even if I WERE a Nazi or White Supremacist or if there IS White Privilege, how does that justify White Genocide?” – Bob

@ BN. You know how we are constantly saying, “don’t suggest things, go try them”? It great advice, so it took it and thats what I’m doing here.

I have been trying a slightly new introduction to my normal mantra posting due to an observation I have made recently. Specifically, I have observed people supporting the mantra because they are tired of POC not keeping their end of the “multicultural agreement”. It’s like they are more willing to accept the idea of genocide because non-Whites continue to complain about inequality (privilege).

You know how we are constantly saying,”report back your results”? Also what I am doing here.

I appreciate the feedback though. Im sure I can make the same point while changing the wording to focus more on anti-Whites.

You are right that you haven’t seen me posting on the working thread. Most of my posts on the working thread were before you were here, and anymore 95% is just cut and paste from the mini mantra pro. The other 5% is having fun with new stuff, occasionally I will post that on the working thread. Im waiting for the pal talk working page. That would be a hoot!