Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with www.bugsswarm.com?
Post on the internet Working Thread

Do we need to attack "hate" more?

Home › Forums › BUGS SWARM › Do we need to attack "hate" more?

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • 12/25/2013 at 1:46 am #55823
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    Hi everyone,
    I saw Bob’s new update about how the White House has removed the petition on “hate”, but I couldn’t respond to it for some reason.
    My question is, should we be focusing on attacking the term “hate” more?

    Merry White Christmas!

    12/26/2013 at 12:06 am #55837
    -Sentinel-
    Participant

    “Hate Speech is a codeword for White speech.”

    “If I didn’t want the truth to get out, I’d call it ‘Hate’ too.”

    Anti-Whites: “1+1=3”
    Normal Person: No, 1+1=2.
    Anti-Whites: “HATE!”

    12/26/2013 at 7:22 am #55845
    Jason
    Participant

    We need to keep a glossary of terms to destroy and update them regularly.

    Hate, Hate Speech, Diversity, Multiculturalism, Racism, anti-Racism, Political Correctness, Tolerance, Inclusion, Cosmopolitanism, White Privilege, White Guilt, Melting Pot, and more. Please add more.

    These can be terms used either as codewords OR terms like “Nazi” used to since dissent.

    12/26/2013 at 12:17 pm #55847
    JPOutlook
    Participant

    As someone who is interested in Protestant or Reformed Church theology, I’d say that the word W.A.S.P. is used very often in a negative context. Whenever someone uses it, call them on it because they are trying to divide The White Race along ethnic and specific religous lines.

    Secondly, does everyone here agree that white is defined as a person who would define themself by wholly European ancestry? (Not that anyone ‘in the field’ should tailgate such a definiton of ‘white’)

    J.P.O.

    12/26/2013 at 1:50 pm #55851
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Jpo…general wesley Clark defined White nations and people for us.

    12/26/2013 at 5:52 pm #55855
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    Jpo, I’ll keep the W.A.S.P thing in mind to use against anyone who calls me that.

    And yes, White is simply a term that is used interchangeably with European. Someone who is White/European is someone who is wholly of European ancestry.

    12/26/2013 at 7:19 pm #55856
    Cleric_Preston
    Participant

    Everybody knows who a White person is, just like they know who is Asian or Black or mixed.
    Don’t even go down that rabbit hole, you’ll get tripped up everytime.

    “Nobody asks Asians ‘what is an Asian’
    Nobody asks Blacks ‘what is a Black’
    ONLY White people asked such SILLY questions.
    The attempt to destroy in whole or in part, EVERY White country through 3rd World immigration and ‘assimilation’ is GENOCIDE
    ‘Anti-racist’ is a codeword for Anti-White.”

    12/26/2013 at 8:31 pm #55859
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    Cleric, I wasn’t sure what Jpo meant when he asked about the definition of White.

    But yeah, I’d use something like what you suggested if I was talking to an anti-White.

    12/26/2013 at 9:24 pm #55860
    Peter Cottontail
    Participant

    Just be sure to attack only when Hate is used against our race. Let the respectibles fight their own battles when it comes to Hate when discussing gays, religion, feminists etc. Don’t fight their battles until they support us.

    12/27/2013 at 9:50 am #55867
    JPOutlook
    Participant

    That’s what I meant, Mr. Newells.

    “Hate” is only used by very stupid anti-whites and probably should be smothered with “In YOUR OPINION… etc.” The repeater that “Horus the Avenger” designed. All childish name calling should be. And so, when the name calling stops the issue of White Genocide (yes, call it that specifically) can be brought out and then reinforced with the fact that only white history is used to justify it, bring up slavery under the Ottoman turks, bring up the religion of Political Correctness and how it forces forensic experts to pretend race doesn’t exist when they have the facts that prove otherwise, if “diversity” is so wonderful why is it only for whites, people say that a place is “too
    white” never “too brown”, “black”, or “yellow”…

    There are a lot of points that can be made when a debate is taking place. However, for a short confrontation just tell them “You are justifying genocide” Also during a longer debate, tell them “You are justifying genocide” while pointing out that it is only for
    white countries.

    Best regards,

    J.P.O.

    12/27/2013 at 10:16 am #55868
    JPOutlook
    Participant

    @Peter Cottontail

    Pro-white areas are the best places to discuss those topics since, I’m sure, many have noticed that in a lot of places, anti-whites have infiltrated and are using, for example, a traditional religious institution as a front for their political goals. Also, most major faiths have prohibitions against their members being sociopaths… which is what anti-white really are. Sociopaths who don’t care if an entire racial group gets wiped out. The racial issue is, it seems, the best way to point out the deep problem of today’s unsustainable course, therefore the first thing to build consensus around.

    However, it is always a good time to tear
    down the false religion of Political Correctness… Something that, as a Christian, I have especial zeal for! Christianity is the one true faith!


    @Peter     Cottontail

    Would you then call me a “respectable pro-white”?

    L.O.L…

    12/27/2013 at 9:35 pm #55874
    Peter Cottontail
    Participant

    I’m sure I agree with quite a bit of your religious stances but I won’t lift a finger to fight for a respectable. They have lost any semblance of power they might have had in the past. Respectables openly campaign for our genocide.

    Why should respectables benefit from our hammering away the term Hate?

    12/29/2013 at 5:41 pm #55909
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    What about “Anti-hate is a code for anti-White”?

    12/29/2013 at 8:03 pm #55912
    Peter Cottontail
    Participant

    I like it! They say they are against Hate. What they are is anti-White. Anti-Hate is a code word for anti-White.

    12/30/2013 at 5:25 am #55932
    Yankee Rebel
    Participant

    I am glad someone brought up the current buzzword by Anti-Whites, “Hate.” I see it more often than almost any other word being used and I was searching for a Mantra response (I’m still new at this). I like the suggestions made.

    12/30/2013 at 5:48 am #55934
    Jason
    Participant

    I like:

    “Racist” is just a Hate word used against Whites.
    “Racist” is a Hate word used to silence dissent.
    (or some variation)

    and

    The Soviets had ‘freedom of speech’ w/ the exception of anything the Soviets said was “Fascist speech”.
    The Nazis had ‘freedom of speech’ w/ the exception of anything the Nazis said was “Communist speech”.
    The Anti-white establishment has ‘freedom of speech’ w/ the exception of anything the Anti-whites say is “Hate speech”.
    Objecting to the ongoing crime of white race GENOCIDE is “Hate speech”.
    RACIST is a HATE word.

    12/30/2013 at 9:17 am #55942
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    “Hate” is a hate word used by anti-Whites to silence/intimidate any White person who refuses to comply with the genocide of Whites.

    Jason, I like your ones.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.