Does the Mantra express opposition to intermarriage per se, and should we?
Home › Forums › BUGS SWARM › Does the Mantra express opposition to intermarriage per se, and should we?
- This topic has 31 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 9 months ago by Wuntz Moore.
-
AuthorPosts
-
11/10/2018 at 1:21 pm #110838Wuntz MooreKeymaster
Reading over this thread, I’m honestly a little alarmed. I think that one feature of the Mantra that’s not sufficiently appreciated by many of us is the extent to which the Mantra sidesteps to the greatest degree possible all the triggers that anti-whites have planted in whites’ minds, despite the Mantra’s succeeding in illuminating in the very deepest and most effective way the true nature of whites’ present situation!
To illuminate such a truth while at the same time stepping so lightly near all the anti-white mines that have been planted is of course an exquisite achievement.
But now some here appear to think that we should step on the mine of interracial marriage and step on it hard, by God!
Expressing opposition to intermarriage per se is a corruption of the Mantra. Any mention of intermarriage should be in the same context the Mantra puts it in, mass non-white immigration and assimilation, AND should be clear that it’s the AMOUNT of intermarriage resulting from the immigration and assimilation that is the problem, as the Mantra itself makes clear by the phrase in bold:
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
Again, this suggested reply by Bob is great:
“You are saying that this whole program of immigration and assimilation and chasing down every white on earth who wants to live in a white community is just for True Love?”That reply also has the virtue that it doesn’t even include the word “intermarriage.” I’m in partial agreement with Laura’s statement above that discussion of intermarriage is tailgating and so should generally be avoided.
But not always. There needs to be one article where the matter is explicitly laid out, and the article pasted into the OP on this thread is that article.
11/10/2018 at 1:49 pm #110839Wuntz MooreKeymasterThe article (the one pasted into the OP) needs to be read as the average white person will read it, not as an average pro-white (lord help us) might read it.
The average white person is not going to read that article and say, “Oh, this author is just trying to be respectable.”
The unavoidable conditioning of ourselves (unavoidable because we’re human) to the outlooks and feelings of the pro-whites that surround us is the greatest threat to BUGS’ longevity.
~~~
1-28-19 Hopefully my last word on this wretched topic — please, no one send me PMs or emails on this topic.
Part of the genius of the Mantra is the extent to which it steps lightly around all the mines that anti-whites have planted in whites’ brains. To attack intermarriage in isolation, instead of in the context the Mantra puts it in, is to just march right up and stomp on one of those mines.
That’s not the Mantra way.
~~~
1-30-19 The article posted in the OP of this thread was originally posted at White Genocide Project, where its beginning had a few more words: “That’s worth a moment’s diversion, since intermarriage per se is not the problem for us.”
I’ve made that change in the article as it appears in the OP of this thread.
I was happy to discover that the article can still be linked to (as just above) at the archive of WGP created by the wayback machine. The wayback machine doesn’t capture everything, I’ve sadly discovered.
11/26/2018 at 9:17 pm #110847WmWhiteParticipant@WM
Your post does make sense in that a direct attack against interracial marriage ALONE does leave out the WHY this nasty problem exists today. All states had anti miscegenation laws up until the 50’s and 60’s (I believe) but that changed when the GREATEST generation of wimpy cowards helped destroy this country with Forced integration/bussing laws and the 1965 Immigration Act sponsored by “Emanuel Celler’s” of NYC.So here we (white people) are today, almost a minority in the very country our white forefathers founded, battling genocide caused by our own grandparents. So, yes, lets also mention immigration and assimilation when we speak of interracial marriage with the same good arguments given by Bob and Beefcake and you.
I only hope for two things now: that the tide of history is not against us and that this post gets past the censorship of sysop.
01/08/2019 at 2:37 am #110967Sunlit I.ParticipantI think that the ongoing program of white genocide is described by these two sentences from the mantra:
“Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”The mantra refers to genocide of a racial group (whites), which, according to the definition in Article II of the Genocide Convention, means “acts comitted with intent to destroy” it “in whole or in part”.
I don’t think that intermarriage per se amounts to genocide. But the combination mentioned in the mantra does.
01/08/2019 at 2:37 am #110970Sunlit I.ParticipantThe mantra refers to genocide of a racial group (whites), which, according to the definition in Article II of the Genocide Convention, means “acts comitted with intent to destroy” it “in whole or in part”.
Does intermarriage per se amount to genocide? I think it’s the combination mentioned in the mantra that does
02/05/2019 at 1:28 pm #111054XenonianParticipantI’m going to add on to this.
When you look at search results for interracial marriage having to do with White Genocide. There is hardly anything but they will talk about it being genocide on Black people. But not Genocide when done to Whites. Denial is a integral part of each stage of every genocide in history. Diversity means chasing down the last White person. That’s White Genocide.
Should mantra replies to anti-Whites be like: Under international law, imposing any condition on a group of people leading to it’s physical destruction (disappearance) in whole or in part is Genocide. Massive 3rd world immigration and forced assimilation (forcing conditions that leads to interracial marrying) resulting in making whites non-existent is White Genocide.
Is there was was to combine the two sentences together and shorten it? and I usually add a repeater phrase at the end.
02/05/2019 at 1:38 pm #111106LauraKeymasterGenocide: Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.
This deliberate attack on Whites is happening via massive non-white immigration into EVERY White country and ONLY into White countries. It is being led by the anti-white leaders in power. And this attack is set to destroy Our race in whole via assimilation i.e intermarry with all those non-whites.
02/06/2019 at 12:26 pm #111108Sunlit I.ParticipantXenonian, just don’t forget to note that it is being done in ALL white countries and ONLY in white countries. Your suggested replies lack it.
If you have to keep it short, how about something like this:
Forced non-white immigration and integration into ALL white countries and ONLY white countries constitute genocide under international law as acts comitted with intent to destroy whites as a group.Anyone is welcome to correct it
04/02/2019 at 11:30 am #111419Wuntz MooreKeymasterMaybe this rewrite of its first sentence will make the article pass muster, maybe not:
Being clear on White Genocide and intermarriage
Extracted from a previous article:
That’s worth a moment’s diversion, since the infrequent cases of intermarriage that would occur under normal conditions would pose little problem. The problem is that the flooding of our countries with third worlders, and the laws and propaganda that impel our assimilation with such a large number of third worlders after they’ve arrived, raise the frequency of intermarriage to the point that we will be reduced to very small minorities in our countries or eventually blended out of existence altogether.
And let’s note that this is not “voluntary,” since we never voted to have our countries flooded with the third world, nor did we vote for the laws and propaganda systems that press our assimilation with that third world.
If whites were allowed our own homelands as the other races of the world are allowed, and we were rid of laws and propaganda that impel assimilation, intermarriage would occur at such a low rate that it would be inconsequential for our race as a whole, as was the case before the current madness was fastened on us.
04/02/2019 at 11:42 am #111420Wuntz MooreKeymaster“…forcing conditions that lead to interracial marrying…”
Xenonian, how about this instead:
“…forcing conditions that lead to a high rate of interracial marrying…”
I think that’s more what the Mantra says.
Cheers! 🙂
04/08/2019 at 1:10 pm #111438LauraKeymaster“That’s worth a moment’s diversion, since the infrequent cases of intermarriage that would occur under normal conditions would pose little problem.”
This is a tailgate.
05/06/2019 at 4:01 pm #111544Wuntz MooreKeymasterPossibly I should apologize to Laura for having re-lit this thread, if in fact I did, although some of the later posts have been useful. My apologies, Laura, if apologies are in order. I’d feel better if I’d left this thread after my last posts that were further up-thread, but that thought didn’t enter my mind when I suddenly became full of my new “bright” idea for a beginning. My name is “Wuntz Moore,” after all. But I’m finally done and will post no more on this thread.
Later edit: there are some interesting comments here.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Comments are closed.
Bob’s Corner
Why Johnny Can't Think ebook zip
pwrd: Phu=9Ad5Login
Copyright Policies
Robert Whitaker grants full and free use of his ideas and writings as they pertain to aiding others in stating the facts about white race genocide and its agenda of forced non-white immigration and integration into ALL white countries and ONLY white countries.
Recent Swarms
- Xenonian on Where did you post the Mantra today?
- time for freedom on test
- Xenonian on MINI MANTRAS PRO
- JPOutlook on Where did you post the Mantra today?
- JPOutlook on Where did you post the Mantra today?
- JPOutlook on Where did you post the Mantra today?
- JPOutlook on Where did you post the Mantra today?
- JPOutlook on Where did you post the Mantra today?
- JPOutlook on Where did you post the Mantra today?
- JPOutlook on Where did you post the Mantra today?
- JPOutlook on Where did you post the Mantra today?
- JPOutlook on Where did you post the Mantra today?
- -scythian- on Anti-Whites are ripe for conditioning
- Xenonian on Anti-Whites are ripe for conditioning
- JPOutlook on Where did you post the Mantra today?
Swarm Topics
- This is another test
- test
- Anti-Whites are ripe for conditioning
- Something Interesting
- Whether intermarriage is being forced
- Diversity is a code word for White Genocide – should we hit that extra hard now?
- Swarming at foreign sites
- Genocide Awareness Webinars
- There is a new White House Petition for You to Sign
- White Genocide Resources
- White Genocide Pics
- New Podcasts
- Cuckservatives
- Postage Paid envelopes
- Our Change.org petitions
Recent Posts
- Personal Loyalty Is No Excuse for Stupidity
- THE ONLY INEVITABLE LEFT FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM
- Anti-Whitism
- BASICS: Black Vandalism With A Diploma
- Robert W. Whitaker Archive Site
- The Practical Wisdom of Robert Whitaker
- First Amendment to the United States Constitution
- Whether intermarriage is being forced….
- Soviet Free Speech
- Is the Only Purpose of a Gun To Kill?
Immigration
Categories
- About Bob (13)
- Activism (10)
- Blasts from the Past (46)
- Bob (416)
- Bob's Book (20)
- Bob's Meanderings (21)
- BUGS Radio (19)
- Coaching Session (2,846)
- Comment Responses (1,001)
- General (716)
- Grouch Growls (2)
- History (681)
- How Things Work (606)
- Insider Letter Archive (54)
- Law and Order (35)
- Links (2)
- Mantra (82)
- Musings about Life (123)
- Political Correctness (105)
- Politics (80)
- Race Matters (24)
- Radio Shows (5)
- Religion (42)
- SF Townhall (2)
- Truck Roy Radio (2)
- We Do What Works (13)
- WOL Weekly Articles (28)
Topic Tags
8 traits of a disinformationist 25 rules of disinformation activism America anti-white anti-white mantra April Gaede diversity fight white geNOcide Genocide german help How to Deal with Anti--Whites Mantra Mantra videos Martin Luther King MLK Medvedev mini-mantras minis Montana Motivations Multiculturalism Feminism occupy wall street OWS rally Paltalk petition Pink rabbit Pioneer Little Europe pro-white Propaganda Putin Russia Spanish Stop Genocide subversion Swedish To Give New Members Info Tactics & Advice To Intellectually Destroy Our Enemies training Twitter videos White Genocide White genocide flyers white privilege youtube Youtube MantrasFebruary 2025 S M T W T F S « Aug 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Archives
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976
A Plague On Both Your HousesBob's second book - 1982
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERSBob's deadliest book - 2004
Why Johnny Can't Think:
America's Professor-PriesthoodWhy Johnny Can't Think ebook zip
pwrd: Phu=9Ad5
In A Few Words
Bob Whitaker has "been there and done that" in the world of politics. His unique perspective is insightful and vital. You may not agree with everything he says, but I guarantee that he will make you think.
Robert W. Whitaker, 1941—2017, was born and raised in South Carolina and attended the University of South Carolina and the University of Virginia Graduate School. He has been a college professor, international aviation negotiator, Capitol Hill senior staffer, Reagan Administration appointee, and writer for the Voice of America. He has written numerous articles and three books. Bob lived in Columbia, SC, coaching B.U.G.S. He had asked the staff to inform female readers that he was "divorced and 'wildly attractive.'" I agree that he was divorced. But actually, he always did and always will love his one and only wife.
Recent Comments