Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with www.bugsswarm.com?
Post on the internet Working Thread

Help needed, URGENT

Home › Forums › BUGS SWARM › Help needed, URGENT

Tagged: 

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • 03/05/2013 at 1:12 am #37383
    James C
    Participant

    I was recently “caught” writing the words “White GeNOcide” on flyers implicitly promoting miscegenation by the campus police at the local college (where I am a student). I need help formulating my written response to be presented to whatever inquisitors I will have to face, this is what I have written so far –

     
    To whom it may concern,
     
    The flyer in question seemed to me to be implicitly promoting White Genocide through intermarriage. Genocide is defined under the United Nations “Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide” as –
     

     

    …any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

     

    (a) Killing members of the group;(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. 
    Promoting intermarriage between White people and non-Whites is genocide because it results in White people intentionally being made a minority in historically White nations. Opposing the anti-White policy of mass immigration and forced-assimilation invariably results in harassment, loss of employment or even legal persecution. That’s genocide as defined by section (c) of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
     

     
    I do not believe this incident would receive the same treatment if the subject was the genocide of American Indians though forced assimilation by the US government, or the genocide of Australian Aborigines through forced assimilation at the hands of the Australian government. I believe I am being unjustly punished based solely due to the fact that I am White and speaking on behalf of White people. It would have been a non-issue had I simply thrown the flyer away, thereby affirming my belief that the issue is not the defacement of a $0.50 flyer, but the content of my speech.
     

     
    In no way can what I wrote on a disposable flyer be construed as harassing or threatening. Appendix B, section (e) of the Student Handbook, reaffirms my right to free speech as guaranteed by the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Oklahoma. I consider this official response to this “incident” itself, including being questioned by three Public Safety Officers, to be a discriminatory form of harassment and intimidation based on my race and beliefs.
     
    Sincerely,
    James C

    Any advice or suggestions would be highly appreciated
     

    03/05/2013 at 2:30 am #37390
    -scythian-
    Participant

    Interrogate them if you can. Tell them you’ll take your story to the press if they charge you with anything.

    Integration wouldn’t have to be FORCED if White people wanted it, correct?  ALL the conditions that lead to “assimilation” (i.e. intermarriage) in ALL and ONLY White countries are FORCED.  Even a 5 year old understands that being FORCED to do something is not freedom.  Why do you enforce “laws” that lead to the GENOCIDE of my people, the White RACE?  Did the Gestapo use the excuse “I was just following orders” too?  If ALL and ONLY Asian countries were being FORCED to “assimilate” with a never ending flood of non-Asians, rendering Asian children an ever decreasing minority in their own countries with no end in site (aka an Asian GENOCIDE), would you arrest and prosecute an Asian kid who objected to his own people’s GENOCIDE? or would you take his side?

    03/05/2013 at 2:45 am #37393
    James C
    Participant

    I’m not quick at the tongue (the verbal part of my brain tends to shut down in conflict), but I plan to go on the offense if and when I am called into an office. Here’s the latest version of my written statement.

    To whom it may concern,

    The flyer in question seemed to me to be implicitly promoting White Genocide through intermarriage. Genocide is defined under the United Nations “Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide” as –

    …any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

    (a) Killing members of the group;
    (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
    (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
    (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

    Promoting intermarriage between White people and non-Whites is genocide because it results in White people intentionally being made a minority in historically White nations. That’s genocide as defined by section (c) of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
    Genocide is about the ends not the means, it doesn’t have to be violent. Any series of policies and social engineering programs designed to lead to the extinction of a distinct group of people is Genocide as defined by international law.
    Opposing the anti-White policy of mass immigration and forced-assimilation invariably results in harassment, loss of employment or even legal persecution. I do not believe this incident would receive the same treatment if the subject was the genocide of American Indians though forced assimilation by the US government, or the genocide of Australian Aborigines through forced assimilation at the hands of the Australian government.
    I believe I am being unjustly punished based solely due to the fact that I am White and speaking on behalf of White people. It would have been a non-issue had I simply thrown the flyer away, thereby affirming my belief that the issue is not the defacement of a $0.50 flyer, but the content of my speech.
    In no way can what I wrote on a disposable flyer be construed as harassing or threatening. Appendix B, section (e) of the Student Handbook, reaffirms my right to free speech as guaranteed by the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Oklahoma. I consider the official response to this “incident”, including being questioned by three Public Safety Officers, to itself be a discriminatory form of harassment and intimidation based on my race and beliefs.

    Sincerely,
    James C

    03/05/2013 at 3:00 am #37395
    Jason
    Participant

    Did the campus police actually take you into custody and get your name?

    My main concern would be that it not hurt your academic career.  That is, what kind of discipline will they dish out?

    The suggestion above that you tell them you could take the issue public if they do anything to harm you might be a good one.  The school probably doesn’t want any publicity on the matter.

    What you did was merely political protest, like we see on campus all the time. Did they give you any idea who would be talking to you … if they go any further with this?

    03/05/2013 at 3:27 am #37396
    James C
    Participant

    They asked me to go to the police office where three campus cops asked me to ‘xplain myself. I said very little. They filled out some paperwork and later (when I went back to give a thought out statement) said that it was already submitted to some people whose names meant nothing to me (no titles given).

    I’ve prepared a written statement (see above), and could use any suggestions to improve upon it.

    I’ll consider the publicity card. Thanks for your input.

    03/05/2013 at 3:51 am #37397
    Simon
    Participant

    If the police take you into questioning repeat these five words ‘I have nothing to say’ and lawyer up.

    03/05/2013 at 3:54 am #37398
    J Locke
    Participant

    In addition to Scythian’s suggestion, which I agree is good, I would add a shorter version of the UN definition, just the most relevant part:

    Mass Immigration and FORCED assimilation in ALL White countries and ONLY White countries is GENOCIDE
    UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 2 1948
    …any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy in whole or part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such
    c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    03/05/2013 at 4:04 am #37399
    Jason
    Participant

    Simon gave some good advice … if they call you in, you might want to see a lawyer before talking to them.

    03/05/2013 at 4:12 am #37400
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Don’t talk to them anymore man, consult your lawyer as soon as you can.

    03/05/2013 at 4:58 am #37403
    James C
    Participant

    At this point I just anticipate being called into an office or facing some board of administrators or something. I am planning on recording any such meetings with my phone (I’ll put it on the table so they know they’re being recorded).

    I don’t have a lawyer, but I may consult one if the situation seems to deteriorate. Again I appreciate everyone’s advice and support.

    Semper Fi

    James

    03/05/2013 at 1:10 pm #37413
    Tom Bowie
    Participant

    Having just seen this I’ll respond as best I can. They will be just general ideas to consider.
    1) Make notes on index cards or something small as reference. Including clarification of each statement on the back of the card when they pretend not to understand. One or two index cards should be reserved for questions that are the equivalent of “Are you still beating your wife”; defer the question until you’re able to seek representation/professional advice and/or dismiss the question as being biased.
    2) Consider using the simple tactic of putting off events as you research the possibility of obtaining representation and/or professional advice.
    3) Get professional advice and representation if possible. (If you have a lawyer or something close; UNDERSTAND THEY ARE AN OFFICER OF THE COURT be careful what you say to them, their first loyalty is to the system as a matter of practicality.)
    4) Another document you may wish to include under an act of conscience is the “Pledge Against Genocide” found at the Genocide Watch website. (It would be better if you had pre-signed it but it can still come in useful.)

    I’d say stalling while you get yourself together is a fairly good idea if at all possible under most conditions. Perhaps even the tactic of attending the board of admissions and brushing aside the questions until you can attempt to obtain professional advice. It may also be noteworthy to bring up how emotionally distraught your condition is and that you’d not be able to provide an adequate nor coherent defense of yourself at this time. (Hearing a few of the questions may give you an advance scout advantage for later however.) It is quite likely they will start off sympathetic sounding but they likely have their mind made up as to the outcome already and all that remains is how to make an example of you so that nobody else gets any ideas. They also have experience and you don’t as well as them not having any pressure on themselves if they screw up, they don’t face punishment.

    Your worst enemy is now you; the moment you forget what you’re up against. I’ve been in a situation not unlike yours, you may think you know what’s coming but you don’t.
    Let’s reverse the rolls so you understand better. An Anti-White is about to face Ol’ Bob acting as Prosecutor and Judge. Ol’ Bob will be polite, sympathetic, deceitful or, whatever else it takes to reach the fair and just verdict of Guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt and stick it to their Anti-White’s backside in every possible way while leaving open the possibility of doing it to them again next month all over again.

    I’ll post more if I get any other ideas.

    03/05/2013 at 1:35 pm #37415
    Denounce Genocidists
    Participant

    Ask the anti-white thought police if they agree with Aborigine genocide law expert Mick Dodson: “Assimilation is genocide” and if so why do they think these flyers promoting white genocide through “assimilation” are acceptable.

    03/05/2013 at 2:03 pm #37418
    Tom Bowie
    Participant

    It occurs to me I should make it clear after my last post; I’m not saying you can’t win.
    You can indeed win but it’s not going to be easy and fair has no place in winning.

    03/05/2013 at 7:17 pm #37437
    Jason
    Participant

    There is no point in having an argument with whoever calls you in, especially since it will be in private.  Mantra points are for impressing an audience, not “winning” an argument with an anti-White.

    You will never win an argument with them.  Or, I should say it is irrelevant. They could fully see your argument is right – but it won’t matter.  They are totally corrupt.
    It’s like you are before corrupt Chicago police under Al Capone.  Maybe they agree you are innocent.  But they have their orders.

    So, yeah, be quiet and if they call you, get a lawyer.

    03/07/2013 at 1:19 pm #37542
    James C
    Participant

    I’ve been called into a “conference” Tuesday. I don’t have time to post details now, but suffice to say that it is true, we ARE Samizdat, the persecution of pro-White dissidents is very real.

    03/07/2013 at 1:30 pm #37543
    Ice Knight
    Participant

    Good luck James, as Jason says no point in playing the martyr in a private hearing.

    Get a lawyer, say very little, conform, lie and try and limit the damage they can do to you…then keep up the great work and continue spreading the Mantra as far and wide as you possibly can! 🙂

     

     

    03/07/2013 at 2:39 pm #37550
    James C
    Participant

    Here’s an excerpt from the letter I got.

     

    “Your conduct may have violated the following sections of the University code of conduct

    Commission of an act which would constitute an offense under appropriate federal, state or local criminal statute – Malicious Harassment based on race, color, religion, ancestry national origin disability

    Violation of university posting policy

    Engaging in conduct that interferes with or disrupts any university teaching, research, administrative, disciplinary, public service or any other authorized activity or the peace and welfare of any person, whether on or off the campus

    Theft, destruction, damage or misuse of property belonging to or the responsibility of University or any person/legal entity

    Intentionally, knowingly or recklessly harassing or threatening, in person, by telephone, in writing, or by any other means, thereby causing or intending to cause annoyance or alarm, This includes racial, ethnic or sexual harassment.”

     

    Any friendly lawyers in SW Oklahoma?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.