B. U. G. S.

Horus,

I was about to write a letter to Dr Duke, that with some things he may find useful or appealing. However when you say it’s “pointless” because of the time on the calendar would appreciate you expanding on that. In your opinion what should our tactics be, if not guiding pro-Whites to our thinking? I don’t have too much of a macro view yet so I am very interested in this.

I think terminology can be recaptured, redefined, and/or subverted. For example, Bob once wrote about how he wanted a right-wing women’s group to call themselves “The real woman’s movement.”

I think pro-Whites could make the argument that we are “for real diversity of nations and peoples and against forced blending of humans into a one size fits all, homogeneous cog within the corporate-globalist machine.”

I’m not telling anyone here to stop mantra operations in order to go on a diversity discourse crusade. I’m just saying that it can be done. Especially by Duke, who has the role of pro-White international statesman. I believe Duke is critical in this role of building friendships internationally.

Realize that I am saying we should claim diversity over all. But we should make it clear that the world will be truly more diverse under our vision of the world compared to the Pink Rabbit vision of the world. We will support indigenous groups and they will support us. If Tibetans proclaim themselves to be against White genocide we will be sure to support their existence.

And I know of no time where Duke “sold us out?” He could have made millions selling out by turning anti-White. He went to prison for trumped up charges and was probably offered various deals to sell out at that point?

I don’t trust anyone 100% but I trust Bob more than any other pro-White. So if Bob says Duke is a good man then I’ll go with that.

I fancy myself an excellent judge of character. The Duke is NOT a sell-out. Period.

Louisiana.