B. U. G. S.

I like Gar5’s response.

“DIEversity” is just a CODEWORD for White genocide”

I came up with this one

“DIEversity” is just another GENOCIDAL term used TARGET White people, and ONLY White people.

School texts are filled with anti-White narratives. Anti-Whites are in denial about this.

Movies and TV are filled with anti-White stories and images. Anti-Whites are in denial about this.

Federal and State laws have a growing number of laws which are anti-White. Anti-Whites are in denial about this.

White Genocide is occurring. Anti-Whites are in denial about this.

Anti-Whites are in serious denial.

Jason, “denial” is being used as a psychological “slap”, not in a manner that is “logical”. It’s playing off of all the kinds of “denial” used by anti-Whites to create psychological guilt for “denying what everybody ‘knows’ is obviously true.

Earlier, I asked for feedback on using the words “denier” and “in denial”. Glad to get yours. Perhaps you can figure and publish a better way to use this meme-term?

Anti-Whites have been using “denial” and “deniers” for years not, as a psych-war term to silence Whites. How can we harness this energy, for our own use, if possible?

“Diversity is a code word for Ethnic Cleansing of White People.”

I think the term “denier” could/should be used when referring to anti-Whites who deny White people exist, or that deny White Genocide (only as a defense of White Genocide). They are NOT in denial, but DENY our people’s Genocide and/or dehumanize White people by denying we exist.

I DO NOT think we should use it in place of “anti-White” for obvious reasons. This should be made clear to anyone who uses it, in my opinion.

One other things I would keep in mind is that we don’t don’t try to take the term “racism” from anti-Whites (who’ve invested billions in the term) even though by any objective definition they are the ones being racist. We flip the script and point out the obvious truth without using anti-White terminology. We impose our own new terminology, ridiculing theirs, not using and thus strengthening theirs.

@ Linux Lewis

Please email me at mimmyjarr at yahoo dot com.

I have some questions I’d like to ask you about your diversity swastika design.

Electric,

BYOB.

No, don’t bring your own beer (on second thought, that’s not such a bad idea).

Be Your Own Bob. Take the wisdom when it is there… but you are allowed to disagree. Most of BUGS’ action takes place outside of here, with the vast majority not reporting. I assume you are following BUGSters on Twitter, watching activity on YouTube, checking out the Facebook groups, etc.

For my part, I probably can’t express how much I disagree with the notion that we have “battered ‘racism’ and ‘racist’ into submission”. That opinion is based on hours of reading and absorbing, but to give a pithy example of why (so as not to be long-winded), it was only a short while ago that an elderly White woman got nationally crucified for having said the dreaded “N-word”, decades in the past, while a gun was pointed to her head. The accusation? Ray-cissssssssssssss!

Our enemies don’t use “racist” anymore? L-O-L

“Diversity” isn’t some Pawn on their side that suddenly got elevated to a Bishop or a Queen. Nor have we struck down most of the other pieces, leaving only “Diversity” remaining. Diversity has always been a Bishop or a Queen, and for all I know, might be nigh unto King.

Most BUGSters implicitly recognized this, which is why, for a loooooong time, we have been using “Diversity is a codeword for Less White People” and “Diversity is a codeword for White Genocide”, or (related), “Multiculturalism is a codeword for White Genocide”. I would take those, any day of the week, over “Diversity is a codeword for Anti-White”.

Watch the activity, and watch the Consistent Message (which is quite beyond any one or three people). There might be a slight burp of “Diversity is a codeword for Anti-White” in the light of the recent hullaballo, but I very much doubt it will stick. If, three months from now, 90% of the seasoned BUGSters that you see on Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, etc., are all using “Diversity is a codeword for Less White People” and “Diversity is a codeword for White Genocide”… then that should help answer your question as to what Message to be on.

Sometimes this place is like the Mad Hatter’s Tea Party. And in those instances, Alice (and all of the resident Hares) needs to realize that she shouldn’t worry her pretty little head over all of the lunacy & glossolalia flying around.

Incidentally, what are everyone’s thoughts on “Diversity is a codeword for Less White People” vs. “Diversity is a codeword for Fewer White People”? I got the that read on the air on the most listened to radio show in our state (via Tweeting the host) a month or two ago. I Tweeted “Less”. He changed it to “Fewer”. “Fewer” is more grammatically correct, and his media instincts changed it on the fly. If any intelligent media figure ever picked it up, they would probably change it to “Fewer” as well… though “Less” would make the same point and be colloquially accepted (without so much as a blink) by 70% of our audience. In either case, they make the same point… but I’ve been using “Fewer”.