Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with www.bugsswarm.com?
Post on the internet Working Thread

Teaching whites to say “white(s)”?

Home › Forums › BUGS SWARM › Teaching whites to say “white(s)”?

Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 81 total)
1 2 3 4 5
  • Author
    Posts
  • 06/04/2012 at 1:44 pm #24898
    Coniglio Bianco
    Participant

    Deleted

    06/04/2012 at 1:54 pm #24899
    White&Normal
    Participant

    @ Coniglio

    I think we need to stick to as few attack words as possible. Remember, we want ‘anti-white’ to be the next ‘racist,’ except it’s going to last alot longer because it’s based on natural inclinations. We don’t need “anti-white traitor,” or “white traitor,” or “traitor,” just anti-white and only anti-white. I believe Bob mentioned once that if you add anything to the term ‘anti-white’ then you are basically diluting it. That is not what we want.

    I agree with your four definitions though. One thing I’ve encountered is that you can’t really ask a faceless person if they are white or anti-white because readers might interpret that as me talking about non-whites. I haven’t had a chance to ask a white in person if they are white or anti-white but in theory it would be highly effective. That’s just my 2 cents

    06/04/2012 at 2:38 pm #24904
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ Coniglio:

    I don’t think we should introduce the term “white traitor”. It’s a phrase that sticks in the mind, and we want “anti-white” and “white genocide” to be the phrases that stick in the mind of the audience, without any competitors to dilute their strength. A single message is still the goal, when bugsering.

    I would respond something like this:

    “You insist that you are a white who is also an anti-white, and that you support white genocide. That is called being a traitor.”

    If posters at SF want to use the term “white traitor,” that seems to me like a good adjunct to their adopting the practice of calling themselves “whites” instead of “white nationalists,” “pro-whites,” whatever. SF’ers don’t have other phrases they are trying to implant that the phrase “white traitor” will compete with.

    just my own thoughts, as always.

    06/04/2012 at 2:47 pm #24905
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ Roderick: I didn’t see your post, and you said some things better than I did. And yes, “everything you add dilutes what you’ve said,” or however Bob said it, made a strong impression on me when I read it. It’s a fundamental point in delivering a message. The jingle that sent Winston sales to the top was “Winstons taste good like a cigarette should,” not “Winstons taste good like a cigarette should, and furthermore….(!)”

    I think “traitor” standing alone is okay. I think Bob has recommended using that himself, and I know other bugsers do. It’s just a common word, and doesn’t seem to me to take energy from our memes and phrases.

    06/04/2012 at 3:25 pm #24910
    Coniglio Bianco
    Participant

    Deleted

    06/04/2012 at 4:43 pm #24917
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ Conigiio: “If it rains tomorrow and Whites were planning to have a picnic then the clouds are ‘anti-White’.” LMAO!

    I still think the term “traitor” is fine, and the term “white traitor” draws too much energy away from the phrases “anti-white” and “white genocide.”

    Yes, I’ve often had the thought too that the anti-whites have a whole collection of terms for us that they can work to their benefit, and we have only one, “anti-white.” That’s just the way it is…I sense some of the reasons, but could probably not give a satisfactory analysis of why it’s so. But I have to travel some today and will try to think it out some while I’m sitting and riding.

    06/04/2012 at 4:54 pm #24920
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    (continued from last post)

    Maybe the analysis is simply that when it’s the enemy who is holding the territory, and you’re the attacking force, you send in your strongest troops first and send in the weaker troops only after you at least have a secure beachhead.

    06/05/2012 at 12:16 am #24962
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    GUIDELINES FOR THIS EXPERIMENT
    ————–
    If you are a newbie, please leave now!

    This experiment brings a lot of new things to think about, and as a newbie you have enough to think about right now just learning to spread the Mantra correctly with the techniques already developed. Getting involved with this experiment will interfere with that.
    —————
    Experimenters: To avoid intruding on the normal operation of BUGS, please:

    1. Post these experimental comments ONLY on threads where other bugsers are not at that moment posting.*

    2. Report to THIS thread rather than to “Where did you post the Mantra today II.”

    We want to not interfere with the FOCUS of Bugs, and not confuse bugsers who are still building their solid body of experience.

    I’ll post these guidelines periodically so they’ll be sure to be seen, and also so that they can be revised as needed.

    *If other bugsers arrive at a thread after we are well into our experiment there, let’s feel allowed to continue for now, and we’ll see how that goes.

    06/05/2012 at 12:38 am #24964
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Oh, another possible guideline. Maybe we should avoid threads like the one Iceknight and I posted on a couple of days ago that are bugser videos. Let’s avoid those for now. Let’s keep this as separate from standard bugser operation as we can, to avoid the confusion that will otherwise result. Even with our best efforts, there’s likely to be more confusion than we want.

    Now that I see more of the possible problems from introducing something totally new into the standard bugs format ANYwhere,..ha, when will I ever learn that any step off the beaten path brings multitudinous complications! Maybe it’s something former liberals never learn.

    06/05/2012 at 2:31 am #24970
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Yeah, well, I guess I should have written SUGGESTED Guidelines for this Experiment, since it’s not my say-so what anyone does here.

    06/09/2012 at 1:46 am #25292
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    I don’t see any bugser activity here on this Tim Wise video, so I gently put the word “white” in play, if the recipient wants to reply.
    It occurs to me that “white people” could be used equivalently to “white(s)” in some settings, no?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3Xe1kX7Wsc&feature=related
    You’re an anti-white who supports white genocide.
    And you beat whites over the head with the R-word when they object to being genocided.
    You say you’re anti-racist. What you are is anti-white.
    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

    06/09/2012 at 5:46 am #25297
    Ice Knight
    Participant

    Hi HD,

    I’ve been continuing my normal swarming activity as it is important us BUGSters target White GENOCIDE as our primary mission. That said I am just subtly dropping in the term “White” here and there and asking “Are you White or anti-White?” On the whole most anti-Whites have greeted the question with silence so far – either an indication they are unable to answer or the terminology is so subtle that they don’t pick up on it. Either way it has not so far caused any distraction from the main BUGS message.

    Will keep on using this and feed back here should I get any interesting anti-White responses.

    06/09/2012 at 1:52 pm #25340
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Hi iceknight, it’s REAL good to hear from you, lol! I too want to be sure that I put more energy into swarming in the normal way than into this experiment, though I’ll admit it’s this experiment that has me really excited at the moment.

    If you’re doing the experiment on threads that other bugsers are posting on at that time, then you’re proceeding differently from myself. I’m trying to avoid confusion for other bugsers, especially new ones, by restricting myself to only threads that other bugsers who aren’t involved in this experiment aren’t posting on at that moment. I think that’s a good idea, but if you’ve thought about it and see no need for it, I’m not going to object. But if dungeoneer or someone else on the working thread starts admonishing “HD” not to do that, please let them know it’s you and not me! Lol!

    If you haven’t, look ahead to what may happen when an anti-white DOES respond to your bait on such a thread, and what the effect on any normal swarming going on there may be (I’m afraid it may be confusion). But I certainly don’t want to cramp you with my own ideas about which threads to experiment on. I tend to be cautious and fretful.

    I’m pretty busy today, but I hope soon…maybe tomorrow?…you and I can have the same fun on a thread together we had the other day! The proof is in the pudding, but right now I think this ploy is going to open up even more opportunity than we have now to press the Mantra points.

    06/11/2012 at 7:05 pm #25611
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @iceknight: ViciousBiter and BunnySpangle were the two anti-whites we experimented on a few days ago. Patrick White Rabbit just posted Biter’s updated YT profile on our working thread, and it included this:

    THE “WHITE RABBIT MOVEMENT”
    Youtube is being spammed by white supremacists, brainwashed by a retired American politician by the name of Robert Whitaker. They think to have some mandate to speak on behalf of white people which they don’t. These idiots threaten everybody who argues against them with “international law” to gratify their Nuremberg style nazi wet dreams and enjoy using strawman arguments like all dumb people do. Today it seemed like Fascism iz Liberty (what an oximoron!) is their latest secret weapon but so far I am not impressed.

    Possibly the bold-faced statement was written as a result of our experiment on them?

    If so, I’m trying to gauge if the inclusion of the statement in his profile aids Bugs’ impact or weakens it.

    Imagining myself back to my racially unconscious lefty days, I think the statement would have had a useful impact on me. Someone speaking for white people, what a novel idea! It certainly would have aroused me in SOME manner, as it seems to have aroused Biter. And getting whites’ attention is what we want.

    Hm, on second thought, he didn’t mention white genocide at all, possibly because our appropriating “white” upset him even more. If we hadn’t experimented on him, maybe he would have mentioned white genocide, who knows.

    A bit of inconclusive data to keep in mind as we proceed.

    Let’s of course be careful to keep our appropriation of the term “white” very low key and matter of fact…something we just do in passing “without thinking”…let’s not let them draw us into tailgating on that little item, but always turn it back to white genocide of course.

    I laid down some standard bugs replies on this thread to troll for some lab rats, but no takers yet:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN1kp1ggWyM&lcor=1&lc=wpSVxtfGk5RCeX8b75zHEd4qCDtPALx7j0lF2cX0lU8&lch=email_reply&feature=em-comment_reply_received

    My thought is to try not to run our experiment on main players like Biter and Bunny, but elsewhere. If it becomes apparent finally that our idea is a bad one, we want to have done as little damage as possible.

    06/11/2012 at 8:33 pm #25614
    Ice Knight
    Participant

    Hi HD,

    Yes Biter is definitely responding to our little spat the other day, so it’s a concept that certainly rattled his chains! LOL

    As you point out though, he doesn’t respond to the genocide argument – maybe deliberately or not as we know that is the truly toxic message the anti-Whites don’t want to touch – ignoring it or censorship are generally the only responses they have. Perhaps one of the concerns with using White is that anti-Whites will feel more comfortable in this territory and focus on it to keep the argument away from White genocide, something we need to assess during this experiment.

    I agree we need to see how it works away from the main swarm and away from the professional anti-Whites like ViciousBiter and BunnySpangle. Truth is where I’ve used it elsewhere it has generally been greeted with silence. Not sure if this is good or bad?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1vJt92nxFc&lc

    Will keep on throwing it out there whenever the opportunity presents. I’m still a fence sitter at the moment on it’s effectiveness, but if it arouses the interest of the professional anti-Whites it’s definitely something we need to look at in more detail.

    Keep up the good work!

    06/11/2012 at 9:45 pm #25618
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    “Perhaps one of the concerns with using White is that anti-Whites will feel more comfortable in this territory and focus on it to keep the argument away from White genocide, something we need to assess during this experiment”

    Agreed. Of course every time they say “white,” we’ll say “white genocide” as we did with Biter and Bunny.

    I added some bait to your link.

    08/18/2012 at 12:24 pm #28900
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    (Brian, please just eliminate the post awaiting moderation…the present post copies it with the links removed from the names).

    Since I’m referencing this temporarily lapsed experiment in a comment elsewhere on this site today, let me go back and recover some of the exchange iceknight and I had with vicious biter and bunny spangle and copy it here for readers to judge for themselves. It’s the only time we’ve done the experiment. I’ll put in bold the parts that are directly relevant to the experiment.

    Iceknight kicks butt for awhile before I show up and try to get the hang of it myself. Begin at the top:

     

    “Nobody is supporting white genocide you paranoid dumbshit.”

    Are you White or anti-White?

    Do you support mass immigration and FORCED assimilation in ALL White countries and ONLY White countries?

    Do you support GENOCIDE?

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    “When you asked me if I support genocide I said “no”. Clear enough?”

    Are you White or anti-White?

    Do you support mass immigration and FORCED assimilation in ALL White countries and ONLY White countries?

    Do you support GENOCIDE?

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    “You keep using these terms “white” and “anti-white”. Why do you never say “European””

    Because I am White, you are anti-White.

    Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    I am white too. What you mean is you are ideologically ‘white’ In your context white is a political not a racial term. titter The two are not synonymous that’s why white people take the piss and laugh at you. titter x2

    Sunnybangle in reply to Alphaman7100 2 months ago

     

    “I’m also white :)”

    You cannot be White if you support the GENOCIDE of my people, White people. You are anti-White.

    Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    Like other whites, I call flooding white countries with non-whites and forcing whites to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence, GENOCIDE.

    You support white genocide.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white

    HarumphtyDumpty in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    “Meanwhile Europe is just a continent, not a “white country”.”

    Says the anti-White that supports GENOCIDE. All White people know that European countries are White countries SILLY.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    “Who the hell do you think you are to speak for whites? Who gave you that mandate?”

    I’m White. 

    “Where did I say I support mass immigration, forced assimilation, etc.? That’s right, nowhere!”

    Do you support mass immigration and FORCED assimilation in ALL White countries and ONLY White countries?

    Do you support GENOCIDE?

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    Whites do not support white genocide.

    HarumphtyDumpty  2 months ago

     

    “”All White people know that European countries are White countries”

    Then how come that Sunnybangle and me don’t know? Oops?”

    Because you are anti-White.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    “Being white does NOT give you any mandate to speak on behalf of white people.”

    I’m White, my family and friends are White, therefore whenever I speak I represent the views of White people.

    You are anti-White as you support the GENOCIDE of my people, White people.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    The anti-White says

    “Do you support GENOCIDE? No, I don’t.”

    Followed by the statement;

    “There ARE no white countries”

    LOL anti-White. White people do not believe you!

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    LOL anti-White,

    Followed b

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    “You have no fucking right to speak on my behalf. I can speak for myself.”

    Yes I agree, I do not represent your views. You are not White, you are anti-White.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    You are an anti-white, pure and simple. Whites do not support white genocide.

    HarumphtyDumpty in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    “I’m white”

    You are not White. You are anti-White as you support the GENOCIDE of White children.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    “LOL You still only speak for yourself no matter what you claim or believe.”

    You only speak on behalf of anti-Whites. Whites don’t support their own GENOCIDE SILLY!

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to Sunnybangle 2 months ago

     

    “As an individual you only speak for yourself. I’m white…”

    You are an anti-White. Whites do not support White GENOCIDE.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to Sunnybangle 2 months ago

     

    As an individual you only speak for yourself. I’m white and uncivilised haters don’t speak for me.

    Sunnybangle in reply to Alphaman7100 2 months ago

     

    “You have no right to speak for white people.”

    LOL anti-White, I’m White, should I speak for black people or Asian people instead?

    You are anti-White as you support the GENOCIDE of White CHILDREN.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    “You have no right to speak for white people. No one has a right to speak for white people. Not even I have a right to speak for white people.”

    LMAO! Does anybody have the right to speak for anybody?

    Have you emailed the MLK, Jr. Foundation to tell them he had no right to speak for anyone except himself?

    Don’t be a moron, since I’m having to choose between enjoying your intellectual company and having lunch at the moment.

    The issue is that you are an anti-white who supports white genocide.

    HarumphtyDumpty in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    “You can only speak for YOURSELF.”

    Why? You speak on behalf of ALL anti-Whites when you support the GENOCIDE of White CHILDREN. I’m White and like ALL Whites against the GENOCIDE of White CHILDREN.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    “I’m definitely white.”

    You are an anti-white. Whites do not support White genocide.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    “I’m definitely white.”

    You are definitely anti-white.

    You just posted to me that you support legally enforced assimilation of whites, after implying earlier that you wouldn’t support that. (I knew of course that you did support it, because all anti-whites like you who support white genocide necessarily support the means used to bring white genocide about.)

    You say you are anti-racist. What you are is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

    HarumphtyDumpty in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    “I’m whiter than you are. I didn’t get a tan this summer because of a lack of sunny days.”

    You think your white skin makes you “white”? I guess you really do believe that race is only skin deep.

    You are an anti-white who supports white genocide, and that’s all you are.

    HarumphtyDumpty in reply to MrViciousBiter 2 months ago

     

    http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=OQmIkc-G0is

    Note that the tactic is ALWAYS used as an entrée to the issue of white genocide!

    I’ve copied here only the posts that use the tactic, which may give an impression that the tactic dominated the discourse more than it did.

    The use of this as a bugser tactic needs more experiments and reflection on the results. I think there IS a danger that the tactic lights such a fuse in anti-whites that it may divert attention from white genocide.

    But aside from its possible use in bugser posts, I’m thoroughly convinced of the correctness of my original idea (actually it was linux lewis’ idea) that the white movement  should appropriate the word “white” for itself immediately, just as the “women’s movement” appropriated the word “women” for itself. I wish I had the energy to push that on all white sites as I did on the SF thread I discussed above on this thread.

    08/20/2012 at 1:09 pm #28866
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Since I’m referencing this temporarily lapsed experiment in a comment elsewhere on this site today, let me go back and recover some of the exchange iceknight and I had with vicious biter and bunny spangle and copy it here for readers to judge for themselves. It’s the only time we’ve done the experiment. I’ll put in bold the parts that are directly relevant to the experiment.

    Iceknight kicks butt for awhile before I show up and try to get the hang of it myself. Begin at the top:

    “Nobody is supporting white genocide you paranoid dumbshit.”

    Are you White or anti-White?

    Do you support mass immigration and FORCED assimilation in ALL White countries and ONLY White countries?

    Do you support GENOCIDE?

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “When you asked me if I support genocide I said “no”. Clear enough?”

    Are you White or anti-White?

    Do you support mass immigration and FORCED assimilation in ALL White countries and ONLY White countries?

    Do you support GENOCIDE?

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “You keep using these terms “white” and “anti-white”. Why do you never say “European””

    Because I am White, you are anti-White.

    Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    [Now Bunny chimes in]

    I am white too. What you mean is you are ideologically ‘white’ In your context white is a political not a racial term. titter The two are not synonymous that’s why white people take the piss and laugh at you. titter x2

    Sunnybangle in reply to Alphaman7100 (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “I’m also white :)”

    You cannot be White if you support the GENOCIDE of my people, White people. You are anti-White.

    Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    Like other whites, I call flooding white countries with non-whites and forcing whites to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence, GENOCIDE.

    You support white genocide.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white

    HarumphtyDumpty in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “Meanwhile Europe is just a continent, not a “white country”.”

    Says the anti-White that supports GENOCIDE. All White people know that European countries are White countries SILLY.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “Who the hell do you think you are to speak for whites? Who gave you that mandate?”

    I’m White. [Ha ha! I love that answer!!–HD]

    “Where did I say I support mass immigration, forced assimilation, etc.? That’s right, nowhere!”

    Do you support mass immigration and FORCED assimilation in ALL White countries and ONLY White countries?

    Do you support GENOCIDE?

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    Whites do not support white genocide.

    HarumphtyDumpty 2 months ago

     

    “”All White people know that European countries are White countries”

    Then how come that Sunnybangle and me don’t know? Oops?”

    Because you are anti-White.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “Being white does NOT give you any mandate to speak on behalf of white people.”

    I’m White, my family and friends are White, therefore whenever I speak I represent the views of White people.

    You are anti-White as you support the GENOCIDE of my people, White people.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    The anti-White says

    “Do you support GENOCIDE? No, I don’t.”

    Followed by the statement;

    “There ARE no white countries”

    LOL anti-White. White people do not believe you!

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    LOL anti-White,

    Followed b

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “You have no fucking right to speak on my behalf. I can speak for myself.”

    Yes I agree, I do not represent your views. You are not White, you are anti-White.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    You are an anti-white, pure and simple. Whites do not support white genocide.

    HarumphtyDumpty in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “I’m white”

    You are not White. You are anti-White as you support the GENOCIDE of White children.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “LOL You still only speak for yourself no matter what you claim or believe.”

    You only speak on behalf of anti-Whites. Whites don’t support their own GENOCIDE SILLY!

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to Sunnybangle (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “As an individual you only speak for yourself. I’m white…”

    You are an anti-White. Whites do not support White GENOCIDE.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to Sunnybangle (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    As an individual you only speak for yourself. I’m white and uncivilised haters don’t speak for me.

    Sunnybangle in reply to Alphaman7100 (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “You have no right to speak for white people.”

    LOL anti-White, I’m White, should I speak for black people or Asian people instead?

    You are anti-White as you support the GENOCIDE of White CHILDREN.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “You have no right to speak for white people. No one has a right to speak for white people. Not even I have a right to speak for white people.”

    LMAO! Does anybody have the right to speak for anybody?

    Have you emailed the MLK, Jr. Foundation to tell them he had no right to speak for anyone except himself?

    Don’t be a moron, since I’m having to choose between enjoying your intellectual company and having lunch at the moment.

    The issue is that you are an anti-white who supports white genocide.

    HarumphtyDumpty in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “You can only speak for YOURSELF.”

    Why? You speak on behalf of ALL anti-Whites when you support the GENOCIDE of White CHILDREN. I’m White and like ALL Whites against the GENOCIDE of White CHILDREN.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “I’m definitely white.”

    You are an anti-white. Whites do not support White genocide.

    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    Alphaman7100 in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “I’m definitely white.”

    You are definitely anti-white.

    You just posted to me that you support legally enforced assimilation of whites, after implying earlier that you wouldn’t support that. (I knew of course that you did support it, because all anti-whites like you who support white genocide necessarily support the means used to bring white genocide about.)

    You say you are anti-racist. What you are is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

    HarumphtyDumpty in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

     

    “I’m whiter than you are. I didn’t get a tan this summer because of a lack of sunny days.”

    You think your white skin makes you “white”? I guess you really do believe that race is only skin deep.

    You are an anti-white who supports white genocide, and that’s all you are.

    HarumphtyDumpty in reply to MrViciousBiter (Show the comment) 2 months ago

    http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=OQmIkc-G0is

    Note that the tactic is ALWAYS used as an entrée into the issue of white genocide!

    I’ve copied here only the posts that use the tactic, which may give an impression that the tactic dominated the discourse more than it did.

    The use of this as a bugser tactic needs more experiments and reflection on the results. I think there IS a danger that the tactic lights such a fuse in people that it may divert attention from white genocide.

    But I’m thoroughly convinced of the correctness of my original idea (actually it was linux lewis’ idea) that the white movement  should appropriate the word “white” for itself immediately, just as the “women’s movement” appropriated the word “women” for itself. I wish I had the energy to push that on all white sites as I did on the SF thread I discussed above on this thread.

    07/20/2013 at 5:47 pm #46424
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Has this thread been purposefully erased, or am I just unable to find it?

    OOps, it appeared when this post went up. Sorry.

    07/21/2013 at 3:35 am #46429
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    the problem with using the word “white” in place of “pro-white” is that people will automatically assume that Anti-White just means Non-White.

    This feeds into the mindset of the self hating white anti-whites who say “hey but im white! how can i be anti-white!”. It is crucial that THESE exact people understand that THEY are Anti-White… so the term pro-white is necessary at times.

    When I brought up using “white” instead of “pro-white”, it was in response to something you were writing on stormfront about the pro-white movement… it as something along the lines of “pro-whites have been doing so and so and achieving nothing”… and i said “why not just say white instead of pro-white”.

    Personally, what I do is use pro-white sparingly, I use white as much as possible… as long as you are giving it SOME thought when you are posting – it becomes obvious when one word is better than the other.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 81 total)
1 2 3 4 5
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.