B. U. G. S.

The point is, we’re supposed to be pushing a consistent message.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

“Diversity is a code word for White genocide.”

Again. And again. And again.

Using new words like ‘x’ is code word for anti-white. or ‘y’ is code word for White genocide will just confuse people and dilute the message.

@David
A penny has drop – I visualised the video where the words hit the woman again and again and again – thank-you. I will be a better BUGster now.

Congilio isn’t any dumber than I am, though I really think this article is kinda pointless and unworthy of being a swarm topic. Keep on arguing about stuff guys 😀 ill go find somewhere to post the mantra

@ David Joop and Coniglio:

Coniglio, I agree strongly with David about your category A. “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white” is a SOUND (not just content!) that we don’t want to dilute in any way!

It’s always, “Winstons taste good, like a cigarette should,” every time. Never, “Winstons taste excellent,…”…that would just break up the mental solidifying of the first phrase in the minds of our audience!

But as for the refrain, “Diversity is a code word for white genocide,” I thought that was just a line that happened to be in that one beautiful mini that I think David is the person that has posted it everywhere I go to post it, if I’m remembering rightly!

It’s not a refrain that’s part of the Mantra, and I wasn’t aware if we’re trying to implant that as we are the last line of the Mantra, so I don’t see any problem with most of the word substitutions Coniglio suggests in that one. But David, if you and others who swarm a lot more than I do have used that phrase to the point that it’s become trademark, or I’m overlooking some other factor, I’d likely change my tune on it.

The reply David handed that visitor who came here looking for how to reply to someone shows David really gets this stuff and has a flair for using it correctly. What this site needs the most right now and is going to need the most in the future IMO is new bugsers with that aptitude who can keep this stuff solid for those of us who have more difficulties with it. So I’m much influenced by anything David has to say.

But until corrected, I do like the substitutions Coniglio suggested in part B (except I agree with six gun’s (?) caution about “tolerance”…I’d just leave that word alone), and I like his definitions and obsolete terms. But it should be admitted that “white” has only begun the experimental stage…until it’s been experimented with and seems successful, it’s been made clear that there’s not a consensus here for that term.

Ahnenerbe, the username of a young lad on whitenewsnow.com posted a number of “Mantra” “conversations” he had had with what appeared to be good success.

I copied down bit of what was posted.
Yesterday I used the R word.
Agreed one of their words.
In our discussions there is only one racist, that is the enemy and they are the anti-Whites.

Horus has that catchy verse;

“In your opinion I’m a racist, you’re just saying that because I’m White. Anti-racism is just a codeword for anti-White.”

Here we have the racist term.
This is a verse everyone should memorise so they know as well as their own name.

http://www.whitenewsnow.com/bob-whitakers-pro-white-bbq/25207-dropped-mantra-bomb-today-class-burn-baby-burn.html

It is worth reading what he writes.
I understand the idea of distancing ourselves from their words.

Here is one of his pieces

“Nobody accuses a Chinese person who defends Asians as being an evil racist who is full of hate…

Nobody accuses an African person who defends Blacks as being an evil naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

People only accuse whites who defend their own people as evil, racist, Nazis…

and these people have the gall to call themselves anti-racists?

What they are is anti-white

Anti-racist is a code-word for anti-White”

reading this over, it could do with polishing up a bit.

I used the next verse on a YT video in reply to a poster who said they were fed up of being called racist for no good reason. It got a really large number of thumbs up, more than any I have in recent history. It really connected with the audience of White people.

“XX calls you a racist.
You say [yawn..zzzzz]
What do you mean racist? [most of them can’t answer that]
I’m only racist in your opinion. [it is only in their opinion]
Why is your opinion of such great value?
You’re only calling me racist b/c I’m White.
I mean when did you last call a Black person racist?
You’re not really anti-racist.
You’re simply anti-White.
Anti-Racist is a code word for anti-White.”

Opinions please.

Seriously, what’s going on here – are we just going to let the trolls determine the direction this site is going?

I’d like some input from other BUGSers, including the mods on this. – DJ

Well, what do you expect when you keep engaging them as if their ideas had merit? Merit enough to warrant a reply? Beyond that, all I will say about “trolls” is beware of those who routinely attempt to reinvent the Mantra wheel and seek to discredit our work with a dismissive “cult-ish” stroke of the brush.

CB got a bit deleted there.

I have been thinking about how to replace the use of the R word in these postings or any conversation.
I thought about “hateful names”

This covers all and any of the words and terms.

So for example this is a piece I copied from elsewhere.

However, if I bring up mass immigration into White countries and only into White countries, liberals and respectable conservatives alike call me hateful names like naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. These people may call themselves anti-racists, but what they really are is anti-White.
Anti-racism is a code-word for anti-White.

In the original the “hateful names” has the R word and F word.

So many of the questions we key into on yahoo for example use the R word.
The reader is expecting to see the R word in the answer.
So with the hateful names this seems to be a solution to enable a nice key into Mantra with a logical link to the original question.

Does this appear a reasonable solution?

The hateful words are the usual thrown at Whites, racist, Fascist [F word] Nazi, White Supremacist blah blah.

Now I accept we don’t use these as this reinforces these words and their association in the mind of the reader.
I accept we hit the reader with the same phrases [which some people call message] – such as Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White again and again.

Ahnenerbe – the Canadian lad who describes a lot of real life conversations he has in class. He can’t just say mini Mantras, he has to converse in a normal way with other people.

Here is a copy and paste from one of his postings
http://www.whitenewsnow.com/bob-whitakers-pro-white-bbq/25207-dropped-mantra-bomb-today-class-burn-baby-burn.html

“After all, nobody is telling the Mongolians that they invaded Russia and Poland 800 years ago and therefore they must invite millions of Somalians and Samoans to live with them and if they protest they are called RACISTS…..” (he didn’t capitalise by the way0

He continues with quite a bit more but he does use say racist, Fascist and Nazi on occasions in his conversations. Now we don’t want to do that, so unless we are going reduce our ability to converse we must find alternatives that do not reinforce the associations.

So I ask what if.

“After all, nobody is telling the Mongolians that they invaded Russia and Poland 800 years ago and therefore they must invite millions of Somalians and Samoans to live with them and if they protest they are called “HATEFUL NAMES…..”

How does that sound?

I think I’ll try the “hateful names” out.
People say “the N word” so they don’t get into trouble for actually using the word, but they are still using it. I think saying “the R word” is just the same, you are still reinforcing the term. Hateful names can mean any of the anti-White names or none of them. It is a cover all phrase which avoids any and all of these stereotypes anti-Whites use against us.

@ six gun: The point being that words carry more than just meaning. Words carry an emotional impact that the larger community has attached to their sound or written appearance in an unconscious group process.

Both the N-word and the R-word carry a heavy emotional charge that has been loaded onto them and absorbed by the general community.

The phrases, “the N-word” and, “the R-word,” don’t carry those charges. Their emotional effect on people is rather negligible.