Thanks for the feedback!

And thanks to John Lock and other bugsers who backed me and made this possible.

I do agree that there is a lot of things that I could improve on.

I have done a lot of commenting and so forth in writing, but this is my first live debate ever when it comes to speaking.

I hope this can be the beginning of us finding anti-whites and debate them like this. Talk to them on skype for example, record and put it up (like we just did). Of course Privot agreed with putting it up unedited.

It does not need to be the director of anything, it can just be an average anti-white without titles.

Palltalk is another way of talking to people. Palltalk is a chatroom. We can have our own room there where we can talk to each other. Ask and answer questions if some bugsers would like to do that.

Anyone interested to continue this?

http://video.foxnews.com/v/1498523799001/the-factor-investigates-professor-derrick-bell/?playlist_id=86923

Listen after 3:25.

Listen to the entire clip. Bill O’reilly uses anti-white more than once.

I have seen some people use anti-white as an ism. Anti-whiteism or anti-whitism (i dont know what is the correct english term)

Why do you believe in anti-whitism?

You suffer from anti-whitism.

“Their hatred for white people and their belief in anti-whitism is what binds these people/organizations together”

meawhiterabbit,

Yea, the anti-whites twists around. It is kind of funny to watch.

They all sound like they are saying: “Oh, I am not anti-white. I am just objectively interested in some kind of abstract principle and that abstract principle just happens to leave no future for white people. But that was not my intention at all. Hope you believe me.”

I got curious. How do you know I debated this anti-white?

Just something I found. Pointing out contradictions:
———–

Who is white? You clearly have no problems knowing who is white when it comes to “white privilege.”

White privilege? Why isn’t anyone talking about Chinees privilege in China? Or Japanese privilege in Japan? Could it be because your anti-white?

Everybody will blend together. Wasn’t diversity a strength??

You say you are not anti-white, yet you only talk about what white people have done wrong. If someone only talked about what jews did wrong you probably would recognize that as anti-semetism. But you are blind towards your anti-white mentality.

All of this is because you are as anti-white as the third reich where anti-semitic.

Nazis wanted a world without Jews. You keep justifying a world without whites – white genocide.

“Do you ever suspect that you’ve been brainwashed?”

Our media and politicians keep telling YOU, that people who talk about white survival are brainwashed. Then you just repeat that: “people who talk about white survival are brainwashed.”

Who is brainwashed?

A growing number see through people like you for what you are. You are not anti-racist, but anti-white. You are at the loosing end.

Have a nice day! 😉

Thanks meawhiterabbit!

I find points where I am pointing out a contradiction to be effective.

1a) Use the opportunity to make a mantra-point.
1b) Dont fall for their logic, dont tailgate. BUT you can take whatever they are talking about to make a mantra-point.

2) Point out a contradiction.

3) Use our attack word: anti-white

4) Keep it short

When I boil it down I think this is the essence of what I find to be effective. But I will try to improve on it.

Someone talked about something that was Orwellian and i made this point.

—————-

Orwellian language is anti-whites who talk about a blend of humanity that will end in a brown future. Then right after talk about diversity.

Or they say that skin color does not matter. And then turn around and talk about a company or area being too WHITE.

These people say they are anti-racist, but what they are is anti-white.

Anti-whites have an anti-white way of thinking. If you have an anti-white mentality and read the Bible you will come up with statements like “what immigrants would Jesus stop?” If you instead as an anti-white read Darwin you will come up with statements like “Some races die out and others evolve this is just natural and there is nothing one can do about white people disappearing”

If white people are being genocided; it is just natural or “karma.” If some “native people” are being genocided it is a horrific crime.

Anti-whites always support “native peoples” rights; unless the “native people” is white.

The argument used to be that native Americans had the right to America because they where her first. And then the evil white man come and took it. But now information is coming more and more that native Americans was not the first in America, maybe white people where. Will the anti-whites now say that white people have the right to America because white people where here first? Of course not. What they are starting to say is that America has always been a melting pot of different peoples.