B. U. G. S.

I’m only halfway through, and I notice the Anti-White was saying over and over again that the “Intermarriage is not being forced”.

I’ll continue listening to it to see if I see this later on, but there is a very simple phrase to deal with this I would like to see next time, and ANYTIME an Anti-White claims Intermarriage is not forced:

Nobody has to ENFORCE the Interrmarriage. They ENFORCE the conditions which lead to Interrmarriage.

Also, WHEN Anti-Whites come right out openly proclaiming to support white Genocide, and they are “proud” to be anti-White openly.

Do Not Correct the Enemy when he makes a Mistake.

You can say “so you’re gloating about Genocide?, is that a typo?” – then leave them be, go Swarm elsewhere, they have already made your point for you.

Some of us are getting so good at blasting Mantra logic at the Anti-Whites, we NEED to remember when to hold fire, and allow the enemy to make a mistake.

When I see Anti-Whites proclaiming to support white Genocide, openly acknowledging it, calling it Genocide, calling themselves Anti-White, and taunting/gloating about it etc… I even hit the like button on their youtube comments when they get really overt and blatant.

Jmcaul, I’m glad you find the podcast helpful. You made my day!

That was my desire for it to be a learning tool.

At the end of the day, its about having good team members who put it to good use.

I wish there were, but as always the concern is that if we had a target list, would the Anti-Whites use that to get those said targets to start censoring harder.

We have gotten to the point where the enemy KNOWS they cannot address our message and we have gotten so good at making our point, they see themselves losing all the arguments, and so as a last resort they attempt to censor us.

Their new Mantra is “Silence Heresy with force because they commit Heresy when they speak!

I’ve been doing this too.

I have not figured out the best way to report Anti-White posting back, being our enemies Troll us and we could get the thread deleted if its seen here.

I have found that by wearing Anti-White clothing we can even come from the standpoint of “tearing it appart” and saying “the best way to shut these Mantra guys up is to just tell them; YES I support this NON-Violent White Genocide, theres nothing you can do about it! There now go away and cry about it racist scum!“.

All they need to do is see is “fellow” Anti-Whites “successfully” defending themselves with it.

They will start using it to defend themselves because they are already EXAUSTED by the swarm.

This way they think they are winning the battle, but losing the war.

Over time, those of us who see them posting blatant support of White-Genoicde it in responces to us, let them think they have “won” this way.

When one of them comes out loudly procaliming they support White-Genocide, simply move on to another thread. Once they say they support it they have done more for us already and we don’t need to show anyone who has the moral highground.

They are actively talking about the MEME either way.

Over time as the Anti-Whites catch on what we are doing there, THEN they have PANIC and HAVOC in their own camp. Never sure who is a plant.

Pro-Whites have dealt with this for YEARS.

Time for our enemies to feel it too.

They cannot trust eachother, and become paranoid when the see other Anti-Whites saying other Anti-White things. This really starts to mess with their heads and pretty soon they sounds like US trying to keep each other from saying Anti-White things, since they think it might be us. It just gets SILLY from there on out.

I was listening to Trucker Roy’s radio show from SF, and he had Horus on. I went to the page, started downloading and listened to all of them, probably 3 x each.

He sounded DIFFERENT to all the pessimistic things I had heard before.

This guy was coming from a confident CAN DO, position.

I was in that “all is lost” crowd, simply listening to whatever I could to make sure I was not the only one who felt the same way.

THEN when I realize there WAS something I could be doing it was a gigantic paradigm shift.

I didn’t get into making a podcast series until after a chance call to the Don and Derek Black show. I was then contacted by whitegenocideproject.com.

The only reason I called D&DB show that day was I was bored after having been IP banned from so many websites.

In banning me, they created me.

I’ve refined that a little more in the thread on it… figured should c&p here too. I’d edit the above if I could.

“Nobody is forcing anyone to Interrmary”

BULLSHIT!

Anti-Whites insist Whites cannot be allowed anywhere exclusive for our race, and they enforce conditions which lead to interracial marriages intended to destroy our race.

Nobody is insisting that Blacks need to be prevented from having anything exclusive in order to inflict conditions which lead to intermarriages intended to destroy Blacks as a race and then telling them “nobody is forcing you to intermarry”.

Saying that intermarriage isn’t being forced is trying to conceal the fact that the conditions which lead to it ARE being FORCED.

“Nobody is forcing anyone to Interrmary”

Either one alone or both of these combined work:

Anti-Whites insist Whites must not be allowed to have anywhere exclusive for our race, they enforce and impose conditions that lead to those interracial marriages intended to destroy our race.

Nobody is insisting that ALL Black countries and ONLY Black countries need to be prevented from having anything exclusive to themselves in order to impose conditions which lead to intermarriages intended to destroy Blacks as a race and then telling them “nobody is forcing you to intermarry”.

Telling us that intermarriage isn’t being forced is trying to conceal the fact that what leads to it IS being FORCED.

Interestingly, in ANY Mantra conversations I have EVER had, I don’t recall ever being asked to define myself.

It was always more so involved with using their words against them, asking them questions, mini mantras and talking points etc…

Never once did I start with “I am Pro White”, and if they ask me how I define myself (don’t recall it comig up, they like to call us names instead), I still make a practice to return with Questions, talking points, and pointing out the internal contradictions and double standards.

My responce is asked would likely be: “If every Black county had been flooded with non Blacks, and they were forced to live with these non-Blacks so they would eventually inter Marry and blend until there were no more Black people left, would you ask a Black man who opposed his Genocide how he defines himself? ”

Whenever I have used pro White, I also define it, and use it as a means to mention White Genocide:

“Are you a Pro-white who opposes the Genocide of whites, or an Anti-white who supports our Genocide?”

So, when asking the question I am defining Pro-white, as opposing white genocide.

I do see merits to white and normal, as well as just white, but so far Pro-white has been WORKING for me well, and as I said I always define it when I use it asking THEM a Question, and I’ve never been questioned how I define myself.

Fascistbrah, thank you for linking to the article, and weclome to the team. – That’s what you did good.

The bad news, is that I am about to ask you something, politely as possible.

Please log off and make a new handle name.

We do NOT want to Validate the names that Anti-Whites call us by using one of those names as a handle name.

You could try whitebrah, pro-whitebrah, whiteandnormalbrah, or my favorite…..: “Polarbrah”