https://mobile.twitter.com/AngryBlackLady/status/775011936001925120

http://www.wired.com/2016/08/alt-rights-dark-army-racist-trolls-just-great-day/

https://sports.yahoo.com/news/alt-beginners-guide-000000002.html

http://www.bustle.com/articles/180692-hillary-clinton-is-playing-the-alt-right-card-to-suggest-donald-trump-has-ties-to-white-supremacists

https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2016/08/25/in-major-speech-hillary-clinton-attacks-donald-trump-as-lifelong-racist.html

http://www.nationalmemo.com/trump-campaign-now-fully-aligned-white-supremacists/

http://www.vox.com/2016/8/25/12647810/hillary-clinton-speech-alt-right

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/08/25/what-alt-right-guide-white-nationalist-movement-now-leading-conservative-media/212643

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/23/alt-right-movement-white-identity-breitbart-donald-trump

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/08/hillary_clinton_s_alt_right_speech_was_shrewd_strategy.html

http://jezebel.com/hillary-clinton-takes-on-the-alt-right-in-excoriating-s-1785776458

https://thinkprogress.org/clinton-alt-right-speech-4c8832cf1572#.do81rmd7o

http://www.theverge.com/2016/8/25/12642006/hillary-clinton-speech-donald-trump-alt-right-white-supremacists

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/08/25/the_alt_right_is_thrilled_about_hillary_s_alt_right_speech.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-levin-jd/the-alt-right-barbarians_b_11706250.html

http://www.wsj.com/articles/alt-right-enters-the-political-limelight-1472081850

http://au.complex.com/life/2016/08/alt-right-clinton-trump-speech

http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/25/clinton-trump-offering-a-dog-whistle-to-his-most-hateful-supporters/

Carloman, that anti-white is trying to reframe the debate to his own advantage. Look at what the anti-white is doing: Instead of discussing White Genocide, he’s trying to come up with a “solution” and in doing so is trying to justify White Genocide in White countries outside of Europe and is admitting to the ongoing genocide in Europe. You need to mention this and force him into the corner.

Cut through it with:

So you admit there’s ongoing White Genocide in Europe, but you support White Genocide outside of Europe?

So you support White Genocide in America?

What are you saying before they make their reply?

“The Anti-Mantra Pro-Whites must be reading The Mantra and see the quotation marks around “assimilate” and think that that means it’s some sort of fake assimilation, inferior to the real thing…”

JPO, the mantra specifies that “assimilate” means intermarry. You’re overthinking this.

Scott, that American Thinker article http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/07/new_rhetoric_for_a_new_politics.html which you posted gave the following advice:

To call someone a race baiter is to be dismissive of that race baiter, but opposition to them requires more focus. To call them anti-white or white haters would be more effective than calling them race baiters.

When the race baiters start complaining about how blacks are suffering at the hands of the majority white society, would it not be refreshing and true if a conservative speaker, writer, or politician would say, “You are using anti-white rhetoric and sending a message of hate.”

You wouldn’t say to an anti-white: “we need to repatriate all the non-whites”.

Because that would be discussing a SOLUTION. And discussing SOLUTIONS is TAILGATING.

So why does it make it okay for you to discuss SOLUTIONS such as “Whites deserve a homeland”?

“Whites deserve a homeland” is discussing a SOLUTION, and discussing SOLUTIONS is TAILGATING.

Do you want me to spell that out for you? T A I L G A T I N G

Don’t worry. I’ve seen worse.

You are not meant to discuss whether anyone “deserves a homeland”. That’s too specific and makes it hard to get out of tailgating. It automatically raises things like “We want to repatriate non-whites”,”We want to change immigration policy”, etc. That’s not good psychological warfare and propaganda. Leave those things to the leaders in the future.