B. U. G. S.

Pretty much like the Jezebel article, with that same good quote from Bob:

http://national.suntimes.com/national-world-news/7/72/2419880/white-nationalist-group-endorses-trump-great-white-hope

http://www.sltrib.com/news/3378638-155/utah-based-dating-site-for-white-people

Debate was more lively on the company’s social media accounts, where some users compared the site to the Ku Klux Klan and Jim Crow-style segregation, and others expressed gratitude to the site owners for standing up to a “white genocide” agenda.

@JPOutlook:

“Eyes Level” made this Vine for the campaign. https://vine.co/v/eL9gbdPj9Ku

I’m wondering how I can put that at the end of a few articles on White GeNOcide Project, like this one about probable future White House meme-messages that mention Bob:
http://whitegenocideproject.com/our-monthly-messages-on-afp-presidential-candidate-bob-whitaker-that-are-broadcast-from-the-white-house/

If I click on “embed” at your link and copy the code there into a “text” composing box at WGP, nothing shows up.

~~~~

A.F.P. is running pro-Trump ads on The Political Cesspool Radio show

🙂 I wonder what good they think that will do anyone?

No one mindlessly throws away opportunities as eagerly as pro-Whites do. We’ve had the website of the president of the United States available to our messages for three years now, and most pro-Whites think it an utter waste of their time (“time” to the tune of 2 or 3 of their precious minutes each month).

With blogs and other media ravenous for things to broadcast every day, I’ll never understand how anyone could think that media folk don’t keep an eye on the president’s website.

Just call me another old guy who’s baffled by the world he now lives in.

But maybe donations to AFP would go down if they don’t use some of it to support Trump, and there would be even less money for our robocalls?

Jason, thanks, and yeah, it’s really making me laugh! We work our butts off to penetrate media, and now they’re coming to us and using our stuff that we haven’t even done yet! Lol! Too crazy! 😀

SF’ers…I vacillate between a state of rage and demoralization (every month at petition time) that those people throw me into, and a determination to make some meaningful part of them play an important part in our work (aside from their having soaked up “anti-White” and “White Genocide” very well and now they unselfconsciously repeat those terms even in their anti-Mantra rants).

There are a very few of them…and very fine folk those few are!…who are already helping greatly.

Btw, it was the Telegraph, not our White House Meme Team, that mangled that meme of ours they quoted. I had to look up the word “byword.”

I’m wondering if we should take a hint from the Telegraph’s professional writer and change “Department of Deportation” to “Department for Deportation.” The latter sounds more active and menacing, even though it’s not the way our gov’t names its departments. I think I vote yes. (Free editorial help…great!) But I’m never confident about such things, if anyone else has an opinion about it.

I’m not much happier with my own choice which appears at the end of the first paragraph in this standard sequence that’s in a lot of our White House meme-messages:

ALL White countries and ONLY White countries are being flooded with third world non-Whites, and Whites are forced by law to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

Diversity is a code word for White Genocide.

In that first paragraph, I’m unhappy with both “integrate” and “blended out of existence,” because they seem too explicit…neither of them appear in the Mantra, and I think with good reason.

“Integrate” I dislike because it seems to challenge a holy of holies, and “blended out of existence” (or Gar5’s choice of “minority” in some form) seem to me to lead the reader further than he needs to be led, and in the case of my choice, to lead him to something that may be off-puttingly extravagant to him (yes, “White Genocide” itself will seem extravagant, but we’ve chosen that as one of our phrases to repeat and repeat until it becomes non-extravagant), or in the case of Gar5’s choice, to lead him to something that may seem “so what?” to him.

I feel that the ideal solution would be to leave out the three items I’ve mentioned (“integrate,” “blend out of existence,” and, in most but not all circumstances, “minority”) just as Bob does in the Mantra, but I haven’t seen how to satisfactorily do it in mini-mantras in the White House messages, or in news articles on WGP meant to spread Mantra. One needs to say something, it seems to me.

I’m not terribly upset with any of the three phrases, but I sometimes wonder if I should be. I did suggest to Gar5 that he could use a little stronger phrasing when he used the “minority” choice, such as “reduced to an irrelevant minority” rather than something like “become a minority.”

I don’t know, but that doesn’t sound to me like something Bob would write about. (I hope I’m wrong…I would love to read his thoughts on writing).

Bob is very economical with words. He doesn’t use many, and I never see him use 10-dollar words…he always gets by with 50-cent words.

If you try to memorize lines that Bob has written (as I once had to), you may find yourself unintentionally sticking in little additional words that make it sound more like the way everyone talks, and also makes it sound more clichéd, which Bob’s expressions never are, to my ear at least.