Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

8/13/05 Bob’s Weekly WOL Articles

Posted by Sys Op on August 13th, 2005 under WOL Weekly Articles


Weekly WhitakerOnline.org Articles

August 13, 2005
Our Established Religion
O’Reilly the Retard
The Collapse of the Communist Priesthood

Our Established Religion

The discussion in this week’s Saturday Internet radio program that can be linked at: Townhall will be entitled, “America’s Established Religion.”

Our established religion is Political Correctness.

Let me repeat that:

America’s established RELIGION is Political Correctness.

The reason they are able to get away with this is because of a myth pushed by respectable conservatives and preachers. This myth is that Political Correctness represents secularism and science.

Since the first amendment to the United States Constitution forbids the establishment of any RELIGION, the religion of Political Correctness is OK because it is not a religion. So every conservative goes into the debate saying that Political Correctness cannot violate the first amendment, whereas regular religion can.

Like all respectable conservatives, they have already surrendered before the debate begins.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

O’Reilly the Retard

I was fighting what is called the secularist agenda thirty years ago. I was marching, organizing marches, and doing press conferences against anti-religious textbooks the NEA was pushing. That was a generation ago, and all the conservatives thought I was being unrespectable.

As usual, decades later everybody is now discovering what I was doing a generation ago, and declaring it is good.

Even that poor little retard Bill O’Reilly is now denouncing the “secularist agenda,” which he discovered after everybody else had long since seen it.

But I didn’t fight the education establishment’s agenda because it was non-religious. I attacked it because I had infinitely more respect for the deep wisdom of the Bible Belt, with all its faults, than I did for the hair-brained kooks who called themselves “intellectuals.”

When Bill O’Reilly says that Political Correctness is secular, he is handing the professor-priesthood the first amendment on a silver platter. No matter how you try to talk around it the first amendment does NOT ban the government establishment of any form of secularism. It bans RELIGION.

Religion is not a bunch of people sitting in a church or synagogue or mosque. Scientology has the status of a religion, but it has no god. When Catholic priests first reached Asia they were astounded to discover that Buddhism was a religion with out a god.

Religion is a set of beliefs based on faith.

Political Correctness is a set of beliefs based entirely on faith. Every university requires you to do homage to “diversity,” though there is no evidence whatsoever that this “diversity” has any value at all. That is a belief enforced on the basis of faith, but the professor-priesthood is able to enforce its faith because conservatives insist that the religion of the professor-priesthood is some kind of science, not religion.

Tens of millions of young people spend their entire lives paying for the professor-priesthood. Right now tens of millions of young people are paying off the back-breaking student loans they had to take out to pay to go to college.

I do not know a single one of them who doesn’t know he was cheated.

But that is just the beginning.

After wasting four years of their lives in college taking courses they scarcely remember and ten years paying off their student loans, some of them are in their mid-thirties hoping to have families. But every child they have is going to require their putting aside huge piles of money, not for a home or for retirement, but for tuition.

All this is backed by government. College degrees are required by government. Government enforces accreditation, which is the life-blood our professor-priesthood lives on.

A generation of young people will spend their entire lives in vassalage to the professor-priesthood.

A whole generation of young people is ripe for rebellion.

They are not interested in O’Reilly’s drivelings about secularism versus religion.

They want their FREEDOM.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

The Collapse of the Communist Priesthood

When I went to a Communist country I crossed the dead line. There were land minds and guards with automatic weapons who would kill escapees. Inside the country there were long, long lines at any store that happened to have something for sale.

When I left the country, nobody outside seemed to notice those things, least of all the anti-Communists. They were busy theorizing about evil atheistic Communism versus their own religious values.

Everybody remembers Ronald Reagan’s famous words, “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!”

What they do NOT remember is that Reagan’s respectable conservative staff removed those words THREE TIMES from his speech and he has to reinsert them himself each time. They did not want him to talk about the Wall he was standing in front of. They wanted him to talk theory.

People in Communist countries wanted FREEDOM from an insane rule by the Communist religion. Nothing in the Communist faith WORKED, but no one was allowed to doubt it. So hundreds of millions of people were enslaved by it while conservatives dribbled theories to each other in National Review.

Today a generation of young people wants freedom from the unbelievably silly professor-priesthood. But National Review and O’Reilly want to dribble theories about a secularist agenda to each other.

It is time for us to tear down the wall in front of us. This insane priesthood must go, not because it is secular, but because it is a priesthood to which our government enslaves us.

It is time we remembered what the Constitution and especially the first amendment to the Constitution, really means.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Camie on 08/13/2005 - 8:36 am

    You have hit the nail on the button as they say. Thank you for sharing your wisdom with us. You have given me some more food for thought which I will be thinking of how to act upon.

    Camie

  2. #2 by Shari on 08/13/2005 - 3:28 pm

    This reminds me of things my Dad always kept saying about so called “educated” people since I was a child. If you didn’t go along though you pretty much lost out. In his case it was the GI bill and farm substities. Those who got on board and managed to buy out their neighbors did very well, sent their kids to college on other peoples money. Kids become college professors and vote left and here we are today. My father is now 79yrs. old and he consoles himself and us by saying things like “Well, we had breakfast this morning.” He was a sharp tongued young man,but is the sweetest old man.

  3. #3 by Diamonddille on 08/14/2005 - 7:12 pm

    Hi Bob, You are right on.This point if understood more deeply by society would end all the disagreements out there. All the problems we have in the world is based on Disagreements, You have the Republican V/S Democrate, Medical ProfessionV/S Natural paths, psychiatry V/S Scientology, religion V/C another religion. So much disagreement over what supposedly is, Who Is right?
    What I have realized nobody is right and yet everyone is right. I’ll try to explain. When one is on the pathway of realizing who they really are they run upon some amazing discoveries. What truth actually is: Everything is based upon ones perception of how they see there surroundings. as everyones perception is different, They agree with people of the same level you know, the wino with the wino the hippy type with the hyppy type, the bar room type with the bar room type I hope that communicates.So ones Reality is just based on ones perception,so that is his agreement, so that will, be the way he sees it.Others seeing it the same will agree with him. As one asends in awareness and conciousness he sees more and more of the truth. This reflects in his viewpoint. But get the Idea That we are human beings, but religions tell us we are spiritual beings. Well that tells me that we as man to grow up means we have a lot of growing up to do. I think that is our future and we are going to see some very strange concepts come about and we must realize that any time we learn we have new concept coming at us, other wise we would already know. As man is not yet operating as Spiritual beings in general, I think there are alot out there who have achieved some very high levels and will naturally agree with each other, but not the general mass conception yet, So what I am trying to say is ones perception is the basis of his awareness and creates his reality, which is basically just agreement, As one goes out of agreement thru spiritual growth, he is basically going out of agreement with the physical and is seeing the spirital aspect and those (spiritual laws which are senior to physical laws), so now has access to a higher plane of agreement or sees more and more of the truth. The physical level is based on lies and deception and is hell if there ever was one, as one climbs in perception, he sees the truths of existence, so his reality and or agreements change. But so does his responsibility, his Havingness, his integrity,,the size game he is playing, his affinity or love for his fellow man, he does more for man, he is more creative, more in the present in other word should become more like our concept of God. So knowing this you can just look at what viewpoint is more survival, , creative, and the more able and know the more one is doing to help man kind in general is probably the one to look at. Sorry about my website, but it is all I have, so you can get back to me on my website in it.

  4. #4 by Bob on 08/14/2005 - 8:30 pm

    Where IS your website?

You must be logged in to post a comment.