Written by Bob Whitaker

Dr. Joseph Goebbels was the head of Adolf Hitler’s Ministry of Propaganda.

Though he did not openly advocate genocide, Dr. Goebbels said Germany should somehow get rid of Jews and other minority groups. Before World War II, the Nazis discussed many ways of dealing with “the Jewish race.”

Dr. Goebbels’ goal was that of abolishing the Jewish race’s presence in all the countries he saw as “Aryan” countries. One way to do this was to send the Jews to Africa or Asia and mix them in with the populations there.

Genocide or not, I think we all recognize that what Dr. Goebbels was pushing was Hate.

If you want to rid the world of minorities, you are a Hater.

If you want to rid the world of white gentiles, you are a Constructive Social Critic.

If you want to rid the world of minorities the way Dr. Goebbels did, you get executed as a Hater.

If you want to rid the world of white gentiles, you are paid well as a Constructive Social Critic.

Dr. Noel Ignatiev is a paid Constructive Social Critic. Dr. Ignatiev is a professor at Harvard University in a chair fully financed by big business money. This Constructive Social Critic says:

“The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.”

So Professor Ignatiev is a Constructive Social Critic and I am now under suspicion of being a racist.

If you want to prove this to yourself, ask yourself a quick question. Is anybody going to get mad at Ignatiev for getting paid to push the abolition of the white race, or are conservatives who read this going to suspect that I am “a committed white racist?”

All respectable conservatives have to agree to abolishing the white race. They don’t say it the way Ignatiev does, but every conservative and every liberal agrees 1) that the Third World must be encouraged to immigrate and integrate into EVERY white majority country; and 2) The Third World must be encouraged to immigrate and integrate ONLY into white majority countries. No one brings up Third World immigration into Japan (which is less crowded than the Netherlands), or into Taiwan or into the huge undeveloped regions of Africa.

Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians.

When liberals and professional conservatives get relaxed, they agree that intermarriage is the “solution to the RACE problem.” But nobody talks about a “solution to the race problem” in Asia or Africa. The “solution to the race problem” means “the solution to the white problem,” and we all know it.

So when Goebbels advocated the “solution to the Jewish problem” he was engaging in Hate. To prove you have no hate in you, you have to favor the “solution to the RACE problem.”

This is too subtle for the average college graduate, but it’s pretty easy to see through if you have normal intelligence. And once again, the only person who will be accused of Hate for mentioning this will be me.

Today, Constructive Criticism says that anyone in Europe who says that the white race deserves credit for anything, from wiping out smallpox to going to the Moon, is a racist.

Anything good is done by the Progress of Humanity. Good things are done by All Humanity, not by whites.

To quote directly from the script, “This is a small step for Man and a Giant Leap for Mankind.”

But you are required to say that whites did everything evil, from the death of American Indians to African slavery to capitalist greed and beyond.

Dr. Goebbels admitted that Jews were shrewd, but he said all the advances Jews were credited with were stolen from others. Dr. Goebbels said the Jews were responsible for every evil thing that was done.

Every student is taught that whites do the world’s evil and Mankind does all the good.

Dr. Ignatiev points out that this leads straight to the Final Solution to the White problem. To be a conservative spokesman, you have to agree with this, though they seldom come right out and say it the way Ignatiev does.

They use terms like “a multiracial Europe” or “a melting pot America.” But the bottom line is that whites have to go.

Dr. Goebbels said that the bottom line was that the Jews had to go.

The Final Solution has not changed. The only question is which people you want the solution applied to.

Written by Bob Whitaker

Finding out about reality comes from almost any starting point. Mine has been racial. But soon one cannot really look at enemies of our race without learning about the hatred that comes from jealousy.

One notes very quickly that the people who shout “Hate!” the most are the ones who hate the most. You begin to notice the basis of hatred. You begin to notice its symptoms. So you understand leftist economics. You see that leftists TALK about the poor, but their real focus, their real goal, is hatred of the rich.

You see the undercurrent of the left. They do not REALLY mind so much if people are desperately poor. They are livid about some people being rich. In other words, they talk about loving the poor, but their real motivation is that they hate the rich. By the same token, anti-whites don’t care if people are ugly. Their motivation is that they hate those who are beautiful.

The Germans have a word for this. It is called Schadenfreude, the joy a person takes when someone who is better off than he is suffers horribly. There is no English word for it, but it is an explanation for most of the sickest things in our society. If we realize THAT, maybe our society wouldn’t look this way. As one whose life has been devoted to racial survival, this has been obvious to me from the get-go. Others NEVER discover it.

The same respectable conservative who says over and over that leftists hate the rich and don’t care about the poor cannot see that he has the same attitude about race. As an extension of what Trager Smith says, it is the right, the “Pro-Lifers” and the National review types, who are the ones who are dedicated to the end of the white race today.

If you look at race, you begin to see that somehow suicide has become an ideal in our society. And you find out why, IF YOU LOOK UP.

I started by looking DOWN. I had the childish torchlight parade view of history. I blamed everything on Jewish influence. That was back in my white hat black hat days of cowboy movies. But there was one saving grace. I was also not interested entirely in the Middle East or in Jews. I came to understand that the Jews, despite what Jews and anti-Semites agree on, did not make our world. They did not make HALF our world, the purely evil half.

In fact you cannot find the Aryan suicide disease anywhere in the Middle East, though you spend eighteen hours a day poring over the Talmud for hidden codes. You find it in all OUR religions. No one but me has ever commented on the fact that the suicide impulse of St. Paul had no basis at all, whatsoever, in the Old Testament. Jesus could have said that thinking of SEX when one saw a beautiful woman was a sin, but he did NOT say that. He said “adultery.”

It took millions of words of Biblical Commentary to get everyone’s mind off the realization that Jesus knew the difference between simple sex and adultery. If a supernatural influence got our minds off that, I doubt it came from Heaven. No, you can’t find a condemnation of survival itself anywhere in the Old Testament or in the words of Jesus. It came from St. Paul, and St. Paul got it from the overwhelming alternative religion of his day and place: degenerate Zoroastrianism, which before it became degenerate, specifically excluded all but Aryans.

Hence “Iran.”

You can start in one point and deduce the world from it. Or you can start with race and look DOWN. Your world becomes Jews or blacks or some other obsession. You know more and more about less and less until your entire world consists of justifying your obsessive world view. It is a tiny world view. And it is a DELICATE world view.

It is delicate the way anti-evolutionary fundamentalism is delicate. Any proof of any aspect of evolution or any animal that lived before 4004 BC can destroy your entire lifetime of faith. When these people read what I say, they couldn’t care less about where I am going. They are looking for some statement of mine that is contrary to their delicate faith.

”Give me a lever and a place to stand and I will move the world.”

Give me a place to begin and I will unravel mysteries.

But no lever can move the world if your one favorite cloud has to stay in the same exact spot.

By Bob Whitaker – Originally posted 

“Bob. I’m heartened by the fact that while our “printing press” is causing the “word” to be spread to more and more people, it seems the powers that be are in a mad dash to force the dark races into historically white lands. It’s almost as if they fear our “Thesis” and are hell-bent to force their desired outcome onto us before we get a chance to scotch the wheels of their damnable actions.”

Mark, that last paragraph explains exactly what is going on. But it also demonstrates how everything they do blows up in their face.  

1) The Mantra would not have been such a bomb in their faces if they had stayed with the old gradual integration and propaganda approach. No one believed me when I said it in the 1960s, but everybody can see it now that we are being overrun.

2) Everybody else on our side looks at the other side as a giant, Hypergenius Conspiracy that makes no mistakes. I am a professional looking for the mistakes other professionals make.

I see a bunch of idiots who are so blinded by hate that they are filling Europe up with people who hate them more than Hitler did. I see a bunch of imbeciles writing laws that puts doubts about the Holocaust out in a way none of our meager powers of persuasion could have done.

In a real war, overestimating your enemy is every bit a fatal as underestimating him.

3) A recent book called “Importing Revolution” goes into the fact that the 60s radicals, who never met any working Americans, were repeating all that crap from Marx — who also never did a day’s work in his life — about “working class revolution” in America.

Meanwhile the Communist World magazine was raising hell about how MY tiny group was “part of a heavily financed right-wing conspiracy” because we routinely became spokesmen for grassroots workers’ protests that would LYNCH a Commie who showed up.

Our heavily financed little Populist Forum never even had a back account. There were three of us and we paid our own way.

We got out in the streets and we were part of making working people into Reagan Democrats. Respectable conservatives didn’t know any working people either, which is why William Rusher, publisher of National Review, came to ME after I proved we not only knew working people, they let us speak for them.

I can talk with a hardhat for hours, but an “intellectual” bores my tail off in five minutes.

4) Their strategy is, as you say, desperate. It rests on two assumptions:

a) That if they get enough of their Faithful Colored Companions in here, they will be VOTED into power;

AND:

b) A country into which they get enough of their Faithful Colored Companions will remain a DEMOCRACY. Every Communist country used to brag that over 99.5% of their population voted in every election.

Only North Korea ever declared that one hundred percent, every last one of its people, voted in one election.

Well, hell, if dead people can vote in Chicago, why can’t North Koreans who are in a hospital with a coma vote there?

c) Another problem with this strategy is the old joke about the Original Faithful Colored Companion, the Lone Ranger’s Indian Tonto. The Lone Ranger says, “Well, Tonto, those Indians have us surrounded. It looks like we’re doomed.”

And Tonto replies, “What you mean ‘We,’ Paleface?

When America breaks up into racial divisions, each representing its OWN interests, we’ll make them an offer they won’t refuse. Those who DO refuse will be left out in the cold, like the white traitors who will have no one to turn to.

This is a war. If the other side NEVER does anything stupid, you might as well start drawing up the best Unconditional Surrender document you can think of.