Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!


Posted by Laura on July 13th, 2020 under Coaching Session, We Do What Works

Written by White&Normal

I’m sure I’m not the only one to notice a surge in our terminology.

I’m also sure I’m not the only one to notice the term “anti-white racism”.

We all know this is bad and will inevitably lead to “They’re the REAL racists.”

We need to hammer our term “Anti-Whitism” into this discourse.

That is all.

  1. #1 by -scythian- on 07/18/2020 - 3:38 pm

    “They’re the REAL racists” is something Rush Limbaugh and his type were saying 30 years ago. It’s quintessential cuckservatism.

    When a supposed supporter of us replies to one my mini-mantras by saying “they’re the real racists” or one of it’s equivalents, I NEVER let it slip, I ALWAYS reply by asking ‘what do you mean by “racist?’ and/or ‘by “racist” are you saying whites have no right to group defense’ or ‘by racist you’re saying the White RACE has no right to exist in the future?’

    Of course, I NEVER get an answer.

    What do you think is the best reply when a supposed supporter says “they’re the real racists” ?

  2. #2 by Laura on 07/19/2020 - 6:29 pm

    I would ask “why are you reinforcing the enemies terminology?”

    They arent “racist” they are anti-white.

  3. #3 by JPOutlook on 07/29/2020 - 12:46 am

    you’re not supposed to get into semantics, you’re supposed to point out the contradictions. anti-mantra pro-whites ARE anti-white in their basic thinking patterns, so they need to either be educated in this better way, or so blinded by the intellect of the pro-mantra pro-white that they get discouraged and yield the discussion space to the pro-mantra pro-white(s). either is acceptable

    and by contradictions i do naturally mean the difference in standards between asia, africa and white countries

You must be logged in to post a comment.