I think that repetition is always good.
I also think that the reference to the Netherlands and Belgium being as crowded as Taiwan and Japan is very important.
I well remember that in my first introduction to the Mantra I was most influenced by the comparison of the Netherlands and Belgium to Taiwan and Japan.
Its logic is very powerful to anyone who has not considered the asymmetry of the standards of Political Correctness between white and nonwhite nations.
Black nationalism is a reality, Chinese nationalism is a reality, Japanese nationalism is a reality. These things need to be stressed.
********************
AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third-worlders and assimilating and intermarrying with them.
The words immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used to promote a program of genocide against the white race.
Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and assimilate and intermarry with all those non-whites.
All this immigration and intermarriage is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries.
This is about genocide against the white race.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
******************
Notice that I dropped some style conventions in the text such as “quote unquote” and “i.e.” because these are unnecessary to delivering a clear message.
Condensing the Mantra really isn’t the issue.
The enemies of the white race and particularly the anti-white white traitors need to know that there are people who are intent upon bringing them to justice.
Right!
I also think the discussion of the black got off the subject. I believe that if the Mantra stayed on the same subject, as Dave does here, I would not have lost Shank.
Shall we make this our new Mantra?
The question mark means it’s a question. A question is a request for an ANSWER. BUGS is no longer just Bob’s.
#1 by backbaygrouch4 on 09/02/2008 - 7:10 am
If brevity is the goal eliminate either Belgium or Netherlands; ditto, Japan or China. Does doubling the examples reinforce or dilute the emphasis?
#2 by Simmons on 09/02/2008 - 11:11 am
It is not the length of the Mantra that leaves people slightly perplexed. As I said before, before it is delivered it needs an introduction which in Power Point language is almost an executive summary in bold one short sentence format followed by details in short sentence format.
#3 by Dave on 09/03/2008 - 7:34 am
Repetition works when “another coat of paint” is needed to allow something to sink in.
But also, repetition is good when every repeat adds another dimension. For example, “texturing” an observation such as in the three repeats:
“There is no such thing as humankind”
“There is no such thing as a family of man”
“Race is for real”
#4 by Tim on 09/03/2008 - 6:46 pm
This is damn good. Good job Dave!
This election does not meant anything to BUGS. With one exception that has come up a few times and that is the RACE issue. Race keeps coming up time and time again.
Now, I was just alerted to the fact that if Obama looses blacks are going to riot and have race wars. If you do Google/Yahoo etc searches for “Obama looses Race war” you get some interesting results.
Patrick Buchanan’s last article brought this up. I was not paying much attention until some liberals question me on this. They were surprised that I did not care WHO won or lost. I told them since blacks were promising race riots/war that NOW I DO CARE. Hell, I gotta vote Republican now and hold them to it!
As you said many, many posts ago, this “berlin wall” could come down at any time. We need to be ready for anything. And picking Palin may turn out to be the smartest damn thing Mccain ever did in this world. She certainly looks “middle america”.
Ok now back to the regular BUGS programming and sorry to get off topic.
#5 by backbaygrouch4 on 09/03/2008 - 7:03 pm
“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan,…” Is this effective repetition? Or even repetition? Would it work better splitting the comparisons?
“The Netherlands is more crowded than Japan; Belgium, more crowded than Taiwan. But nobody….’
This adds one word but makes two separate, sharp, free standing comparisons. The ‘and’ versus ‘and’ approach blurs the comparison by multiplying the images the mind must summon to see the point being made. The two comparison format calls up one image against another image, thus hammers the clear point home twice.
#6 by savethechildren on 09/03/2008 - 8:50 pm
Discussions on the mantra.
For what it is worth. I’ve felt the analogy to unrestricted immigration to a black country as lacking something. I don’t believe people really care about black people so reference to a black country loses on emotionally appeal. Liberals don’t really care about them and the rest of mankind sees them more clearly as they are, so they don’t have a great deal of sympathy for them. Black might be too abstract.
Perhaps using an analogy to the Japanese might be better because the Japanese are viewed more as human beings because they are seen as productive, intelligent, honorable, creative, wise, etc. Plus we are hit by advertisements from Japanese companies so they have really become a valuable part of our culture. The loss of the Japanese would be more meaningful and tangible to people.
Or more of an emotional appeal could be made, coming from a deep level of the psyche, to women or children. Its hardwired into us to protect women and children. And appeal to this protective drive could make the mantra more powerful.
I’m new to this internet warrioring, and yet have found that its pretty simple to set up a blog and get hits from posting the mantra.
What is needed I believe, once a person reads the mantra and wants more, is a more structured transfer to whitakeronline.org. An interface of some sort to bring people up to speed with the program. The information is overwhelming and a lot of people might be lost who could become internet warriors.
#7 by Dave on 09/04/2008 - 12:47 pm
backbaygrouch4
I think that is a good revision.
“The Netherlands is more crowded than Japan; Belgium, more crowded than Taiwan. But nobody…”
is more effective.