Weekly WhitakerOnline.org Articles

July 2, 2005
The British Thought Police Take Action
Me and John and Nick
Nick Griffin Searches ME Out
The Ultimate Sacrifice

Fun Quote:

Westerners would never pay back their Muslim enemies in kind for 9-11, because no one is about to commit suicide in defense of hedonism.

— The Last Ditch

.

The British Thought Police Take Action

The British Broadcasting Company (BBC) secretly filmed tape for a documentary about the British National Party (BNP) early last year. Since then the British police have been arresting BNP members and party leaders for what they said on that show.

You see, there is law in Britain against saying anything that might incite racial violence.

Please note that word “might.”

There are laws in America against inciting violence. The classic example is shouting “Fire!” in a crowded theatre. But that law has a very important exception. You may shout “Fire!” in a crowded theatre if there IS a fire in a crowded theater.

When it comes to being convicted of inciting to violence, British law has no such exception. A man was sent to prison for inciting to violence when every word he said was true. In the case of The Crown versus Pierce (1986) the court ruled that, under the racial laws, “The truth is no excuse.”

There is one more little difference between law in a free country and the British race laws against free speech. In order to be convicted for inciting violence in a free country you have to actually incite somebody.

The BBC documentary was made a year ago and there is no evidence that what the BNP members said during their private meeting incited anybody.

Oh, and one other little difference. If a TV station puts on a program that incites violence in a free country, the TV Company is as liable as the person who said the words. The question of condemning the BBC has not come up, and will never come up. They are being praised as apparatchniks of the British section of the World Politically Correct Thought Police.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

Me and John and Nick

The two main arrestees in this Thought Police Raid were BNP leader Nick
Griffin and former BNP leader John Tyndall. I know them both.

John Tyndall spoke at the 2004 New Orleans Euro Convention. He is the kind of rip-roaring speaker who brings the crowd to its feet again and again. He is a hell of an act to follow.

Well, SOMEBODY had to speak right after John Tyndall.

When John Tyndall stepped down from the podium to be mobbed by his ecstatic admirers, somebody had to go up and follow that act.

They needed a sacrificial lamb, someone who was dumb enough and loyal enough to be the anticlimax right after one of the high points of the Convention.

Guess who they picked?

Oh, well, I have taken embarrassment for the cause for lesser reasons.

A few years ago, there was a leadership change inside the BNP and Nick Griffin took over the chairmanship. Once again, both the new chairman of the BNP and I spoke.

At this year’s Euro Convention, Nick Griffin searched me out. He was already having problems with the British Government and felt I might be able to help.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

Nick Griffin Searches ME Out

The BNP gained some votes in the latest British election and, by some strange coincidence, they were denied the right to have a bank account in Britain. Many years ago I did a lot of work moving money from country to country to help fight terrorists. Since many of the places I worked for were former British colonies, all this was better known in Britain than in the US.

Once again, can you imagine a free country in which any party, no matter how radical, was banned by the authorities from having a bank account? That’s one way they handle opposition in Britain.

Tony Blair wants to help Bush make Iraq a Land of Liberty like Britain.

Nick Griffin asked me about his banking problem, and I am going to try to set up a bank account the BNP can use here.

As soon as I got back from New Orleans I called a big-time lawyer friend of mine whom I last saw on Capitol Hill when he was setting up a bank. Our conversation was a little confused at first. Finally he got what I was talking about.

“You mean,” He said, “They won’t let them put their OWN money into their OWN bank account?” He had thought they were trying to set up a BANK. Even he, a right-wing activist for decades, was astonished at this.

My reply was, “They’re living in 1984 over there, man.”
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

The Ultimate Sacrifice

Right after the Convention, Griffin made the ultimate sacrifice: He actually READ my book, Why Johnny Can’t Think: America’s Professor-Priesthood cover to cover. He LOVED it. It is every bit as descriptive of the leftist professor tyranny of Britain as it is of the one in America.

And much of the humor in it is exactly the kind an Englishman would appreciate. It would cause a LOT of trouble over there. That is just the sort of thing this kind of government persecution is meant to stop.

Nick is ordering a couple of cases of the book for BNP distribution. He has plenty of serious matters to deal with, but finds my book important enough to add that to his plate. No matter whether they will soon be convicted or not, the British tyranny has crippled the BNP for some time.

I am proud to stand with men like Tyndall and Griffin. You will remember that when the head of the Canadian Free Speech Movement was caught with copies of my book at the Canadian border, the books were seized.

I am not in the same league as people like Tyndall and Griffin, but I am very proud to be on their side. My reason for writing the book and working to get it out there, is to try and stop the Inquisition of Political Correctness before it goes as far as it has in Britain.

Maybe we can keep some of our best men from having to face jail time for standing up for us.

Weekly WhitakerOnline.org Articles

June 25, 2005
Castles in the Air
One Castle Just Fell
No Show
Why the Whole Thing Looks Different to Me

Fun Quote:

“The concept is interesting and well-formed, but in order to earn better than a “C” the idea must be feasible.”

— A Yale University management professor in response to Fred Smith’s paper proposing reliable overnight delivery service.

Smith went on to found Federal Express Corp.

.

Using Time

My internet radio program this week is about the fact that the Soviet castle in the sky fell, and the American castle in the sky is ready to go, too.

It is called “Idiocracy.”

America’s established religion, Political Correctness, is sitting on nothing. It is made up of mindless, bureaucratic fools who have promoted each other to titles that sound great, but mean nothing.

They are living on inertia, just like the Soviet Union did for so long. Only a cold-blooded murderer like Lenin or Trotsky or Stalin and finally Brezhnev could keep the system going by terror.

Nobody believed in any of that Marxist nonsense anymore than anybody really believes in Political Correctness today. All they have left is a more subtle form of terror. They can get you fired. They can withhold a college degree.

Outside the United States, this terror is less subtle. You say the wrong thing and you go to prison, though a much nicer prison than the Gulag. Under capitalism you are ruined professionally instead of being sent to Siberia.

Each system that is run by mindless go-alongs and which does not work must base its power on its own form of terror.

No one predicted the fall of the Soviet Empire.

No one is predicting the fall of Political Correctness.

That is because the people who get paid to do all the public predicting assume the system they are studying rests on something.

But the Soviet system rested on nothing.

The same is true of our present system.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

One Castle Just Fell

The reason that the USSR fell is because it was sitting on nothing.

Not one single professional Sovietologist, not one, had any inkling that the USSR and its empire were about to collapse.

I have looked it up, and not one single “expert” had the slightest inkling that this was about to happen. Almost every time I mention this fact the person I am talking to says he heard about somebody who predicted it. I asked for a citation.

No citation.

I have searched.

Let me repeat this:

Not one single expert on the Soviet Union, who got paid the big bucks to know all about the Soviet Empire, had the slightest idea that the whole thing was about to go down.

What happens to a business consultant if he hasn’t the slightest inclination that his client’s competition is about to go under?

Every single one of those experts, inside and outside of government and the universities, cost thousands of dollars to “educate” and they all got paid good money.

They ALL failed.

Completely. Utterly. Inexcusably.

So what happened?

They all kept their jobs and most of them have been promoted since. All of them will get great pensions for the job they didn’t do.

We have plenty of experts on every aspect of our ruling religion, just as the Soviets did. But what was clear to Yeltsin, that the system was built on nothing, was something no expert INSIDE the USSR would be allowed to hint at.

And our experts OUTSIDE the system were just as oblivious to the fact that the Soviet Emperor had no clothes.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

No Show

In 1982, anyone who said the USSR was about to fall would have been laughed out of the room.

But what happened when the pressure was on was a game of dominoes:

1) Gorbachev renounced the terror that had kept the USSR going since Lenin’s Red Terror in 1918.

2) Suddenly people started saying what everybody was thinking, “This system is silly, is childish, the dream of a bunch of professors who never did a day’s work in their lives.”

3) People began to QUESTION. And that was the end.

Suddenly the Republics like Estonia and Ukraine started saying, “Why SHOULDN’T we be independent?”

People started asking, “Why are all other WHITE countries rich and we live at a level a third-world country would consider embarrassing?” The Confederate flag started showing up.

We all remember the crisis when Gorbachev was arrested and Yeltsin took his stand on top of a tank.

We all remember waiting for the Soviet Army to show up.

It never showed up.

NOBODY believed in the System. The Emperor was as naked as plucked chicken and had been for years.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

Why the Whole Thing Looks Different to Me

Everybody else sees Political Correctness as a giant, unbelievably powerful monolith. Which is exactly how the USSR looked in 1982.

I repeat, in 1982, anyone who said the USSR was about to fall would have been laughed out of the room.

You see a huge, totally dominant system built on unimaginable amounts of money and power.

Above all, you see Evil Geniuses at work backing that system with their lives and with genius and subtlety and endless ruthlessness.

Like Yeltsin, who was from the Russian version of Pontiac, South Carolina, I see a bunch of wimps and ignoramuses like the Soviet bureaucrats. Yeltsin saw a Potemkin Empire in Russia.

You are too much a product of our system to be able to see it as it is.

All those grim-faced Sovietologists were complete morons. They looked at the USSR as a power forever. Respectable conservatives perform the same service for our own Idiocracy.

Push it hard and it will fall to pieces. The universities are a wonderful place to start. Tens of millions of young people are paying off back-breaking student loans, and every one of them knows he was cheated.

Tens of millions of young people are trying to start families, and each child will require the payment of college costs that are skyrocketing and show no sign that there will be any limit to them when their children reach college age.

Everybody knows that. Only I SAY that.

Our Idiocracy is ready to fall.

Go to

READBOB.COM

and let’s push it over the edge.

Weekly WhitakerOnline.org Articles

June 18, 2005
Using Time
We Need A New Approach For A New World
Who Are We?

Fun Quote:

Beware of marriage counselors who have been divorced and remarried several times.

Ex-spouses make good references.

.

Using Time

During my professor days, I often had to teach basic economics at 8 AM on Monday morning. It was a small nightmare.

First of all, basic economics is very, very boring. Secondly, a lot of students had to take it. Thirdly on Monday morning about everybody in the class, including me, was trying to recover from the weekend.

Spending fifty minutes talking about a notoriously boring subject when you and everybody else in the room feels like hell is a very, very unpleasant thing to have to do.

So I hit on a formula. I told the class that, if they listened to every word I said, my lecture would be over in half the time, twenty-five minutes. After twenty-five minutes, I kept the students who weren’t listening in for the whole fifty minutes. I just sat there and felt bad and let the rest go.

Soon I didn’t have to keep anybody.

And I found on tests that the class remembered what I said during that twenty-five minutes better than they remembered the material in any other class.

I could say it all twice in twenty-five minutes if everybody was listening.

No one was interested in this.

The job of a professor is to give fifty-minute lectures and sign a piece of paper that says a student took a course. It makes no difference whether the student learns anything. To get promoted a professor has to devote his life to pleasing other professors.

Other professors give him his degree.

Other professors decide whether he gets published.

Other professors vote on giving him tenure.

Other professors decide whether he gets promoted.

One published article is more important to a professor than a thousand students who learn the subject from him.

But the fact remains that twenty-five minutes well used is better than fifty minutes of routine lecture.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

We Need A New Approach For A New World

My Saturday show this week at 2 pm at

The Untrained Eye

will be about how to discuss our issues.

You have heard a thousand debates between “both sides.” You could write what the liberals are going to say and what the respectable conservatives are going to say. This way, the media says it has free speech and that it presents both sides.

This “discussion” consists mostly of conservatives trying to prove that they are less “racist” or “isolationist” or whatever than liberals say they are.

It is far, far worse than a waste of time. It is totalitarianism with a pretence of two sides.

Like a professor, a respectable conservative gets paid for filling a time slot. He could do it in his sleep. You could do it in your sleep.

The internet is breaking into this. But when an internet radio show goes on, it follows the old media rules.

Those of us talking on the internet spend most of our time trying to prove we are not who liberals say we are. We are called haters, so we use the useless old conservative tactic of quoting minority hate speech to prove we’re not the haters.

You know the drill.

The other regular media habit we have inherited is slavishly filling up a time slot.

This is a new medium. We need to develop a new approach.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

Who Are We?

Are those of who oppose Political Correctness just here to fight liberals?

Are we just here to provide “the other side” in the standard debate liberals set up?

No. We want to replace them completely. Destroying leftism completely is just a tiny first step.

That means the purpose of discussion is not to show we are not the “haters” or whatever other label the other side makes up.

Our job is to make OUR points.

Before you slide away and repeat the “they are the haters” crap, let me repeat what I just said:

That means that the purpose of discussion is not to show we are not the “haters” or whatever other label the other side makes up.

Our job is to make OUR points.

IF preventing the ongoing program of genocide against whites is racism, then we are racists. IF dedicating America to “ourselves and our posterity,” and to NOTHING else, is isolationism, then we are isolationists.

Screw it.

Your job is to make YOUR point.

This is called “staying on message.” No matter what they say, your job is to make the point that YOUR race is being subjected to genocide. Your job is not to make the other side stop saying mean things about you.

Your job is to make the point that we need to make a natural alliance with Russia to get out of using Middle East oil. Israel doesn’t like that.

Your job is to explain why all major Jewish groups have declared war on white gentiles for a very human reason. Your job is NOT to give an entire obsessive history of Jews except where THEY hurt US.

Is this anti-Semitism? Every minute you spend trying to prove it isn’t is a precious minute lost.

Your job is not to prove to every person who thinks he speaks for God how your ideas fit his.

Your job is to say what everybody knows and what almost everybody understands. Your job is to get the mainline back into power. Nut cases, right or left, are not your concern.

Stay on message. Tell the truth. Don’t discuss THEIR obsessions or THEIR labels. If you do, you are FAR worse than useless.

Weekly WhitakerOnline.org Articles

June 11, 2005
Routine Racism
How Respectable Conservatives Save Racist Liberals
Don’t Embarrass Poor Little Jesse
Interrogator

Fun Quote:

I walked twenty miles a day to school when I was young.

I know all the other old-timers tell you that, but they lived in Minnesota or New York.

I was raised in South Carolina, and walking twenty miles in the snow in South Carolina is MUCH more difficult.

.

Routine Racism

One of the main jobs of a political advisor is to analyze attitudes everybody has, but nobody realizes they have. I will be discussing one of these attitudes on this week’s internet radio broadcast. You can listen to the main program at any time:

Go To: The Untrained Eye

I call it routine racism.

When a liberal and I discuss race, we are both being very racist.

We both consider black people to be pathetic. The only disagreement we have is how to deal with the pathetic black folks.

So when blacks say whites are all racists, they are perfectly correct. But what they NEVER want to talk about is what that MEANS.

Let me give you an example of what I am talking about.

There are many black men like O.J. Simpson who make it very, very clear that they would never date a black woman. I remember watching a roast of Sammy Davis, Jr. on television. A black singer was thanking him for his help early in her career, and said:

“I couldn’t figure out why he was helping me. I wasn’t anybody special. I wasn’t white.”

Sammy Davis gritted his teeth and laughed. She was talking about his younger days when he married Mai Brit, a very blond Swedish actress. Brit had worn a revealing wedding dress that made her look like a whore. Davis would never date anybody with discernable Negroid blood in them.

In other words, O.J. Simpson would never date a woman who looked like his daughter with a white woman, and Sammy Davis would never date someone with the obvious Negroid blood in her that Davis’s son with Mai Brit has.

Every liberal understands why a black man would want a blond. Every liberal will fight for the black man’s right to have a blond.

Everybody understands a black man who is obsessed with blond beauty. That is the opposite of racism to a liberal. What the black man wants to do with that blond beauty is destroy it. He wants to produce children he would reject as a mate.

I love blond beauty. But I am a racist because I want to preserve it.

If you watch anything produced in Canada, you will see that they only have blond girls walking with very black guys or making whoopee with very dark and greasy-looking Middle Easterners. They have to pay their dues to Political Correctness.

Look at Swedish ads. The blond girls are always with very, very dark Middle Easterners or blacks.

This is required anti-racism. Liberals agree that blonds are more beautiful, and dark guys have a right to them.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

How Respectable Conservatives Save Racist Liberals

Back when Bob Jones University had its tax deductible status revoked because it did not allow interracial dating, a reporter interviewed three Bob Jones students, one black and two whites.
The liberal reporter asked the black student, “Don’t you resent being discriminated against?” The black student replied, “I can only date black women. I WANT to date black women. White students can only date whites. Why am I being discriminated against?”

That answer put the reporter in an AWFUL position.

If the other students had backed the black student up, he could have forced the reporter to admit that the reason he asked the black student that was because he looks upon black females as inferior.

Fortunately the reporter had the white students to talk to. As good respectable conservatives, they acted as if the black guy wasn’t there, and got the reporter off the hook by going into nice abstract arguments.

Liberals all agree that a black man who is denied blond beauty is being discriminated against.

Liberal or conservative or Communist, all white folks assume that non-whites are inferior. We only argue about what to do about it.

Liberals support the underdog. They take it for granted that blacks are the eternal and incurable underdogs.

So do I.

But I am the racist.

Black “leaders” live on liberal handouts. They leave it to heroes like Stokley Carmichael to go to Africa and die there working to help out black people.

Black “leaders” stay in the Maryland suburbs and make a good living attacking the Confederate flag.

They say whites are racist. We all know that. But black “leaders” never explain exactly what “racist” means. It would ruin their whole gig.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

Don’t Embarrass Poor Little Jesse

Back when Jesse Jackson first ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 1984, of all years, the media reported a problem the white candidates had. As the first debate approached, the media reported a concern other liberal Democrats had that they understood perfectly.

They were afraid of making Jesse Jackson look like a dumb (N word).

Jesse Jackson has never said anything in a debate that anyone could not have written for him. It was hard for even the most devoted liberal to convince people that Jackson was saying something interesting.

We all know why. If you look at any so-called black leader on television, you see what is obvious to everybody. He never says anything that doesn’t go straight from his parietal lobe to his mouth.

The human brain has a frontal lobe, where new information is processed, a parietal lobe behind it from which remembered information comes, and the occipital and temporal lobes which were there from early evolution. A black “leader” spouts. He never comes up with anything that he has not perfectly memorized from endless repetition.

What I have said is far too blunt. I need to say it more diplomatically. My bluntness is the result of my peculiar experience. Let me explain that to you.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

Interrogator

I have been a professional interrogator for decades. If you want to know what that does to you, listen to a routine conversation any experienced cop will have with another experienced cop:

“He’s lying. What do you think he’s lying ABOUT?”

They know a person is lying. It may be the fluid, unhesitating lying that anyone in prison learns to do, or it may be the opposite. A normally honest person hesitates and averts his eyes. There is no formula, there’s simply experience.

My doctor brother said to me, “It is incredible what people who take the Minnesota Personality Inventory (MPI) tell me.” He went on, “if they knew what those harmless questions told me, they wouldn’t do it even anonymously.”

When you talk to me, I hear every word, or I make you repeat it. I know exactly when you didn’t hear what I said.

I know where your statements are coming from, your memory or your thought.

When a black “leader” speaks and you watch his eyes, the lights go out. Watch him. Every word comes straight from the script he has repeated hundreds of times.

That was the problem the Democratic debaters faced with Jesse Jackson.

Every professional politician is an interrogator, and the liberals were worried about what they knew about Jesse Jackson.

They didn’t embarrass little Jesse, and every word Jesse said was straight out of his memorized play book.

I remember a black man who was part of a public discussion of Thomas Jefferson’s alleged relationship with Sally Hemings, the mulatto woman who was supposed to have borne his child. All the DNA tests proved proved about this was that Jefferson or a member of his family had fathered her child. It was probably one of his cousins.

But the black guy did not know a thing about this. When someone asked him if he had read the report, he was very indignant.

Of course he hadn’t read the report. That was not why he was there.

He was there because he was black. He was there to make a point. He was there to make the point that when the child was fathered Hemings was underage so Jefferson was a child molester.

No one expected him to read the report. He was black. NO one expected him to read the report. At the end of the program he said Jefferson was a child molester. That’s what he was there for and that’s what he did.

If a white man had done exactly the same thing, he would have been ridiculed.

But black is not white. Everybody understood the Democrats’ dilemma when Jesse Jackson showed up in the debate. They were dying to prove that the other white candidates were repeating the same old crap mindlessly. But they were terrified of even hinting that the black guy, the guy they knew was going to repeat the same old crap endlessly, was doing just that.

You know that. I know that. The media knew that. We also know no one is allowed to say it.

Except for me, of course.

Weekly WhitakerOnline.org Articles

June 4, 2005
The Tide of History
Hitler’s Revolution
Other Revolutions
Riding the Tide of History

Fun Quote:

You make friends by laughing WITH them.

You destroy enemies by laughing AT them.

.

The Tide of History

This Saturday on my radio show I will talk about “The Tide of History.”

This comes from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar:

“There is a tide in the affairs of men which, taken at the crest, leads on to fortune.”

That is the story of revolution throughout history…

It makes no difference whatever what the revolution is about. It makes no difference whether the revolution is good or bad. They all depend on riding the tide.

A revolutionary is exactly like a surfer waiting for his wave. A hundred other surfers are waiting for the big wave. None of them can CREATE the wave. If the wave does not come, they will all be left standing there with their surfboards in their hands looking a little silly.

But there WILL be a wave. That is the nature of the ocean.

There WILL be a wave.

That is the nature of men.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

Hitler’s Revolution

The reason that there are so many books about Hitler, not just the Nazis, but about Adolf Hitler himself, is because he stands out in history as a one-man show. Historians know that the Nazi Revolution could not have occurred without this unique personality.

So historians and Nazis keep asking, “What was there about Hitler that made this revolution?”

What, to use the colloquial phrase, did Hitler have going for him?

He certainly had talent. Even Churchill wryly admitted, “he was great man, if evil can be called great.”

Concentrating on Hitler personally it is easy to miss what Hitler “had going for him.”

Hitler had Germany’s defeat in World War I and the Allies insane drive to destroy Germany out of spite and greed. He had the wild German inflation in 1923. In 1933 he had the greatest and deepest Depression the world had ever experienced, with Germany suffering most because of the impossibly high reparations imposed upon them.

He had a stupid Communist Party. In 1933 the Nazis and the Communists between them held a majority in the Reichstag. No government could be formed which did not include either the Communists or the Nazis. If they had been reasonable, the Communists might have prevented the Nazi takeover. But they demanded power, so Hindenburg had no choice but to make Hitler chancellor.

The Nazi Party almost disappeared in the late 1920s. But when the tide of history rolled in, Hitler was ready for it.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

Other Revolutions

In 1776 America was a separate country from Britain. Almost every American had been born here, his father had been born here, his grandfather had been born here. The tea tax had nothing to do with it. A nation had grown up here that had no stake in the British Empire and it was time to separate. That was the tide of history.

If they had not been here at the crest of that tide, the Founding Fathers would have remained a group of talented gentlemen, nothing more.

If Robespiere and Napoleon had lived at any other time, history would have passed them over.

You can analyze Lenin all you want to, but he did not create World War I and a weak and stupid Czar and a Russian history of totalitarian rule.

A surfer who thinks he created the wave is insane.

But a revolutionary must, like a surfer, concentrate on being ready for the wave.

A person who is preparing for the Big Wave is entirely different from a swimmer who waits for nothing, but makes do with the water as it is and makes all his motions in a calm sea…

By exactly the same token, a revolutionary is entirely different from a politician, who makes his own motions.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

Riding the Tide of History

After the Battles of Lexington and Concord many patriots made impassioned speeches.

Some demanded peace. Some demanded war.

George Washington spoke very little. He just took his seat in the legislature wearing a uniform.

His message was, “There’s a war on. When you clowns get around to facing the facts, I’m ready to take over.”

In the Soviet Assembly in 1917, all was confusion. The chairman of the soviet, of which the Communist Party held only a few seats, asked, “Is there any party here that would be willing to assume complete control of the country at this time?”

Lenin stood up and said, “There is such a party.”

He was not playing politics. He was playing Revolution.

At this moment, everybody is trying to play politics. But there is a tide rising. The reason Europe and Canada have laws against discussing race is precisely because race is the elephant in the living room.

In the next age, someone will speak for the black race, someone will speak for the Asians, someone will speak for Hispanics.

And someone will speak for whites.

That is the tide of history.

While mealy-mouths are playing politics, whites are soon going to have to take on spokesmen. Not spokesmen for protecting the border and a melting pot. Spokesmen for WHITES.

Like Lenin and Hitler and, oddly enough, Washington, someone is going to have to see the wave and ride it. All regular politics will, quite simply, drown.