Search? Click Here
New to BUGS? Read Me
Join the BUGS Team by posting with us in the Working Thread

Demanding Free Speech Is The High Ground

Written by Bob Whitaker

In General Comments (link at top of this page) one pro-white pointed out that one attack consisted of what pro-whites on SF are always saying: It’s too late to save the white race.

The commentator was too wise to fall into that trap.

This “too late” business is a prophet only tactic they have against the Mantra: getting off the subject. Look at the Mantra. What is says is that white genocide is a legitimate topic of discussion on what is a legitimate subject of concern to white people.

The Mantra points out that this would be a natural topic of concern for BLACK people under the same conditions. Like amateurs in Stormfront, anti-whites want to go straight into the hopelessness of it all, which shows why the SFers are amateurs: They make the anti-whites’ points FOR them.

Kicking into your own goal is a great way to lose.

The answer to this is, as I say, IN the Mantra. This is a legitimate concern of white people. What is the first thing an intelligent human being does when faced with a legitimate problem?

He DISCUSSES it.

Anti-whites use this “hopeless” business to SUPPRESS any DISCUSSION of a legitimate problem. We refuse to get into solutions — like the Final Solution to the White Problem they are pushing under the euphemism “race” problem — until we are allowed to DISCUSS our legitimate concern.

Right now we are saying we should not be called racists to gag us from talking about white genocide.

Another GC 5 pro-white quoted a anti-white as saying we were just whining. He said we are complaining because WE don’t have enough children. This is the same mistake Lord Nelson was falling into and immediately got out of as soon as I called him on it:

This is not just immigration and “being overwhelmed by numbers,” it is the fact that any time someone presses intermarriage as a “solution” he has in mind that one of the partners is white. “Assimilation” is being pressed as a Final Solution to the WHITE Problem, not the “race” problem.

Keep YOUR objective in mind. Those who attack us are NEVER doing it to DISCUSS white genocide, they are ALWAYS demanding that all discussion of it be SUPPRESSED.

Our goal now is to argue that we have a right to discuss this without being yelled at or arrested. We deserve the same public forum freedom of speech allows anyone. It is the thugs attacking and screaming down our spokesmen that freedom of speech is designed to stop.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Fight White Genocide Podcast #9 – House Judiciary Committee Anti-White Inquistion Part 1


The crew discuss the April 9, 2019 House Judiciary Committee hearing on white nationalism.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

1 Comment

Anti-Hate is a code word for Anti-White…

Bugsers, here we have a new talking point that has just been quoted in the Washington Post and during a Judiciary Hearing. It was picked up from the YouTube chat during the Judiciary Hearing by Jeff’s comment as Fight White Genocide. I would like to have a discussion on the effectiveness of this new meme…have other bugsers used this meme before?

Bob would expect us as bugsers to have a discussion on this. How do we attack this term “hate” in the most effective way? Some have questioned that this new meme is hard to understand..

Some other optons may be….

You say you’re “anti-hate” but all you are is anti-white.

Any disagreement you call hate. Anti-hate is a code word for anti-white.

Jeff said today “Hate speech is any speech you hate”.

We are a meme team, so let’s discuss this new development and the fact that this meme of ours was picked up and quoted. 🙂

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

6 Comments

House Judiciary to Hold Hearing on Hate Crimes & White Nationalism

“Washington, D.C. – On April 9, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on hate crimes and the rise of white nationalism. This hearing will examine hate crimes, the impact white nationalist groups have on American communities and the spread of white identity ideology. The hearing will also foster ideas about what social media companies can do to stem white nationalist propaganda and hate speech online.”

https://judiciary.house.gov/news/press-releases/april-9-house-judiciary-hold-hearing-hate-crimes-white-nationalism?fbclid=IwAR0rbcc2NP_GagO3NLQdsVddQHMO8I0azsxpoGgjwpifcsq5B_arz6BjJWI

With the hearing set for tomorrow our team at FWG saw the need to make our pro-white position known to the Judiciary Committee.

Ken has faxed the following to ALL of the REP’S on the Judiciary Committee and snail mailed the same thing to the Hearing Room.

He has also sent it to each REP’s chief of staff and press secretary:

ATTN: All members of the House Judiciary Committee

We are a human rights organization monitoring & documenting the words & actions of those who wish to demonize Whites, incite violence against Whites, and coerce/intimidate Whites into submission of their genocide via forced assimilation & mass immigration.   If you have any questions feel free to contact us at info@fightwhitegenocide.com

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY White country and ONLY into White countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY White country and ONLY White countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-Whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-Blacks were brought into EVERY Black country and ONLY into Black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane Black man to notice this and what kind of psycho Black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the White race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-White.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

18 USC Ch. 50A §1091 – GENOCIDE

Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such—

(1)kills members of that group;

(2)causes serious bodily injury to members of that group;

(3)causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members of the group through drugs, torture, or similar techniques;

(4)subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part;

(5)imposes measures intended to prevent births within the group; or

(6)transfers by force children of the group to another group;

ALSO……

Jeff has written the following Communique which is posted on FWG.

Ken has emailed this to all staffers on both sides and we encouarge BUGSERS to spread this far and wide:

Communique to the Republican Members of the House Judiciary Committee re Upcoming White Nationalist Hearing

The following is a communique we have sent to staffers of the Republican members of the House Judiciary Committee. The purpose is to make our pro-white case and and also in the hope they may use some of our talking points. We also sent ALL committee members the US law on genocide (18 U.S.C. § 1091 ) and Bob Whitaker’s mantra.

Republican Members of the House Judiciary Committee:

“Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.” ~Harry S Truman

During the upcoming Holy Inquisition of the Religion of Political Correctness to be held April 9, 2019 in the House Judiciary Committee, your white voters will be watching to see whether you advocate or support any action which singles them out for censorship, whether done by you directly or indirectly through social media as a result of federal legislation. If you do, why should any of them vote for you?

Pro-whites have already been convicted without ever having a chance to defend themselves in court. They never invited anyone to testify on behalf of white people. This is just a sentencing hearing. But the anti-whites never made the case as to why pro-white advocacy is uniquely evil.

With that in mind, please consider the following:

Many political positions have violent advocates.

If you outlawed discussion of anything that had been horribly misused historically, anyone who talked about the distribution of income would be in prison.

Stalin used the question of the distribution of income to kill tens of millions, and Mao Tse Tung killed even more. Would it be all right then for a gang of thugs to show up and riot every time someone came to the campus to discuss income redistribution?

On July 7, 2016, in Dallas, Texas, Micah Xavier Johnson murdered five police officers and injured nine others. According to Dallas police chief David Brown, Johnson “stated he wanted to kill white people, especially white officers.” In an interview with Wolf Blitzer July 8, 2016, Hillary Clinton said “I’m going to be talking to white people. I think we’re the ones who have to start listening to the legitimate cries that are coming from our African-American fellow citizens.” There were no calls for censorship of black lives matter or any political position they favor. There were no congressional hearings on the effect of anti-white speech inciting violence against white people. No one is saying we have to listen to the legitimate cries of white people.

On June 14, 2017, in Alexandria, Virginia, James Thomas Hodgkinson Shot Congressman Steve Scalise and also shot Matt Mika, Crystal Griner, and Zack Barth. Hodgkinson was a Democrat who was, according the Virginia Attorney General “fueled by rage against Republican legislators”. There were no calls for censorship of Democrats or any political position they favor. There were no congressional hearings on the effect of speech inciting violence against Republicans or conservatives.

Why is only pro-white advocacy being singled out for censorship?

Right-wing speech is routinely blocked at universities due to threats of violence from leftist thugs. The threat of violence ALWAYS comes from the left. Universities are engaging in political censorship at taxpayer expense in violation of their tax-deductible status. They are censoring YOUR constituents. They are making it harder for YOU to get elected. Why don’t you hold a hearing on university censorship?

Tyranny is free speech with exceptions.

In Communist countries the word “fascist” is used all the time. In fascist countries almost all opposition was called “Communist.” That is exactly the way “racist” is used today.

Freedom of speech is always suppressed with the excuse that it might cause trouble. Tyrannies like Nazism and Communism always used somebody else’s totalitarianism to justify their own.
In fact, no suppression of free speech has EVER used anything but screaming some label to justify itself.

If no one stands up for the right of a person to openly talk about the disappearance of the white race we see going on around us, how long will it be before Political Correctness condemns the discussion of other issues?

Stalin’s Constitution of 1936 declared more freedom than did any US constitution, state or Federal. But those announced freedoms were limited by one small problem: No one could exercise them if they would interfere with Purposes of the State.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote The Gulag Archipelago about his nightmare years in Soviet Death Camps. He was sent to the Gulag for writing private letters that were critical of Stalin. It was one of tens of millions of cases where Soviet Freedom of Speech had an exception.

We are told that “Hate is not free speech.” Throughout history, the motto has been that “Heresy is not free speech.”

By that definition, everybody has free speech. Slaves were permitted to say anything they wished, so long as it did not interfere with the will of their masters.

As with Stalin, the so-called “right” to free speech is now simply the right to speak if it doesn’t cause trouble.

Every established religion and tyranny in history had free speech according to those criteria. The Medieval Church, slaveholders and Mao-Tse Tung all agreed that they allowed free speech, with certain exceptions:

1) Heresy was not free speech;
2) Free speech was all right if it didn’t make trouble; or
3) Stand in the way of the purposes of society.

Those three exceptions are all accepted by America today, by the left and by the respectable right.

“If all printers were determined not to print anything till they were sure it would offend nobody, there would be very little printed.” ~ Benjamin Franklin

Calling disagreement “hate” is childish.

Truth doesn’t cause violence, censorship causes violence.

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” ~John F Kennedy

“We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.” ~John F Kennedy

There is currently a global genocide of the white race.

Genocide is defined under UN Resolution 260 as any attempt to eliminate a group by any means. Every white country is being flooded and force assimilated BY LAW with millions and millions of non-whites. This is genocide by force blending. The conditions of interbreeding are forced. Genocide need not be violent or involve killing. Sterilization and force blending are two methods of genocide which do not necessarily involve killing. Pertinent parts of the international law against genocide:

Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
a) Killing members of the group:
b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III
The following acts shall be punishable:
a) Genocide;
b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
d) Attempt to commit genocide;
e) Complicity in genocide.

Force blending meets the definition of genocide under Article II (c).

The United States Senate ratified the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide on February 19, 1986. Enabling legislation to enforce this treaty has also been voted into law, namely 18 U.S.C. § 1091 signed into law by President Ronald Reagan as the Genocide Convention Implementation Act of 1987 on November 4, 1988. Pertinent parts:

18 U.S. Code § 1091 – Genocide
(a)Basic Offense.—Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such—
(1) kills members of that group;
(2) causes serious bodily injury to members of that group;
(3) causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members of the group through drugs, torture, or similar techniques;
(4) subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part;
(5) imposes measures intended to prevent births within the group; or
(6) transfers by force children of the group to another group;

Force blending meets the definition of genocide under section (a)(4) of 18 U.S. Code § 1091.

The United States not only has an obligation not to engage in the crime of genocide, it is obligated to take steps to prevent genocide.

You can’t be a separatist and a supremacist. You can’t supremacize people who are NOT THERE.

Self-determination is not supremacy.

If race doesn’t exist, what’s diversity?

If there’s no such thing as white people, what’s white supremacy or white privilege?

We see that every excuse given for singling out pro-white advocacy for censorship is spurious. Whites, in fact, are under attack globally. They are being subjected to harassment, censorship and violent assaults. They are the only group being denied the basic rights to homelands and self-determination. They have every right to speak out against their genocide.

Racial politics is the inevitable result of multiracialism. Anyone for multiracialism is necessarily in favor of racial politics.

Anything governments REQUIRE you to believe is a lie. Anything governments REQUIRE you to disbelieve must be true.

Perhaps you think your white voters will remain in a demoralized, self-hating state forever. Perhaps you believe you will never be hauled before an international tribunal for support of white genocide. Perhaps you believe you can continue to dog whistle to your constituents then stab them in the back the moment you take office and they will nevertheless continue to vote for you. But what if you’re wrong?

George Orwell explained in his novel 1984 that a rational society must include the right to say that two plus two equals four. It must include the right to say what is true.

In 1799, the Federalist Party passed the Alien and Sedition acts which largely outlawed any criticism of government policy, even if the criticism was true. In 1800, the people voted them out and soon the Federalist Party ceased to exist. The PEOPLE, not the courts, got rid of that whorish doctrine, “The truth is no defense” in America.

Sincerely,

The Team at Fight White Genocide

About Fight White Genocide:
We’re human rights activists calling attention to the crime of genocide being committed against the white race. The crime of genocide was codified under international law by General Assembly Resolution 260 (adopted Dec 9, 1948 in effect Jan 12, 1951), The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

Sent to all members

This genocide is being carried out by means of mass non-white immigration and forced assimilation in ALL and ONLY white countries the goal of which is to force blend ONLY white people out of existence. Anyone who objects to this crime is subject to harassment, intimidation, violent acts and threats of violence, psychological terrorism, job loss, and prison terms.

We DEMAND an open and free discussion of white genocide without threats of attack from screamers, thugs, or thought police.

We DEMAND a worldwide repeal of all laws that make it illegal for white people to speak out for their racial interests.

We are against white supremacy in all its forms, including the notion that white people have a moral obligation to take care of every race but their own.

We unequivocally condemn, denounce and disavow the use of violence to achieve political ends.

Read more at http://www.fightwhitegenocide.com/

Get our position heard…..

Here are some Republican Chiefs of Staff and Press Secretaries on twitter: https://twitter.com/TruthSpeech1/lists/cos
Please reach out to them and share the communique.

Also, here is a site that lists the members of the Judiciary Committee, it also has their staffer names and social media accounts. Please contact and meme them:
https://www.congressweb.com/sfaa/legislators/committee/cmte_id/154/

Judiciary contacts:
Phone: (202) 225 – 3951
Fax: (202) 225 – 7682
E-mail: Judiciary@mail.house.gov

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

7 Comments

The Demoralization Curve

I don’t judge a country on whether a “far-right” party gets 6% or 9% of the vote, or how draconian their censorship is or even their racial demographics. I judge a country on how demoralized the white population of that country is. More specifically, I judge it on where it is in the demoralization curve.

The demoralization curve is a hypothetical model of how the effects of subversion and counter subversion will change the overall level of demoralization of a given white population over time. It is hypothetical because we haven’t seen any white population make it yet to the right side of the curve.

A curve can be drawn for a region, a country or the world as a whole. Remember, to be demoralized means you have been put into a psychological state where you can’t come to any reasonable conclusions in the interest of defending yourself, your family, your country, your race.

The demoralization curve resembles a bell curve. It starts out low, reaches a peak, and then falls. This is how I think things will play out as our counter-propaganda takes hold and we take propaganda superiority.

You can see by this curve there are two ways a population can be in low state of demoralization: because you are on the RIGHT side of the curve or because you are on the LEFT side of the curve. You are on the left side of the curve if you haven’t been subjected ***YET*** to a large amount of anti-white propaganda. This is the case in Eastern Europe now. It was the case in the rest of the white world 60 or so years ago. I bring this up because some people think whites in Eastern Europe have some cultural traits or magic ability to resist anti-whitism. Such people may think we can just adopt whatever it is that gives them this resistance and not have to fight the propaganda war. I say the reason they they are in a low state of demoralization is because they haven’t been subjected to anything like the anti-white programming Anglosphere and Western Europe have been subjected to. As soon as they are, their level of demoralization will rise unless counter-propaganda is deployed immediately.

No action or combinations of actions will substitute for winning the propaganda war and taking power.

So, to assess the state of a country I ask how successfully are pro-whites in that country fighting the anti-white brainwashing? Unfortunately, at this point I don’t think any country rates better than a “D.”

This curve follows the model of epidemic disease. You can have a low state of disease occurrence either because you haven’t been exposed to it yet (left side of the curve) or because you have developed anti-bodies and genetic resistance to the disease (right side of the curve).

If you were to examine an isolated population and you observed that they had no incidence of an infectious disease, and they had never been exposed to that disease, would you conclude that they had some immunity to that disease that you would want to study? In fact, if someone said they did want to study that population to determine why they don’t have the disease would you even regard that person as SANE?

We can wish that the anti-white mind virus had never been released into white populations. But wishing won’t save white people. We have to develop and culturally embed the terms, talking points and narratives that constitute resistance to virulent anti-whitism.

This is a process we’re going to have to go through. Our goal is to get to the right side of the curve. When we do, we’ll be stronger than ever.

Demoralization curve

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments