In a Stephen King novel, there was a black woman, who was born and raised in New England, like most black women King had met. She has never in her life been south of the Mason-Dixon Line.

But when she wanted to comfort someone, without thinking about it, she got a Southern accent.

When somebody was in dire straits, as is so often the case in a Stephen King novel, this lifelong Yankee found herself talking as if she had just stepped off the bus from a lifetime in Low Country South Carolina.

It may not be related, but I cannot count the number of times that, when the news was all about a black alpha male like Tiger Woods or OJ, a young black woman would say to me, “He wouldn’t have any use for me.”

I maybe reaching here, but that statement sounds a bit personal for a girl talking to a stranger.

It occurs to me that the Southern accent may have a side effect.

————–

Bernie just won in Alaska and Oregon, and the media is actually reporting what I said in the first place, that Bernie wins where the population is white.

The media is less guarded about reporting on a leftist campaign.

I said that Bernie was supported by Mommy Professor worshippers, which in Liberalese translates to “younger voters.”

This contest may lead some to come to a hazy idea of reality, which is that blacks don’t actually vote. A few leftists are right now coming to this conclusion.

But it is all EXACTLY the way I called it.

Very few commentators on the right can call a leftist election that accurately.

—————-

Here is some more ammunition for your Twitter campaign to get Trump to hire me on Free Speech:

Not one single anti Trump Republican has ever whispered any criticism of the thug riots at Trump rallies.

Some Republicans have said that it is only Trump’s atmosphere of Hate that has caused these wonderful young idealists to try to break up his rallies.

This could be used to completely discredit the enormous cuckservative forces against Trump.

So why doesn’t Trump counterattack?

The reason is that Trump’s campaign is choked up by leftover respectable conservative Republican advisors. They can’t see past their residual admiration of the liberal media.

He has better get some Free Speech Advisors like me, who can see past this old conservative nonsense.

These opportunities don’t stay open forever.

Barry Goldwater always felt inferior to the snobs his side chased out of the Republican Party to take over briefly.

The minute Goldwater got trounced in the election he called the old Establishment and groveled and pisses his way back into their grace.

Upon getting the nomination in 1980, Reagan sealed the Party’s long-term doom by, albeit reluctantly, taking on George Bush as his VP and successor.

Win or lose, we can only hope that Trump will not become the typical Groveling WASP.

In 1964 Goldwater doomed the Party to many years of moderation and disaster.

In 1980 Reagan gave those same moderates back control of the Party in 1989.

To younger people, this election is everything.

To me, no matter what happens, there will be many more.

What Trump decides to do AFTER his nomination will be a big decider of our future.

Will he, like Reagan, give the moderates SOMETHING, like Bush, which meant everything in the future?

Will Trump, unlike Goldwater, insist on his right to say what he says, and not grovel to the establishment and give the future to them, as Reagan and Goldwater both did?

Will Trump be Trump, and take victory as VICTORY, without conceding the future to our enemies?

You now have a clear example of how snobs handle things from the AFP’s instantly handing its campaign over to Taylor without consulting me.

Eyeslevel and Laura looked up an old article in National Review that attacked me as advocating “Country and Western Marxism.” They saw those thousands of real working people who paid for their own buses from South Boston and Louisville to march against busing, and the thousands of fundamentalist Christians who were protesting dirty textbooks as “Marxists!”

Bill Rusher and I finally won our basic fight to get Reagan to “appeal” to what were called “Wallace Democrats” or “Marxists.”

As of Election Day 1980 they were suddenly the deciding factor, the “Reagan Democrats.”

An appeal to that base, working people, seemed inevitable.

But the snobs avoided dealing with working people using the example of the leftists they worshipped.

I always put the Black “vote” in quotes because when it counts, Black people don’t vote. Blacks and other minorities are owned outright by their owners. Coat and tie leftists do not have to speak to Blacks. They talk to Black “leaders”.

As I said, everybody knows this. The 2010 United States Senate primary can be explained no other way. Even after I explained this, one BUGS commenter said we should get a copy of the list they hand out.

I had to explain, AGAIN, that anyone who produced that list would be ignored and ruined.

I repeat: Everybody KNOWS how minority “votes” are handled.

When they finally had to admit they needed the dirty old working people’s vote, Reagan types used their leftist heroes’ method of avoiding dealing with working people.

The GOP went to people who owned a bloc of working class vote.

As with Blacks, they went to the preachers.

So instead of a populist appeal, conservatives went to the TV preachers. Instead of working Americans, they went to the preachers and instead of an anti-busing appeal, they had The Religious Right.

This is a very important history that no one knows.

But it is critical.

Today the vote I wanted Reagan to go after is the rebellious Trump voter.

He is not to be put off by screaming “ABORTION” or some other non-issue.

The Trump electorate is the one conservatives avoided after 1980.

Anti-whites hate white people. They hate us above all else.

Then they falsely accuse us of hatred of non-whites for objecting to their genocidal policies.

They claim we’re the ONLY people who have unjustified hatred. They say we have a MONOPOLY on hate. We’re “haters” the same way someone is a Kansan or a Baptist or a Cubs fan.

Horus speaks of imposing our terminology and destroying anti-white terminology. A term like racist has no legitimate meaning and must simply be discredited at every opportunity. We would never say “They’re the real racists!” or “Everyone’s a racist” or “You bet I’m a racist!” because that would reinforce and legitimize a strictly anti-white term.

But what about a term like “hate?” Hate has a perfectly legitimate meaning. It certainly describes how anti-whites feel about white people and how we feel about anti-whites. We don’t hate other races, just the people trying to destroy our race, white traitors above all.

So, when we talk about destroying terminology, we’re talking about destroying a term AS THE ANTI-WHITES USE IT. When an anti-white says hate, they’re just talking about anything not sufficiently anti-white. If a white person isn’t groveling and begging forgiveness for historical acts every race has committed, not welcoming their coming minority status, or not putting other races’ well-being above their own, that’s “hate” according to anti-whites. However, their insistence on imposing conditions of white genocide is not hate. No, that’s Peace on Earth and Brotherly Love and Loyalty to Humanity.

Anti-whites claim they don’t hate all white people, just racist supremacists, that is, only white people who don’t hate themselves and want their race destroyed with “diversity.” Sorry, if you’re trying to get rid of a race, you hate that whole race, not just the ones objecting to the genocide. They claim a whole race of people deserve to vanish from the earth because a handful of whites did this or that, things every race has done.

No one has a monopoly on hate. Anti-whites have been attacking the WHOLE white race for decades. Our hatred is justified; their’s is not. Anti-whites have turned reality on it’s head. We see that what they accuse us of is exactly what they are, in fact, guilty of.

Destroying a term really means discrediting it in the eyes of the average white person watching an exchange between a pro-white and an anti-white. Whenever an anti-white utters such a term, we want white people to immediately think “lie, scam.” We do this by building up true associations over time as opposed to the anti-whites’ false associations (self-defense or anything pro-white is “hate”).

So when I talk about tackling hate, I’m referring to tackling both the libelous accusation of hate against us and the anti-whites very real hatred of ALL white people.

When Donald Trump was asked about Islam, he replied “Islam hates us.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-Zj0tfZY6o

This throws the accusation of hate leveled against anyone opposed to unlimited Muslim immigration right back in their faces. Good move if he keeps it up.

To tackle hate, tell the truth over and over.

White self-hatred is SICK!!!

You hate white people.

Calling disagreement “hate” is childish.

White genocide is a hate crime.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN7eSTENoqw

You hate free speech. You’re trying to ban facts and honest opinion.

Racist is an anti-white hate slur.

Only someone who HATED white people would say that.

If I hated a race, I’d destroy it with diversity. But I’m not doing that. You anti-whites are doing that to my race, the white race. But I certainly do hate you, anti-white.

Anti-whites are the ones with illegitimate hatred. And they’re justifying genocide.

I don’t know if Jews meet at midnight under the capitol dome to lay their plans for undoing.

I do know from personal experience that Jewish Mothers are real, and sons become nasty little bastards.

The most fluent and ferocious anti-Semitic diatribe I had ever heard came from a boy my own age who was going to Columbia High School and we were having lunch together.

I couldn’t understand it.

He used words that clearly meant Jews, but out of the league with “kikes” or a couple of terms I had heard.

And, I kid you not, he finished by saying, “Those God damn New York Jews are half my synagogue now!”

And even New York Jews have real problems with the real sons of Jewish mothers.

They are spoiled beyond imagination, and they take it with them for life.

You wonder where a Tim Wise comes from.

What grown man on God’s green earth would announce to us that if we do not accept “his multiracial society, we are HIS enemy.”

Only a Jewish mother would be worried by a declaration like that.

Tim Wise is a hideously spoiled child in a man’s body.

He will never grow up.