People make their livings by discussing Marxism. The same kind of people made their living writing about the Soviet Union. These latter were “Sovietologists.” Not one single “Sovietologists” ever came even close to predicting what would happen, what WAS happening, to the USSR.
On September 11, 2001 I predicted that not one single person in the entire defense-intelligence complex would get so much as a slap on the hand for the gross errors everyone then was screaming about. I was right.
The USSR collapsed so totally and instantly for two reasons: 1) The Stalin Constitution of 1936 gave each republic the right to secede; and 2) Communism is SILLY.
You will not read the above ANYWHERE else.
You will not read the above obviously true statements anywhere else for the same reason the fight against the Mantra was so expected by me and so long carried out by pro-white leaders.
There is far too little room for simple truths in the world of the paid expert.
Only a society which had reached Newton and calculus could have respected men who could deduce the world from basics. Until then it was Mommy Professor all the way: Latin, Greek, chained books, robes in the universities so you could tell which one was The Wise Man.
As Polydoros has pointed out, we have the same situation in today’s social sciences.
When we find something, like quarks that simply does not fit into physical science theory, the real scientists are fascinated. Anything that does not fit into social science theory or into theology is simply ignored.
No one is going to mention the fact that Communism is SILLY. John “Stewart” admits now that Communism is “not viable.”
Not viable and hysterically absurd are totally different things.
Even the USSR admitted that it found Communism ridiculous when Lenin adopted the “New” Economic Plan in 1921. His attempt to found an economics based on “Soviet leadership and electricity,” i.e., throwing out the market and having “intellectuals” run the economy, went to pieces instantly.
But one cannot appear wise or be a Published Professional by telling an obvious truth.
The old theologians and the new theologicans HATE Occam’s Razor.
In Homer’s Iliad, leaders are called “shepherds of the people”. In Zoroastrianism, the ruler of the world is called “the good shepherd”. In Islam and Christianity, the leaders are also called shepherds. Pastor literally means “shepherd”.
That is remarkable.
But even more remarkable is this. Hardly anyone ever OBJECTED to being called a sheep!
Without putting a value judgment on this; – simply to make an observation. All these cultures/religions were unanimous that the vast majority of people are sheep; they were open about this; and few “sheep” objected to it (let alone noticed it as odd)…
Those in alternative news and research agree with the above sources. The word “sheeple” is commonplace. But few actually “GET IT”.
Books and essays have their place for those who can handle it. But to affect the masses something different is needed.
“The King of TTGH’s” article a few weeks ago was hard for me to write because it is the kind of historical happening that made Tolkien cry out at night over the outcome of the Battle of Hastings, and us old Southerners weep over some piece of special stupidity that destroyed us in our War for Southern Independence.
But comments on the article were largely down at the Stormfront level, like whether Mrs. Simpson was a good girl or not, until Secret Squirrel and Jason put in their slams at the gossipy nonsense:
Secret Squirrel began the one-two punch:
“I assumed everyone got this, because it’s old news to me.
“TTGH: As a Matter of Principle – or Romance – we will have our own way and the cause be damned.”
Here Bob is pointing out the TTGH personality type and the reasons they give for betrayal.
If you have someone in your group and they start making threats to do things their way, or they’ll leave because “its the principle”, then tell them to leave. Nothing is more damaging to a group than a TTGH.”
Jason followed with a good hard left:
“Exare usually just getting off some steam. Exactly right. It wasn’t the King chasing a woman that caused the trouble, it was his “principled” demand to have his own way or throw a big temper tantrum. It could have been over a woman, religion, or anything else under the sun. The point is for US to remember the trouble such people cause.”
When someone gets us off track with Aristotle or God Will Get You, they are just letting off some steam.
There is room for people we respect to let off SOME steam here.
But when commenters reduce the most tragic lesson of history, the TTGH throwing away a world in which Britain and Germany could have ruled a white world, to talk about whether she was a whore or comparing that utterly mindless figurehead Britain now butt kisses to the last potentially real kind Britain ever had, it leaves even me speechless.
Edward VIII’s TTGH is a lesson of history, not an item in a gossip column.
Romantics say there were “Golden Ages” in prehistory, before there was ANY writing. Conveniently, there are no records to prove otherwise.
Mommy Professor writes to get her meal ticket. She says there were “Golden Ages” when there was the MOST writing.
The “Golden Ages” of Mommy Professor always involve LITERATURE. The Elizabethan period to her is a LITERARY “Golden Age”. But the texts fawned over by Mommy Professor had no bearing on England’s POLITICAL POWER. The plays of “Shakespeare” disappeared for decades after being written. Meanwhile England grew its territory and political power.
Few notice this. But Europe’s “high” literature from the “early modern period” was remarkably SILENT about the New World. Considering the colonization of the New World was so significant, why was it so rarely written about?
The literature of Mommy Professor doesn’t refer to reality. Her “Golden Ages” usually happen during or just before a massive collapse! Periclean Athens was the cause of Athens’ total defeat to the Spartans. Rome’s “Golden Age” included the final destruction of the Roman Republic. The most approved of Spanish texts were from Spain’s decline. Germans’ literary “Golden Age” was when Napoleon took over.
Under Napoleon, people called the Germans “the Folk of poets and thinkers”. To Mommy Professor that is a compliment. This just shows how silly Mommy Professor is! “The Folk of poets and thinkers” was about “educated” Germans who were lost in “high” literature and being trounced. They were a laughing stock.
Enemy soldiers can be marching through the streets. But so long as “intellectuals” are publishing, Mommy Professor will call it a “Golden Age”.
Only having been up for number of hours, the billboard company in Birmingham, Alabama started receiving death threats both at their home and office. This has forced the company to remove the sign for fear of violence.
But the word is the activists will be receiving a FULL refund. Not bad for the amount of publicity it received and now for FREE.
Congratulations again to the Guys and Gals in Alabama for getting this billboard up and FORCING the conversation on #WhiteGenocide.
Posted new activist video of Bob’s interview on FWG – New Video – Pro-whites attempt Free Speech with AL Billboard #WhiteGenocide
White Rabbit tells me this is Country Rabbit’s second sign:
Please note the wording: “Diversity means chasing down the last white person.”
Another of our sign groups tried that wording and the sign company rejected it.
Why did they reject it?
Because diversity means chasing down the last white person is the flat truth. Pro-whites refuse to use my words because of ego problems. Anti-whites HIRE people like me and USE their product.
Country Rabbit sees quality and USES this old professional staffer’s out put.
Like the respectable conservatives before them, professional pro-whites are afraid of being upstaged by a dedicated old man.
The Country Rabbits, the White Rabbits, and other BUGSERS will use the good stuff and win this battle anyway, as frustrated conservatives finally had to fall back onto my work to elect Reagan and bring down the USSR.
I suppose it’s a bit odd to tell a rabbit to sic ‘em, but Go For It, Country Rabbit!
As with ALL of today’s commentators, for whom the children just come out, Marxist theory begins with distributing the economic production that, to the mind of the average Mommy Professor or college student, just “comes out.”
Like Medieval monasteries, universities are now the graveyards of the genes that finance them. As with the monks, if you can read, you are to be dedicated to childlessness. A family that emphasizes education must have a tiny family or none at all because of the giant expenditure for their Mommy Professor.
The real future of our race depends on this succession. Presently we build the gene pool out of people who are too stupid or careless to use contraception. Genes that produce college-prone offspring are doomed.
More practically speaking, the more developed a society, the more parents become responsible for their offspring. DNA analysis is just the beginning. More and more careless men are going to be ordered into WORK for the children they produce.
On the other hand, before the welfare state, children were your only social security. Now, that is government’s realm.
So I cannot discuss what the Mantra means in the Real Future because the more any editor or writer is important in the present regime, the more his power depends on the PRESENT despot.
I even offend the Conspiracy Industry here, both that on the right and the one not called conspiracy industry because it is on the left.
From what I am saying, all conspiracy theorists will scream that I am ascribing the endless popularity of Adolf Hitler as being an ideal to cover any criticism on the present genetic system which is the unquestioned monarch.
Here I am telling you why I do NOT discuss the future.
You can’t take it.
Even BUGSERS will either not comment on this or will sink down to a Stormfronter level.
The present system is NEVER questioned. There is never a question of a question.
But when it collapses, the Mantra will be one of the deciding mechanisms in it.
Now, there will either be total silence except for the “God Will Get YOU For This,” but this is the first answer to people who ask me about “the Future.”
Under a powerful monarchy the most important question is that of the succession to the throne.
It is also the most dangerous.
Because it involves a discussion of the death of the ruling monarch.
Any discussion of the future of genetics is strictly limited for the same reason. That is a major reason why Hitler is still such an overwhelming excuse NOT to discuss it.
The present patchwork of how to select future genes is doomed.
I am not saying it is just wrong, but that it simply won’t serve. Right now the white race is threatened, but in a few decades there will be a sudden realization that it is the Oriental race that is really dying out.
When that reality finally bashes its way into the universities, there will be those who say it was predicated long ago by Aristotle. Others will write books to show how it was “developing in the literature.”
I do not think that the example of everybody so obviously getting caught totally with their pants down, the uselessness of academia in anything dealing with the future, will be so blatantly revealed.
And the Silence has so thoroughly covered that catastrophe that almost no one will have any idea what I am talking about.
When you criticize today’s method of choosing future generations, it is much like discussing what would happen when the present tyrant dies. The ruling establishment starts screaming “Hitler!!!!”
The “Christians” start screaming that they are going to get you for that, because God has Ordained what is rather amusingly called The Traditional Family.
The bottom line is that the more absolute the present monarch is, the more each person’s present power rests on his survival. The more important the succession is, the more danger to anyone who even mentions the succession.
The simple silliness of the Communist system or bringing it down overnight was never discussed by any recognized Soviet Expert. He would be talking about the end of his whole industry’s livelihood.
No one would publish it. You were dealing with a group whose whole profession was theorizing about the permanent Soviet presence, the second of the Great Powers.
No knowledge of the total absurdity of the Soviet Empire in the real world made up any part of the discussions of those who got paid for it.
Today, the entire tens of trillions of dollars spent on Human Betterment constitute an industry based on the assumption that “children will be produced.” So the whole industry based on what to do with the children who are “Produced.”
This was the basic problem not only with the Soviet Studies Industry but also with the Marxist system itself.
Marxist assumed that “goods will be produced.”
As Lenin said, “Economics is Soviet Leadership and electricity.”
So Marxism said that there was only one real subject in the world: The DISTRIBUTION of income.
Mommy Professor can only explicate Marx’s text. She/He is chained to the Book. He/She cannot handle the consequences of that text or comprehend the basis of it.