Search? Click Here
New to BUGS? Read Me
Join the BUGS Team by posting with us in the Working Thread

A Brown Future?

Originally posted in 2004 by Bob Whitaker – https://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2004/05/25/a-brown-future/

The more I think about it, the more I like the idea of a white minority. I have been a white minority for much of my life, and we were much more racially conscious.

We have always been in a minority, what is changing is WHERE we are in a minority. Fanatical white anti-whites were always in Minnesota and Sweden and Canada, away from the objects of their affection. A threatened white minority has a MUCH better chance of unity and survival than yesterday’s Yankees and Europeans for whom the poor little colored brethren were just a theory.

Actually, the only thing that unites Yankees today is a common hatred of the South. We serve the same function for them that blacks served for us in the slavery and segregation days. Pathetic “American patriots” like today’s National Review have nothing to be loyal to. They play John Brown’s Body, they worship Abraham Lincoln, but they have nothing of their own at all.

A threatened self-conscious white minority will have a much healthier mind-set.

It is true that the slavish minorities will give liberals a majority soon by election. But there is a time limit on that, too. The NAACP had been in existence for over sixty years before it had its first black president. Then there was what was called a “black takeover.” Liberals were astonished to see blacks taking over the NAACP!

When minorities become majorities, they stop being slaves to liberals. They take over with their own spokesmen. The Lt. Governor of California is a member of a Hispanic supremacist group. He refused to drop out when he ran for governor.

Whites will be the largest minority and they will have to bargain as whites.

I wouldn’t worry too much about the “Future voters.” There won’t be any. All multicultural societies are tyrannies, and any multiracial society is tyranny squared.

Somebody like Saddam takes over. He took over Iraq for the 40% Sunni minority. Tito did the same thing for the Yugoslavian Serbs.

As a third world society gets richer, it experiences a population bust. People want to spend the money they would have spent on children on their own toys. The third world doesn’t have children if they have to pay for them. In the classic third world, children are an asset or a source of pride, and if you don’t want them you just let them starve. With a little income, the government begins to demand that you pay for your kids.

Anyway, the whole question of children will be 100% choice before long. Swedes hate white people, but a lot of Indians would love to have pure Aryan children. The Aryans were the top caste of India. Buddha was a Nordic. India loves blondness.

They can choose. And there are a billion Indians, while China’s population is dropping already.

With all those variables and my own experience, I know damn well that the future is totally unpredictable. The only people I know who are so wrong they are silly are the ones who talk about an “inevitable future.”

They are drooling idiots.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Personal Loyalty Is No Excuse for Stupidity

Written by Bob Whitaker

I was at a gathering of BUGSERS. There was a lot of admiration expressed for me..

As an old political warrior, that worried me.

Why would I worry about personal loyalty to me being danger to us?

Because, as I said at the beginning of my first book, A Plague on Both Your Houses, “All of our best instincts are being used against us.” Sympathy for the oppressed was used to build a Communist prison around a third of the world. Opposition to unfair discrimination has been twisted into making us totally do away with our entire race.

For over seventy years I have witnessed how every time we show a decent emotion, it is twisted into a weapon against us.

When an anti-White sees a decent instinct among us, he sees it as something to exploit against us. Love of country in 1940 was used to get us to side with Communism and to give a third of the world to Communism. The list goes on and on.

As usual, I seem to be the only person who has seen the pattern clearly.

It is time for you to see it CLEARLY, too.

If I were a normal human being instead of a political paranoid, I would have just reveled in all that admiration.

If someone attacks Bob, an amateur would stick out his chest and defend Bob.

But a person who attacks or reveals something about Bob has no interest in Bob.

He is doing with your loyalty to Bob exactly what he does with your loyalty to anything else.

And it is WAY past time that we stopped falling for that crap. At least a hundred million deaths past time.

There is only ONE answer to any talk against me.

“Bob never got shot at.”

Your reply:

“So that means White Genocide is OK?”

“Bob didn’t really write those two mainline books.”

“So that means White Genocide OK?”

“Bob never worked on Capitol Hill.”

“So that means White Genocide is okay?”

“Reagan never appointed Bob.”

“So that means White Genocide is okay?”

“Bob is a nut, officially retired on mental disability.”

“So that means White Genocide is okay?”

In World War II, the leftists were not talking about your country. They were using that to give the only real victory in that war to Comrade Stalin.

That was seventy five years ago, my beloved but slow-witted friends. Since then they have, among other things, used our loyalty to fairness to turn us into fanatical destroyers of our own race.

Isn’t it time we at least BEGAN to catch onto this tactic?

Nobody else has even NOTICED it since my 1976 book.

I have been blasted into two heart attacks and two nervous breakdowns. The LAST thing I need is someone protecting my reputational virginity.

They can’t dish out anything I haven’t long since gotten used to.

But YOU can.

You can hurt me by being a fool.

You can hurt me by doing anything but answering a charge against me with “So that makes White Genocide OK?”

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

THE ONLY INEVITABLE LEFT FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM

Written By Bob Whitaker – April 20th, 2009

THE ONLY INEVITABLE LEFT FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM

January 1, 2000

Before we discuss what will happen in the twenty-first century, it would be useful to talk about what didn’t happen in the twentieth. In 1976, I began my first book with the following words:

“Our most trusted ‘inevitables’ are collapsing around our ears today. We used to hear that integration would make mankind one, inevitably. It was said that socialism was the most efficient economic system, and would be universally adopted. Bigger, more interfering government was not long ago an inevitable. The United Nations was to lead on a rocky but inevitable road to a united world. Rehabilitation, not punishment, would end crime.”

“Public confidence in these certainties has collapsed.”

Socialism, Thomas Dewey’s New Education, the criminals-as-victims theory, all these things have been obvious disasters.

As you can see, if we had entered the millennium forty years ago, trendy media opinion would have listed a number of things that would “inevitably” develop in the coming decades. Now we are reduced to one.

Today all the “inevitables” are gone but one. That is the inevitable “solution to the race problem” by immigration and integration. This “race problem” exists only in white majority countries.

A white country is said to have a race problem if there is racial friction. But there is also a “racial problem” if there is an area where there is no minority population, no “diversity.”

Over a hundred and twenty million Japanese, with a population more racially uniform than in any European country, has no “race problem.”

Red China, with ten times as many people and far more racial uniformity, has no “race problem.”

Sub-Saharan Africa, with a racial uniformity that would drive the integrators insane if it were white, has no race problem at all. A “race problem” exists only where whites predominate.

“Race problem” means “white problem.” The “solution to the race problem” always means “the solution to the white problem.”

Respectable conservatives never mention it, but the left uses code words. One of these is “the race problem.” This so-called “race problem” only exists in white-majority countries. When Australia limited immigration to whites only, it was a “race problem.” Any area which has an all-white population has a “race problem,” and needs to be integrated.

The one inevitable that every person who is allowed to speak out in our society is required to agree with is that, in the next millennium, “the race problem” will be solved.

Analog Magazine is the most prestigious publication in science fiction. Analog had always featured its cover art, beautiful representations of bold warriors and their women in ancient garb or in futuristic space uniforms doing heroic battle. They were all Nordics.

In the 1970s a liberal editor, Ben Bova, took Analog over for a short time. As a good liberal, Bova saw a future where there would be no Nordics. All white majority populations would, by then, be brown.

But Bova could not replace the Nordic features on his covers with pictures of random racial mixes. He did not want to put ugly people on the cover that was to sell his magazine. So throughout Bova’s short reign as editor, the uniforms or other clothes on the warriors covered their faces. You could never see what race they were.

Except once.

That one time during Bova’s editorship the race of the person on the cover was clearly shown. He was a pure black man, driving what appeared to be an anti-gravity tractor.

Several things were interesting about that one cover, but the one that is important here is something Bova did not even think about.

He insisted there would be no Nordics in the future, but he took it for granted there would be blacks. Africa would always have plenty of them, as would many Caribbean islands and the other solidly black countries of the world.

I am sure that it never occurred to any reader of the magazine that this was a totally racist, totally genocidal attitude. It is, after all, the only acceptable attitude of anyone who dares say a word in public in today’s society.

In many countries, you can go to prison for expressing any other attitude.

As we go into the third millennium, only one inevitable is left on which all allowable opinion agrees. That is that the new millennium will see the end of what liberals and moderates and respectable conservatives and the leaders who call themselves “Christian” conservatives all agree to refer to as “the race problem.”

All of our liberal, moderate, respectable conservative and so-called “Christian” leaders shout in unison that we must have “a final solution” to “the race problem.”

They shout about the dangers of “white racism” when we all know that we are targeted to disappear from the face of the earth. But anyone who even mentions this is declared anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. And who is shouting the loudest? Respectable conservatives, of course, the people who call themselves the “conservers” of Western society!

Outside the United States, they don’t stop opposition to the last “inevitable” just by shouting and oppressing opponents economically. They use straight police state tactics. If you mention your concern with the disappearance of the white race from the earth in Canada, you are subject to criminal penalties. In Britain, under the race hate laws, a judge officially declared that “The truth is no excuse.”

In the cause of the code words “ending racism,” freedom of speech has simply ceased to exist throughout the Western world. In Canada, this jailing of people for expressing any white racial concern at all is already expanding to include sexism, criticizing gays and all other categories of Political Correctness.

And when it comes to racism, sexism, and more and more forms of Political Correctness, the Canadian courts are following the British judge’s dictum that “The truth is no excuse.”

There is already a tiny but growing reaction to this. This sort of criminalizing of Thought Crimes will be hard to sustain in the age of the Internet. But today’s conservatives will have no part in leading or taking advantage of this reaction.

So the so-called opposition in America shouts even louder that the only real problem in our society is that old code word, “racism.” The last thing you can depend on our so-called conservative opposition to the left to point to is the REAL problem.

This conservative dedication to genocide fits the pattern of what the Christian writer C. S. Lewis had in mind when he had Satan’s Senior Demon Screwtape give his formula for tricking men into eternal damnation. Screwtape explains to his nephew Wormwood how this sort of fashionable toadying is used to destroy humanity:

“The use of Fashion in thought is to distract the attention of men from their real dangers…The game is to have them all running around with fire extinguishers when there is a flood, and all crowding to that side of the boat which is already nearly gunwale under. Thus we make it fashionable to expose the dangers of enthusiasm at the very moment when they are all really becoming worldly and lukewarm…Cruel ages are put on their guard against Sentimentality…”

So today’s conservatives are helping liberals pursue this Screwtape approach. The real danger of the new century centers around the program to eliminate whites — or “the race problem.” Along with this program goes the War On Thought Crimes that is destroying freedom of thought and freedom of speech.

Meanwhile the right, which claims to be so Christian and so moral, is devoted only to being part of Fashionable Opinion on these issues.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Anti-Whitism

Written by White&Normal

I’m sure I’m not the only one to notice a surge in our terminology.

I’m also sure I’m not the only one to notice the term “anti-white racism”.

We all know this is bad and will inevitably lead to “They’re the REAL racists.”

We need to hammer our term “Anti-Whitism” into this discourse.

That is all.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments

BASICS: Black Vandalism With A Diploma

Written by Bob Whitaker

A Chevy Chase Movie in the 1970’s began with a little black boy going along with an old “church key” type bottle opener, down a line of parked cars, scraping the paint off each one by just holding the thing against the sides and walking.

Chase got his car out just in time, naturally then having a different disaster with it, and that was the joke. But the subtext that jumped out at me was the attitude the movie showed about the little black boy. No black people complained about that stereotype of a little black kid naturally doing his vandalism. Whites took it for granted, too.

The black boy’s vandalism was as routine for the 1970’s Yuppies the movie was made for as the garbage truck Chase then proceeded to ram his car into. They deal with it daily, routinely. They do not resent it because the black kid was not responsible for it. That’s the way blacks act.

“I’m gonna get you, sucka” is assumed to be a natural black attitude, and not just little street kids. When a black is pulled over, it is assumed that the cop is being racially prejudiced.

Actually there is no “prejudice” to it. People with black skins commit vastly more crimes than do people with white skins. No black is EVER mad at the BLACKS who DO this. They never mention it.

At all.

On Planet Earth, a black skin it exactly like any other clue. The cop doesn’t know you personally. If young blacks, half of whom are in the penal system, are driving slowly around a residential area, the REALITY is that they are far more likely to have criminal action in mind than they would be if their skins were white.

But if you are a black with a degree, the one thing Mommy Professor trained you think of is not the blacks who commit the crimes, but of the Evil Cops, including the black ones, who have to face reality every day.

Anti-whites will fly off the handle at this. But see if they can cite any black activists who blames the black criminals and vandals.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments