The black rage is their defense.
Now when the young guy in Charleston did his shootings, they instantly convicted me which gave us lots of publicity.
The guy who just did the Jewish Center killings has just been convicted. At the beginning of his closing argument he put up on the whiteboard that “Diversity is a code word for White Genocide”.
One explanation for this is, the same reason they put it off with CNN, they can’t deal with me.
But all this has made me consider White Rage.
If a black man runs around killing white people, it’s because of oppression.
Now if we have white guys out killing, In The Name Of White Genocide, it may be a warning.
Isolated Black killings of whites are the result of a legitimate “Black Rage”.
So isolated killings In The Name Of Genocide, may mean that instead stopping all discussion of White Genocide, the White Rage may indicate that’s exactly what we need to discuss. Or are we going to just have people keep picking up guns?
At the moment we’ve had very isolated incidents, two of them, but should we not consider White Rage?
There is no excuse for anybody just shooting other people, on a basis like this, but it may signify that we are going to have to discuss the real issue. And that does not mean with in the current bounds.
So maybe we should start looking at these isolated two killings as White Rage.
And a warning.
Bill Rusher wrote a book called “How to Win an Argument.”
Even then the idea struck me as a bit childish, though of course I never said so.
If you want something to brag about among the lightweights of National Review, you aim at WINNING. You end the story triumphantly by saying, “And you should have seen the look on his face!”
I constantly lost arguments by using the word “all.”
“All Communist countries have armed guards to keep their people in.”
Didn’t mind at all if someone made that point and lost the argument.
My point was made.
On gun control, I would bring up Switzerland. It has guns in millions of private hands and no more gun crime than other European countries with fanatical gun control.
I didn’t mind the other person thinking they “won” because they listed all the European countries with fanatical gun control and low gun crime.
Despite the fact that my boss was on the NRA Board of Directors and I wrote him at least a dozen speeches on guns in Switzerland, no conservative defending against gun control ever used that example.
No conservative ever whispered about the prison walls around all Communist states.
They were afraid that if they made the point they would lose the argument.
To me they were Losers.
They probably thought they were Being Shrewd.
Hillary Clinton’s whole personality is Ice Station Hillary. She makes the Republican cuckservatives look real and warm by comparison.
Even her advantage is cold numbers.
By electing Reagan I knew we could bring down the silly ass USSR, I also knew he would do nothing about gut issues of my working people like busing and quotas.
I made news back then actually representing real working people at real marches and real strikes and real press conferences.
Unlike every highly paid Soviet specialist, I not only predicted, but helped bring on the Soviet collapse.
YOU DO NOT BECOME A PAID SPECIALIST BY BEING RIGHT!
I believe Trump has a great chance of being elected, by process of elimination.
But it never occurred to me that cuckservatives could listen to or deal with real working people.
Reaganites did with working people what Democrats do with blacks: They bought them by the lot from their owners.
Cuckservatives did not hire me to deal with working people. They went to the Religious Right, which then took care of the working folks’ politics the same way black churches do.
It is expected that those who think Trump is electable are the ones who think he might be seriously helpful.
Like Reagan on race, I see Trump as eminently electable, but useless.
Donald Trump is following a strategy which is as old and as true in politics as buy low and sell high is on Wall Street:
That is because the Republican BASE tends to be right wing and the Dems’ base is left of center.
The nominee then spends the period until the election backing off what he said in the primaries.
This is an election.
This is not Twitter.
Trump’s stance is more reflection of the Mantra than representing it.
Exactly the people who cannot deal in power politics are the ones who go nuts over a headline.
You are dealing with someone who says genocide. So you debate definitions.
“So you admit that diversity is only interested in doing away with one race, the white race.”
“You agree that diversity means to chase down the last white country and the last whites in the last white country.”
“But you says that is not genocide because you plan to use as little violence as possible.”
On another subject, “white country” or “The white race,” we tailgate.
When they say there is no white race and no white country, the obvious answer is that they are always blaming the white race for taking America and Australia from the natives.
That completely stopped my CNN interviewer, of course.
Donald Trump’s candidacy has produced varying reactions from opponents of White Genocide, ranging from feverishly supportive to sullenly cynical.
Here’s an abridged exchange from another site that plays on the term “cuckservative”:
Trump can uncuck himself any time by saying he is 1000% opposed to the White Genocide that’s being carried out by massive third-world immigration and forced assimilation in all White countries.
But the opening that Trump seems to be creating may prove to be ephemeral, or limited in its scope (if Trump is elected and by the end of his second term has come even close to speaking the phrase “White Genocide,” it will be only because of the hard work of Bob Whitaker and the worker bees at BUGS!
The lasting effect of Trump is very much still in doubt, but the spreading of the terms “anti-white” and “White Genocide” and the other STOP WHITE GENOCIDE memes is beginning to have the appearance of being inexorable.
The term “anti-White” is rocketing now in the mainstream…it is after all a term that both linguistically and socially/politically has been absolutely needed…it fills a gigantic hole, and fills it perfectly…and the term “White Genocide” is also appearing to be irresistible (imagine yourself a blogger or a newsperson and ask yourself how would you NOT want to write about such a term!)
The whole story is right here:
One person pointed out that cuckservative wasn’t OUR meme and one real BUGSER who actually READS the blog quoted my repeated statement, “The best memes I cause will not be mine.”
SPLC sure as hell knows that.
“Cuckservative” has gone explosively viral, and SPLC quotes DR. Kevin MacDonald, saying it traces directly to “Bob Whitaker.” I am named as AFP presidential candidate in this and other SPLC publications and in their New York Times Op-Ed, and on CNN.
How much would that kind of publicity cost any other third party?
Anti-whites never discuss whether anything we say is true. All they have is labels.
Watch them ask whether cuckservatism is racist or even (God forbid!) anti-Semitic. They do all the defining.
Ann Coulter keeps trying to define the battle as cultural, not racial. She says it won’t matter if our race disappears if whatever she chooses to call “our culture” survives.
And they say RACE is hard to define!!!
All the birdbrain sees is a bird. A bird is not smart enough to tell that these birds are not its own.
So cuckholding among birds is triumph of their Common Birdianity.
It also uses the nests built for one species to produce more cuckolds, who will grow up and do the same thing.
One who does not accept Cuckservatism may be a racist, but he is not a suicidal birdbrain.
The following scene will be familiar to those who have visited New Guinea or who have seen the film “Mondo Cane”.
In Port Moresby, outside the airport there, New Guineans are standing around. They look with incomprehension at a plane flown by a White person. The powered flying vehicle moves through the air to the bewilderment of the spectators. The New Guineans eventually leave the airport, walking back to their huts with a mixture of awe and jealousy.
When back in their village, they try to recreate the outer FORM of the aeroplane they just witnessed, to gain its special powers. But they have no idea how the aeroplane actually WORKS. So they sit around for days near their model plane they made out of grass, looking up at the sky.
And so they sit around, waiting for The Day of Salvation, when something will come out of the sky to help them.
Now Anti-Mantra Pro-Whites (AMPWs) are essentially the same. They desire special powers, so they sit around, waiting in bewilderment for Der Tag, when Kalki or some other soteriological thingamabob will come out of the clouds to help them………
In contrast: here at BUGS we simply have BOB, a seasoned “curmudgeonly” expert who knows exactly what to do to gain political power. His resumé is impressive in itself, but it is only the tip of the iceberg that is crashing into the “Diversity” (White Genocide) bubble. As Bob said in a Scandinavian interview: “When I’m very impressed that something showed up in a Respectable Conservative magazine, you know that’s a sort of technical statement . . . like an engineer would be talking about heat and temperature and so forth that he noticed.”
The track record of BUGSERs’ successes is astonishing:
MILLIONS of media impressions each year. The term “anti-racist” has been so discredited as a code word for anti-White that the notoriously unwise Tim Wise did not even use the word once in his article against Bob. In contrast, the term “anti-White” is now even used by anti-White media without using quotation marks. Gigantic billboards against White Genocide have appeared above motorways. Marches have taken place as far away as New Zealand. In every White country, consciousness is being raised about White Genocide. Popular alternative news and research sites have taken on our message. Automated telephone messaging has been sent out on a state-wide level. And White Genocide is now even being addressed by Respectable Conservative outlets.
So what is the AMPW reaction to this? They ASSUME that Bob must have a huge organisation behind him.
But this shouldn’t be surprising. AMPWs are essentially the same as New Guinean cargo cultists.
They don’t understand how things WORK, so they focus on the FORM.
One difference is: The New Guineans at least manage to make nice-looking model planes.
AMPWs don’t even manage to do that.