People who talk about Roman discipline in detail would have lost a real Roman battle if they were in command back then.
Why? Because they are so obsessed with the formation and the short sword that they forget the javelin. Every Roman battle began with each soldier throwing his javelin at the beginning. This was absolutely essential in every battle.
That javelin throw was so routine that it is barely mentioned. It took seconds, and then they formed up for battle. I was very young then but I seem to remember every Roman soldier carried sixty to one hundred pounds of equipment along in the tens of thousands of miles of marching he did in his twenty-five years carreer. Every one of them carried his javelin all that way for the one throw. The javelin alone was as cumbersome and heavy as the short sword and shield he toted all that way.
For one throw at the beginning.
It is hard to explain battle, so it is hard toe explain why the initial javelin throw was so essential that they carried it all that way and always began the battle that way. But the fact that they DID it shows how essential it was.
This initial javelin throw was a sine qua non because the Roman strategy was based on dispersing the enemy in the way all those flying javelins did it. It gave them time to form up for a defense or a charge. The form of the enemy that came at them was determined by that mass of deadly spears in the air.
So, while AFKAN and others are making essential points about the fight itself, you will lose if you forget the initial javelin throw. Our indispensable, sine qua non javelin throw at the beginning of ANY battle is the Mantra***. Without it, the enemy forms up his own way and goes on the offensive. The Mantra must be the keystone of our attack, because it is a shock, and it puts the enemy on a PREDICTABLE defensive at the outset as all those flying spears did:
*** AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
http://whitakeronline.org
http://www.nationalsalvation.net/
#1 by danerebor on 10/28/2007 - 10:15 am
Stay in formation. Right now we’re outnumbered and they can attack from all sides. But they’re barbarians and they don’t know what the hell they’re fighting for. We do. And we can take them apart.
And let’s not forget the javelins were specially made so they couldn’t be thrown back at us. Just like the Mantra.
#2 by Dave on 10/28/2007 - 7:24 pm
This weekend I attended a college football game, a perfect sunny autumn homecoming college ball game with 61,000 in attendance.
I looked hard but could not find a nonwhite person in the stands. Blue-eyed freckled nose chicks everywhere, a sea of white faces and flaxen hair, here and there a tow headed toddler held by mom or dad.
What a contrast to the racial composition of the players on the field!
And also, what a contrast to the racial composition the talking heads in the media presentations on the huge screens at each end of the field.
This is the result of 50 years of “integration”? What is going on????
It is expensive to attend college ball games and the darkies don’t have the cash.
But they didn’t have the cash in 1957 when Jim Crow was dying on the marble slab either. Nor did they have it 1967. Nor did they have it 1977. Nor did they have it 1987. Nor did they have in 1997. And they certainly don’t have it in 2007.
We have got half-century test bed for income integration as evidenced by the racial composition of the folks in the stands and I am going to make a prediction: In 2017, the homecoming game will be just as segregated.
The Mantra is a “majestic view”, a very orienting strategic vision that is wonderfully explanatory.
The delusions of political correctness “disperse” into nothingness when the Mantra is hurled.
Think of the investment political correctness made to blind all those white people I saw in the stands to the contradiction staring them in the face.
Political correctness is the enemy of reality while the Mantra is in accord with it.
And it is long past due for the mainstream mass of white folks out there to start coming to terms with the preposterous contradiction in their thinking, this “religious” hope for an “integration” of the races that will never come to pass, this pretending that we are all destined to become “equal”.
The gap between the dark races on the field and the white race in the stands is not going away. After all, the white race in the stands is the race that creates, funds, and shapes the entire context to begin with, for the darkies on the field are only there at the pleasure of the white race in the stands, but it is heresy to state it.
Accordingly, the white folks in the stands need to begin to get a grip on reality. They need to start being honest with themselves.
The Mantra is a good place to start.
#3 by Simmons on 10/28/2007 - 9:01 pm
Its always been my opinion that “liberalism” as practiced was sold on the ideas of white supremacy, cockeyed views of white supremacy but still. Having grown up in the North around the Quaker and Puritan influences in Northern Illinois it was sold on the ideas like, “we are better than that”, “or its are duty to the simple.” The Mantra is a great place to start, shoves their face in it good and hard, but don’t be suprised to meet an airhead or two who still wants the white man’s burden (liars but it sounds good to them).
#4 by Dave on 10/28/2007 - 10:58 pm
Simmons,
You have hit on something that is very important: Make no mistake, in the beginning political correctness was a program of white supremacy.
For example, at first the dismantling of the Jim Crow wage system was motivated by the Roosevelt administration’s concern for using colored labor domestically to replace white labor repurposed to the battlefield.
Political correctness (non-Southern attitudes toward the coloreds) then unfortunately became a means for fresh-off-the-farm Northern and Western States inductees to disrespect (feel superior to) their Southern States counterparts, this according to the usual rules of the junior high school level cliquish behavior.
You have to remember that all those WWII inductees were really just a bunch of kids.
Problem was that after the combat was over, too many of these kids started to take their junior high school ranking down of Southern “country boys” seriously, all in the name of “equality” for the coloreds.
But the big difference between then and now is that back then, when political correctness was just getting underway, it was just a contretemps between white boys. Our society was not fundamentally racially destabilized as it is now.
The nonwhite numbers are now too great to return to light and airy conceits of yesterday.
Accordingly, political correctness is now MOTIVATED, as it is in India.
Even though everybody knows political correctness is a preposterous lie (here and in India), attempts to disestablish it are taken with the utmost seriousness, driven by the fear of bloody hell.
For example, India’s establishment retains a keen memory of the bloody hell that erupted with Independence (and later with the spinning out of Bangladesh) as millions died and millions more lost their homes and were uprooted in Muslim-Hindu-Sikh conflicts that make a lot of what happened even in WWII look like a Sunday school picnic. Most people in the West are entirely unaware of this, as large-scale horrors elsewhere in the world have gone unrecognized (except in the Hollywood charity rock concert sense).
With the racial destabilization of America, it is possible for the shit to hit the fan BIG TIME, just as in India.
To this we can lay the fabulous inheritance of the “Greatest Generation”, their junior high school social sensibilities being what was truly important to them.
#5 by AFKAN on 10/28/2007 - 11:39 pm
in reply to Dave (1):
you wrote:
in reply:
This is a stronger point than many will care to accept.
Even at the level of the commentators, look at the screens on the field at the big college games, and look at ESPN.
Two COMPLETELY different markets, two COMPLETELY different demographics; to paraphrase, the living difference between the university of Mississippi, and “Ole Miss.”
The White Tribe moves forward, in the area where tolerance is only allowed for excellence.
On ESPN, many shows which are proudly sponsored by makers of cheap alcohol, you will see our Colored brethren as *ahem* “color” commentators.
The REAL analysis, which requires abstract thinking, is done by people who are, literally, carrying the White Man’s Burden…
Incidentally, listen to the language of the play-by-play commentators versus the *ahem* “color” commentators:
“Coach, what do you think just happened?”
“Tim, you played with this team. How do you feel about what just happened?
Two completely different worlds occupying the same physical space.
Marketing is, obviously, aimed at two different groups.
I see this being done with great clarity of purpose by Brigham Young University’s marketing, which is increasingly focused on the Core of the future LDS Church, the densely connected, more intelligent, White graduates of BYU.
Football games are used as building blocks for connection enhancement between Y Grads, with arrangements for Game Day meet-ups and parties (alcohol free!) being made at the Church’s Elders Quorums at LDS Churches nationwide on Sunday. (Think of the stands at the stadium, and multiply by, oh, tens of thousands.)
At selected meetings, within selected demographics, soft pitches are made to support various school endeavors, and various Church community endeavors, aimed at supporting the appropriate Church demographic, while supporting and building the Racial ties that bind, support, and sustain, Families.
Have no illusions – this is all about Race, writ large, as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture.
you wrote:
in reply:
And the de facto segregation throughout America will increase, as well.
In our case, “income” is a substitute for “values,” including delaying gratification, and investing in the future, whether it is in college, or in the real world.
It’s those “values” that win first prize, and the temporal benefits – income, education, ability to control – are simply derivatives of those values, in action.
Take those and compound them over generations, and suddenly, you have Western Man, reaching for the stars…
THAT is the qualitative shift that manifests within a Race, acting racially.
you wrote:
in reply:
I agree, and suspect that political correctness will fail in the real world as soon as the political facades it requires become unsustainable.
This might be sooner than one might think.
A lot sooner.
you wrote:
in reply:
I have found The Mantra to be a bit too complex for many of my Racial brethren.
I also believe that, as the economic house of cards falls apart, people with nothing will have nothing to lose, and will be more receptive to ideas of social transformation starting at the Family level.
And the Family, as we all know, is the microcosm of Race.
As we learn to treat the Family AS the microcosm of the Race, I suspect new social arrangements will present themselves, along with new opportunities, at all levels of society.
#6 by richard on 10/29/2007 - 8:32 am
Because political correctness is fundamentally irrational, when it is forced to acknowledge a different point of view, it collapses.
And when it collapses, it doesn’t make a loud noise. In fact, you don’t even notice at first. You just wake up one day and it isn’t there any more. Like communism.
On the discussion boards where i post the mantra, it’s fascinating to see this happen. For example, one of the most hardcore antis has just posted this, in a discussion about evil racists like me – “as for the ones who “innocently” ‘just like to be among their own kind” – they are mostly creatures (as are we all, i suppose) of habit. as long as they don’t go about burning crosses on the neighbors lawns, or otherwise attempting to sow fear and terror, i havent MUCH of a problem with ’em.”
He doesn’t realise it, but he has just accepted the case for a White homeland. After that, the rest follows.
#7 by Simmons on 10/29/2007 - 8:47 am
I view the LDS not as a religion but an evolutionary demographic with the trappings of a religion. They are good, but wait till the Jews sniff them out and then we will see how good they are. The mantra is good especially for the higher IQ demographics who have spent a little time trying to digest the latest PC. For others I quote the intro sentence and then punctuate (ask) “Why?” That word is the greatest word ever invented, and its the white man’s word. We live in a cult ruled by emotive sloganeering, I believe even Lenin noticed that by sloganeering you forestall though that is why we have words like “racism.” “Why” turns the cult onto itself.
#8 by Tim on 10/29/2007 - 9:16 am
Dave,
Interesting enough, some Egyptian Pharaoh’s kept Pygmies as pets. The Pygmies would perform for them etc. This kind of stuff is still going on …..at least on a subconscious level. Of course, the pygmies were not accepted as equals and they most definitely did not live in their neighborhoods.
#9 by woundednietzsche on 10/29/2007 - 11:44 am
I don’t believe we have the burden of completely defeating our enemies, as they will be consumed by their own dogma. By preserving our formations and fighting correctly, we can serve as an anchor when the seas of reality start rising. We can provide survivors with the “Colors” to rally to when the matrix disintegrates.
Certainly there are elements within the matrix planning how to best manipulate the masses during a chaotic breakdown. We are their competition. They must pretend that bad weather has been abolished. We are free to deploy.
The following link and excerpts are a comparison of the Soviet collapse and the one the US is potentially facing. It is interesting to see the points the author makes in defining what is different about the US and USSR and how that will likely impact the results of a collapse.
http://www.energybulletin.net/23259.html
“In terms of racial and ethnic composition, the United States resembles Yugoslavia more than it resembles Russia, so we shouldn’t expect it to be as peaceful as Russia was, following the collapse. Ethnically mixed societies are fragile and have a tendency to explode.
In terms of religion, the Soviet Union was relatively free of apocalyptic doomsday cults. Very few people there wished for a planet-sized atomic fireball to herald the second coming of their savior. This was indeed a blessing.”
#10 by AFKAN on 10/29/2007 - 6:28 pm
woundedneitzsche made an excellent point tied back to the goal of The Mantra. It also works as a reminder to the limits beyond which we can do nothing, and should not trouble ourselves.
woundedneitzsche wrote:
in reply:
All of the Conspiracy Theorists (I am not a Conspiracy Theorist – I am a Conspiracy Factualist) simply miss the Larger Issue – it is OUR Creative Talents, OUR Gifts, and OUR Energies, that are being used against US.
Once we get to that conceptual breakthrough, and replace the “energy leakages” with a focus on transferring them internally to develop our own lives, and our own Families, in the context of Race, so much comes together so quickly, as we are no longer paddling upstream in the dark.
Those are the Colors we need to nail to the mast – this is the Principle that works for well for the Jews, and can work even better for US.
And, it is an easy Rule of Thumb – “Is what I am about to do help, or hinder, my Family’s goals?”
Work your way back from that – ruthlessly – and, suddenly, the correct choice is an easy choice to make.
That is why I am moving my nephews in the direction of working with Ron Paul Meet-Ups, with the goal of them learning the social and technical skills to succeed in working with groups, while they are being groomed for the Day of Leadership in a political party that has the simplest platform ever – “Family FIRST.”
No matter how bad things get, THAT will be the organizing principle that will succeed over millennia…
And, after all, Family is the microcosm of Race, and Race is the macrocosom of Family, as well as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture.
woundednietzsche wrote:
in reply:
That article has seen a lot of play on the Peak Oil boards, but it indirectly addresses a much stronger point that is our primary point.
When the Leadership of New Russia reorganized the former Soviet Union, they did so in a manner that took issues of economics back to raw material economics, and physical economics, in a framework of national strategic investments. The Lanor Theory of Value has gone to the dustbin of history.
Socially, they organized New Russia so Russia was prepared to be a Racial whole, with New Russia being, essentially, White Russia, and the Asiatics added to a de facto economic and political commonwealth, where they pose no burden to White Russia.
From the Baltics to Sebastopol, including the Ukraine, it’s White Russia, resurgent, with the Russian Orthodox Church being resurgent as the unifying spiritual organization.
I think it was Gaidar who had a piece in Foreign Affairs where he laid out the day the Soviet Union collapsed – the day there was no money in the bank.
The New Russian Revolution is a Racial Revolution. Like the Bolsheviks of the last century, things fell apart (helped along here and there), and they literally walked in and formed a new nation that is economically prosperous, and has the detrius of a century of outgrow.
They are outgrowing it quickly.
Russia Today has a website, and you can watch it for free online. Pay attention to the commentaries of Peter Lavelle (some are on YouTube under his name), and listen to the kind of things we ought to be teaching our Children to say.
We should be preparing for how we shall deal Racially with the slow-motion Implosion of the status quo, knowing that it could quickly go from slow-motion to fast at a moments notice.
#11 by mderpelding on 10/30/2007 - 5:43 pm
Our great weakness when confronted with so-called progressive thought is to be conservative. Resisting change gives the initiative to the other side. So then we counterstrike. The progressives call this being a “reactionary”. They are correct. This is a defensive position and the best outcome of defense is the status quo. In extremis it means extinction.
Every Roman battle began with the Javelin throw.
Note that it didn’t begin with an enemy attack.
*** AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
What a great opening salvo!
#12 by Tim on 10/30/2007 - 8:12 pm
Nick Griffin and Neocon’s sound alike all of sudden and a lot of WNs and Stormfronters are bitching. BUT neither know anything about Politics. Nick Griffin is in the process of coming to power from the grass roots. The Neocons are in power. And Neocons have media power in the UK. But the Muslims with their oil money are giving them fits.
Many people say the Neocons are very smart and clever and have it all figured out. I am disagreeing now more than ever. While there are a few of them that are no doubt clever operators. Up until recently, they have had LITTLE COMPETITION! They have OWNED the damn media for my whole entire lifetime (and probably Bob’s too!).
I have just read Horowitz’s latest hour and half speech against Islam. I believe the Neocons here in America can never get it. It is like Communist defector says: “After ideological subversion is complete –true information no longer means anything”. Melanie Phillips is a NeoCon in the UK who’s column has shown up on the BNP website. Her last radio program had on all the controversy regarding the Race and IQ stuff with Watson. SHE DEFENDED HIM with passion!!! She said IQ and RACE were a critical issue on the BBC! Can you imagine a Podhertz saying that?
In short, I believe the Neocons (esp. in the UK) are in Panic and have no one to support BUT THE BNP. I have read old Nick Griffin stuff from before I was born. No one says things like that on the record and goes through all he has been through to sell out white kids on the last yard line. Sorry. I don’t buy it. Frankly, I see his speech as a positive sign. People in power now have problems. We have all the solutions………and there are few at least THAT KNOW IT.
Neocons came to power by FACING NO competition. WASP’s were a joke. They are now facing a huge Muslim Oil Financed Machine and a rising tide of European Ethnocentric Nationalism. So the BNP must be taking advantage of things. I don’t care what the BNP says in coming to power.I care what they DO. I am a one issue guy……MY RACE. I know damn well Nick Griffin and company understand this and feel this same way.
And I am sorry guys. A few Jews on the Bus with me in the Ghetto are NOT the same threat anymore. Because all the choices are different and a fast talking Podhertz would be facing a pogrom that would make him WISH he were back in 19th century Eastern Europe.
(oh not to mention the fact that Nick Griffin was ON TRIAL for speaking his mind!—his speech must always be limited)
#13 by Z on 10/30/2007 - 9:01 pm
Great news! The power structure is getting weaker by the minute. I’ve added a link to a story about the University of Delaware’s new program that requires students to be evaluated on their thoughts. Here’s the first paragraph.
“NEWARK, Del., October 30, 2007—The University of Delaware subjects students in its residence halls to a shocking program of ideological reeducation that is referred to in the university’s own materials as a “treatment” for students’ incorrect attitudes and beliefs. The Orwellian program requires the approximately 7,000 students in Delaware’s residence halls to adopt highly specific university-approved views on issues ranging from politics to race, sexuality, sociology, moral philosophy, and environmentalism. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) is calling for the total dismantling of the program, which is a flagrant violation of students’ rights to freedom of conscience and freedom from compelled speech.”
The system is now so concerned with young people’s thoughts that their creating programs to change them. Here’s one of their lessons:
“A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be racists, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities, or acts of discrimination. (This does not deny the existence of such prejudices, hostilities, acts of rage or discrimination.)”—Page 3
See that, now just being White makes you a bad racist. Now if “diversity” was really such a great thing would they need such a programs?
You know the answer. Read this story.
http://thefire.org/index.php/article/8555.html
#14 by AFKAN on 10/31/2007 - 12:14 am
mrpelding just nailed a critically important issue that explains why, in no small part, WN2/M has fallen so short of the mark, and the key needed to turn things around.
mrpelding wrote:
in reply:
INCREDIBLE POWERS BECOME AVAILABLE TO US WHEN WE GET OFF PLAYING PURE DEFENSE.
Once we realize that we have damn little to lose by playing nice – past a certain point – with people who clearly intend to destroy our Familes, and our Race, an enormous amount of Creative Eneergy – Spiritual Energy – becomes available for us to draw upon in a sort of spiritual/psychological renewal.
I have taught my nephews the positive use of Anger, and how to control it to work FOR them.
That more than HALF of the nominally Adult population in America is on prescription tranquilizers tells us their Minds can not handle the clear evidence of what their Senses are telling them.
We MUST get off playing pure defense.
The Key is to use the decision-making Rule that explains Jewish success so well; to the Jews, there is only ONE issue, and that is Racial Supremacy, by any means necessary, even if it means the death of the Host at the hands of the Parasite.
They are ALWAYS on the attack; verbally, conceptually, with all means of expression, and ideological control.
I suspect that the Reconquest of Russia by the White Christian Europeans had more than a few nights of the long knives done softly, quietly, in a thousand dark corners, and a thousand back alleys, as the scales of Justice were brought into balance.
I suspect the Reconquest of America, and the transformation of America into a New America, will require no small degree of the same Mindset, manifested as the same practices.
My nephews WILL be ready to do their part.
It’s quite heartening how, once they accept that it CAN be done, and it SHOULD be done, that it is BEING done, even as we speak, minute by minute.
These little bastards aren’t reactionary.
They are developing into revolutionaries of the Mind.
When it comes time to take the battle to the Enemy, they will be READY!
#15 by Prometheus on 10/31/2007 - 6:52 am
AFKAN writes
INCREDIBLE POWERS BECOME AVAILABLE TO US WHEN WE GET OFF PLAYING PURE DEFENSE.
Prometheus says :
This is essentially why we are still stuck. The Javelin throw is an offensive move, right from the beginning of battle, before you’ve even formed. Sometimes, in a verbal battle, it is enough to maintain the upper hand, by merely being the first person to speak. Hence the reason allowing anti’s to debate on OUR forums doesn’t go anywhere. They pose a question, which, from the wording, has already dictated the course of discussion.
The offensive is, us, right off the bat, right from the beginning, asking the questions and never deviating from the point we are trying to get accross.
#16 by Lord Nelson on 10/31/2007 - 9:43 am
First let me apologise in advance, for any bad language I may use in this comment.
I still remember the first time I heard the mantra. It was on one of Bobs audios, and I knew the importance straight away. The coach may remember I sent a PM saying how priceless I thought it was.
Like others have already said, (unlike the present day BNP and a lot of our present leaders) it makes NO attempt to justify. It ATTACKS! And lays down the foundation of how the coming battle will be fought.
After decades of intense brain washing, antis are used to having their arses KISSED, every time they get into a debate about the GENOCIDE of the White race.
This seminar is unique in promoting neither, Arse Kissing or “Der Aryan Master Race” as a means to fight this war.
However. Once the battle has started we must remember that war is a dirty business. And that antis are NOT particularly nice or honest people.
So a word like genocide, while it is CORRECT, and it has a lot more propaganda value when fighting for hearts and minds. When you are cheek by jowl with antis, it gives them a chance to turn the tables, and leave you trying to justify its definition.
So from the mantra:
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
Which gives me this:
Out populating and assimilating of ALL White people and ONLY White people etc.
I know this may sound weak, but if it keeps the battle where YOU want it to be fought, and keeps the enemy on the back foot. Then you are still on course to rip their f.cking heads off before the battle is over.
I feel it is important to point this out because there seems to be some confusion between, talking to the average White person at work or in a bar; and getting into a debate with a rabid, lying, social construct.
So here is a simple rule:
When trying to influence the average White – use GENOCIDE.
When in a dogfight with antis – don’t let the BASTARDS off the hook.
Anti or Social Construct:
I am not suggesting we confuse the issue by not using the word anti. We all know what it means and its understood. That is why I use the word myself when I am talking to my own side.
But again, (in a dogfight) “anti” is simply a shortened version of what they (White antis) like to call themselves. Meanwhile they label us as RACISTS, and WHITE SUPREMECISTS.
It is no accident that the term “social construct” is offencive and DE-HUMANISING. The people who program White antis created the term specifically to dehumanize the White race, and justify our genocide!
I know from first hand experience that of all things, this is what White antis HATE being called more then anything else.
Also, we know that antis ONLY use this term when refering to the WHITE race, so let us make the same distinction.
And use “social construct” when refering to White antis only.
Let us offend and dehumanise them, like they do to our race.
Let us take their term “SOCIAL CONSTRUCT” and ram it straight down their F.CKING throats!
PLEASE!
#17 by Dave on 10/31/2007 - 11:50 am
Like AFKAN says: “In racial issues, we are dealing with the irrational”.
The value of the Mantra is that it turns consciousness to the survival imperative. America and Europe are filling with nonwhites because of the survival imperative.
The affluent regularly lose sight of this because, becoming soft, they lose their “street-level cynicism”. This makes them vulnerable to Wordist nonsense.
Let the kiddies at the University of Delaware be indoctrinated. They are not observers of their own lives. Ruin is ruin and pain doesn’t come in flavors. As these kiddies fall to their knees I will not lend a hand to clear up their delusions. Instead I will visit them with a brutality they never imagined was possible. At least, that is my sentiment.
This is because I live in a world where I get to nurse hatred. Nobody gets to take that away from me.
This is why stray dogs, who have insecurity for their feed, have a great advantage over tame dogs who trade their freedom for slavery and a collar.
#18 by shari on 10/31/2007 - 12:25 pm
I like ramming that “social construct” idea, as in WELL,YOU ARE A SOCIAL CONSTUCT, BUT I’M NOT! Ha!
#19 by woundednietzsche on 10/31/2007 - 10:45 pm
My anger wells as deep or deeper than the next man’s and I understand the need to keep traitors from infiltrating the trenches. However, if we are talking about the average brainwashed white kid who has never had any guidance beyond the acceptable PC tripe they get in schools and churches, then I believe they have never been given a chance to decide, as they’ve never seen a different view, one that might align with what they felt instinctively but never had confirmed even by their parents.
Have I missed something or are we going to have a litmus test where everyone has to know from birth what we know here now or they will be regarded as an un-trustable enemy forever, never to join our ranks or at best a lower caste?
We cannot afford to write off every generation of college grad who has been sheltered from reality and spoon fed with Big Lies from mommy-priest-professor. They are like prodigal sons and from experience may form a mindset harder and stronger than one of us, once exposed to the Real World, depending on how they respond to it. Right now they don’t know what they don’t know and its our job to help them GET IT, not throw them under the bus for making mistakes. Ok we might have to throw them under a bus every now and then but we can’t toss them from the helicopter. They are our racial brothers. To be clear here, I am not talking about antis, persons acting as capos in the genocide against us. They should get back all the mercy and good deeds they’ve shown us.
I don’t think we need a Big Tent, but we need a Big Enough Tent to do what we need to do. The neo-cons should have been distrusted from the beginning as their motives and allegiance were known to conflict with real American conservatism. We will not face that same conflict of interest with the formerly brainwashed white youths once they leave the PC train and start to see this world as a life and death struggle for their family, race, and future. Once you finally SEE IT, its a view you can never forget.
#20 by AFKAN on 11/01/2007 - 12:47 am
in reply to woundedneitzsche:
I can understand your point, and I understand Dave’s, as well, when he wrote:
#21 by woundednietzsche on 11/01/2007 - 8:39 am
AFKAN that was a powerful and disturbing metaphor. Given that context my approach would be to explain the situation clearly to the “victim” and give them an opportunity to leave the abusive relationship for a healthy Family. If they choose to remain where they are at or attack me for trying to rescue them, then that says it all. I would have no problem at all writing the victim off after this. I consider myself practical, not sentimental. There are so many victims trapped in the matrix that are able to take that first step to freedom after one healthy conversation.
#22 by Hardric on 11/01/2007 - 11:14 am
woundednietzsche;
AFKAN presented a good analogy but I think the issue goes a bit deeper. The question is to what extent the “Rescuer” is really able to rescue.
A policeman who intervenes in a domestic altercation may certainly offer a way out of the immediate confrontation, and may believe that he can offer a permanent solution to the problem (domestic violence shelter), but at some point he will leave and the “Victim” will still be left alone to deal with the situation. And the victim will still be gripped by fear and uncertainty.
There are timid souls and there are stronger souls. They may both understand, but respond differently.
The more solid the opportunity to leave becomes, the easier it will be to convince the victim to leave.
#23 by AFKAN on 11/01/2007 - 2:45 pm
in reply to Hadric:
you wrote:
in reply:
That is why being able to admit to feelings of anger, in an environment where one can learn feelings of empowerment, lays the critical foundation for being able to face the truth, and accept the truth.
When I started my nephews on martial arts training, my goal was to help them learn how to accept anger, and transform the feelings into feelings – and actions – where THEY could internalize the dragon of impotence and anger.
Remember, anger usually results from a feeling of helplessness, and in OUR case, that feeling if helplessness is LEARNED through the media and the public indoctrination system.
Once they have accessed the Power of the Shadow through accepting the anger, and working with it, they can not only “be convinced to leave,” which is a one-time-only Change, but they hcan leave, and move FORWARD.
#24 by woundednietzsche on 11/01/2007 - 4:12 pm
Agreed Hardric. And we can provide solid opportunities for victims to leave the matrix by building strong families, networks, friends, associates, businesses, where we can lead by example and influence many lives. We must break the enforced stereotypes of the racially conscious white person.
Our ability to intelligently discriminate offers us an advantage that should lead to more success and less blunders. There is a world of sink holes waiting out there today for anyone who is racially unconscious. I hope to reach a person before they become a true victim. Healthy people can learn from the mistakes of others and I NEVER miss an opportunity to point out the racial element of mistakes made by others. Our ideas are not often enough heard, so a subtle comment introduced at the right moment can have a tremendous impact on another person’s thinking. The media brainwashing machine works by repetition, reinforcement. There are endless ways we can reinforce our message every single day. RACE DOES MATTER.