Read BUGS comments a couple of years back and now. You will see a complete change around. Our people are thinking in OUR terms. We are talking ORIGINALITY, not just applying whatever is said here to the standard old line, “Well, that just proves that X was right, the JEWS did it” and so forth..

Uniquely among those in our movement, OUR brains are unjamming.

Political Correctness, as we all know damned well, exists only because we accept its Big Lies. As AFKAN says, what we lack is a POSITIVE racism. They hit us with the Big Lies and we argue with the Big Lie on THE BIG LIE’S OWN TERMS. Our brains are jammed. We never get OUT of the Big Lie.

It is surprisingly easy to get OUTSIDE the Big Lies. It invariably EFFECTIVE to change the terms of the debate. But our brains are as rusted as there are. A documentary says that Thomas Jefferson, from a Welch family, had some Phoenician genes. This proves, they say, that Jefferson was an African, and since he didn’t LOOK African, it proves that looks don’t matter.

It is likely that, due to the ancient tin mines in Britain, Jefferson might have had some Phoenician blood, as do many of the Welsh.

Instead getting tied up in that crap, I simply point out that what it proves is that Phoenicians did not look the way documentaries portray them. Like people of that day in general, they were white. One sentence and their whole load of crap is turned on them.

When the debate gets on to how the Plague ended, I point out below that it was simple GENETICS. The people who died of plague had less and less genes in each generation, so the plague, like all other plagues, including the common cold, became non-fatal to remaining generations. I then go on to make a POSITIVE, i.e., OUR points instead of chasing THEIRS around endlessly.

I THINK about the point just made, and I point out that the common cold almost wiped out the Eskimos, and the hard=earned European resistance to disease was a major factor in the conquest of America. Note how this turns all their crap on its head. Instead of evil whites selling liquor to the Indians, the fatal problem of Indians was that they had not had the millennia of exposure to strong alcohol our ancestors did, that their4 ancestors did not EARN resistance to diseases that ours paid so much for.

But every time I do this kind of thing, my comrades, “That’s a CUTER point. Now let’s get back to JEWS.” Like insane military commanders like those who ran the French Army to defeat after defeat, they do the same things over and over and over. They say a new approach against a place where PC never expected an attack is “cute,” then they go back to charge the most heavily defended area in the enemy’s line.

No, my points are not “cute.” They take intellectual WORK, intellectual ELASTICITY.

In short, you have to THINK, not just act like a brick wall bouncing the same old crap back.

p

It is natural for children to be highly aware of genetic endowments (as they notice differences right off the bat), only to be tossed into a public school culture that is on a relentless full court attempt to pacify the issue.

Of course the reality is the system is as obsessed with the issue of genetic endowments and the child naturally is. It is just that Political Correctness expresses this obsession inversely. Were it not so, there would be no need for so much Political Correctness on the issue.

You can’t dispose of the awareness of genetic traits because you can’t dispossess of narcissism and desire, even where millions of innocent children are gleefully thrown into the meat grinder of officially sanctioned dereliction and suffer horrendous damage there, including relentless pain which quickly morphs (for many) into self-inflicted and permanently disabling injuries and ruin (usually through drug and alcohol abuse and related accidents and criminal acts).

The medical profession and pharmaceutical industry leap about in bacchanalian ecstasy on account of their profit in the carnage, carnage they make every effort to expand and worsen (along with the justice system which likes the carnage for the same reasons).

Hoffer was obsessed with the subject of genetic endowment because he was sure owing to family history that he would die around the age of 30. When this failed to happen, he realized that transmission of genetic traits is far trickier subject than he had supposed.

There is a fraud in esthetics that goes like this: “Nothing hath beauty that does not have some strangeness of proportion”. Swindlers and the deluded of every age love that one. It should be tattooed on Hillary Clinton’s butt (there’s certainly plenty of room) as the defining motto for everything she represents.

Of course, the opposite is true: The very essence of beauty lies precisely in the lack of strangeness of proportion.

That’s why the genetic husbandry of man will triumph. It lies in a narcissism that no matter what must be endured, cannot be defrauded.

That is also why there is more to Orwell’s maxim, “Freedom is being able to say two plus two equals four” than its literal meaning.

What is beautiful is beautiful and what is ugly is ugly.

No amount of deceit and crime can change that fact.