B. U. G. S.

The “elite” version is good for a setting where there will be exchanges of ideas back n forth. Ultimately you want everyone to be in the elite mode, but i am just thinking more along the lines of creating 2 consistent response messages that will nullify all their points in one quick blow… and give the audience an easy method to remember.

Although it’s nice to drag anti-whites around on a leash and take them to whatever point you want them to make… in situations like youtube where the attention span is ADHD – it’s probably best to squash all their arguments ASAP rather than making it a back n forth dialogue… this makes it even more humiliating for them… when you know everything they are going to say and just list it all out from the beginning.

For example – a good response for Justifying Genocide” could be something along the lines of the following mini mantra –

“We are all human!” does not justify White GENOCIDE
“We all bleed red!” does not justify White GENOCIDE
“Because of history ” does not justify White GENOCIDE
“For the economy” does not justify White GENOCIDE
“A shortage of doctors” does not justify White GENOCIDE
“Race is a social construct!” does not justify White GENOCIDE
“We are all from Africa!” does not justify White GENOCIDE
Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.

Of course you can add in a top line as an adlib response to whatever they claimed justifies genocide, and it might be best to rethink how they are written – so we can maximize the word/character count and make the point as powerful as possible.

If we all use just a couple consistent response messages – these messages will become etched into their mind just like the phrase “anti-racist is a code word for anti-white”.

In the quotes section, we need to include Richard Nikolaus Von Coudenhove-Kalergi.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nikolaus_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi