B. U. G. S.

In response to “My Humility Can Beat the Hell Out of YOUR HUmility,” Joe writes:

As I read this piece, Bob, the computer on the top of my neck instantly picked up on something you said. I immediately thought that you won’t like my comment. Then it occurred to me that you have said on occasion that you are a Christian. In your piece you mention something about Zoroastrianism (not my thing) and Christianity. Brace yourself. Here it comes. “Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof; but he that doeth the will of God abideth forever.” Please forgive the king’s language. You’ve probably heard it before. Most of it was in my head but, I admit, I deliberately looked it up so as to not deceive you as to the exact wording.

I deliberately put this comment in here because you mentioned in an earlier piece that people who quote Scripture “too much” cannot be trusted. There is some truth in this observation but it’s not entirely true. There are exceptions to this rule.

I understand that Scripture I just quoted to you. I have understood it for quite a long time. I am aware that being “on” Bob’s Blog is being in “the world.”

Comment by joe rorke

MY REPLY:

Joe, int his blog, I have quoted reepeatedly Christ’s words, “My kingdom is of of this earth.”

Jesus blesssed the marriage at Cana. According to your interpretation of the quote you cited, he should have CURSED it.

There is long, unhealthy trip from Jesus as here to teach us about the next world to a man turturing himself to death in the desert in the name of Chirst. There is along, and sick journey from these words from one who blessd a wedding to the sterility demanded by early Christianity.

This is a matter of deep concern to me because I want want to know where the white race got this obsession with racial suicide. It should of deep concern to every Christian or even anyone who wants to understand Christianity.

Old Testament Christians rest their entire faith on the literal truth of the Old Testament. They do so rather desperately. A preacher wrote a long e-mail to show that the Magi were actually steeped in the Old Testament.

Meanwhile, inthe real world, the Holy Jews did not invent the story of the Flood. I am sure the discovery of the legend Gigamesh caused some Old Testament Christians to lose their faith.

The idea that many of Christ’s ideas, and those of the Old Testament, derived from the biggest monotheistic faith of their day will shake many a faith which balanced on the narrow ledge of the Holy Jews.

The very thought that Jesus was incluenced by anything but the Old Testament is pure heresy to many.

But if you don’t understand Roman history you are going to have a very hard time finding out where the term “The Living God” came from in the Old Testament, though I am sure it can be done if you are desperate enough.

You say you are interested in Christianity but not Zoroastrianism. I cannot imgine how you can understand the former without the latter.

Early Zoroastriansim did not preach self-hate. What Jesus said, which, by the way, is a great contradiction of the Old Testament which concentrated on THIS world, was a statement of early Zoroastrianism.

Late Z like Modern Christianity, was a sick thing, a rotting corpse. And it was from that corpse that early Church got the poison we could die from.

Studying Christianity without any awareness of Z is like studying medicine without taking anatomy.