If war were decided by the number of generals, the Confederacy would have won. We had more generals, qualified generals, than they did.
In fact we even had an advantage in manpower at first. It is estimated that inthe coupelof months afdter Fort Sumter was fired on, some 300,000 Southerners volunterred for service in the Confederate Army. Lincoln was having difficulty getting the 75,000 he called for. But the South couldn’t USE its 300,000 volunteers.
Why? Because we lacked two things:
1) Sergeants and
2) Guns
We had plenty of generals, but what we needed was sergeants to train that 300,000 men. If we had had the sergeants, we could probably have gotten guns, guns were not rare in the South. There was never a better strategist born than General Robert E. Lee but in the end you have to have guns aimed at the enemy, people inteh trenches firing, and Lee simply did not have enough of those.
I want to fight, not make strategy. I gave you guns to use, Bob’s Mantra and “Heresy!” I am more of a sergeant than a general. Stormfront is one solid mass of generals.
Bob’s Mantra
” Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
http://whitakeronline.org
HERESY!
Each society has its own word for HERESY!
Communists called all HERESY! fascism. Fascist Italy called all HERESY Communist.
Today, under the Politically Correct tyranny, HERESY! is called HATE! or “racism.” Nobody wants to try to deal with a point like Bob’s Mantra, so they start demanding that nobody say it, just like any other tyranny does. They call people who speak HERESY! names.
You Political Correctness fanatics are playing a very old game.
When you call people names who disagree with you or scream Hate or racism, a.k.a., HERESY! it says nothing about the point we heretics make.
But it tells us ALL about YOU.
And quit right there.
Try it.
I have found that when they are confronted with an argument like this or Bob’s Mantra, they see desperately for something ELSE you said that they can argue about to avoid the simple point you made.
DON’T give them that opportunity. Say it and make them ANSWER it or insult you or throw labels.
Then just put this same point back again.
The other side only has two defenses,
1) To ignore Bob’s Mantra: and
2) To scream HERESY! at us.
Cut them off at the pass.
#1 by Simmons on 10/07/2006 - 12:18 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
And you might add we have one more powerful advantage, they are a joke or the king wityout any clothes. Liberalism is little today not much more than the effite snobbery of its white and Jewish handlers passed off as the wordist religion of the day, it has fallen to farce.
#2 by joe rorke on 10/07/2006 - 7:55 pm
not spam
not spam
Yes, I have said many times that your oppressors have no argument at all and they never have had an argument. They call you names and ignore your point and that’s all they have. It is so easy to defeat them in argument because they have no argument. It has always been that way. I remember as far back as 1965 on the Alan Burke Show or the Joe Pyne Show there was this phoney argumentation. It is so easy to defeat.
The result has been that there really is no debate almost anywhere you go. None. No debate. They talk about debate and pretend that a debate is being held but this is simply a lie and the lie itself is never addressed. I’m serious. They have nothing! Truth cannot be whipped. It’s that simple. Keep it simple. Never let your opponent get your emotions worked up. Unscrew your hjead, clean off the threads and screw it back on. Never doubt the truth of what you are saying unless you know it is a lie. If it is a lie, you deserve to lose. If it is the truth there is no reason for you to take a defeat. It is as simple as pouring piss out of a boot.
I have seen so many phoney “debates” that I refuse to watch another one. Keep everything simple.
Follow Bob’s advice and play your cards close to the vest and you can’t lose. Never get pulled into the phoniness of your opponent’s argument. There is right and wrong. There is good and bad. There is truth and falsehood. Whitaker is either right or he is wrong. There is no middle ground. If he sounds right to you he is most likely right. Just because people spit in his face and have been doing so for years does not make him wrong. He would not be the first person in the history of the world to be right when half the world is saying that he is wrong. Personally, I think he’s right. I spar with him but that is not because I think he is wrong in his basic premises. I spar with him to keep him sharp.
Whitaker is the man. He is the one who has dedicated his life to a certain purpose. Presumably, you know what that purpose is. All I am is and all I want to be is the man who keeps him on his toes, keeps him sharp. I can never take his place. Whitaker is a far better man than I am or ever will be.
History is full of men who have not been appreciated in their time. Mr. Whitaker is probably just another one of them. Surely, he understands that he will be spat upon. Hey, he’s in good company. They spat upon Jesus Christ.
Sometimes I think that we have forgotten how to carry on argumentation in America. It’s not that difficult. If you know how to carry out a solid argument, when the phonies enter the arena you will spot them in the first ten seconds. They have nothing to offer but a big bag full of nothing. I have seen it so many times I can’t count the occasions. Whipping your opponents is child’s play. They simply can’t stand up to what your saying if you say what Mr. Whitaker is advising you to say.
#3 by Pain on 10/07/2006 - 9:00 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
I like the comment from Ole Black Joe, especially the Poker imagery. I have never played Poker since I am told I wear my emotions on my sleeve, but I like the metaphors anyway. I am still trying to figure out where the screws on my head are, though.
As for Bob’s drilling, maybe we should call him “Bob, Sergeant Major of the Blog.” (BOBSMOB)
#4 by Alan B. on 10/08/2006 - 10:39 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Selling ideas can be alot like trying to start up a new business with a new product, it takes dedication , effort and commitment. Steve Jobs built the first personal computer in his garage in the 70’s and we now have millions of Apple computers through out American. If your looking for the quick and easy road in our fight then you will fail. Forget about the christan denominations, those SOB’s are selling their people out left and right, they are pro border jumpers, kinda queer friendly and muticultrially bent over the pulpit. Like a Democrat sees brown skin as a vote the church sees brown as money in the coffers. Only real peopel like us coming together as a united front, can we have hope.