NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Are you sure Trager was criticizing you? It sounded only like a commentary to me.
Comment by Pain
ME:
PLEASE don’t do that to me! You know I don’t care whether someone criticizes me or notm and I am very disappointed that you would bring it up.
Trager made some silly comments, the kind of not-listening pretend wisdom I am am deeply sick of. Now you add more ofhte same, “I don’t he was criticizing.”
Who gives a damn? He was bieng SILLY, and that bothers me more than any personal insult, and you should know that by now!
#1 by Alan B. on 10/11/2006 - 1:28 pm
NOT SPAM
We will move on from here now, focus on the objective. Pain meant well, but the point Bob makes is important, it was an attack and represented nothing usefull to our dissusion so why harp on it, just let it go and move on.
#2 by Al Parker on 10/11/2006 - 8:10 pm
NOT SPAM
Proper form is important when rambling, ranting and raving, engaging in silliness or other types of textual buffoonery. Using paragraph structure, appropriate punctuation, capitalization and spell checking will allow such content to slip by unnoticed to those who do not take the time to read and attempt to digest it.
#3 by Mark on 10/11/2006 - 11:10 pm
Not Spam
NOT SPAM
Either there’s something hidden in all of this “my race” “the race” talk or else I’m quite stupid — which I wouldn’t argue against, looking back on my past blunders and outbreaks of “foot in mouth” disease. I thought the piece was interesting, several points invalid, but it made me think and re-read it a couple times just to figure out what was being said. I too think it was a criticism but I guess due to my inability to grasp anything that’s not black and white (no pun intended) it doesn’t surprise me that I’m still scratching my head in ignorance of what all the hoopla was about. I feel badly for Peter. I guess that makes me stupid and simple.
#4 by Pain on 10/11/2006 - 11:21 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
I doubt any one thought it was important. He seemed to be making a rambling commentary with a long bad joke in the middle. He made some interesting comments about our race being both ours and the race that matters. Poorly written perhaps, but you ask people to think aloud, and sometimes it comes out badly. It is important to read things closely, despite if one has ADHD.
A more important thing to discuss would be why White ethnics believe in their ethnicity first and last. Or why such define themselves against the white majority in their country of residence, which they perpetually talk about as if they are living among foreigners. If members of a group must wave their arms up and down to proclaim their superiority to their white neighbors, why should we take them seriously?
If a group puts itself above the race, how reliable are they in a fight for the race’s survival? Didn’t Tolkien talk about how useless in the ring-struggle were those dwarves who fought only “for the dwarves?”
Wouldn’t they just turn around and fight us to even up imagined grudges? (The list is long, you know.)
This must be asked.