By the patty-cake crap I mean the stuff you would address to a kid. For instance, “You only favor those who agree with you because you can’t stand criticism.”
Where the HELL do you think I’ve BEEN the last fifty years? I value your thoughtful criticism because many times you represent a unique point of view. But most of it is what I have heard – LITERALLY – hundreds of times before.
I am looking primarily for extensions of my thinking. This “constructive criticism” and “devil’s advocate” horseshit I do not address. I am not in this for money and I am not in this for my health – ask my doctors. I am in this because I have something to offer.
NO ONE takes criticism and apologizes for his mistakes more than I do, but there is a LIMIT.
Someone asked me to give sources for my Che quotes. That was covered in Stormfront – by others. That is covered in Google. I WILL NOT DO YOUR RESEARCH FOR YOU. That is patty-cake crap.
I am bad at remembering examples, so I’ll pick on Simmons’ latest comment. The second I saw he was saying we should get the liberals first I knew he had missed my whole point. Why? Because that point has been missed a hundred times before the same way.
Then there are bitches about my attitude. If they are novel and important, I’ll pay attention to them, but usually it is same old stuff.
PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT IS NEW HERE.
Cut the patty-cake crap.
#1 by AFKAN on 10/24/2007 - 6:18 pm
On another WN Forum, a poster decided to accept the painfully gained advice of Dr. David Duke for actually making the beginning of headway IN PREPARATION FOR the actual practice of the responsible assumption of political power.
Some time back, Dr. Duke argued we should get involved with the political parties at the grassroots level, where they offered FREE courses on how to organize and get things done, in the current political framework. Everything is there for you; expert advice on fund raising, finance, sign design and manufacture.
Great idea.
My variation was to work within the new Ron Paul organizations – Internet based, Meet-Up types – and learn with them, gaining practice on a playing field where it would cost us nothing, but offer us a chance to deal with the politics of true alienation.
The other choice – if you are serious about the issues involved in forming a nation – would be to get with Dr. James Dobson’s new proto-party, NOW, and work within that system using the same techniques that worked for Gramsci, in his followers long march through the Institutions. Our difference would be to use the word “Family,” but always apply it, in practice, to mean “Race.”
The tree fell in the forest, and, no one seems to have heard it.
Not one word of commentary on a solution to issues the owner and founder of the board claims to have had in mind when he designed the board.
Not one – not from anybody.
I have done this with my nephews looking over my shoulder, explaining to them what I was doing, and why it mattered.
They were amazed at the complete lack of response to the suggestion.
The answer, of course, is simple.
Tonight, and for the next few days, we shall be discussing the differences between a meeting to alter the Articles of Confederation, and the ratification of the new Constitution by the affected States in 1791.
They have the time ahead I don’t, and I know they will enjoy attending Ron Paul Meet-Ups – “Hey, guys, a chance to meet women for free!”
I’ll find the local Dobson people, and get them to work with them, too, if an opportunity develops.
The lesson?
The Lesson of how a meeting to revise the Articles of Confederation became the foundation of a New Nation is also a lesson in how a small, intelligent, organized minority, given time and a singular focus, can form the lever that rests of the back of the indifferent, moving them into the formation of a New Nation.
Nobody shows up?
More opportunities for US!
#2 by AFKAN on 10/25/2007 - 2:55 am
[sprung]
The above post might seem trivial, to some, but I think it is of greater importance in the light of Bob’s theme for this thread.
In an earlier post, mrpelding noted our need for a new religion. I commented on this, noting that all other religions bind the followers BACK, while Christianity – True Christianity – bound its followers FORWARD.
White Nationalism, Western Nationalism, and what could be called a possible “Movement” involving these Ideals – call it WN2/M – has not made the headway it should have for numerous reasons. Among those is the so-called “Golden Age” – Rockwell, Oliver, Pierce – was formed in the clear background of a race war defined as a “Civil Rights Movement.”
ALL of these men could remember a White America, and KNEW that only a White America could be a Great Nation.
Since then, the “Civil Rights Movement” has been part and parcel of a Gramscian Institutional Transformation, and WN2/M went nowhere, compared to what could have been.
Thus, even now, the personal battles of thirty years ago are being refought daily on various WN bulletin boards and forums…
I am convinced it’s because they, essentially, stopped moving forward; they saw the issues in one context, and are trapped in that intellectual context.
Some have moved forward, even while these battles try to drag them back – like the archaic religions, they draw them BACK to a past that never really was, where they never spend any time creating a better future.
There are exceptions, but even these are spending too much of their time fighting yesterday’s conflicts.
My nephews shall not have anything to do with these dramas.
I have explained to them the conflicts they see being worked out, and have explained why nothing much has happened around WN2/M activities; everyone is still arguing over who should have won The Big Game back in high school, while our Opposition went on to colleges, and universities…
And I am tired of it.
So, we are looking to an incredible future, with the best of Bob’s Insights – and the Insights of his posters – in starting with the intellectual framework of Family First – Family, as the microcosm of Race, Race as the macrocosm of Family, and Race as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture.
And, if they can learn with Paul’s Meet-Ups about diplomatic and political skills, and can apply them to good effect with Dobson’s Third Party, so much the better.
If this leads to them leading a new nation twenty years from now, ALL based on the foundation of Family, and Race, so much the better.
At least, I will have offered them honor, discipline, and the stars…
Let everyone else fight, continuously, the battles of high school.
WE have work to do.
#3 by Back Bay Grouch on 10/25/2007 - 9:08 am
BobW disappeared for several days. Was concerned for his health. But he is back, ornery as all hell. That is the Bob I want to hear from. This seminar. We are looking for truth, not balm. If Bob sh*ts on me, he’ll find that can diarrhea back. We are among friends, pour a little bourbon & branch. Have a laugh. And stay on message.