Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

My Take on “Ethnic Soiling”

Posted by Bob on May 31st, 2008 under General, Mantra


The point made by the Mantra was to ignore all of what the other side CHOOSES to say, and making clear the whole picture BEHIND it. No one does this on the term “ethnic cleansing.” In fact the solution to all our problems is presented as ethnic soiling of white countries.

Is ethnic soiling worth fighting for?

No one noticed when General Wesley Clark stated flatly that his troops were in the Balkans because, “there is no place for an ‘ethnically pure” country in Europe.” This is a great deal more than just objecting to VIOLENT ethnic cleansing. It was a statement of policy made by a man who would later be a candidate for the presidency that “assimilation” is to be enforced by the US.

No one noticed it but me.

Since no one objected to that statement, it became legitimate US policy. Any European country that stops immigration and becomes TOO “ethnically pure” in America’s opinion is subject to invasion. That is what the man SAID. America is willing to go to war from ethnic soiling, which is precisely what the Mantra says, if not MORE than the Mantra specifies.

Ethnic soiling is a principle America is willing to go to war to enforce in Europe.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Tim on 05/31/2008 - 10:14 am

    I copied and pasted that quote by Clark. Attempted genocide. No wonder the Russians love us so much.

    Someone on this blog mentioned Jared Diamond. Vdare has run a blog piece on his latest rant. It is actually funny, complete comedy, that any sane human could believe this hebrew. Read it and laugh.

    here is a taste.

    “It’s easy to recognize two reasons why my impression that New Guineans are smarter than Westerners may be correct.”

    Can anyone take this shite seriously? The only thing our enemy has behind them is money (oh and the fact that he is a Hebrew). Money made Jared Diamond. That’s all. In the world to come, these fools deserve what they get.

    http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2008/05/30/jared-diamond-life-is-full-of-interest-in-the-new-guinea-highlands/

  2. #2 by Dave on 05/31/2008 - 2:07 pm

    Wesley Clark is an interesting character. I like these pure distillations.

    He has been mentioned as a running mate for Obama and that is perfect, for he is personally certain that his advocacy of crime, if carried out in a spirit of righteousness, put some polish on his narcissism.

    That pretty much describes most of today’s big league American politicians.

    The real problem is that they are able to accumulate an audience, given their “act first and think later” personalities, and their notion that if you can’t be arrested then its not a crime, when a truly responsible society would put them into orange jumpsuits, slap handcuffs and leg irons on them, and frog walk them into jail cells, the wholly appropriate place for them.

    Nevertheless, a low punk like Wesley Clark doesn’t bother me.

    The world is full of his kind.

    However, it really bothers me that he is taken seriously. That is the problem.

  3. #3 by shari on 05/31/2008 - 3:05 pm

    Dave, That’s what really bothers me too!! That such as Clark, ETC,ECT, ECT, are taken seriously. When talking about technology, I don’t have a lot of comprehension. But a world that is SANE, means a lot to me.

  4. #4 by AFKANNow on 05/31/2008 - 3:27 pm

    in reply to Bob:

    I saw the Kosovo Affair as being an attempt to control the Siberia of the Balkans – look at the resource maps of “Kosovo” – while insuring the formation of a permanent Muslim state in the reaches of Europe. It was also a nice demonstration to the Northern Europeans of which country can block the Danube at will – and don’t think that lesson was missed in Berlin.

    The principle Clark enunciated was mentioned as the overriding political principle – and, if memory serves, Clark is quite Jewish.

    Jewish interests in having Christians (Serbia) and Muslims (Kososvo) at one another’s throats are obvious.

    Indeed, it seems ethnic homogeneity is allowed for one Race, and the Jews intend to keep it that way.

    We shall have to Do Something about that…

    While we can.

  5. #5 by AFKANNow on 05/31/2008 - 3:29 pm

    in reply to Dave:

    I think Clark was in charge of the Texas National Guard during l’affiare Koresh.

    He is a dimwitted fool, but clever indeed in his service to his masters.

    That he is taken seriously shows more about our “democracy” than many feel comfortable about.

  6. #6 by Tim on 05/31/2008 - 7:12 pm

    AFKANNow,

    Interesting how the Russians really woke up after Clark and company played that game in Kosovo. Since then Putin and company really made some moves since then.

  7. #7 by IAN T. SANTIAGO Redux on 05/31/2008 - 7:52 pm

    It is important to remember that our movement is not just an American phenomenon. The entire multi-racial “democratic” paradigm is in its’ death throes. We are approaching end game.

    A tenacious number of Germans hold far-right views including deep skepticism about democracy, belief in their supremacy over other nations and suspicion of Jews, a poll released Wednesday indicated. About 5,000 Germans were questioned for the survey conducted for the respected Friedrich Ebert Foundation, which is run by the Social Democratic Party, partner in Chancellor Angela Merkel’s coalition government.

    It found that nine percent of those polled believed “predominantly” or “completely” that under some circumstances a dictatorship can be a better system to run a state than a democracy. Fifteen percent support an iron-fisted leader “to govern Germany for the benefit of all”. One in four — 26 percent — said they favored a single party in Germany “that would embody the national community as a whole”.

    About 15 percent said they believed the Germans were “by nature” superior to other cultures while one in 10 said they believed that some human beings were unworthy to live.

    Sociologist Oliver Decker of the University of Leipzig, who conducted the study for the Usuma opinion research institute, said he noticed key regional differences. Easterners, he said, were more likely to express xenophobic views while westerners were more anti-Semitic.

    Forty-four percent of those in the former communist east said that foreigners came to Germany to exploit the generous social welfare system, versus 35.2 percent in the west. Meanwhile 15.8 percent of westerners agreed with the statement “Jews use dirty tricks more than other people”, against six percent in the east.

    Westerners were also more likely to play down the importance of the Nazi era, with nine percent saying they thought the focus on this period was exaggerated versus five percent in the east. Decker said that unemployed Germans expressed right-wing views most often, followed in second place by pensioners. And more men held far-right opinions than women.

    Viva La Raza Blanca!!

  8. #8 by Dave on 06/01/2008 - 11:10 am

    Ian,

    There are things that we WNs need to be very careful about. History isn’t a “wash rinse spin dry repeat” kind of affair.

    As Robert Whitaker has keenly pointed out that what differentiates whites is that we whites continually change the way we think and move on to new frontiers.

    Poltitical Correctness invests race relations with the principle that all demands for racial integration in any form must be mollified, including inter-racial procreation.

    From the standpoint of a way of thinking, it is very ancient. You adhere to a behavioral taboo (exclusivism) and risk God’s wrath, while putting aside any natural offense you may feel, propitiates God.

    It is the old ritualistic “who’s God is more powerful” arithmetic. It is absolutely appalling that most in the political class are unable to see beyond this. That is why the Wesley Clark personalities are legion in America and all the Anglo-Saxon countries and Europe.

    These people should not be taken seriously because their real thinking is very primitive.

    Political Correctness is a grave offense to the white race. And our race’s future depends upon how we react to its withering assault.

    If we react by erecting endlessly, yet another Wordist proposition based on the principle that God will thereby propitiated, and his favor accordingly gained, we have lost, for we have failed to move on.

    The white race’s responsibility is to move on, away from all this ancient nonsense.

    The whole capital platform is our creation for we are its organizers and creators, the only race keenly focused upon “what works”. That is why we must adhere to real science in all of our perspectives without fail, which is a search for truth, not Truth.

    Political Correctness is a religion, the Established Religion, of which there have been many in history. The challenge is to move on.

  9. #9 by Simmons on 06/01/2008 - 4:08 pm

    Yeah Tim, Diamond is a superb storyteller and no wonder they take him seriously at AR.

You must be logged in to post a comment.