Some commenters were reporting that they were accused of “tribalism” for racial loyalty. I have covered this crap a dozen times here. You have the job of going on with the fight, so you should pay attention to the stuff I’ve already spent all those hours and years dealing with.
Real bugsers are usually very good at bringing up these problems, and usually you are very good at telling each other about the points we have covered, so I’m not complaining about this one case.
Every time anti-whites bring you some old argument, they lay themselves open to a kick in the teeth. It’s like what soldiers get done to them when they try to say “surprise” a dozen times.
With this “tribalism” bit, you get to make fun of them.
Again.
Just as nobody is as dumb as a dumb man who thinks he’s smart, there is no one more hopelessly provincial than a Universalist.
They say anybody with loyalties is a “tribalist,” but we have only a few hundreds of nationalisms at the most. There are a MILLION Universal Truths. There will be more Universal Truths invented this week than all the “tribalisms” that now exist.
And no Universalism can tolerate free expression. If your only loyalty is to particular set of words, then you cannot REALLY allow people to discuss which words are best, or to use words in any but YOUR way.
People with loyalties can have freedom of thought and freedom of expression. No Universal can allow freedom of thought.
As one who has been around knows well, this means that the Wordists proclaim wildly and loudly that part of THEIR Wordism is Freedom of Thought and Freedom of Expression. The Soviet Constitution, written in a state with the most total despotism and terror in history, extols freedom of speech in a way that makes the Second Amendment look pathetic.
You cannot be loyal to words and use them freely.
And the millions of universalisms on earth, multiplying like amoebae, make what they call “provincialism” incredibly universal by comparison.
Nothing is more provincial than the demand for a single multiculture.
#1 by BGLass on 12/20/2011 - 8:39 am
which are you loyal to— people or concepts?
that’s a good date question.
#2 by Genseric on 12/20/2011 - 9:50 am
Theirs are only capable of whoring themselves out to New Ideas. Concepts are WAY over their heads. Something nobody could EVER accuse you of, Lass.
Date question #2 should ALWAYS be “Can you cook?”
I like your style.
#3 by Dave on 12/20/2011 - 10:28 am
Charades and ritual, charades and ritual, charades and ritual.
Then there are the growing numbers of us that just cannot remember the prescribed words and phrases, even though the Respectables try to remind us.
The professors, mainstream media, and PR pros think that there was a time when it was possible to get fads going. They are forever reliving the fads of the past. It was a wonderful time they think can be resurrected. Now about the only thing left is the mind numbing “excitement” of mixed race college football, just as exciting and authentic as a North Korean arts performance.
When you are down to that kind of senility in social plumbing, it bodes well for freedom and the Establishment just hates it or they wouldn’t be so nostalgic.
I love watching the Establishment suffer.
#4 by Simmons on 12/20/2011 - 11:24 am
Slightly askance from what cranky Bob is saying. Professors such as Fleming and Hill and their “culture” crusades miss the point simply because they are trapped by wordism.
They have willingly ceded the right to a physical existance of their own choosing so they can be slightly heretical in their universalism. They simply have been swallowed up by the machine, they are within the Soviet debating Lenin for all the good they do.
Its why those two meatheads produce information dealing with wonderful African bishops and black Confederate babies. They hate the Mantra, it reminds them they are in the back of the genocide’s cattle care singing hyms.
#5 by Epiphany on 12/20/2011 - 12:58 pm
The Blacks and Hispanics can always be as Tribalist as they wish. It simply is not called Racism, when exhibited by them!
#6 by Harumphty Dumpty on 12/20/2011 - 2:13 pm
When accused of “tribalism,” how about this response? (thanks for the apt phrase, Genseric!) :
In the Soviet Union there were public statues to children who sold out their parents to the regime.
You’ve built a huge statue to yourself for selling out your own people.
In place of loyalty to your people who brought you into this world and who built the civilization in which you enjoy your life, you’ve whored yourself out to the idea of the day.
The idea of the day that you are passionately whoring yourself out to is White Genocide.
Think about it. You are actually being paid to be an anti-White and to practice White Genocide.
You claim to be anti-racist, but what you are is anti-White.
Anti-racist is just a code word for anti-White.
——-
If any newbies haven’t listened to Bob’s Porch Talk audios tabbed above, please do. I’m familiar with what Bob is saying in this post because I’ve heard him discuss it in his audios (SO much better and clearer for me when I can hear his voice, and I also remember it much better), but I haven’t thought about how to use this material in posts. I make a small stab at it in this one.
I gave some thought to the wording in this post, such as when to say “your own people” and when to say “your people,” and saying “practice” rather than “support” (since the post was drifting too much toward presenting White Genocide as just an idea).
I find it extremely challenging to maneuver among all the nuances…the Anti-Whites have long ago planted their mines in so much of the ground we are sometimes obliged to traverse! We can hardly find words to use that they haven’t already destroyed! How can we say “your people” or “your own people” in some other way that the anti-whites haven’t touched?
#7 by ANOTHERWHITERABBIT on 12/20/2011 - 7:17 pm
The Mantra
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
all throughout history whenever a genotype realise they are slated for genocide they become tribalist. Its only natural to band together as a “Tribe” to insure survival. Tribalist is just another word for racist and we all know how to counter that one
as for the question your own or word for your own race that anti-whites havent defiled I like kin or kinfolk might be a little on the southern side, but I do like apple pie and love my momma
#8 by Simmons on 12/23/2011 - 9:37 am
Duh moment on my part, sorry.
“Which tribe in Africa or Asia do you wish to see overwhelmed by immigrants not like themselves, and which tribe in Africa or Asia do you want to tell they must intermarry and become a minority in their own land?” asks the BUGSer.
“Which African-American majority city in America do you want to see blacks become a minority thru immigration and intermarriage?” asks the BUGSer.