Written by Bob Whitaker

The Mantra forces the question of white genocide. Anti-whites avoid the Mantra because it is so deadly to them.

Once the FACT of genocide against whites becomes front and center, the entire argument is transformed. White genocide is part and parcel of the religion of political correctness, exactly as slavery in the South and in New York City and the slave trade in New England were part and parcel of the American economy.

What is to be done about this white genocide? On slavery, the attempt was made to deal with “non-racial issues,” precisely as anti-whites advocate today relative to white genocide. Less than twenty years before the Civil War, the Liberty Party and the Free Soil Party each got less than one percent of the vote.

Debate on slavery on the floor of congress was under the Gag Rule.

So today it is a bit absurd for us to be arguing over white nationalism or National Socialism or other details of the future. Those who argue White Guilt for genocide do not argue in detail over HOW we repay for our evil. They simply want this as an argument to keep whites from wanting whites to avoid genocide.

In fact the same black leadership that decided the word “niggardly” was invented by eighth-century Saxons to insult blacks also demanded dollar reparations. This is a BAD tactic. The first thing you run into is that American blacks are many times richer than the entire black population of all black countries combined. This is exactly the kind of reality that Mommy Professor trains his little anti-white tape recorders NOT to think about.

So those of us who use the Mantra stick with stating the REALITY, which is genocide. We do NOT get into an endless argument about HOW to save the white race. The best argument against ending slavery was always to get into the specifics of freeing them and what to do with them.

Blacks had a right to be free. We have a right to survive.

PERIOD.

We of the Mantra will not yield an inch on this point: Our race has a right to survive. Once that point gains the slightest public realization – THE SLIGHTEST – then the search for a means and an opportunity will come.

For some reason, I have to keep REMINDING my comrades that the very MENTION of white survival has them screaming that you are anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. We must get to the point where “Slavery must end” and “white genocide must end” can no longer be drowned out by shouts of Abolitionist or Racist.

One anti-white asked Mommy Professor’s question, “Are we in 1800 or 2009?”

My reply was that HE is 1800, still fighting the New England slave trade, while I am 2009, TRYING TO INSTILL A CONSCIENCE on the issue of white genocide.

If you give their specific objections time but avoid the basic moral question, you are fighting their fight FOR them. If you talk about Obama or Jews and don’t bring THIS up, you are helping the anti-whites:

The White Mantra:

“AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am ANAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS.

“They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“ANTI-RACIST IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE.”

Written by Bob Whitaker

In General Comments (link at top of this page) one pro-white pointed out that one attack consisted of what pro-whites on SF are always saying: It’s too late to save the white race.

The commentator was too wise to fall into that trap.

This “too late” business is a prophet only tactic they have against the Mantra: getting off the subject. Look at the Mantra. What is says is that white genocide is a legitimate topic of discussion on what is a legitimate subject of concern to white people.

The Mantra points out that this would be a natural topic of concern for BLACK people under the same conditions. Like amateurs in Stormfront, anti-whites want to go straight into the hopelessness of it all, which shows why the SFers are amateurs: They make the anti-whites’ points FOR them.

Kicking into your own goal is a great way to lose.

The answer to this is, as I say, IN the Mantra. This is a legitimate concern of white people. What is the first thing an intelligent human being does when faced with a legitimate problem?

He DISCUSSES it.

Anti-whites use this “hopeless” business to SUPPRESS any DISCUSSION of a legitimate problem. We refuse to get into solutions — like the Final Solution to the White Problem they are pushing under the euphemism “race” problem — until we are allowed to DISCUSS our legitimate concern.

Right now we are saying we should not be called racists to gag us from talking about white genocide.

Another GC 5 pro-white quoted a anti-white as saying we were just whining. He said we are complaining because WE don’t have enough children. This is the same mistake Lord Nelson was falling into and immediately got out of as soon as I called him on it:

This is not just immigration and “being overwhelmed by numbers,” it is the fact that any time someone presses intermarriage as a “solution” he has in mind that one of the partners is white. “Assimilation” is being pressed as a Final Solution to the WHITE Problem, not the “race” problem.

Keep YOUR objective in mind. Those who attack us are NEVER doing it to DISCUSS white genocide, they are ALWAYS demanding that all discussion of it be SUPPRESSED.

Our goal now is to argue that we have a right to discuss this without being yelled at or arrested. We deserve the same public forum freedom of speech allows anyone. It is the thugs attacking and screaming down our spokesmen that freedom of speech is designed to stop.

Bugsers, here we have a new talking point that has just been quoted in the Washington Post and during a Judiciary Hearing. It was picked up from the YouTube chat during the Judiciary Hearing by Jeff’s comment as Fight White Genocide. I would like to have a discussion on the effectiveness of this new meme…have other bugsers used this meme before?

Bob would expect us as bugsers to have a discussion on this. How do we attack this term “hate” in the most effective way? Some have questioned that this new meme is hard to understand..

Some other optons may be….

You say you’re “anti-hate” but all you are is anti-white.

Any disagreement you call hate. Anti-hate is a code word for anti-white.

Jeff said today “Hate speech is any speech you hate”.

We are a meme team, so let’s discuss this new development and the fact that this meme of ours was picked up and quoted. 🙂