Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with www.bugsswarm.com?
Post on the internet Working Thread

Nation vs. Country

Home › Forums › BUGS SWARM › Nation vs. Country

This topic contains 4 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by  jo3w 2 years ago.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • 12/21/2014 at 11:11 am #99717

    jo3w
    Participant

    I would like a discussion about the use of White nations as opposed to White countries. In my experience people tend to associate the word “nation” more strongly with the government and unity of a people and the work country with a political boundary of land.

    I have found use of the term White nation has been more effective than White country especially as it pertains to The USA.

    I have been posting the mantra as is, but in my follow ups, I have been using White nations and seem to get considerably less resistance from anti-Whites.

    It is a small change, but I have found it to be of considerable utility.

    12/21/2014 at 11:25 pm #99725

    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    If the results show that “nation” is met with less resistance, then go with that. But anti-whites will find 1000s of excuses to justify White Genocide or deny it, so overall it doesn’t matter whether you use nation or country.

    When they deny White countries/nations exist, it’s best to deal with them with rhetorical points.

    “Of course White nations/countries exist. You anti-whites like to play sick games when #WhiteGenocide is brought up, don’t you?”

    I thought of this one just now: “Denying White countries exist is also like denying White people exist – just another anti-white excuse to carry out #WhiteGenocide”

    When someone denies that White people exist (“one race”, “bleed red”, etc.), it’s very easy to deal with it.

    “Denying that White People exist is dehumanization. Denying a RACE exists is genocide under UN Law.”

    “White people don’t exist, yet you blame White babies for colonization/slavery of non-Whites?”

    And so on.

    You could merge the two concepts of “denying White people exist” and “denying White nations exist” into one to make it more powerful:

    You anti-whites go full retard when #WhiteGenocide is brought up: “What’s a White country? What’s a White Person? I don’t know what dat is. duuuuhhhhh”. And then you blame White children for all the world’s problems. #antiwhite sociopaths

    12/21/2014 at 11:31 pm #99726

    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    The other day an anti-white said “I never denied White people exist” and in the same tweet he made a sick anti-white joke about inbreeding. So you can say:

    So you agree that White People/Race exists. You just make sick anti-white jokes that we are “inbred”?

    Whenever you get them to say “I never denied…”, then you switch to saying “So you agree that Whites exist” followed by “You just make sick anti-white jokes” or “You just blame White children for all the world’s problems, slavery, colonization”, etc.

    12/27/2014 at 6:53 am #99768

    Denounce Genocidists
    Participant

    Why in the hell would we not want anti-whites provoked into justifying white genocide?

    12/28/2014 at 7:45 pm #99785

    jo3w
    Participant

    Anti-whites still justify genocide, but in my opinion it is more clear that they are after the people rather than focusing on the land. Maybe I shouldn’t change my strategy of posting mini leaving country then follow ups with nation. I feel this point is more concise to the audience.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.