Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with www.bugsswarm.com?
Post on the internet Working Thread

Plan to grow White Nationalism

Home Forums BUGS SWARM Plan to grow White Nationalism

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 20 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #36917
    Electric
    Participant

    Here’s a video of a Negro in France who is on trail for raping at least 15 French women. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VexdIOKZM0 This video made me sad and angry but gave me an idea.

    We should all help and set up an organization dedicated to helping White people (Men, Women and Children) who got victimized by non-Whites because of this multiCULT that got forced down all of our throats.

    This will surely get many people on our side. Who knows, if we get big enough maybe we could even get legal action against those anti-Whites to put these people here in the first place.

    #36928

    @ WhiteActivist_123

    We`ve got our work cut out pushing the mantra, the “white peoples Organizations” are being done elsewhere.

    #36934
    Jason
    Participant

    Yeah I agree, it is a noble idea and I support helping White victims, but it is basically News & Jews approach.  The way to help Whites in the long run is to expose White Genocide through the Mantra.

    #36936
    The Beef
    Participant

    If White people had a HOME we would not have issue with Anti-White Terror.

    White’s are not ALLOWED to have a HOME or ANYTHING exclusive, as it is part of the means to our Genocide.

    Anti-White terror is a horrible, BUT it is a puzzle piece. The BIG PICTURE is…. WHITE GENOCIDE.

    Stand and fight with us, get on board with consistent message about White GeNocide, and you eventually get a HOME where these things are not an issue.

    Consistent message about White GeNocide is what we are all about. We are on the front lines.

    #36955
    Nordoxen
    Participant

    To cure any illness, one must treat the cause of that illness not mask the symptoms.

    Anti-white terror is a biproduct, stay on message.

    #36957
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I’m going to have to disagree with y’all.  I don’t  think we can ignore sections (a), (b), (d) and (e) of the genocide convention.  The fact is all aspects of white genocide, that is physical (anti-white crime, forced integration), identitarian (anti-white propaganda and humiliation), political repression, cultural (feminism sowing divisions among us), economic (affirmative action), work together and wind up being a deadly witch’s brew.

    Still, by far the most important are immigration and forced integration and I wouldn’t mess with the mantra, but there are none-the-less those people who will not see a genocide without physical violence.  I like the approach Jared Taylor took in his video about Brittney Watts, blaming the anti-white educational system more than individual criminals, which just makes it sound like you’re demonizing white people.

    Anyway, just some thoughts.

    #36958
    Ice Knight
    Participant

    @ Justawhitemom  – yes a case can certainly be argued that the Genocide convention parts a) b) d) and e) are also being violated, but the issue is much more clouded and often involves individual cases, hence it gives the anti-Whites much more room to attack. For example “Part a) Killing members of the group” is really News and Jews territory.

    “Part c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part” is a perfect fit for the Mantra message of mass immigration and FORCED assimilation in ALL White countries and ONLY White countries.

    My feelings are that whilst we are establishing the consistent message we need to keep it as simple and obvious as possible, hence I only tend to use Part c).  Only one act needs to be violated for it to be classified as Genocide, so I choose the easiest one.

    Once the Mantra is fully established maybe we could introduce discussion of parts a) b) d) and e) but that said I’d be happy enough to just leave it to the lawyers to chew over at the tribunals 😉

    #36959
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Iceknight,

    Thanks for responding.  I’m not talking about leading with a, b, d, or e.  I’m just talking about using them in a defensive way if you know what I mean.  Like this:

    Bugster: mantra or mini

    AW: If there’s no killing its not genocide, that’s what -cide means dummy.

    Bugser:  Rape is “serious bodily or mental harm” under subsection (b) and therefore genocide under Article II of the UNCG.  Haven’t you heard about the grooming gangs in London?  Haven’t you heard about all the rapes in Norway.  such and such number of whites were killed last year.  More and more are murdered every day.  Brittney Watts’ killer admitted he did it to make “white people mend” because his professors taught him that Whites have it coming.

    How many dead white children do you require before you stop denying white genocide?  (They won’t give a number.)  Why do you demand mass immigration into ALL white countries and insist that whites integrate with all those non-whites knowing that will end up in a future with no white children?

    You may say you’re anti-racist but what you are is anti-white.  Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

    I know this is arguably tailgating, but honestly I don’t see the point in neglecting to argue all sections of the Genocide Convention that apply.

    I guess I just don’t see anti-white crime so much as an irritant as a rather fundamental part of the whole genocidal system arrayed against us, along with anti-white education that makes white women hate white men.  I do think its important not to hate on black men though.  That is a trigger as people are very sensitive about that.  Like I said, you have to put the focus on the media and academic anti-whites stirring up all the hatred.

     

    #36965
    Cleric_Preston
    Participant

    Just a White mom

    This is  the sort of Anti-White reply (from experience) you’d receive, if you don’t believe me go live on youtube with that sort of stuff and see what happens.

    “I suppose you think white men don’t commit rape ? Your hatred makes me sick. Yeah like ‘white countries’ where so perfect. You ignore the rape and murders commited by your precious ‘whites’ and simply blame immigrants for all your problems. Racist bitch”

    You guessed right, it is tail gaiting

    I personally would have used in the example is “Genocide is defined under the 1948 Genocide Convention.The attempt to destroy, in whole or in part, EVERY White country through 3rd World immigration and ‘assimilation’ is GENOCIDE. ‘Anti-racist’ is a codeword for Anti-White”

    Just make your point, don’t argue, just bludgeon them to death with ‘It’s GENOCIDE’ and ‘Anti-racist’ is a codeword for Anti-White

    NEVER GO ‘defensive’ EVER !!!!!!

     

    #36968

    @JustawhiteMom

    Anti-white terrorism is just a by-product of mass immigration and “assimilation”.

    It is OK to point that out, but not to the exclusion of the mantra.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2013/01/18/petition-stop-white-genocide/

    Crime stats is still crime stats, even if you give it the white genocide label.

    #36970
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    CP and Dungeoneer,

    Thanks again for responding.

    CP you are exactly right.  I have tried it and gotten responses very similar to the one you modeled.  The thing is that I think the people who say that are anti-whites.  They are not the white and normals we are trying to reach.

    Your mock anti-white response completely negates the idea of sections a and b altogether.  If “your own men rape and murder you sometimes too” is a defense to genocide under sections a and b then there is no reason to have them in the Convention because that will always be true in human populations.  I think people instinctively know this and that is why that tu quoque defense is less effective when arguing crime statistics in the context of the Genocide Convention.

    I can tell you that a couple of times now I have panicked moderators and gotten myself banned using all sections of the Convention together.

     

    #36975
    Kanintass
    Participant

    @WhiteActivist_123@ I think I speak for a lot of us when I say that the anti-white terror is what woke us up in the first place i e it’s not a “irritance” when we see our people suffer. That being said, IMHO I don’t think that this is the right forum. Where a small group spread out around the group. The things you suggest is probably done more efficient on a local level.

    Of course it doesn’t mean that we can’t booth be BUGStering and helping out on other fronts at the same time. Just that there is better forums than BUGS for getting together locally. I wish you the best of luck if you really get it done!

    #36976
    Cleric_Preston
    Participant

    @ Just a White mom,

    If an Anti-White wants to talk about White criminals, or you lose focus and slip into tailgaiting into crime stats this is how you can recover,

    “In Black countries all the thugs, rapists and murderers are black

    In Asian countries all the thugs, rapists and murderers are asian

    ONLY in White countries are we expected to import thugs, rapists and murderers from the 3rd World so 3rd Worlders can assualt rape and murder us in our own countries

    The attempt to destroy, in whole or in part, EVERY White country through 3rd World immigration and ‘assimilation’ is GENOCIDE

    ‘Anti-racist’ is a codeword for Anti-White

    ———————————–

    Maybe you should change your callsign to NotjustaWhitemom 😉

    #36977
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    CP that is pure genius!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    #36978
    Peter Cottontail
    Participant

    Here’s a crime stat that may be useful: 100% of White Nations are subject to genocide through massive non-White immigration and forced assimilation.

    #36984
    Nordoxen
    Participant

    Rule nr 1 😉

    ● 1 Stay on message; we deal with the genocide of White people and the perpetrators, anti-Whites. When talking to the general public don’t go into a rant about Jewish conspiracies, banking families, NWO, etc. White genocide is the first step to establish a beachhead in the general population’s consciousness — we can expand on other ideas later.

    Let’s claim that beachhead first, then we can sort out the biproducts.

    #36992
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Justawhitemom writes:
    “…but there are none-the-less those people who will not see a genocide without physical violence.”

    Bob writes:
    The message of BUGS is that white genocide is nonviolent. That is a hard sell. So it is MUCH easier to go with the tide and talk about the actual killing of whites. And this is exactly the kind of slippery slope it takes constant vigilance to avoid.

    We find that things get much easier when we abandon assimilation and just piggy back on the anti-immigration movement. We will find things begin to go easier as we piggy back on South African genocide because there is actual killing involved. It saves us the enormous effort of getting across the reality that the real program of white genocide goes under the Guise of Peace and Justice.

    When you piggyback things become far easier.

    BEWARE when it gets easy!”
    http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/12/09/no-piggy-backing/

    Justawhitemom, after “White Genocide” has been repeated enough, with our simple explanations of it as massive immigration and forced assimilation, it will seem self-evident. That will take a good while!
    I’m sure that Southerners didn’t buy the absurd R-word at first either!
    http://whitegenocideproject.com/white-genocide-are-you-from-dixie/

    I immediately loved your idea, a LOT, but then had to remind myself that it’s not for here. Unfortunately we have our hands full, and can’t do things like this that might be a help even to us if someone else would get off their butts and do them. As you mentioned elsewhere, it would be so useful with some anti-whites, at some points, to challenge their hatred of whites by offering them a concrete opportunity to help whites. But even that would have it’s dangers for us in possibly diverting our focus.

    I agree entirely with iceknight’s very clear comment 2/25/2013 at 2:07 pm.

    Cleric, I think your suggestion 2/25/2013 at 7:54 pm that whitemom liked so much is okay only if you change this:

    “The attempt to destroy, in whole or in part, EVERY White country through 3rd World immigration and ‘assimilation’ is GENOCIDE”

    to something like this:

    “But White Genocide is being carried out not principally by violence, but by flooding ALL White countries and ONLY White countries with non-whites and forcing Whites to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.”

    Otherwise the strength of your statements that precede it will obliterate that you’ve changed course.

    What’s happened to Gavin? He’s the main one who patiently changed all my proud tailgating posts to Mantra posts until eventually I got it, and he was very good.

    Apologies for the length of this.

    #36993
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    If violence against Whites were to continue at its present level, it wouldn’t cause our genocide.

    If massive immigration and forced assimilation continue at their present level, they will cause our genocide.

    We’re familiar with our material, and are able to see distinctions that our audience won’t see. If we were to start bringing violence into our arguments, I think much of our audience would carry away the idea that we’re saying that the present level of violence has reached genocidal levels. And especially as that gets transmitted further, it confuses the issue.

    #37003
    Cleric_Preston
    Participant

    @ HD,

    (a) Your suggested change makes the post 56 letters too long for youtube.

    I’ve never encountered difficulties with how I phrased it, your suggestion ‘“But White Genocide is being carried out not principally by violence’ seems a little too like civil conversation, it almost sounds like we’re trying to convince the Anti-White.

    We’re not here to ‘convince’ we are here, to my understanding, to  just say the same thing time after time. So I just used my standard finish to any youtube comment.

    I’ve never got into trouble with Anti-Whites with that post, but I will give more thought to what you suggested incase there’s some angle I don’t yet see.

    (Besides I was just basking in the warm ‘that was pure genius’ applause of a fellow Bugser , dude 😉

    Anybody else want to way in ?

    #37014
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    “I was just basking…”…Ouch, I can be so thoughtless! 🙂

    Whitemom, I’ll go in the direction of Cleric’s earlier reply to you:

    AW: If there’s no killing its not genocide, that’s what -cide means dummy.

    Bugser: ALL white countries and ONLY White countries are being flooded with non-whites, and Whites are forced to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

    That’s genocide by U.N. Convention:

    “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”

    Those carrying out this genocide say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white!

    ANTI-RACIST IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE!

    That firmly returns to the Mantra topic and phrases, and it fits youtube with 3 characters to spare…it’s just this month’s petition #3 pared down.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 20 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.