Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with www.bugsswarm.com?
Post on the internet Working Thread

UK Government Deliberately Censors White Genocide Petition

Home › Forums › BUGS SWARM › UK Government Deliberately Censors White Genocide Petition

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • 02/10/2013 at 3:20 pm #36216
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I recently attempted to set up a white genocide petition on the UK Government’s website. Normally when a petition is rejected, they list the rejected petition and the reasons why it was rejected. However my petition was not listed as rejected and i never received any explanation as to why. So I decided to contact the Petition site for an explanation.

    Here the email exchange I had with a House of Commons Assistant Secretary.

    to me
    Moderation decisions are taken in individual Government departments, and I was not involved in this decision. Having viewed the petition, I agree with the views of the moderators. We do not display e-petitions which are moderated as offensive, as made clear in the terms and conditions of the site.
    Yours sincerely
    Ben Sneddon
    Assistant Private Secretary
    Office of the Leader of the House of Commons
    ——————————————————–
    to petitions
    could you please explain to me how protesting the genocide of my people is OFFENSIVE?
    ——————————————————–
    to me
    We do not allow petitions which make accusations of criminality. As your petition accuses unspecified ‘anti-racists’ as genocide, this falls as a matter for the courts.
    —————————-
    to petitions
    I see that this petition was accepted
    http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/44089
    if i take out the accusation of unspecified individuals and replace it with the wording in the numbered list, that will be acceptable correct?
    ——————————————————-
    to me
    Moderators consider e-petitions based on the action the petition is calling for. In your rejected e-petition, the action you are calling for is for the Government to stop ‘non-white immigration’ and ‘forced assimilation’. Should you wish to resubmit your e-petition, the wording should be focused around this, rather than the accusations of genocide which are presented without evidence in the original petition.
    ——————————————————-
    to petitions
    This petition is making accusations of ongoing genocide, how is mine any different?
    http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/44355
    ——————————————————
    to me
    As I have said, I do not take the moderation decisions, these are taken in individual Government departments and so there is a degree of freedom in terms of what is accepted.

    However, the focus is on the outcome of the petition. The use of terms such as genocide are emotive and controversial – if you wish to start a petition on the recognition of a genocide, you would be advised to state this as the purpose of the petition and provide evidence (we discourage the use of external links, but departments may choose to accept these). We would otherwise advise against making such claims

    You may wish to contact the department to which you are submitting the petition for further advice, as my information is hypothetical. You can find departmental contact details either via their website or http://www.gov.uk

    02/10/2013 at 7:17 pm #36228
    Ice Knight
    Participant

    LOL Brilliant exchange!  Completely shows them up as the anti-Whites that they really  are allowing petitions for non-White groups but then censoring the message of White GENOCIDE.  You completely destroyed that Ben Sneddon in your exchange and even he must know it!  LOL

    02/10/2013 at 7:28 pm #36229
    J Locke
    Participant

    For evidence, this link has Pew research on Muslim immigration.
    http://www.pewforum.org/future-of-the-global-muslim-population-regional-europe.aspx

    02/10/2013 at 8:01 pm #36231
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    He was all over the place – first it’s offensive, then i’m not specifying, then i didn’t provide evidence. He could have just got to the point and said “because you’re white”.

    My petition btw was titled “Stop White Genocide”. It contained a longer version of a mini mantra which explained white genocide, then it was followed by part C of UN resolution 260 article 2. The website asks you to provide a solution, so I put “stop massive non-white immigration and forced assimilation”.

    I suppose i could write up another petition, provide evidence such as quotes from Sarkozy/Sutherland/Van Rompuy, but it will get rejected because i didnt dot an “i” or cross a “t”.

    His main point was “stop calling it what it is”, and i wonder if it was coming from him or a superior.

    02/12/2013 at 7:08 pm #36351
    j1mmy_Zeta
    Participant

    “Moderators consider e-petitions based on the action the petition is calling for”

    In that case, maybe you could re-phrase the action similar to how the one about genocide in Zimbabwe was phrased, i.e. ‘Officially Recognize Mass Third World Immigration and Forced Assimilation into All White Countries as Genocide’ or something like that. So then you’re not asking them to stop immigration which he objected to in one of his emails, but asking for it to be recognized as genocide.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.