Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

For Gator

Posted by Bob on October 11th, 2009 under Coaching Session, Comment Responses


Adam Smith wrote a whole long book on the simple observation of supply and demand.

Alfred Marshall had to write another book a century later covering that simple point even better.

Two or three thousand years, at least, before Smith and Marshall wrote merchants who survived took supply and demand as the basis for all their actions. In no age did anyone think it a smart idea to take coal to Newcastle.

There is only one law simpler and more universal than supply and demand. That is the law of gravity. It took the to work out the implications of THAT one. Every merchant took the laws of supply and demand for granted, but its IMPLICATIONS were not really laid out until 1776.

Every ancient man who carried home a dead animal felt the law of gravity, but no one studied its IMPLICATIONS until Newton.

Real advanced are made by looking at reality and thinking out its IMPLICATIONS. The Church fought Galileo and Newton because of the IMPLICATIONS their clear thinking brought out.

Asking “What are the IMPLICATIONS” the most common way of stopping independent thought. Today established faith, Political Correctness, is no different than earlier established faiths in this respect.

Gator sounds like what I used to hear in graduate economics: which set of WORDS will make us prosper? He wants ANYTHING but Race,

The Genome Project predictably told us that all humans are, variously, 99.999% (Bill Clinton), 99.8%, 97.5 % ore whatever you like, alike. That means that every moron, every congenital criminal, the strongest and the weakest, the healthiest and those who will die at age ten, are 99.99999999999% or whatever figure you care to throw out, alike.

In other words, it means nothing. Let me state the proposition I think needs thorough analysis. It is as obvious as gravity and as heretical as Newton.

The most accurate economic indicator of the wealth of nations is the color of the skin. All ancient civilizations that went down and STAYED are now brown-skinned. You can wake up in a country after a drunk, take a look at the skin color around you, and tell me what the country’s standard of living is.

Whatever the magic words may be, no brown skinned country ever seems to invoke them. As I said, California is turning brown and its economy has begun its steady slide beyond stagnation down to the level of a brown-skinned country.

The environment will be saved ONLY if we colonize space or make other technological breakthroughs. Environmentalists are already screaming about what Brazil is doing to the rain forests. yet they insist that the future ideal is a “new race” like Brazil.

If you think nature has been crushed so far, just wait until a world-wide Mexico, or even a Japan, which is still killing whales, gets hold of it. Have you looked lately at what China and Southeast Asia are doing to the air?

If they are 99.99999% like us, that .000001% must be a humdinger.

I don’t have to prove cause and effect here. This is an OBSERVATION that is as universal as gravity or supply and demand. Once again the only argument against it is its IMPLICATIONS.

In the post-petroleum age, we need INNOVATION. There was a time when Japan was expected to outrun the West. All it did was what any observation of the Orient would have predicted: Japan caught up and stopped.

Sort of like the people who refused to see supply and demand, or, for God’s sake, GRAVITY, sat around making up gigantic theories conjuring with Aristotle and Company which are laughable today.

So now we are talking about the end of oil while we are dedicated to getting rid of the only race which forms FUNDAMENTALLY CREATIVE societies. We can get rid of the race and conjure some words to take care of it all.

In fact, two Japanese heads of state got into trouble attacking the flow of Mexicans into the US. They both complained this inflow was lowering the average IQ here. That is simple arithmetic, but both were condemned as only an established church can condemn simple reality.

Most people could not understand this Nipponese concern. But it was important to Japan that the flow of technological advance they could see continue. A brown America was a threat to THEIR future.

Orientals tend to look at out obsession with their IQ scores as humorous. To them an IQ test if a puzzle. They are good at puzzles and they go to school twelve hours a day from Kindergarten to learn things by rote and to learn to solve puzzles.

This won’t do much good in a post-petroleum world. That requires societies that can CREATE, not just ADAPT.

Naturally, in just such a time, our established religion is dedicated to doing exactly the wrong thing:

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am ANAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“ANTI-RACIST IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE.”

When Jenner proved the effectiveness of vaccination every Anglican pulpit in London rang with denunciations of his heretical procedure. When will Established Churches STOP being so predictable?

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Gator61 on 10/11/2009 - 12:26 pm

    Bob,

    Thanks for the reply. I agree that supply and demand is an law the same as gravity. What I was trying to get at in a round about way is that the notion that population must expand, in this case by importing black and brown people, in order for us to prosper. I have no doubt in my mind that a stable population of white people will always be more prosperous then an expanding population of brown people.

    Your The Cost of Fads post pointed out that white people have been convinced that they will be more prosperous if they have fewer children and at the same time the white population would need a growing population of brown people to prosper. It seems to me that prosperity would be dependent on the creativity and productivity of the population regardless if it is growing or stable. White people are very creative and very productive, therefore they are prosperous.

    What I can’t understand is why the prosperity of any nation is a function an increasing population.

    Don’t get me wrong. I am not in anyway opposed to increasing the white population. To the contrary The more white people the better.

    We have two contradictory propositions that white people accept.

    They and the few children they have will be better off if they limit their population.

    The other is that we will be more prosperous if the population grows. One of those propositions must be wrong. On a micro level it is easy to see that you can provide one child with more advantages then you can a family of 9. It is a real up hill battle to convince white people that they should have more children.

    So the other side of the equation must be looked at. Can we be a wealthy nation with a stable population?

    I believe we can. The first question to be answered is why we must have an ever expanding population? The second is how can an economy grow with a stable population?

    Here in central Florida, we have an economy based on a rapidly rising population of retired white people. It does bring a great deal of money to the area. You have to convince those white people who are beyond child bearing years that we don’t need more third world immigrants to buy up their old homes up north and that they don’t need Mexicans to cut their grass when they get down here.

  2. #2 by backbaygrouch4 on 10/12/2009 - 7:23 am

    “The Church fought Galileo and Newton because of the IMPLICATIONS their clear thinking brought out.” No. Once the Church thought out the implications, it adopted Galileo and Newton.

    The problem was that the Church did not think, it recoiled from the different, the other, anything not received from Tablets on High. In college a required Theology course was taught by a young Lecturer who was somewhat proud that in researching his Master’s thesis he discovered that a footnote in the standard a text was wrong. That in its self is no big deal. But he traced the error through about a dozen and a half preceding texts. In Theology, as in most academic fields, texts of each generation, or third of a generation get rewritten, that is copied, to garner royalties. For over two hundred years the damned footnote error survived the scrutiny of esteemed academics.

    It is a mistake to assume malice on the part of the Church, be it Protestant or Catholic. It is deeper than that. The higher clergy and academics have a ritual oriented mentality that mimics stupidity. Perhaps it is stupidity. They memorize Aristotle rather than internalizing his method. Understood, Aristotle is as fresh as the latest scientific discovery.

You must be logged in to post a comment.