Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

How Hate Laws Stopped Hitler

Posted by Bob on June 19th, 2010 under Coaching Session, History


A figure I have often seen quoted is that about one-third of German Jews just before Hitler took power married gentiles. This was to demonstrate that intermarriage is not a sign that all is well.

What is interesting about this statistic is that at the time it was supposed to show HITLER’S problem. Nowadays the same statistic is used to show the JEWS’ problem. There was a major ad in the New York Times saying “Jews, be JEWISH!”

There is a lot of money dedicated by Jews advertising dating services to introduce Jews to Jewesses.

It took Hitler over two years after he took absolute power to promulgate the Race and Nationalities Act, prohibiting Jewish-Gentile marriages. There is no way one could say that the legislation was stuck in some congressional committee.

When the media began in 1962 to refer to Barry Morris Goldwater, National Review called up the shades of Hitler. They pointed out that giving the full name of a Jew was the Nazi method of pointing out he was a Jew.

Hold it, gang! Didn’t Hitler, of all people, just refer to somebody as “Jew.”

No.

Why not?

Because there were laws against it. That was why they had to put in the full name if it sounded Jewish enough.

If I remember correctly Henry Ford stopped attacking Jews when a civil suit was brought against him by Jews. This did not stop the KKK from reaching a membership of about four million. The KKK was destroyed by corruption.

But if the facts get in the way, there is a way to deal with it. Just say that the reason Hitler never took power in Germany was because of those strong hate laws that kept even Adolf, to some extent, muzzled.

And if anyone points out that Hitler did indeed take power in 1933, put them in prison.

Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
  1. #1 by backbaygrouch on 06/19/2010 - 6:48 am

    Does anyone know for sure [that means a reputable footnote] what the position of the German rabbinate was on the Race and Nationalities Act, specifically with regard to sections on intermarriage? Mr. Hitler’s legislation parallels the laws of Israel in these matters except that Israel’s are even more restrictive.

  2. #2 by Dave on 06/19/2010 - 10:08 am

    Getting your opinion enshrined in law is not the same thing as successfully arranging privileges for you and yours that nobody sees and this explains much of Jews’ hatred for one another that they displace onto hating everybody lucky enough not to be a Jew.

    What a sad-sack fact these Jewish dating services are.

    With regard to the KKK and corruption, corruption did in the Nazis too, too busy constructing the future, acquiring modest fortunes like little kids set free in a candy store, and not addressing unseen privileges enjoyed by wealthy families, who saw them coming and going.

    In hard times, the fires of resentment and hatred burn, and the opportunists make hay, while nobody focuses on the privilege quietly receding into invisibility. These kinds of facts are incredibly galling to Jews, who have no means of hiding, try as they may. In addition, they are being played by wealthy Turks, and being intimidated by Hezbollah. On top of it, the “wrong people” are turning against them in Europe and the Anglo-Saxon countries and the old time quarantine is coming back.

    I don’t really care about any of this, but you do need to see it in order to settle the scores that really need to be settled. It is a mistake to let this privilege that quietly recedes into the background and into invisibility get away with it just because it isn’t Jewish. They used the cult of Political Correctness for a veil and their beneficial interests must be seized no matter what form or manner these interests take. They should not even be allowed to apply to recover them, for the crimes they helped incite are too great and they are guilty by association.

  3. #3 by Simmons on 06/19/2010 - 11:27 am

    Laws are taboos with legal language attached. We in the alt-right grouplet have a sub industry explaining how we will lose because the “law” and its enforcers are omnipotent (see occidental dissent).

    Let us all understand one thing the Blank Slate Theory is collapsing the center will not hold and genocide will be seen for what it really is and not some wonderful experiment in “oneness.”

    The “People who shall dwell alone” got their multi-cult and now they are gonna get it good and hard.

    If every naysayer we have on our side prefaced his/her comments with the word “It might be taboo to question this or that, it might be taboo to think differntly or to question such authority, but ‘I don’t believe it or you.'”

    The left is nothing but taboo, the right is its captive audience nodding its head on cue.

    Legal smegal.

  4. #4 by Wandrin on 06/19/2010 - 3:42 pm

    “we will lose because the “law” and its enforcers are omnipotent”

    Rock on. The revolutionaries in Tsarist Russia were swarming with government agents. It didn’t stop it. If the people get agitated enough then stuff will happen.

  5. #5 by Lord Nelson on 06/19/2010 - 6:16 pm

    The biggest tabboo we face today is calling out the Anti-White Racist Establishment for what it really is. And their constructive program of Genocide against the White race.

Comments are closed.