In the 1932 German election, the Nazi Party got exactly a third of the vote and the Stalinist Communist Party got exactly one in six. Together the two totalitarian parties got half of the vote and a bare majority of the seats in the Reichstag.
This produced a milestone in history: The next German government would have to include Communists or Nazis. Hermann Goering presided over the Reichstag because the Nazi constituted the plurality.
Please note what history never mentions: It took two to tango: The Communists elected Hitler every bit as much as Nazis did.
How did the German Jews vote in 1932?
If you take out the Nazi third, that leaves two thirds of the electorate. If Jews voted proportionately, one in four would have voted for a Stalinist State.
But the fact is that Jews traditionally vote for the left, the far left. Even William Buckley said that “Jews live like Episcopalians and vote like Puerto Ricans.” The Founder of Commentary, the Jewish conservative magazine stated flatly, “For most Jews the term ‘conservative Jew’ as an oxymoron.”
Until I wrote this article, no experienced political analyst would doubt that in 1932 Jews voted at least 2 to 1 for the Communist Party.
Which in this story as it turned out, was the same as voting FOR Hitler!
Be careful what you ask for!
German Jewish voters in 1932 WANTED concentration camps.
They DEMANDED an absolute dictatorship.
They saw the Terror Lenin bragged about and called it good.
The 1932 Jewish electorate asked for it and they GOT it, secret police, concentration camps, the whole nine yards.
Be careful what you ask for.
And where in this story do we find the SuperJews, those who know all and determine all?
What the German Jews did in 1932 was not exactly penetrating SuperKnowledge. They voted for concentration camps and secret police, and they GOT concentration camps and secret police.
But those wonderful concentration camps and secret police got THEM, not the goyim Stalinists were after.
And it is impossible to analyze the 1932 German election without concluding that a higher percentage of Jews voted for dictatorship and concentration camps than German gentiles.
Is this All-Knowing Jewish Genius at work?
Or is it a people with a grudge being maliciously stupid?
This 1932 election is bad for both Jews and monomaniacal anti-Semites.
Neither Jews nor monomaniacal anti-semites want German Jews portrayed as a group of morons whose hatred of those around them exploded in their faces.
#1 by Secret Squirrel on 09/18/2014 - 1:31 pm
“The 1932 Jewish electorate asked for it and they GOT it, secret police, concentration camps, the whole nine yards.
Be careful what you ask for.”
Today we have “hate” laws, mass spying on law abiding citizens, check points at airports and soon buses and trains as well. It all looks very similar.
#2 by Daniel Genseric on 09/18/2014 - 5:45 pm
Bob,
I was going to throw this comment in the place it belongs, your article at http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2014/07/15/screamers-thugs-and-thought-police/. However, the comments are closed.
Right now I am watching Greg Gutfeld (of Fox News’ “The Five”) do his bit on American Polarization. He is using your Campus THUGS talkers almost point for point. If you want to see it you might catch it on re-runs tonight. He makes the points about halfway through their hour long block.
Not a huge win, but noteworthy nonetheless. And another great example of Mantra thinking breaking through the dam.
[system is default set for post comments closing after it’s 30 days old. ~ Sys Op]
#3 by Jason on 09/21/2014 - 9:29 am
I’ve heard Gutfeld say a few things that seemed Mantra influenced as well. One night he kept saying DIEversity, instead of diversity, which has been used by some BUGSERS.
It’s fun to see these virus memes spread whether the carriers like it or not!
#4 by Undercover Lover on 09/18/2014 - 6:05 pm
I thought this was interesting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1e0HFCKcVhc
A documentary on Raphael Lemkin and the word genocide? That seems like a pretty big coincidence. I wonder if anti-whites are continuing to try to force the idea that white genocide is not genocide in it.
#5 by Jason on 09/18/2014 - 6:46 pm
“Is this All-Knowing Jewish Genius at work?
Or is it a people with a grudge being maliciously stupid?”
And cheering while every White country on earth is destroyed is particularly stupid. Just how do they think a Muslim Europe will treat them? Or even countries like Venezuela where Brown people fully take over.
Not it is not genius at work. It’s being wrapped up in your own narrow little grudge – at the expense of your descendants.
#6 by JPOutlook on 09/19/2014 - 4:25 am
You have gotten smarter, “Bob.” By adding the audio it makes your blog posts generally too interesting for me resisting… then run smack into insults. “No life”? Well, it was you summoned me here so I’m sure you had quite a dandy of a smirk on your face when you said it. Nevertheless, it is just as much my fight as yours. As much my fight as yours. As much my fight as yours. (Repeating) Talk to you soon…
J.P.O.
#7 by shari on 09/19/2014 - 9:58 am
If you author a strong law for the “prevention and punishment” of genocide, and then involve yourself in promoting and commiting genocide, there will be no end to the problems, you bring on yourself.
#8 by Henry Davenport on 09/19/2014 - 3:14 pm
I’m not sure the Zionist elites were stupid, since if the international economic boycott against Germany that they led was as effective as I’ve read,* then they traded an opportunity to possibly destroy Hitler’s regime, since they ended the boycott in exchange for the release of wealthy Jews and their money to Palestine:
http://www.amazon.com/Transfer-Agreement-Dramatic-Between-Palestine/dp/0786708417
Ha, I see it has an afterward now by Abe Foxman. That should be a good read.
*Among other places, I think I read that it was very effective (the economic measures taken against Jews in Germany I believe were a response to it at least in part) in a very long and very favorable review of the book above in the Jerusalem Post decades ago…I don’t have my zeroxed copy of that review handy, and apparently I didn’t record the date of it in my computer. It hadn’t been reproduced online anyplace that I could find when I looked for it several years ago.
#9 by Henry Davenport on 09/19/2014 - 5:03 pm
I guess it’s an irony too that so many Whites today think their votes are for a world of equality and brotherhood.
I had to call an ambulance for an elderly friend of mine a couple of days ago, and watching the multiracial ER team work on him and briskly and happily go about their other business in the ER, I was impressed by the feeling that seemed to exist among them. I guess the realness of their work has created the happy, often laughing bond that I observed among them.
I can’t imagine the Whites who work in that setting moving toward any pro-White orientation by anything other than a ceaseless drum drum drumming of Mantra. (No, I didn’t…)
Because, I imagine they would reject any material that would challenge their own daily experience of races working together in happy collegiality.
Mantra doesn’t challenge that at all.
Lol! Every year or so I notice another bit of wizardry in the Mantra!
#10 by Jason on 09/19/2014 - 10:09 pm
Yes, what we want is an end to the genocidal program against Whites. But Whites will naturally have non-White friends or non-Whites they admire.
We don’t argue that other people aren’t valuable. We point out the GENOCIDE of our people.
#11 by Benjamin Newells on 09/20/2014 - 2:27 am
Can someone please explain to me how the Jews voted for concentration camps?
I didn’t understand that part of the article or Bob’s explanation on the audio.
#12 by Jason on 09/20/2014 - 5:23 am
This part of history tends to be ignored – for obvious reasons. I had to do a bit of research.
The Nazis could not have taken control without support from the Communists. The Communists thought it was more important to destroy the republic of Germany and oppose the moderate Social-Democrats rather than to oppose the Nazis. They voted to help the Nazis take control in a coalition.
The Jews voted overwhelmingly for the Communist Party. It was already obvious from the example of communism in Russia that the Communists would use brutal police state tactics, including concentration camps, yet Jews supported them – because they thought someone else would be in those camps.
The Jews voted Communist knowing full well the Communists used concentration camps.
But, when the Communists threw their support behind Hitler, in what they thought would be a temporary situation, the Nazis seized power and ended up up building their own concentration camps, expect it was Communists and Jews who were put in them.
Does that make sense the way I explained it? It’s a bit complicated.
#13 by Benjamin Newells on 09/20/2014 - 12:06 pm
When people voted, did they know that the Communists would throw temporary support behind the Nazis?
#14 by Benjamin Newells on 09/20/2014 - 12:21 pm
Actually my above question is not that relevant/interesting.
Thanks for telling me all that, Jason.
#15 by Jason on 09/20/2014 - 6:56 pm
Good question, I don’t know the answer.
#16 by Jason on 09/23/2014 - 8:48 pm
Well apparently I was wrong on the details anyway – sorry about that.
#17 by wretchedWhiterabbit on 09/20/2014 - 9:04 am
Jews also supported gun control legislation in 1928, under the Weimar regime, to restrict firearms possession among National Socialists. Those same laws were later used by the National Socialist gov’t to restrict firearm possession by their political opponents, largely Jews.
Making up rules is all fun & games when your own people hold power.
#18 by jo3w on 09/20/2014 - 12:32 pm
Why do the Jew addicted use the mantra to attack Jews? It does not matter how clear the point of this article is, the Jewaholic will only be able to interpret this as ammunition for their war against Jews. Where you write,” be careful what you ask for” they will see,” you’ll get what you deserve evil Jew”.
I read once here on bugs,
“And, please, I was in alcohol and drug recovery and I sponsored a number of people, so don’t tell me you can take just one little sip, one little mention of JOOS and then leave it alone.”
For a chronic Jewaholic this article is a little sip. Again, It does not matter how clear or benign the message is, for the Jewaholic it is a little sip.
#19 by Henry Davenport on 09/20/2014 - 3:30 pm
Your comment is just what I needed. I was thrown off kilter by the recent excitement, and I feel like I have jews on the brain lately. I was going to comment something about that, but I’ll leave it. Enough jews already!
I am so ready to read about ANYthing other than jews!
#20 by Jason on 09/21/2014 - 9:35 am
Bob,
I would like more advice on working with loose canons. It seems that political movements, especially ones considered HERETICAL like ours, have a pretty good contingent of loose canons onboard.
Should we just work with them and accept the damage they do when they blow up as a price to be paid? I suppose right now, almost anyone can carry the message, even if they are a felon who killed puppies.
But, it seems to me we might not want to get too close to such people in real life.
I know the TTGH principle (Take Your Toys and Go Home) is a good way to provoke certain trouble makers to throw a tantrum and get lost. In that case, you deliberately insult them to see if they will go.
I guess just your general advise on dealing with crazies and loose canons would be useful as we go forward.
#21 by Jason on 09/21/2014 - 9:37 am
Sorry for typos, I can’t edit.
I wanted to add, should we tolerate the odd Loose Canon even though we drive the TTGHs out?
#22 by Tom Bowie on 09/21/2014 - 11:21 am
A Loose Cannon by it’s very definition is a powerful weapon that’s not lashed down securely. In this case, if they were restrained they’d be following the party line of White GeNOcide.
Perhaps one good example of a Loose Cannon would be somebody in a political party who’s not happy with the party line that leads to White GeNOcide.
I agree with Bob, I’m surrounded by Loose Cannons.
#23 by Henry Davenport on 09/21/2014 - 1:33 pm
There’s at least a few of us like myself who can become loose cannons at times (I’m not claiming powerful weaponhood for myself though). I was a bit off the reservation about a week ago, re Robert Ransdell’s campaign for Senator from Kentucky, when I was a little out of my gourd with stress, and with a medication that has produced so many disastrous enthusiasms in me in the past that I should know better than to even make a squeak when I occasionally need to take it.
I expect Robert’s campaign to make a strong contribution to my understanding more deeply than ever how appropriate the Mantra is to our present circumstances and how inappropriate so many other efforts are to those circumstances.
Anyone who happened to see and be confused by my earlier comments on his campaign can read what I just posted elsewhere (otherwise, don’t waste your time clicking and reading):
https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1043977-13/?postcount=121#post12373040
This is the time to be hammering Mantra memes into the zeitgeist, not to be doing what seems to me the propaganda equivalent of trying to set off an explosion in a Federal bldg.
Which just hands to the federales, señor, an additional tool to use to strengthen themselves.
#24 by Tom Bowie on 09/22/2014 - 11:07 am
I was and am still am rather happy with Robert Ransdell’s campaign. I expect such things will be what they are however, it’s an improvement over anything that’s gone before.
Robert Ransdell does use the word AntiWhite thereby advancing its usage more than any possible baggage it may pick up. There are indeed a few other ‘White Leaders’ that would do well to follow such an example.
Perhaps most importantly his campaign is groundbreaking in the obstacles he has managed to overcome. Robert Ransdell has been quite innovative in finding solutions to those obstacles and, his resourcefulness offers a chance to learn rather than having to re-invent the solution to such problems. (Just one example is that he couldn’t get his signs printed the way he wanted so he had signs made with space left to put “With Jews We Lose” on them by use of a template he’d made. The added words ended up with a kind of other-worldly appearance as if it were a special custom sign.)
Robert Ransdell for the most part is a one-man-band with only a little help. There were and are things he can’t accomplish but even those are valuable lessons. “I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” – Thomas A. Edison
#25 by wretchedWhiterabbit on 09/22/2014 - 4:54 pm
One way to take the Ransdell campaign is as an opportunity for exposure. His campaign and related media coverage are provocative and inflammatory, attracting vocally anti-White antifa as well as curious spectators who can then be introduced to the standard mantra memes by the semitically correct and always on point Swarm.
#26 by Henry Davenport on 09/22/2014 - 7:20 pm
You’re regarding as an opportunity something that I would probably regard as a pitfall.
With the slogan he has, no campaign could possibly be regarded as more explicitly aimed against the tribe, and so even just posting Mantra on threads about his campaign seems to me to associate Mantra much too closely to one of the main things we try to keep it separate from.
#27 by wretchedWhiterabbit on 09/22/2014 - 9:46 pm
sure, except propaganda doesn’t care about association or being wrong…propaganda is about repetition and exposure…it’s not about being right…it’s about HAVE IT YOUR WAY, BE ALL YOU CAN BE, IT’S BRITNEY BITCH!
like it or not it’s in your head now
it’s a sound…a vibration that you can’t unhear
#28 by Jason on 09/22/2014 - 10:06 pm
But Randsell didn’t make any Mantra points did he?
#29 by wretchedWhiterabbit on 09/22/2014 - 10:10 pm
maybe not, but the only thing stopping you from tagging an article about him with a mantra post is self-righteousness
he drew attention, now hit his audience with you consistent message
#30 by wretchedWhiterabbit on 09/22/2014 - 10:14 pm
if i post a mini mantra on a marky mark video
it’s probably not because marky mark made a valid mantra point
#31 by Jason on 09/23/2014 - 12:02 am
Oh, posting on his video might be okay, although I take HD’s point seriously. But we do go everywhere.
I just wouldn’t ever give the impression we support him, which I doubt any BUGSER would. When Jimmy went chasing after that Craig Cobbs guy (whatever his name was) to show the Mantra signs where he was setting up his town, Jimmy used the excuse of “following the cameras”.
But, there are more cameras elsewhere. So I suspect Jimmy was just real sympathetic to the “neo nazis” cause and all the Mantra memes end up getting photographed next to Confederate flags and Swastikas, which is exactly what doesn’t work.
I don’t think Bob was much worried about it – or at least thought it more valuable to have the Mantra seen than not seen. BUT, it would have been great if Jimmy had skipped the event and gone to some dog show instead that had more cameras!
Anyway, I doubt this campaign of Randsell’s will get much attention because it is so unoriginal. I’m indifferent to whether anyone posts on his video.
#32 by Secret Squirrel on 09/23/2014 - 5:49 am
Take your religion elsewhere.
#33 by wretchedWhiterabbit on 09/26/2014 - 11:24 pm
LOL you seem queerly sensitive to any discussion, question, or criticism of the jewish issue
#34 by Jason on 09/26/2014 - 11:55 pm
Oh here we go with the lame insinuations that if someone wants us to stay on message they must be A JEW! Or working for The Jew!
We saw this several weeks ago here on BUGS in which a productive BUGSER was accused of being a Jew for some trivial reason, and drama ensues. This has happened before and it always leads to a demoralizing effect on the group.
Wretched, if you don’t like the BUGS message, no one is forcing you to be here. There are tons of idiot sites that do that other crap (SF, Daily Stormer, VNN, etc).
Why the need to bring the ONLY effective pro-White site into the same failed sewer as the rest of the “White Nationalist” losers?
#35 by Carloman on 09/27/2014 - 2:11 pm
When dealing with AMPW’s, show them the following quotation:
“Propaganda must always address itself to the broad masses of the people. For the intellectual classes, or what are called the intellectual classes to-day, propaganda is not suited, but only scientific exposition. Propaganda has as little to do with science as an advertisement poster has to do with art, as far as concerns the form in which it presents its message. The art of the advertisement poster consists in the ability of the designer to attract the attention of the crowd through the form and colours he chooses. The advertisement poster announcing an exhibition of art has no other aim than to convince the public of the importance of the exhibition. The better it does that, the better is the art of the poster as such. Being meant accordingly to impress upon the public the meaning of the exposition, the poster can never take the place of the artistic objects displayed in the exposition hall. They are something entirely different. Therefore. those who wish to study the artistic display must study something that is quite different from the poster; indeed for that purpose a mere wandering through the exhibition galleries is of no use. The student of art must carefully and thoroughly study each exhibit in order slowly to form a judicious opinion about it.
“The situation is the same in regard to what we understand by the word, propaganda. The purpose of propaganda is not the personal instruction of the individual, but rather to attract public attention to certain things, the importance of which can be brought home to the masses only by this means.”
They will recognize the author of the quotation and the work it was taken from. Remind them that we are only spreading propaganda, not the complete message, that propaganda will lead them to the complete message, but must be aimed at the lowest intellectual level to be effective.
#36 by Henry Davenport on 09/23/2014 - 12:35 am
No, he posted on VNN that he wasn’t going to mix Mantra into what he was doing. He mentioned that “anti-white” was a word before Mantra spread it widely, so he’d use that. That seems fair enough.
#37 by Secret Squirrel on 09/23/2014 - 5:48 am
Not fair enough. BUGS did all the hard work getting anti-White out there. He’s just riding our coattails through the mud.
#38 by Secret Squirrel on 09/23/2014 - 5:59 am
He’s trying to associate Jewsanism with anti-White, so ordinary Whites will be scared off using it.
#39 by Jason on 09/23/2014 - 10:40 am
I agree with RamZPaul on this one. The guy Randsell almost looks like he is playing a part. It’s too over the top. The whole thing reminds me of when Borat pinked all those people by pretending to be something he wasn’t.
“White Nationalism” has had a long string of paid informants and agents working for the Feds. They always come off like kooks, but that is exactly what gets the juices of 95% of SR’ers going.
SF doesn’t care about winning, they care about getting their glands off.
Now, if one of them wants to carry the banner of the Mantra in a pure form, great. But we should keep an extra eye on them. Like any addict, the first sign they want to return to the bottle is a problem.
If an alcoholic told you he was going to stand with a banner outside a bar … you might get a little worried. If he said he was going IN the bar to spread the message, you’d know he was going off the wagon.
Yet this is exactly what happens with Jewaholics and Uncle Adolf lovers. In all of North America, they just happen to find themselves in front of of Craig Cobb’s Shiny Nazi Event! Why, what are the odds! And then, before long, he is mixing in with them.
Who could have seen it happening? Answer: ANYONE.
#40 by Jason on 09/23/2014 - 10:40 am
RamzPaul video link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTKP-LAVBOU
#41 by Henry Davenport on 09/23/2014 - 12:33 am
I agree with you up to a point, but if what you say were completely true, we’d have no restrictions on what we put in a Mantra post at all.
#42 by Henry Davenport on 09/22/2014 - 5:29 pm
I disagree with you (and that is RARE!) 🙂
My bet is that you’ll find my “Federal bldg” analogy accurate if you keep it in mind as you observe what effects his campaign produces as it proceeds.
And that’s Including the effects it’s already had: his story is being told in every publication under the sun where it will increase the fear, resoluteness, and donations from anti-whites to our favorite anti-white organizations.
And while anti-whites are being thus strengthened by the campaign, I predict the campaign will not only attract virtually zero ACTIVE support from explicit pro-whites, who with few exceptions rarely produce anything other than a lot of rah! rah! you go, man! hot air, but will also attract no active support from other whites with pro-white sentiments…if he can get the wonderful idea of the White Guard protecting UC students up and running and keep it up, I’ll be amazed. If he can even get sufficient legal help to get his radio programs reinstated, I’ll be amazed. He’s a one man band as you said, and I predict he’ll remain so, because that’s the state that present pro-white sentiment and behavior is at.
But let’s say I’m mistaken about all of that, and he does get enough support to proceed and get more exposure to his message and has the solid accomplishment of an ongoing functioning White Guard to build on.
In that case I expect the results to be even more negative in exactly the ways I’ve just described, and with the additional negative result I forgot to mention of antagonizing ordinary whites and strengthening their anti-white sentiments much more than he will attract some of them.
That last may initially be true to some degree even with Mantra, and possibly I could turn out to be altogether wrong about his campaign and he can get enough support on board to hammer hammer hammer his material and his slogans until he accomplishes what he’d like to accomplish.
It’s much more likely that if his campaign gets big it will just be crushed in a lot bigger way. It’s a direct call to battle against the Tribe, and just consider the disparity in power. Popular sentiment among Whites is a LONG way from being sufficient to overcome that disparity. If you look at it abstractly as an attempt at a revolution you don’t have personal feelings about, it becomes obvious pretty quickly that this is not the revolutionary moment for that kind of revolution. Popular sentiment isn’t there, and disorganization and weakness of the enemy isn’t there.
If he can miraculously get a White Guard going that can last for more than several months, maybe there is a tiny chance of different outcomes than I’m expecting. The battle in White minds between the desire for a little protection and their repulsion to the clever slogan that that protection will operate under would be wonderful to observe.
As to “learning,” if it plays out as I’m thinking, few pro-whites will learn anything at all, since they NEVER anything at all because they are religious fanatics about “what should be done.”
But Robert might be capable of learning, and if he is, he could be a mighty weapon (I admire him a lot), so I almost support his campaign just so that he might learn whatever he can from it.
Hey, just my opinion. I barely know what I had for supper last night, much less what will happen in politics.
#43 by Tom Bowie on 09/23/2014 - 1:10 am
I didn’t quite intend to say that we’d see much progress in the traditional sense.
He’s using the word AntiWhite and many people may be unaware they’ve heard it, but they have. It’s something easy to overlook based on the core message key words and how short most people’s memory is.
Robert Ransdell has worked for 6 months to get his campaign going on. He had many obstacles to overcome the radio being one he’s still working on. At some point however we may see a Mantra candidate and getting signs made, the difficulty accessing media, as well as difficulty becoming a candidate is some of what I’m observing. His failures and successes are our lessons to learn from. (Not exclusively us per say as hopefully others will learn as well.)
“It’s much more likely that if his campaign gets big it will just be crushed in a lot bigger way. It’s a direct call to battle against the Tribe, and just consider the disparity in power.”
You nailed that one for sure; Netanyahu as well as quite a few others got the word in their morning paper. The story was on September 21, 2014, 1:13 am – http://www.timesofisrael.com/adl-blasts-anti-semitic-senate-candidate/ in The Times of Israel. Oddly enough I talked about it on the 19th.
Before it drives everybody to distraction; I knew about the story because it originally appeared under “Israel & The Region” on September 18, 2014, 3:38 am – http://www.timesofisrael.com/with-jews-we-lose-reads-one-senate-candidates-slogan-in-ky/ (No magic required on my part.) How often does any topic get two runs in a newspaper; looks like a tribal hornets nest has been stirred.
“Hey, just my opinion. I barely know what I had for supper last night, much less what will happen in politics.”
I have an idea this is going to be the Wild Card of Politics that’ll baffle the experts even after it’s over. (and I don’t remember what I had to eat last night myself.) With luck and skill however there may well arise opportunity out of this.
#44 by WmWhite on 09/22/2014 - 2:50 pm
Careful what you wish/vote for:
“…first sin, the fallacious preamble of ‘equality’ which was the ‘original sin’ or ‘fatal flaw’ in the foundation of the United States and it was further compounded by the Constitution which was touted as “a government of law, not of men”. As we know, law is a statement of values and values emanate from race.
The second sin in the establishment of the United States was in the founders’ insistence that laws could substitute for racial and individual quality. The Constitution, like money, is only as valuable as the people who back it. If the people are worthless crooks, then no bit of paper will correct the situation which such people bring about. It is people, not laws, who make the difference.”
–Eric Thomson (2000)
“Most of society is like this — locked in by necessity. So, it’s only when people feel they have nothing to lose is when they will fight and when leaders are born … No law is any better than those who support it. History will record it (The US Constitution) as another failed experiment. MLK fought against what he considered “unjust laws” and it behooves White people to reflect upon that –for their time “in the barrel” is coming.”
–Bob Frenz (2003)
#45 by Jason on 09/22/2014 - 6:29 pm
Too many pro-Whites are like a girl who’s never been asked on a date. We GUSH! when some guy, no matter how sketchy, kinda, sorta seems to say something pro-White.
The video I saw of Ransdell didn’t show him mixing Mantra with News& Jews and Crime Stats. There was no mixing because I didn’t see ANYTHING Mantra related. It was White Nationalism from 1972.
I do worry that in the future our standards will be so low that we let some creepy Bill O’Reilly type waltz in and become our spokesmen.
#46 by Henry Davenport on 09/22/2014 - 7:53 pm
It also reminds me of a certain conversation in a lefty men’s group decades ago. Che Guevara had just been killed after briefly having tried to replicate in Bolivia what he and Castro had done in Cuba where the poorer population had been much less content.
Had Che made a poor decision in going to Bolivia?
It had never occurred to me that smart people might have planned the whole lefty project that I was being swept up in, and I said no, no, there’s no way anyone can figure out stuff like that, he was right to go in and try.
No, he was wrong. For one thing, he had too much faith in the magic power of the truth he felt himself to be in possession of, and too little faith in the importance of examining the real world for important differences between one situation and another.
#47 by Secret Squirrel on 09/23/2014 - 6:09 am
Remember the knock down drag out fight we had, getting Jewsans to mention White Genocide?
“Oh no! We mustn’t mention White Genocide. Too shocking! We must whisper to our next door neighbors about the nefarious Jews.”
They were saying the Mantra has no value.
Now Bob has told the Jewsans to take a hike and they are coming here, demanding we mix their failed crap with the Mantra.
So now they are saying the Mantra has value.
#48 by Secret Squirrel on 09/23/2014 - 6:59 am
I want to underline the fact, they fought us tooth and nail, to prevent a discussion of White Genocide.
#49 by Jason on 09/23/2014 - 9:39 am
His campaign slogan is “With Jews You Lose”.
I guess the irony of just how true that is, is lost on most Stormfronters.
#50 by Jason on 09/23/2014 - 10:07 am
Don’t we at least have to be aware of the general pattern of behavior by people who are hardcore Jewsians and deeply sympathetic to Uncle Adolf?
If reports are true, Jimmy praised Frazier George Miller, the man who killed 3 random people at a Jewish Community Center a few months ago. One of the victims was a 14 year old boy – who was not a Jew.
If I am reading VNN threads correctly, Jimmy has become something of a pen-pal with the accused murderer. I believe he is sending him a second letter now.
Jimmy is over 60. He’s not going to change. And, if all his proclivities had been known before hand – the Sieg Heil salute he led in public and all the rest of it – I hardly think we would have a right to feel shocked by his subsequent reversion to Jewaholism.
I may be too wary of these types, fair enough. But please, some people on the pro-White side need to develop at least SOME radar for spotting this kind of thing.
#51 by Secret Squirrel on 09/23/2014 - 10:33 am
A couple of years before Jimmy came to BUGS, I remember seeing a picture of him coming out of a club, holding a clay tile with a Swastika on it, he and his wife acting like lunatics for the photographer. So I was expecting something.
Then he puts the Mantra in with the Swazis at Leith. Then when he leaves BUGS, he says he came here with a “secret agenda”.
Honestly if these people aren’t part of “the great conspiracy”, they may as well should be and they should be well paid, with all the damage they do to White interests.
Bob compares them to alcoholics, well I now see them as a Religion. Trying to change them, is as pointless as a Mormon trying to convert Catholics.
BUGS is different from them and we have to accept that we are different. BUGS speaks for White interests. White interests for them is a poor second.
#52 by shari on 09/23/2014 - 2:28 pm
I doubt that. That white interests are only a poor second for Jimmy Marr. That’s my opinion. I just bet white interests aren’t a poor second for the guy in Kentucky, Randsell, either.
#53 by Secret Squirrel on 09/23/2014 - 3:45 pm
All they talk about is Jews and if you anger them, you are also a Jew.
Jimmy came to BUGS – the ONLY place on the internet, that wants to talk about Whites and only Whites!
He said he came here with a “secret agenda”. What was that agenda? To get us to talk about his favorite subject, which is Jews!
Why did Jimmy have a tizzy, leave BUGS and bad mouth us everywhere? Because he was not allowed to talk about his favorite subject, which is Jews.
As I said, Pro White is a poor second to these people, because they only talk about Jews.
I don’t know how it can be made any more clearer, shari. If all that came out of their mouths was White, White, White, I would have no doubt they are Pro White. But that’s not what comes out of their mouths.
#54 by Secret Squirrel on 09/23/2014 - 4:02 pm
Thanks Jason.
I hadn’t seen that video and see Ramsey saying, what I was about the clowns. I guess more and more Pro Whites are getting tired of them.
#55 by shari on 09/23/2014 - 5:05 pm
So what’s coming out of your mouth? It sure isn’t staying on message. You two should stop it.
#56 by Secret Squirrel on 09/23/2014 - 10:56 pm
If you don’t like that I expect people to be on message Pro White whenever they open their mouths, then tough luck.
#57 by Benjamin Newells on 09/24/2014 - 1:28 am
secret squirrel, your commentary has been excellent.
#58 by Henry Davenport on 09/23/2014 - 9:11 pm
At a personal level, I like and admire both of the persons who’ve been discussed.
I know a bugster whose contributions have been way beyond my own who gets even more wiped out than I do by the rancor we often express here.
#59 by Henry Davenport on 09/24/2014 - 2:08 am
But it’s great that apparently there are new bugsters here (or maybe secret squirrel is an old bugster I don’t recognize) who will keep this stuff straight. That’s the most important thing by far. I’m probably too soft for that job, and I sure am tired of that job, and I sure do hate that job.
#60 by Henry Davenport on 09/24/2014 - 2:25 am
I guess I’m going to have to give up my long effort to have everyone here hold hands and sing kumbaya.
During a rest on the nature hike after the first seminar in Tennessee in 2011, Sam Dickson had us all hold hands and sing a song. I didn’t think he’d be able to pull that off, or even get us to do it, but surprisingly it turned out to be quite nice instead of being the huge embarrassment I expected it to be.
I never have understood how he did that. Except for myself and maybe one other in the group, we weren’t your usual bunch of hippies.
#61 by shari on 09/24/2014 - 9:52 am
There is no need to hold hands and sing kumbaya. Just refrain from spreading suspicion and accusation. That’s what our enemies do.
#62 by -scythian- on 10/04/2014 - 9:46 pm
“And it is impossible to analyze the 1932 German election w/o concluding that a higher % of Jews voted for dictatorship & concentration camps than German gentiles.”
It ain’t even close actually if you consider the Nazis didn’t campaign on concentration camps & secret police, & had not yet run a government; while all of Europe was all too familiar w/ what a Communist government was, for a couple decades already. In 1932 Europe, Communism was already synonymous w/ Stalinism, i.e. concentration camps, secret police, genocide, etc.
67% of Jews voted for concentration camps & secret police, only 8% of Germans voted for this.
41% of Germans voted for either Nazis or Communists (33% Nazi + 8% Commie).
67% of Jews voted for Communists (I assume none voted for Nazis).
If Jews didn’t vote, Hitler would have never come into power.
Talk about a “swing vote” that brought Hitler into power!
It’s one thing to flout foreigner status in a nation & then complain that you’re treated as an outsider, it’s quite another to vote for concentration camps as a foreign minority in that nation. That is a hatred for the nation you are living in & a stupidity that is beyond belief!
“This 1932 election is bad for both Jews & monomaniacal anti-Semites.”
Jew obsessives are the power source for the myth of the Super Jew Masterminds, BUGS is the kryptonite.
Jews were still free to leave Germany after the 1932 election for some time. There’s a famous photo of Einstein freely boarding a train to leave Germany; I saw yet another Nazi documentary on the History Channel (formerly the Hitler Channel) whereby they show this image while the narrator says he “escaped” Germany! You know after I pointed out here many months ago that the Jews were free to leave Nazi Germany I then saw for the 1st time on yet another Nazi documentary that the Nazis imposed an exit tax on Jews? If only East Germans & the rest of Eastern Europe had that luxury while they were imprisoned behind Communist walls.
“Be careful what you ask for” reminds of anti-whites who insist on forcing White children to live in a brown world.
To put the European system in American terms, basically there’s no Senate & no Presidential election, just a Congress w/ it’s many Congressional seats & the Congressional election is for every single one of those seats on the same day. The majority coalition that’s created (or kept, depending on how the election goes) after the election then themselves elect the President/Prime Minister.
The Nazis got 33%, the Commies got 17%, but together represented a slight majority of Congressional seats; so obviously if all the other parties formed a coalition, they’d still be a minority, so a government could not be formed that didn’t include either the Commies or the Nazis. Of course the Commies & the Nazis could have formed a majority coalition, but they were obviously diametrically opposed. The Commies didn’t have enough allies in the Congress to make a majority coalition, the Nazis did and took over.
The Super Jew Masterminds should have seen this coming; not good voting for concentration camps as a minority population, especially when voting for the party that was going to bring that brought into power the party that was diametrically opposed to the party you voted for. If the Super Jew Masterminds simply stayed home on election day or voted for anyone other than Commies or Nazis, Hitler & the Nazis would have never ceased power.