B. U. G. S.

I dont use that line for that reason. I say people say there is a race problem.

However ‘everybody say’s is Colloquial speech and quite valid

But yeah, ‘does that justify W Genocide’, bring it back to that

@ AlphaBlonde

You’re not supposed to debate with the Anti-Whites. The trick is to just MAKE YOUR POINT. The Anti-White asked you that question because they don’t want you to talk about White Genocide. My response to this Anti-White would be,

“Why do you Anti-Whites always avoid discussing White Genocide? ‘Diversity’ is a codeword for White Genocide. ‘Anti-racist’ is a codeword for Anti-White.”

The trick with swarming for us to control the narrative. Never let the Anti-Whites get an inch.

He’s not wily, he’s just a fool, or acting like one. If someone’s stuck in slow traffic at 5:30 pm and remarks, “Everybody’s coming home from work,” he doesn’t literally mean “everybody” as if he’s stating a puzzle in logic.

I like Cecil Henry’s reply. Anything that shuffles the anti-white’s non-objection to the side and gets back to attacking him for being an anti-white who supports white genocide is fine.

I don’t think I ever encountered that objection during the fairly short time I swarmed, but I might be tempted to say,

“Everybody likes ice cream too, dude. Except maybe you.” And then back to the attack. “Or is it just White people you don’t like and want to see removed from the face of the earth?” Whatever! Cecil’s is probably better.

Oh, and welcome to BUGS! 😀

Do it g r a d u a l l y. Like our White genocide.

“It’s as if everybody thinks….It’s as if everybody thinks”. Do that for the first two times, then do the Netherlands and Japan schtick and revert to “but nobody says….”

Now you’re set up for the kill: “Everybody says the final solution….”

Make sure to keep in mind that anti-whites will always ridicule or slander what you say. If you can make a habit of this and get some practice doing it, you’ll always control the energy flow, and you MUST control the energy flow.

Either say something like what AnotherOne said, or point out that anti-whites always resort to slander to avoid talking about White genocide.

Also: Fight fire with fire. This guy picked out one minor inconsistency in the mantra, and didn’t try countering anything else. BUT THEN HE RESORTED TO SLANDER. So give him a taste of his own medicine: Only address one aspect of his post: The slander. And then redirect that and say your own thing.

Anti-whites always resort to slander to avoid talking about White genocide.

Anti-white, do you always slander White people when you find out they want their people to survive into the future?

It’s White Genocide.

When making your point you have to become childish. Not only should you be making your point but sometimes the most effective tactic is to pretend that the anti-white is saying something that he’s not even saying.

Don’t bother discussing genotypes, or any of those details about Taiwan or Japan – it’s totally pointless.

Use what AnotherOne or what I said. Keep it short and simple. You’re making your point. This might not mean much to you at the moment because you’re so used to “arguing.”

Picture being a child and calling some other kid names and using certain phrases to mock them. That’s what you’re meant to be doing here. You’re just repeating points and trying to humiliate your opponent.

These guys responding to you are focusing on insignificant details and it’s possible that it may appear as if they’re somehow winning a big argument. You have to do the same back – repeating phrases and name calling is the answer.

Great advice about posting the Mantra and Minis for a while before responding. When I first started, I wanted to come up with creative answers. I broke myself of that habit and I did much better. Later, I started using the BUGS BUDDY to find replies, because it is so fast and it keeps me disciplined.

We don’t want to be driven by what they say. We are just using them as a prop to make our points.

Their reply is just an opportunity to get more of our talking points out there. It takes a while to realize you aren’t making arguments, you are spreading memes.

Beefcake’s bootcamp is great.

Everybody says there is a Mantra problem. Everybody says this Mantra problem will be solved when new words pour into it from every White mouth.

The Netherlands and Belgium are more verbose than Japan or Taiwan, and nobody says Japan or Taiwan should change their mantras.

Everybody says the final solution to this mantra problem is for every white voice and only white voices to “assimilate,” new words into their Mantras.

What if I said there was this Mantra problem and this Mantra problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of BUGSers were brought into every black country and only into black countries?


How long would it take anyone to realize I’m wasn’t talking about a Mantra problem. I’d be talking about the final solution to the BUGS problem.


How long would it take any sane BUGSer to notice this and what kind of crazy BUGSer wouldn’t object to this?


But when I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of criticism against modified versions of the mantra, BUGSers agree that I’m a word supremacist.

They say they are anti-wordist. What they are is anti-change.

@ Jimmy: When it comes to the Mantra, I’m definitely anti-change, until the time comes that reality has changed so much that the Mantra no longer accurately describes it.

And that’s not what you’re discussing; you’re offering a change that you believe is a stylistic improvement.

I strongly resist stylistic changes to the Mantra because I have a deep appreciation of the instinctive subtleties of Bob’s mind and of his writing, and of the fact that he developed the wording in the Mantra over a long period of testing against anti-whites in the opposing views section of SF.

The subtleties in the Mantra’s composition and wording are appreciated after some experience using it as it is and dealing with the responses to it.

Even for someone as sharp as yourself, I recommend strongly acquiring that experience, since it’s invaluable. And I should say especially for someone as sharp as yourself, because I believe that one of the greatest dangers to the Mantra is smart people who will confidently change it without having adequately experienced it.

And yes, “once a liberal always a liberal,” and once a conservative, pro-White, bugster, whatever, always a liberal too, because we’ve all been raised in an era that’s imbued us with the liberal idea that change is the solution to all difficulties, and that the unseen and usually unseeable complex web of advantages in what has already been developed with great struggle is to be overridden in any moment of “improved” insight.

My appreciation for Bob’s unique style of expression was deepened during my struggle (a struggle you witnessed!) to repeat the lines in the freedom farm script exactly as he had written them…I kept drifting into small changes I didn’t even realize I was making that made the wording more in line with our usual way of expressing ourselves, e.g., saying “You know what is even worse than hate speech,” in place of, “You know what is worse than hate speech?”, and “It’s people like you who…” in place of “It is people like you who…” which unfortunately made it into the finished version.

Each one of the involuntary changes I made weakened the impact of what Bob had written. I could easily see that myself…it was never discussed with Bob except that I told him of the experience I was having with the script and the deeper appreciation it gave me for his apparently instinctively spare and un-clichéd mode of styling.

I say, stick to the script. But yes, he’ll probably forgive you if that gets published, and good work. But realize it has an effect on the Mantra that goes beyond the moment.